Test beam 2001 Results M.C. Fouz Muon Week, CERN Nov 01.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roma, P. Camarri DAQ & on-line monitoring at X5 (G. Aielli, P. Camarri) DAQ realization and performance for RPC tests at X5-GIF. Adds and changes.
Advertisements

24-Apr-15S.Movchan Straw prototype beam test into the NA48 infrastructure 1 Goals: test of straw prototype wires positioning straw bending check grounding.
27/02/2002M.D.P. - ATLAS Muon Week1 First results of Atlas RPC cosmic rays test Massimo Della Pietra Atlas RPC Group Napoli ( M. Alviggi, V. Canale, M.
CMS week mar 051 Results of the Analysis of 2004 DT Test Beam C. Battilana and S. Marcellini – INFN Bologna Trigger Performance: -Single Muons -Di-Muons.
Test Beam 2003 Some Preliminary Results CMS Week Sep-2003.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
FDR of the End-cap Muon Trigger Electronics 1/Mar./04 1 Beam Test of TGC electronics in 2003 Introduction Electronics Setup Stand-alone Run Setup Data.
1 Apr. 28, 2007 Test of the Pulse Height and Time Jitter for the IHEP Full-Size RPC’s with 8-m-Long Readout Strip Planes C. Lu, K. McDonald and W. Sands.
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
Commissioning data are taken with individual chambers TP data autotriggered Cosmic rays data  ( different configuration) Different cosmic track angle.
G. Martellotti CERN 22/04/20021 Tooling / Test Stations for MWPC (Meeting LNF, Roma1/Pz ) Production rate : 408 chambers (Fe + LNF) :192 R4 M1.
A.meneguzzo, 03 april 2002 LNL- MB3 chamber test with cosmic triggers Some results on the tests performed on the MB3 chambers produced in Legnaro are presented.
U.GaspariniCMS week, 11/06/021 MB3 internal alignment study using cosmic muons - 14 MB3 chambers assembled in Legnaro have been extensively tested using.
RPC Cosmic Rays Test in Naples Paolo Iengo Atlas RPC Group Napoli ( M. Alviggi, V. Canale, M. Caprio, G. Carlino,R. de Asmundis, M. Della Pietra, D. della.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
T. Kawamoto1 Small Wheel upgrade project Muon week, upgrade meeting T. Kawamoto.
Ivan Vitev & E906 Muon Identifier Status Patrick McGaughey and the muon radiography team E866 Meeting at FNAL June 20-21, 2007 Large Muon Tracker at LANSCE.
BOS Testbeam Results in 2001 MPI & LMU, Munich 1. Drift time spectra 2. RT-relation 3. Resolution - HV & threshold dependance -Comparison with the 1999.
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
Measuring the Position Resolution of a COMPASS Drift Chamber Prototype Rojae Wright 1, Ihnjea Choi 2, Caroline Riedl 2, Matthias Grosse Perdekamp 2 (1)
Timing Counter Report of Feb 20th, 2008 F.Gatti. Final Construction Phase of TC TC with fibers exposed TC upside down for Fiber APD gluing High reflectance.
21 Jun 2010Paul Dauncey1 First look at FNAL tracking chamber alignment Paul Dauncey, with lots of help from Daniel and Angela.
CMS WEEK – MARCH06 REVIEW OF MB4 COMMISSIONING DATA Giorgia Mila
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
A. Meneguzzo Padova University & INFN Validation and Performance of the CMS Barrel Muon Drift Chambers with Cosmic Rays A. Meneguzzo Padova University.
RPC Timing Results with Final Splitters Gianpaolo Carlino INFN Napoli The Napoli RPC Group: M.Alviggi, V. Canale, M. Caprio, G.C., R. de Asmundis, M. Della.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
ATLAS Trigger Development
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
Ted Liu, July 5,00, idea on Ztrigger L1 Trigger Strategy L1 Trigger Requirements and Trigger Lines L1 Trigger performance Background Study Improving Performance:
Adele Rimoldi, Pavia University & INFN – CERN G4usersWorkshop Nov H8 Muon Testbeam Simulation CERN - 14 November, 2002 and the Physics Validation.
B.Satyanarayana (For INO collaboration) Department of High Energy Physics Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai, 400.
Preliminary results on DT T0s in beam collisions J. Santaolalla, J. Alcaraz (+ help/suggestions from C. Battilana, C. Fouz)
Feb 24, Abnormal Events in HF: TB04, Simulation, and Feb.08 Fermi Testbeam Anthony Moeller (U. Iowa) Shuichi Kunori (U. Maryland) Taylan Yetkin (U.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
NBI2006 Starting OPERA data-taking with the CNGS beam D.Autiero IN2P3/IPN Lyon 5/9/2006.
Khaled Belkadhi (LLR-Ecole Polytechnique)1 DHCAL Test Beam Results using Full Train Reconstruction Khaled Belkadhi.
SP- 41 magnet ZDC RPC (TOF) DC ST Target T0 detector MPD / NICA and / Nuclotron Experiments Picosecond Cherenkov detectors for heavy ion experiments.
Status of Digitization, Testbeam Simulation, and Production ATLAS Muon Week -CERN, February 18th 2005 Daniela Rebuzzi – Pavia University and INFN.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
A. Parenti 1 RT 2007, Batavia IL The CMS Muon System and its Performance in the Cosmic Challenge RT2007 conference, Batavia IL, USA May 03, 2007 Andrea.
CALICE, Shinshu, March Update on Micromegas TB analysis Linear Collider group, LAPP, Annecy CALICE collaboration meeting 5-7 March 2012, Shinshu,
Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,
Comparison of algorithms for hit reconstruction in the DTs: Test of calibration procedures for t trig and drift velocity on Test Beam data Test of calibration.
(University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”)
S.Movchan Straw prototype beam test into the NA48 infrastructure
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
PADME L0 Trigger Processor
Validation and Performance
eXtremely Fast Tracker; An Overview
DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data
Muon DPG 2012 Camilo Carrillo (INFN Napoli) Tim Cox (UC Davis)
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
Clk_ch4 Clk_ch3 Clk_ch2 Clk_ch1 L1A global L1A _ch T0+T0r
L1 Trigger Strategy Ted Liu, Lawrence Berkeley Lab
Performance of MDC during New Data Taking
Univerity of rome “Tor Vergata”
DESY drift chambers efficiency and track reconstruction
Imaging crystals with TKR
Cosmic ray test of RPC for the ATLAS experiment
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
11th Pisa meeting on advanced detectors
LSO: Energy resolution
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
Calibration of DT-MTCC data
The CMS muon system performance
Beam properties for run
Presentation transcript:

