Cass River Water Quality Monitoring Project Year Two Project Summary Prepared by: Environmental Science Solutions, LLC June 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Calculating Water Quality
Advertisements

Water Cycle Water Quality. About the Hydrologic Cycle Hydrology is the study of movements and characteristics of water.Hydrology is the study of movements.
Status and Trends of Water Quality and Benthic Habitats in the Little Manatee River Environmental Resources Management (ERM) Division Environmental Protection.
THE EFFECTS OF EXTREMELY HIGH DENSITY SEPTIC SYSTEMS ON SURFACE WATER QUALITY IN GWINNETT COUNTY, GEORGIA John Anderson Georgia Perimeter College Lawrence.
Figure 23. Nitrate concentrations on the lower Ventura River from June 2002 to October 2003: the vertical lines mark the beginning of the water year. The.
Fecal Colform Bacteria Contamination during Rain Events in Sayler’s Creek, Virginia Blake N. Robertson Senior Honors Research Under the Supervision of.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Division of Water Quality
How Management Effects Nutrient and Sediment Losses Dennis FrameFred Madison Directors UW Discovery Farms Program.
Water Quality Analysis of the Golden Tract West Wetland Mitigation at New Brittany Kelli R Braightmeyer and Bruce B Smith Department of Biological Science,
Assessment of Ecological Condition in Coastal Waters Impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Rain Gardens at Vassar College: A Water Quality Assessment Emily Vail Collins Research Fellow Vassar College Environmental Research Institute Community.
Water Quality; An Introduction to Water Quality Research in the Yakima Watershed.
Presented at the 9 th Stakeholder Meeting Mike Herrmann, NCEEP Central Watershed Planner April 20th, 2010 Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Intake Stessor.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND EXAMINATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND HYDROCHEMICAL RESPONSE IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER OBSERVATORY TEST BED Jeffery S. Horsburgh.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Outcome: ES20-AE1 – Analyze the relationship between biotic and abiotic factors that provide criteria to determine the condition of aquatic systems. ES20.
1 Water Quality: Temperature How is water quality affected by temperature?
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream Introduction Georgia Adopt-A-Stream 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW Suite 1462 East Atlanta, Georgia
Michael Tamblin, P.E., BCEE Stearns & Wheler, LLC Protecting and Enhancing the Ramapo Watershed – A Designated Sole Source Aquifer Supplying New York and.
Watershed Watchdogs Understanding the Water Quality Index (WQI) Parameters.
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
Dr. Matt Helmers Assistant Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Dept. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University How is.
REDUCING OUR FOOTPRINT Unit 3-1b How To Measure Water Quality
Highlights A Study of Phosphorus Loading of Ballston Lake by Tributary Inflow Presentation to BLIA Annual Meeting June 16, 2014 Scott Miller, Bob Duncan,
Shell Creek Watershed Study Advisors – Mark Seier, Suzy Goedeken, & Karen Malmkar Researchers –Katie O’Brien, Jake Kaufman, Mark O’Brien, Aubrey.
Ric Lawson Watershed Planner Huron River Watershed Council MiCorps Staff.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
Summary of Water Quality Data Analysis from the Storm Water Management Ponds of Central Park Fredericksburg, VA Dr. Michael L. Bass Miña Recta, Diana Gutierrez.
OLTAC Meeting - Oct. 31, UPSTATE FRESHWATER INSTITUTE.
Charlotte Harbor Environmental Center Water Quality Canal Sampling Gated access to harbor.
San Luis Rey Monitoring Station Regional Urban Runoff Monitoring Program Update MEC.
Northern Commencement Academy Presents Genesee GREEN.
HearneNWQMCMay06 1 A Review of Water Management Institutions in The Red River of the North Basin Robert R. Hearne Department of Agribusiness and Applied.
An assessment of water quality in tropical streams located in primary and secondary rainforest By Emily Schultz Supervisor: Cheryl Baduini.
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
What’s in Your Creek? Results of the 2009 Clackamas Basin Volunteer Monitoring Effort.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
INDIAN HEAD RIVER PROJECT Whitman-Hanson Regional High School RiverNet Club 2005.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
Delaware’s Non-Tidal Monitoring Update for CY 2011 February 8,
Our Case Study. Rationale for study The TMDL model assumes that there is no decrease in seepage during low flow conditions, basing its calculations on.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Surface Water Monitoring Pam Anderson, MPCA May 20 th, 2015.
Water May 2-8, 2010: National Drinking Water Week!
Sources of Bacteria and their Variability in Urban Watersheds Robert Pitt Cudworth Professor Urban Water Systems Department of Civil, Construction, and.
District of Columbia TMDL Schedule and Update D.C. Department of Health Water Quality Division March 2004.
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
EPA HWI Comments on CA Assessment June 26, 2013 HSP Call 2 major categories of comments: – Report writing (we will work on this) – Content/Analysis/Discussion.
Water Quality Monitoring on Larkin Creek St. Francis County, AR JL Bouldin RA Warby Arkansas State University.
 Salinity: Salinity is the concentration of dissolved salts in the water and is an important element of a  habitat. Aquatic animals are adapted to living.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Sustainable Development Goal for Water: Indicator 6.3.2
Larkin Creek Phase II Project
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring Project S
Areas of Environmental Concern in Livestock
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Restoring Norton Creek
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
Global Rivers Environmental Education Network
Pearce Creek DMCF Baseline Exterior Monitoring Spring 2017 Results
Welcome to Jeopardy!.
Presentation transcript:

