MMWCON 2013 WEB ACCESSIBILITY Patrick Burke Lloyd Nicks Chris Patterson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QUICK TESTING FOR WEB ACCESSIBILITY UCCSC 2013 Patrick Burke Lloyd Nicks Chris Patterson.
Advertisements

Deakin University CRICOS Provider Code: 00113B WEB ACCESSIBILITY Umesh Gupta Consultant – (HRIS)
Developed with material from W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) IMPORTANT: Instructions Please read carefully the Instructions for.
Adapting Technology Changing Lives Web accessibility Web accessibility and Disability A Practical introduction Robin Christopherson and Curt Holst AbilityNet.
Web Accessibility: Mastering the Essentials for Compliance Annie Bélanger Liam Morland May 2013.
WAHEP Website Check-up A Look at the Project Midway Website Evaluations.
Sue Cullen Program Manager, CSUN Universal Design Center Accessibility Network Product Testing Coordinator for the CSU ATNetwork.
Website Accessibility Testing Todd M. Weissenberger Web Accessibility Coordinator University of Iowa
MAKING WEBSITES WORK FOR EVERYONE WEB UCLA Patrick Burke Lloyd Nicks.
XX/XX/XX Presenter names Position Title Accessibility “How to”
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 by Julius Charles Serrano, Even Grounds.
Introduction to Web Accessibility. What is Web Accessibility Web accessibility means that people with disabilities can use the Web Disabilities including.
Everyday inclusive Web design: an activity perspective CS575 MADHAVI L NIDAMARTHY.
WCAG 2.0 California State University, Los Angeles.
Dhananjay Bhole, Coordinator, Accessibility Research Group, Department of Education and Extension, University of Pune.
Designing for Disabled Users.  p?vid=35 p?vid=35.
Terrill Thompson Experience IT: Testing IT For Accessibility.
Debi Orton, Co-Chair NYS Forum IT Accessibility Committee.
WEBINAR SERIES: ACCESSIBLE INTERACTIVE DOCUMENTS Week 3: Accessible Web Forms Norman Coombs
Website Accessibility
Testing for Accessibility and Usability Is Your Site Accessible and Usable or Just Conformant?
The Internet Writer’s Handbook 2/e Web Accessibility Writing for the Web.
1 Inclusive Learning Technologies: Requirements, Strategies and Tips for creating Accessible Training - From the Act to Implementation CCCE January 16,
Website Accessibility Testing. Why consider accessibility People with disabilities – Visual, Hearing, Physical, Cognitive (learning, reading, attention.
1 © Netskills Quality Internet Training, University of Newcastle Web Page Design © Netskills, Quality Internet Training University.
Design and Construction of Accessible Web Sites Michael Burks Chairman Internet Society SIG For Internet Accessibility for People with Disabilities June.
Birkbeck University of London Business Workshop Web Accessibility Introduction and welcome.
How People with Disabilities Access the Web Web Design – Sec 2-5 Part or all of this lesson was adapted from the University of Washington’s “Web Design.
ADA Training Online Instructional Materials
WEB ACCESSIBILITY. WHAT IS IT? Web accessibility means that people with disabilities can use the Web. Web accessibility encompasses all disabilities that.
+ A11y assessment Lisa Liskovoi. + WCAG POUR some accessibility sugar on me Perceivable – Can I see it? Hear it? Feel it? Operable – Can I scroll it?
Making eLearning Accessible for Everyone. Will the be accessible to everyone? MOOC online space scenario mobile course eLearning.
Dive into Mobile Guidelines for Testing Native, Hybrid, and Web Apps Susan Hewitt, Accessibility Consultant, Deque Systems Jeanine Lineback, Accessibility.
Accessibility : Designing the Interface and Navigation The Non-Designer’s Web Book Chapter 7 Robin Williams and John Tollett Presented by Sherie Loika.
Technical Communication A Practical Approach Chapter 14: Web Pages and Writing for the Web William Sanborn Pfeiffer Kaye Adkins.
Section 508 Refresh WCAG 2.0 A and AA Information & Comparison CB Averitt – Deque Systems.
Copyright © Terry Felke-Morris Learning Outcomes  In this chapter...  common types of website organization  principles of visual design  your target.
The Disability Resource Center Web Accessibility Assessment for Everyone.
Developed with material from W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) IMPORTANT: Instructions Please read carefully the Instructions for.
Accessibility of services on the web. Table of contents Statistics Definitions Different kinds of disabilities Solutions for accessibility.
The User Experience “Keeping Web Accessibility In Mind” Video available online at:
Accessibility First! David Kelleher
Web Accessibility June 2, 2016 Evaluation and Workflow.
Accessibility is not boring or difficult. It’s the right thing to do. Benjy Stanton.
Web Accessibility training An introduction to web accessibility.
Web Accessibility John Rochford Rich Caloggero UMMS Shriver Center
Guidance for 3rd party content providers
Making your web site accessible a11yoz.com/maximise
Widening the web Resources Readable. Keyboard navigable.
AODA Website Accessibility at York
Project Objectives Publish to a remote server
Making the Web Accessible to Impaired Users
Logistics Audio is also available over a phone line:
Screen Reader Testing and Website Support for Beginners
Information Architecture and Design I
Screen Reader Testing and Website Support for Beginners
Introduction to Web Accessibility
Implementing Digital Accessibility
Colorado State University Web Accessibility
Web Content Accessibility Beata M. Ofianewska (DG COMM) 7 December 2006 December 2006 COMM C2.
Unit 14 Website Design HND in Computing and Systems Development
Lakeshore Public Schools
International University of Japan
Information Architecture and Design I
Demystifying Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
Название доклада.
Accessible Design Top 10 List
Accessibility Evaluation
WebAIM Screen Reader Survey Results
Accessibility.
Presentation transcript:

MMWCON 2013 WEB ACCESSIBILITY Patrick Burke Lloyd Nicks Chris Patterson

 FCC Requires Mobile Phone Manufacturers to make browsers accessible by October 2013:   UC Electronic Accessibility Policy goes live   Technical discussions on code solutions  Automated Tests  SSB Bart Group AMP  WebAIM WAVE CURRENT ACCESSIBILITY TOPICS

 Goal of web apps is to be cross-platform/interoperable.  Accessibility Tools do most of the work but are specific to mobile operating system.  Wide gap in standards, old standards are not up to date with advancing mobile technologies.  Best strategy for web developers: Use MWBP, with understanding of WCAG 2.0 and awareness of built-in accessibility features of major target platforms. STATE OF MOBILE ACCESSIBILITY

 blind user  low vision user  color blind user  deaf / hard of hearing user  user with dexterity/mobility disability  user with cognitive disability USER SCENARIOS

WHAT IS MISSING?  Tests for elements that can only be evaluated by a human.  Color Contrast  Captions  Navigation  Non technical assessment tools  Practical / Case based analysis

WHY QUICK TESTS?  AMP automated tests still show many items that require human judgment of accessibility (AMP scores show either 100% or 0% success)

QUICK TEST SCOPE  We aim to create a fast process to make many of those human-judgment assessments.  We do not attempt to show how to fix accessibility errors in this talk.

QUICK TESTS GOALS  Further prioritize the 21 Level A WCAG checkpoints. (Most can be checked by AMP.)  Do verifiable, repeatable tests for the 13 AA items (that mostly require human judgment).  Find simple, quick tests that can be applied to large amounts of content.

THE TESTS  Consistent Navigation  Color Contrast  Double-Size Test  Copy Test  Logical Structure  Focus Visible  Captions  Image Accessibility

CONSISTENT NAVIGATION Consistent Navigation: Navigational mechanisms that are repeated on multiple Web pages within a set of Web pages occur in the same relative order each time they are repeated, unless a change is initiated by the user. (Level AA)Web pagesset of Web pagessame relative order

CONSISTENT NAVIGATION Consistent Identification: Components that have the same functionality within a set of Web pages are identified consistently. (Level AA)same functionalityWeb pages

CONSISTENT NAVIGATION  Maximum 5 min: Are there unusual changes to the navigation or other page components?  Things to check:  Consistency between Front page and secondary page navigation  Choose a common navigation element and use keyboard only to get there.

COLOR CONTRAST Contrast (Minimum): The visual presentation of text and images of text has a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 (Level AA)textimages of textcontrast ratio

 Run tests on 4-5 potential problem areas, concentrating on extreme cases requiring immediate fix.  WebAIM’s Jared Smith mention readability is a continuum.  Text at 4.4:1 isn’t suddenly totally illegible. So focus on the biggest problems. COLOR CONTRAST

 Color Contrast Checking tools  Snook.ca   Juicy Studio:  COLOR CONTRAST

DOUBLE SIZE TEST Resize text: Except for captions and images of text, text can be resized without assistive technology up to 200 percent without loss of content or functionality. (Level AA)captionsimages of text assistive technology  Use CTRL-+ (CMD-+) to test whether the site is readable at 2x magnification.

COPY TEST Images of Text: If the technologies being used can achieve the visual presentation, text is used to convey information rather than images of text except for the following: (Level AA)textimages of text

COPY TEST  Browser/OS-level test  To test if images of text are being used, try copying any “suspicious” items.  WCAG: (1.4.5) Text that cannot be copied is likely to be inaccessible.

LOGICAL STRUCTURE - WCAG Headings and Labels: Headings and labels describe topic or purpose. (Level AA)labels  Headings should not be used for visual effects, on large blocks of content.  Use judiciously (too much structure without content is a problem).

LOGICAL STRUCTURE  Are headings used for logical structure?  Does structure make sense?  Do not worry about skipping consecutive heading levels (even though it is a red flag in AMP).

VISIBLE FOCUS – WCAG Focus Visible: Any keyboard operable user interface has a mode of operation where the keyboard focus indicator is visible. (Level AA)  Is there a clear focus indicator when tabbing with keyboard.  On the homepage & 5 subpages, test focus by tabbing through the page.

CAPTIONS Captions (Prerecorded): Captions are provided for all prerecorded audio content in synchronized media, except when the media is a media alternative for text and is clearly labeled as such. (Level A)Captionsprerecordedaudiosynchronized mediamedia alternative for text

CAPTIONS  Quantify & assess portion of content that is multimedia  Ensure controls are easy to identify and to enable captioning.  If significant in quantity or importance, play 30 sec of 3-5 clips  Are captions present?  Are they readable?

IMAGES  Survey Content: Appropriate Use of ALT text on Images  Check 3-5 random images (or prominent images) on a site for appropriateness of alt text.  Fail if several of those images have alt text = the filename.  Fail if lots of text is embedded in images.

REFERENCES  UCLA Disabilities and Computing Program   Electronic Accessibility Leadership Team   SSB Bart Group AMP   WebAIM   W3c Easy Checks   BBC Mobile Accessibility Guidelines 0.8  ty/mobile_access.shtml ty/mobile_access.shtml

 Testing  AMP   Wave   Validators   Color Contrast  Snook.ca   Juicy Studio:  MOBILE ACCESSIBILITY RESOURCES