Test beam 2001 Results M.C. Fouz Muon Week, CERN Nov 01

 Few comments about T0´s  Results with CAEN TDCs and with the final ROB  Drift velocity  Resolution  Efficiency  A first look at the 25ns LHC beam-like data All results are preliminary

SL  1 C27 SL  2 C26 SL  C20 336ns 335ns 333.3ns 335.8ns335ns 336.9ns 338.8ns343.8ns 342.5ns In SL  : Differences of ~6ns between L1,L3 and L2,L4 ?

SL  1 C27 SL  C20 The 6ns T0r difference for SL  between L1,L3 and L2,L4 is not “real”. It must be related with the TP system. (1 TP connector for L2,L4 the other one for L1,L3) A global T0 per Layer required

SL  Vd (  m/ns) Resol (  m) SL  Vd (  m/ns) Resol (  m) ROB

11  22 SL’s  1 and  2 : All values inside of + 1ns SL  : ~ difference of ~5ns between left and right Resolution (left or right) = ~200  m Global shift between L1,L3 and L2,L4 ~ 140  m

( x ) = 42.3 mm Nominal Value: 42 mm Shift respect to nominal ~ 300  m (inside tolerances)

Eff=4L/(3L+4L) (For the central part of the cell) L1 L2 L3 L4    L1 L2 L3 L4    ROB Efficiency > 99.5 %

Selection of events with good track (4L) on  and  And looking for track (3 or 4 L) on . Beam postion on  : Eff= 97 %Eff= 92 % There is about 5 % of events lost on CAEN data

L1 L2 L3 L4       ’s ABS:10) Efficiency : Resolution: not   217  m (217  m)  258  m (254  m)  229  m (217  m) Not degradation on resolution

 25ns LHC beam-like) In a first look the values of resolution, drift velocity and efficiency (computed as L4/(L4+L3)) Are compatibles with the previous one.

Time Hits Trig2 Trig 1 Trig 2 Overlaping of events: Overlaping of events: The TDC is recording hits all the time. Trigger time is recorded in an dedicate TDC channel When a trigger arrives a window is open looking for hits. Time window is bigger than the maximum drift velocity and therefore bigger than the time between triggers. For each muon trigger given by the scintillators, we will have ALL the hits associated to this muon, and perhaps SEVERAL hits associated to the Previous/next muon Hits Trig1  25ns LHC beam-like)

 25ns) Event N: Trigger chan: 2 hits found: Time1=280ns Time2=430 Hits Found: Cell Time Tim- Time- -T0G RAW TC40L1 -Ttrigger C40L C40L C40L C40L C42L C42L C41L C41L Trigger chan: 2 hits found: Time1=130ns Time2=280 Hits Found: Cell Time Tim- Time- -T0G RAW TC40L1 -Ttrigger C40L C40L C40L C40L C42L C42L C41L C41L C42L Event N+1: (T1+T2+T3+T4)/2 = 373 (T1+T2+T3+T4)/2 = 686 (T1+T2+T3+T4)/2 = 72 (T1+T2+T3+T4)/2 = 386  passing through Cells 40 must correspond to the event N  passing through Cells must correspond to the event N+1 The additional hit on C42L4 appears on the event N+2 correspond to the next trigger

Chan (1/0.2)Hz NO  ABS100  ABS5 RPC OFF No  : 50Hz 0.05 Hz/cm 2 (~2xISR value)  ABS100: 2.5 Hz/cm 2  ABS5 : 45 Hz/cm 2

Preliminary results from the analysis of the test beam data shows a good performance of the MB2 chamber at GIF. ROB electronics has been tested and validated