Cass River Water Quality Monitoring Project Year Two Project Summary Prepared by: Environmental Science Solutions, LLC June 2014

Project Background and Goals The Cass River Greenway (CRG) organization contracted Environmental Science Solutions (ESS) to assist with fulfillment of its obligations pursuant to the Cass River Water Quality Monitoring Project grant (Project # ) issued by the State of Michigan Department of Environmental Quality – Water Resources Division – Office of Surface Water Assessment. The main goal of the project is to provide current baseline information to help determine watershed conditions along the main channel of the Cass River. Data and information from this project will be used to complement the current Cass River Watershed Management Plan and provide community members and stakeholders information about water quality within the study area.

Project Study Area The study area for the project is the main channel of the Cass River on the northern boundary of the Cass River Watershed from Cass City in the northeast to Bridgeport in the southwest in east central lower Michigan. Nine sampling sites are located near the municipalities of Cass City, Caro, Vassar, Frankenmuth and Bridgeport in Tuscola and Saginaw counties. (See site map on next slide).

Project Study Area

Sample Sites Site NameSite IDMunicipalityCountyLatitudeLongitudeWatershed Cemetery Rd.CC2Cass CityTuscola Cass River Dodge Rd.CC1Cass CityTuscola Cass River Dayton Rd.C2CaroTuscola Cass River Wells Rd.C1CaroTuscola Cass River Caine Rd.V2VassarTuscola Cass River Huron Rd.V1VassarTuscola Cass River Bray Rd.F2FrankenmuthTuscola Cass River Beyer Rd.F1FrankenmuthSaginaw Cass River Fort Rd.B1BridgeportSaginaw Cass River

Sample Parameters Total Phosphorus Total Suspended Solids Fecal Coliform Bacteria Nitrates Turbidity Temperature pH Dissolved Oxygen Biological Oxygen Demand

Year Two Sampling Summary Highlights 2013 Sampling season began about 3 weeks earlier than 2012 (Early- April vs. May) 2013 was a bit cooler and wetter sampling season. More significant rain events. Variation from 2012 to 2013 includes: Increased Phosphorus levels in the upper and lower reaches of the sampling area. pH Values were lower throughout the sample area. Nitrate Values were down throughout the sample area. Elevated values occurred throughout the sample area on the 4/24 sample date. Total Suspended solids and Turbidity values were elevated in all but the Fort Rd. site (B1). Biological Oxygen Demand values were increased at all sites

Sample Results – Year Two Site NamePhosphorous Total Suspended Solids Fecal Coliform Bacteria NitratesTurbidityTemperaturepH Dissolved Oxygen Biochemical Oxygen Demand Geometric Meanmg/L Col / 100 mlmg/LNTU° FUnitsmg/L Cemetery Rd. (CC2) Dodge Rd. (CC1) Dayton Rd. (C2) Wells Rd. (C1) Caine Rd. (V2) Huron Rd. (V1) Bray Rd. (F2) Beyer Rd. (F1) Fort Rd. (B1) Study Area Geometric Mean

