Harris County Flood Control District Model and Map Maintenance Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
III. 1 III. Overview Of ADWR/ADEM Roles A. State NFIP Coordinator – ADEM.
Advertisements

Presented By: Richard Rogers - Sr GIS Technician.
Regulations and Processes for Floodway/Non-Encroachment Area Encroachments. What to look for and what to require. Robert Billings, PE, PH, CFM Mecklenburg.
Scoping the North Carolina Cooperating Technical State Project Ed Curtis, P.E., CFM, North Carolina Division of Emergency Management Jerry Sparks, P.E.,
Alabama’s Floodplain Management Program Tom Littlepage Alabama Office of Water Resources.
FEMA Update: Flood Map Modernization and Risk MAP Presented on behalf of FEMA by David I. Maurstad, PBS&J.
Digital Data and Modeling Repository ASFPM - May 22, 2012.
The Risk is Real… Be PREPARED! Robert Billings, PE, PH, CFM Flood Mitigation Project Manager Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services May 18, 2011 Briar.
1 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Update FEMA Public Meeting October 22, 2009.
Risk MAP and Discovery FEMA Region [#], [WATERSHED NAME] Watershed Discovery Meetings [DATE]
Duval County: Using the power of SWMM unsteady modeling for CLOMR applications May , Louisville KY José Maria Guzmán, P.E. D.WRE Gaston Cabanilla,
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Northwest Florida Water Management District Monday, August 22, 2011.
Update Training Meeting
Analysis of the Rainfall of Tropical Storm Allison Creating an Excel Model Creating an Excel Model.
In coordination with FEMA Scoping Meeting Lake County, California February 19, 2010.
NC Floodplain Mapping Program North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Becoming a Cooperating Technical State.
Engineer Circular Requests to Alter USACE Projects
Proven People... Proven Technology... Proven Results Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel Management Module Katherine Hermann, CFM, Dewberry Ken Logsdon,
NC LiDAR ( ) Success in other States – (Zsolt Nagy – AECOM) 1.What was the business driver for NC LiDAR? 2.What was the coordination approach?
Homepage To learn about eLOMA click on the ‘Learn about eLOMA’ link under the Tools For Professionals.
Emergency Watershed Protection Program West Virginia Ron Wigal, EWP Program Coordinator, NRCS, West Virginia Gene Saurborn, Watershed Management Director,
Flooding & Drainage Committee May 16,  Participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)  Participate in the Community Rating System.
Tropical Storm Allison & its impact on Harris County
MIP Workbench: Revisions FEMA Learning Management System PROJECT ADMINISTRATION ROLE.
The rFHL/NFHL: What’s In It For Me (WIIFM). 2 What is the NFHL?  National Flood Hazard Layer  FEMA’s most up-to-date flood hazard information  Database.
Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
FEMA UPDATED FLOODPLAIN MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division August 5, 2008 FEMA UPDATED FLOODPLAIN MAPS Public Works Department.
FEMA’s Coastal Mapping and Management Process. 2 2 Welcome  Background and Coastal study methodologies  Technical Opportunities  Management Opportunities.
Oconee County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kickoff Meeting Brian Laughlin Hazard Mitigation Planner Georgia Emergency.
Predicting and Preparing for Natural Disasters Margaret A. Davidson Director NOAA Coastal Services Center June 7, 2005.
Flood Map Modernization Multi-Hazard Flood Map Modernization NOAA Height Mod Conference 12/1/06 Dave Jula, Michael Baker Jr., Inc.
North Carolina White Oak River Basin Plan December 19, 2000.
Department of Water Resources California Levee Database (CLD) An ongoing Initiative to Collect and Catalog Data for California’s Levees and Flood Control.
Establishing a Fiscal Foundation DFSS 2009 Annual Fiscal Conference – Fiscal Indicators WELCOME Fiscal Indicators for Youth Development Agencies.
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Office for Information Resources GIS Services Flood Map Modernization and the Tennessee Base Mapping Program Dennis Pedersen, Director F&A, OIR – GIS Services.
Pre Conference Seminars 1 Arc Hydro and the Regional Watershed Modeling System in Texas William Burmeister, P.E. PBS&J, San Antonio, Texas.
Getting Started with FEMA LOMR Delegation May 2012.
Community Resilience Planning in Coastal North Carolina Sixth Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012 Linda B. Rimer Ph.D. 10/20/20151 U.S.
FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY UPDATES City Council Workshop July 7, 2008.
North Carolina Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings January 30 and 31, 2001.
The Story of Floodplain Remapping in Springfield, Missouri.
Houston ARCH 5502 Fall 2010 Professor Torres-Macdonald Jonathan Cordingley.
A Great L-EAP Forward: Successes and Challenges in Implementing FEMA’s Expanded Appeals Process Todd Steiner FEMA Maggie Mathis, CFM RAMPP.
Hazard Mitigation Plan An Overview. What is Hazard Mitigation? Action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk Long term impact Different from –Preparedness.
FLOOD STUDY Burlington County, NJ FEMA REGION II November 29, 2010.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Proposal for a Donor Sector Mapping Exercise Katarina Kotoglou 31 October 2007.
4.0 Unit 4: BFE Considerations. 4.1 Objectives At the end of this unit, you should be able to:  List potential data sources for determining BFEs in A.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation NHD Stewardship POC: David Anderson Liaison: Frank Kenney MOU: Signed.
1 Community Hydrology in a Watershed World The Fulton County Experience Amy Bergbreiter, PE, CFM Monica Urisko, PE, CFM.
Re-writing the rules on retirement plan investing.
Risk MAP Discovery Malheur & Payette Counties Information Exchange Sessions July 2015.
IDAHO “Best Practices for Supporting Locals” MARK STEPHENSEN, CFM, SHMO.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Huntington District Floodplain Management Services Dan Bailey, CFM Huntington District August 2012.
Adopting National Standards for Tidal and Geodetic Datums
North Carolina Lumber River Basin Plan
Colorado Hazard Mapping Phase III Program Overview
Real Time Flood Event Modeling Program
Risk MAP & the Little River Basin
Electronic Products Workshop Division of Air Resource Management -DEP
Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning
Tulsa's Risk MAP Program Goals
FEMA and Stream Restoration
FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY UPDATES
Agency Logos. Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Summer 2018 California Wildfires and High Winds DR-4382.
FEMA Letters of Map Change
DRAFT ISO 10007:2017 Revision Overview Quality management – Guidelines for configuration management ISO/TC176 TG 01.
Presentation transcript:

