A daily dose of 400 mg efavirenz (EFV) is non-inferior to the standard 600 mg dose: week 48 data from the ENCORE1 study, a randomised, double-blind, placebo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Single Pill HIV Regimens – Introducing the Quad Pedro Cahn, MD Jean-Pierre Routy, MD Calvin Cohen, MD.
Advertisements

Greatest Hits of 2012 Mark Wainberg McGill AIDS Centre Jewish General Hospital Montreal, Quebec.
ARV overview and toxicity Dr Francois Venter Reproductive Health Research Unit University of the Witwatersrand.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir in Genotype 1 (Viral Relapsers) PROMISE Trial Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Forns X, et al. Gastroenterology.
A5336 A Phase IIa, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Trial of Ruxolitinib in Antiretroviral-treated HIV-Infected Adults CAB Draft Discussion.
TMC278 Update, 30th January 2009  C204 data  ECHO and THRIVE - Phase III studies  New TMC278 formulations Peter Williams Tibotec BVBA, Mechelen, Belgium.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2013.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in GT-1 and HIV Coinfection NIAID ERADICATE Trial Phase 2a Treatment Naïve and Treatment.
Can dose-optimization trials be conducted ethically in low-income countries? Dr Andrew Hill World AIDS Conference, Melbourne, Australia July 2014 [TUWS1104]
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS (maturation inhibitor)
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
IAC 2006 Abs# THLB0214 Potent Antiretroviral Effect of MK-0518, a Novel HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor, as part of Combination ART in Treatment -Naïve HIV-1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
WORLD AIDS DAY Zero new HIV infections Zero discrimination Zero AIDS-related deaths.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Copyright © 2003 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Treatment-Naïve Adults
Introduction. Adult ADHD in the Real World: From Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice.
Design Randomisation 1 : 1 Double-blind W8 W12
Optimizing Antiretorviral Therapy for Long-Term HIV Care
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
EFV versus ATV + RTV, both with ABC-3TC or TDF-FTC ACTG 5202
What’s Next – and When: An Update on Injectable Prevention
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
Phase 3b Treatment-Naive
Lopinavir-ritonavir mg BID (n = 354)
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Switch to Etravirine from Efavirenz due to CNS Toxicity SSAT-029 STUDY
Once Daily Etravirine versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive SENSE Trial
Dolutegravir versus Raltegravir in Treatment Experienced SAILING Study
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-1 (TMC125-C206)
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Atazanavir + ritonavir vs. Lopinavir-ritonavir CASTLE Study
Saquinavir + RTV versus Lopinavir-RTV in Treatment-Naïve GEMINI Trial
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Injection Drug Use
Y. Sun, J. Li, J. Ma, C. Wang, F. Bai, K. Zhao, Z. Yu, W. Kang,
Boceprevir in Treatment Naive SPRINT-2
Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS I)
Trends in virological and clinical outcomes in individuals with HIV-1 infection and virological failure of drugs from three antiretroviral drug classes:
ASPIRE Study: SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV for genotype 1 experienced patients
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced HIV Coinfection
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
HARMONIZE Trial design: Patients with hyperkalemia (K ≥5.1 mEq/L) were randomized in a 1:1:1:1.7 fashion to receive sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS)
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Telaprevir in Treatment Experienced GT-1 PROVE3
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Dolutegravir in PEPFAR
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
The IAS TB/HIV Research Prizes are awarded to:
Presentation transcript:

A daily dose of 400 mg efavirenz (EFV) is non-inferior to the standard 600 mg dose: week 48 data from the ENCORE1 study, a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, non-inferiority trial Rebekah Puls for the ENCORE1 Study Group

Reduced dose antiretroviral drugs (ARV) GFATM/WHO/PEPFAR plans to expand treatment to 15 million people by 2015 will come at significant cost Although reduced, the cost of ARV remains substantial Dose reduction may be a means to reduce drug costs Efavirenz (EFV) is a globally important ARV WHO guidelines recommend EFV for first line Phase II trial and observational cohort data suggest comparable performance at lower daily doses