Annual Comparison

Mean Value Comparison - Phosphorous

Mean Value Comparison - TSS

Mean Value Comparison – Fecal Coliform

Mean Value Comparison – Nitrates

Mean Value Comparison – Turbidity

Mean Value Comparison – Temperature

Mean Value Comparison – pH

Mean Value Comparison – Dissolved Oxygen

Mean Value Comparison– Biochemical Oxygen Demand

Water Quality Index (WQI) Summary Water Quality Index Range WQI Value Rating Excellent Good Medium Poor Very Poor

Water Quality Index (WQI) Summary

Site Name 2012 Site WQI 2013 Site WQI Percent Change 2013 WQI Rank 2012 WQI Rank Net Rank Change Cemetery Rd. (CC2) %67 Dodge Rd. (CC1) %73-4 Dayton Rd. (C2) %41-3 Wells Rd. (C1) %52-3 Caine Rd. (V2) %242 Huron Rd. (V1) %154 Bray Rd. (F2) %98 Beyer Rd. (F1) %891 Fort Rd. (B1) %363 Mean Value %

Water Quality Standard (WQS) Summary Under weather conditions encountered, all sites met all statutory and generally accepted water quality standards. However, analysis indicated that heavy rain events and high temperatures can adversely affect bacteria levels. All parameters for all sample all sites met state and EPA standards and scored in the good to excellent range in developed Water Quality Index standards. Total suspended solids, nitrates, turbidity and Biochemical Oxygen Demand fall into the non-regulated category. Standards for these parameters are developed based on generally accepted water quality monitoring principles and practices. Locally and Developed standards apply to E. Coli. This project measured fecal coliform. E. Coli is a subset of fecal coliform. Generally fecal coliform levels were below any thresholds that are a cause for public health concerns.

Observations and Conclusions The overall increase in solids, turbidity, phosphorous and fecal in year two is likely due to the timing and intensity of precipitation throughout the study area. Second year sampling saw more and heavier rainfall events during sampling days. The decline in temperature in year two can largely be attributed to the earlier sampling season start date. Water temperature was significantly cooler during the April sampling events. The decline in pH in year two can likely be attributed mainly to the earlier sampling season start date. Research shows that pH increases with water temperature. Additionally, early season runoff may contain snow melt which can be lower in pH than ambient river water. pH was lower throughout the watershed throughout the sampling season. Increased DO and BOD levels in year two also follow from increased flow. Again, the timing and intensity of precipitation supports the increase in these parameters during year two.

Recommendations Extend sample season from early spring through late fall to capture seasonal variations in water chemistry. Vary sample times within sample days to capture diurnal variation in sample parameters. Conduct additional testing after rain events and during high temperatures to determine changes from steady state conditions Investigate seasonal variation in pH – lower pH in early spring sample events. Reducing flow rates from overland runoff during major rain events is key to slowing flow and reducing phosphorous and sediment loading levels. Remain aware of DEQ’s potential action regarding tributary stream E. Coli standards (possible tributary studies including E. Coli and benthic monitoring) (Grant Opportunities).

Project Partners Cass River Greenway Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Cass City Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facility Caro Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facility Vassar Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facility Frankenmuth Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facility Saginaw Valley State University Environmental Science Solutions, LLC

References Clair N. Sawyer, Perry L. McCarty, Gene F. Parkin (2003). Chemistry for Environmental Engineering and Science (5th ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill. ISBN M. Mitchell, W. Stapp (2008). Field Manual (13th Edition) for Water Quality Monitoring. University of Michigan. Correll, D.L (1998) Phosphorous: A rate Limiting Nutrient in Surface Waters. Edgewater Maryland Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. Pfaffenberger, Roger C., Patterson, James H Statistical Methods for Business and Economics. Irwin-Dorsey Limited, Georgetown, Ontario. EPA 440/ , Quality Criteria for Water Michigan Administrative Code, Part 4. Water Quality Standards. Rule