Harris County Flood Control District Model and Map Maintenance Program Ataul Hannan, P.E., CFM Harris County Flood Control District National Flood Workshop Houston, TX, October 24-26, 2010

Overview Harris County Overview Model Management Mapping Activity Statement No. 14 (HCFCD Agreement with FEMA) LOMR Delegation

Harris County

Tropical Storm Allison

HCFCD / FEMA CTP HISTORY HCFCD becomes Cooperative Technical Partner (CTP) – 2000 Tropical Storm Allison Recovery Project (TSARP) – June 18, 2007 New LiDAR topo, new models and maps Total Project Cost = $32 Million ($16M – HCFCD and $16M – FEMA) Stats 144 FIRM panels 1300 miles studied 22 watersheds New Network of Benchmarks New Topo HMS RAS DFIRMs We must protect the investment

LiDAR Elevation

Identified Flood Plains The Scale of Our Work Identified Flood Plains

MODEL MANAGEMENT

Why Model Management? Protect the investment Current and accurate Information to local community & FEMA

Model Management Objectives Continually manage and maintain the integrity of the effective model set Foster a partnership between HCFCD and the Floodplain Administrators Facilitate and expedite model and data distribution Coordinate concurrent development activities in watersheds

Standards www.hcfcd.org/m3

Why Do We Need Standards? Purpose Maintain the integrity of the models and supporting data Ensure model modifications are made in a consistent manor so others can easily understand changes

