An Analytical Solution of Shield Tunnel based on Force Method Xiaomin You Zixin Zhang Yongsheng Li Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering Tongji University.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Normal mode method in problems of liquid impact onto elastic wall A. Korobkin School of Mathematics University of East Anglia

Advertisements

1 MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE PROJECT AND THEIR POSSIBLE INCLUSION IN EUROPEAN STANDARD -Major findings -Major findings suitable for inclusion in European Standard.

Electrical resistivity measurements and their uses in marine soils.

Finite element modelling of load shed and non-linear buckling solutions of confined steel tunnel liners 10th Australia New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics,

J. Matos e Silva Lecturer at ISEL (Lisbon Technical University), Portugal.

Calculation of Heave of Deep Pier Foundations By John D. Nelson, Ph.D., P.E., Hon. M. SEAGS, F. ASCE, Kuo-Chieh (Geoff) Chao, Ph.D., P.E., M. SEAGS, M.

TONGJI UNIVERSITY THE 5TH JAPAN-CHINA JOINT SEMINAR FOR THE GRADUATE STUDENTS 1 ANALYSIS OF BACK CAVITY IN HIGHWAY TUNNEL Authors: J.F. Wang & H.W. Huang.

Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of.

Wave Equation Applications 2011 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.

LRFD Design of Shallow Foundations

4.3 STONE OR SAND COLUMNS IN SOFT CLAYEY MATERIALS :

서울대학교 Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering Laboratory.

Pavement Design CE 453 Lecture 28.

Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.

Impacts of Seismic Stress on Pore Water Pressure in Clayey Soil By: Qazi Umar Farooq Lecturer Civil Engineering Dept Univ of Engg & Tech Taxila.

Prediction of The Reinforcement Ground Behavior with The Vacuum Consolidation Method by Triaxial Model Test & FE Analysis H.Kawabata Y.Tanabashi Y.JiangT.Shiono.

Session 25 – 26 DRILLED SHAFT And CAISSON FOUNDATION

PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting Performance of Improved Ground u Elizabeth A. Hausler and Nicholas Sitar.

OUTLINE SPATIAL VARIABILITY FRAGILITY CURVES MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS CONCLUSIONS EFFECTS DESIGN RECOMMEND BEARING CAPACITY OF HETEROGENEOUS SOILS APPENDIXOUTLINE.

Back to basics…… for Foundation design of Monopile Support Structures

The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Numerical Analysis ECIV 3306 Introduction.

Status report on Step1 of Task A, DECOVALEX-2011 modeling for Ventilation Experiment –modeling for Ventilation Experiment By Xiaoyan Liu, Chengyuan Zhang.

Presenter：Shuai Zhang Institute of Aerospace and Material Engineering

THE ENGINEERING OF FOUNDATIONS A BOOK BY RODRIGO SALGADO POWERPOINT RESOURCES FOR CHAPTER 9 Contains copyrighted material.

The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Numerical Analysis ECIV 3306 Chapter 1 Mathematical Modeling.

Session 17 – 18 PILE FOUNDATIONS

A Comparison of Numerical Methods and Analytical Methods in Determination of Tunnel Walls Displacement Behdeen Oraee-Mirzamani Imperial College London,

Liquefaction Analysis For a Single Piled Foundation By Dr. Lu Chihwei Moh and Associates, Inc. Date: 11/3/2003.

Providing Design Standards for Frictional Compression Ground Anchors Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Lab., Seoul Natl. Univ. Master Course Student Joo,

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CFAC Review Thomas F. Joos, P.E. Civil/Structural Engineer BNL Plant Engineering Division May 8, 2007 NSLS-II Conventional.

Subsurface drainage – Investigations

Timothy Reeves: Presenter Marisa Orr, Sherrill Biggers Evaluation of the Holistic Method to Size a 3-D Wheel/Soil Model.

Session 7 – 8 SETTLEMENT OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION

Session 15 – 16 SHEET PILE STRUCTURES

2-D Heat Transfer Model of A Horizontal U-Tube M. S. Islam 1, A. Fujimoto 2, A. Saida 2 and T. Fukuhara 2 2-D Heat Transfer Model of A Horizontal U-Tube.

An Easy Method of Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of Soils using Pore Pressure Response of Piezocone Penetration Test Chung R Song, Ph.D., University.

1 Natural Strain Near Welding Interface For Different Collision Angles EPNM-2008 Lisse, Netherlands H.H. Yan; X.J. Li May 6-9, 2008 Dalian University of.

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Inductive Observing the data, recognizing a pattern and making generalizations Do you see a pattern Can you describe.