Model & Map Standards Channel Cross Sections tied to LiDAR HEC-HMS HEC-RAS

Standards www.hcfcd.org/m3

Modeling Standards Highlights Model Version (HEC-HMS/HEC-RAS) HEC-HMS (v3.3.0) HEC-RAS (v3.0.1) No model truncation (Section 4.3.3) Use current model set (Section 5.2) Tracking number (Section 5.2) New/modified cross sections (Section 3.4.4) Nomenclature change (Section 3.2) Version: The versions of HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS can always be found on the home page of the M3 website. Truncation: Not a problem any more, look at the entire channel reach – Section 4.3.3 Current Model/Tracking Number: Ensures the user has the most current model – Section 5.2 Cross Section: New Cross Sections (Survey TOB to TOB / Lidar Overbanks) – Section 3.4.2 Nomenclature Change: The effective models are different than the Preliminary Models on the DVD. Preliminary Models are no longer valid. Must use effective models, Grand Father period is quickly approach (Work with HCFCD). – Section 3.2

Watershed Wide Updates Model Management How ? Model Management Continuous Updates Watershed Wide Updates M3 is the Support System

Continuous Updates Objective: Continually update the models and associated data sets due to changes in Floodplain and Floodways which require a LOMR Challenges: Many LOMRs throughout Harris County Multiple LOMR projects – one stream When FEMA approves the first LOMC project, they will issue a LOMC that will re-establish the model. However, FEMA may inadvertently supersede that model by approving the resultant second model. This issue above can be addressed through better coordination. FEMA does not update model data set and the models quickly become out to date and there is no one model which represents all of the approved LOMCs for the stream. FEMA’s model maintenance procedures work for the flood insurance program, but fall short of HCFCD goal. If the project has “no rise”, FEMA is generally satisfied but does not update the model set.

Our Agreement with FEMA Mapping Activity Statement (MAS) Continuous Update Process (MAS No. 14 HCFCD Custodian models MAS = MOA with FEMA

Continuous Update LOMR

HCFCD and Local Community Agreement and Partnership Continuous Update HCFCD and Local Community Agreement and Partnership

Continuous Update Local Floodplain Administrators 35 Different Floodplain Administrators within Harris County Our Agreement with FPM (Memorandum of Understanding) –mailed on Dec 17, 2009 Cursory review Follow standards Technical resource for communities Yearly workshops 34 Floodplain Administrators, HCFCD would like to conduct a “concurrence review” of all CLOMRs and LOMRs. HCFCD job is not to complete a through technical review. Ensure the standards are followed No model truncation Correct program version Electronic submittal of models and report   MOA has been developed and distributed to the 34 Floodplain Administrators Open communication with regard to submitted LOMRs and CLOMRs HCFCD would like to review these LOMRs and CLOMRs Adopt our standards

Continuous Update Proposed LOMR FEMA Approval Model to FEMA Update Master Model Set Local Review

Memorandum of Understanding HCFCD Responsibilities: Provide current/accurate models from web Provide technical resource Provide training (yearly workshops) Local Community Responsibilities: Obtain models from HCFCD Follow Standards Provide HCFCD a copy of map revision submittal for review prior to signing Community Acknowledgement Form

What is M3? www.hcfcd.org/m3

M3 Functionality Model and Map Management (M3) System Distribute models and supporting data Track changes to models Facilitate communication between projects Assist HCFCD in the review process

M3 Workbench

M3 Model Check-Out Benefits Receive the most current and accurate model Current model versions Modeling standards Notifications of model changes

Average 30 to 40 LOMRs per year Notifications Average 30 to 40 LOMRs per year

Notifications Various stages throughout the LOMR or CLOMR acceptance process Regular updates of model and supporting data Large projects in the same location Watershed-wide public projects Information will be available both on the website and through email

M3 Checker

LOMR DELEGATION LOMR CLOMR

Continuous Updates with LOMR Delegation Proposed LOMR LOMR Delegation FEMA Approval Model to FEMA Update Master Model Set Local Review

Advantages Most current and accurate models and supporting data come directly from HCFCD – one source HCFCD, FEMA and local communities are all in the same datum Knowledge of local area and issues Accessible during review process Technical resource Cut down review time

LOMR DELEGATION www.hcfcd.org/lomrdelegation

LOMR DELEGATION

LOMR DELEGATION

LOMR DELEGATION

Reduce the risk and rediscover the beauty QUESTIONS???? Reduce the risk and rediscover the beauty