Dynamic Behaviour of Unsaturated CH soil under Cyclic Loading in Unconsolidated Undrained Conditions 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering,

OMAE 2009 Honolulu, HI - May 31 to June

Limit Load Analysis of suction anchors for cohesive materials By Dr Amir Rahim The CRISP Consortium Ltd/South Bank University 14 th CRISP User Group Meeting.

IWM2003 in Seattle Kinya Miura: GeoMechanics Group,

PRACTICE AND RESEARCH ON MICROPILE GROUPS AND NETWORKS Prof. François SCHLOSSER ENPC - CERMES 2 nd LIZZI lecture Tokyo IWM August 2004.

Developing soft soil engineering competency by problem based learning using ”Class B” and ”Class C” predictions Minna Karstunen, Jelke Dijkstra, Amardeep.

Wave Equation Applications 2009 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.

CE 482 Examples.

Session 19 – 20 PILE FOUNDATIONS

Pertemuan 10 Penurunan Pondasi Dangkal

Chapter 8 Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables Section 8.3.

ME 160 Introduction to Finite Element Method-Spring 2016 Topics for Term Projects by Teams of 2 Students Instructor: Tai-Ran Hsu, Professor, Dept. of Mechanical.

Prefabricated vertical drains and Preloading by vacuum

Geotechnical Eng. Software PEYSANJ Started at 1997 with Bearing Capacity Module Current version with more than 5 modules Database (Access / SQL Server)User.

CFAC Review NSLS-II Conventional Facilities Update

An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering

Presented By: Sanku Konai

Solving Systems of Linear Equations in 3 Variables.

on soft clay using finite element method Road & Highway Engineering

O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv

Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington

Off-Road Equipment Management TSM 262: Spring 2016

Model Updating of a Nine-Story Concrete Core Wall Building

The Derivative as a Function

Preliminary design of foundation for HEPS

Solving Systems of Equation by Substitution

Solving Systems of Linear Equations in 3 Variables.

Solve the differential equation using the method of undetermined coefficients. y " + 4y = e 3x 1. {image}

Solve the differential equation using the method of undetermined coefficients. y " + 9y = e 2x {image}

Section 8.2 Part 2 Solving Systems by Substitution

Solving Systems of Equations by Elimination Part 2

Notes: 2-1 and 2-2 Solving a system of 2 equations:

Presentation transcript:

An Analytical Solution of Shield Tunnel based on Force Method Xiaomin You Zixin Zhang Yongsheng Li Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering Tongji University 3nd Sino-Japan Joint Seminar for the Graduate Students

ITA （ 2000 ） Guidelines for the Design of Shield Tunnel Lining

Tunnel projects constructed in Shanghai in recent years ProjectD cal * (m)Thickness (m) Shanghai Subway Tunnels East Yanan Rd. Tunnel Dalian Rd. Tunnel East Fuxing Rd. Tunnel Xiangyin Rd. Tunnel Shangzhong Rd. Tunnel South Xizang Rd. Tunnel Shanghai Yangtse River Tunnel  Large section → low ratio of thickness vs. diameter  Large section → shallow embedded depth

Conventional Model

Soil resistant pressure. STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 β1β1 β2β2

Deduction based on Force- Method 1st step: Force method equation

2nd step: to solve β 1 and β 2

3rd step: Internal force

Comparison Detailed information about cases adopted in analysis Cases Rrrwrw K0K0 Khwhw (m)(kN/m3) (m) Clay layer Sand layer Analysis of the parameters 1.Effect of horizontal soil pressure coefficient 2.Effect of soil resistance coefficient Comparison with different solutions

Effect of horizontal soil pressure coefficient

Effect of soil resistance coefficient

Comparison with different solutions R(m) Thickness( m) Embedded depth (m) r (kN/m 3 ) rw (kN/m 3 ) hw (m) (kN/m3)K0 Compression Modulus (kN/m 3 ) SPT-NC (kPa) Φ(º)Φ(º)

CONCLUSION For a given soil resistance coefficient and a shallow embedded depth, the distribution of soil resistant pressure is significantly effected by the value of horizontal soil pressure coefficient, and also the ratio of thickness versus diameter is a influencing factor. For a given horizontal soil pressure coefficient and a shallow embedded depth, the distribution of soil resistant pressure is significantly effected by the value of soil resistance coefficient, and also the ratio of thickness versus diameter is a influencing factor. The results predicted by the proposed analytical solution are compared with those of numerical simulation and the conventional model solution. The comparison indicates that the proposed solution agrees more reasonably, and it provides a new approach to better predict and make the preliminary design of shield tunnel lining

Thank You!