Encore1 study design Patient population A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of reduced dose EFV with standard dose EFV plus 2N(t)RTI in ART-naïve HIV- infected individuals over 96 weeks Patient population ART-naïve HIV-infected adults with no prior AIDS, plasma HIV-1 RNA (pVL) >1,000 copies/mL, 50 <CD4+ T cells/µL <500, creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min, no pregnancy or nursing mothers Randomisation I. TDF/FTC + 400 mg EFV qd (2 x 200 mg EFV + 1 x 200 mg matched placebo) II. TDF/FTC + 600 mg EFV qd (3 x 200 mg EFV) 1:1 (400mg:600mg), stratified by clinical site and screening pVL

Methods Primary endpoint Proportion of participants with pVL <200 copies/mL at 48 weeks in the intention to treat (ITT, M=F) population, using a non- inferiority margin of 10% pVL determined retrospectively at a single, central laboratory <50, <400 copies/mL Sample size 630 patients to demonstrate non-inferiority of 400 mg EFV assuming 85% participants taking 600 mg have <200 copies/mL, at least 90% power for both ITT and PP analyses Safety data Adverse event (AE) summaries, cessation of study drugs Changes from baseline in laboratory results

Participant disposition Total screened N=768 Withdrew consent N=9 Total ineligible N=123 United Kingdom Germany Israel Hong Kong Randomized N=636 Mexico Thailand Nigeria Malaysia Singapore South Africa Australia Chile Argentina Patients were recruited over a 9 month period commencing August 2011 EFV 400mg, N=324 Withdrew prior to commencing randomized therapy N=3 ITT and NC=F, N=321 PP, N=293 EFV 600mg, N=312 Withdrew prior to commencing randomized therapy N=3 ITT and NC=F, N=309 PP, N=271

Baseline characteristics EFV 400mg EFV 600mg Total N=321 N=309 N=630 Male, n (%) 221 (68.8) 206 (66.5) 427 (67.7) Mean age in years (SD) 36.1 (10.0) 35.8 (10.0) 36.0 (10.0) Ethnicity, n (%) African 118 (36.8) 116 (37.4) 234 (37.1) Asian 106 (33.0) 103 (33.2) 209 (33.1) Caucasian 97 (30.2) 90 (29.0) 187 (29.6) Aboriginal Australian 0 (0.0) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.2) CDC category A, n (%) 264 (82.2) 265 (85.8) 529 (84.0) Median pVL in log10 copies/mL (IQR) 4.76 (0.84) 4.73 (0.90) 4.75 (0.88) pVL copies/mL, n (%) <100,000 214 (66.7) 202 (64.4) 416 (66.0) ≥100,000 107 (33.3) 107 (34.6) 214 (34.0) Mean CD4+ T cells/µL (SD) 273 (97) 272 (101) 273 (99) 100 < CD4+ T cells/µL ≤ 350, n (%) 244 (76) 224 (72) 468 (74)

Primary endpoint: non inferiority at week 48 EFV400 % EFV600 Difference (95%CI) p ITT 94.1 92.2 1.8 (-2.1, 5.8) 0.36 NC=F 90.0 85.8 4.3 (-0.8, 9.4) 0.10 PP 98.3 97.4 0.9 (-1.5, 3.3) 0.47 favours EFV600 favours EFV400 Difference in percentage of participants with pVL <200 copies/mL

Primary endpoint: non inferiority at week 48 EFV400 % EFV600 Difference (95%CI) p ITT 94.1 92.2 1.8 (-2.1, 5.8) 0.36 <105 strata 94.9 92.9 2.0 (-2.7, 6.8) 0.40 ≥105 92.7 91.1 1.7 (-5.3, 8.6) 0.64 NC=F 90.0 85.8 4.3 (-0.8, 9.4) 0.10 90.4 84.8 5.6 (-0.9, 12.1) 0.09 89.5 87.5 2.0 (-6.1, 10.2) 0.63 PP 98.3 97.4 0.9 (-1.5, 3.3) 0.47 98.9 97.6 1.2 (-1.5, 4.0) 0.70 97.0 0.3 (-4.1, 4.8) 1.00 favours EFV600 favours EFV400 Difference in percentage of participants with pVL <200 copies/mL

Distribution of participants : NC=F <200 copies/mL EFV 400 mg EFV 600 mg Total N=321 N=309 N=630 n (%) Failures 32 (10.0) 44 (14.2) 79 (12.5) pVL >200 copies/mL 5 (1.6) 7 (2.3) 12 (1.9) Death 2 (0.6) 3 (1.0) 5 (0.8) Withdrew consent 3 (0.9) 6 (1.0) Lost to follow up 4 (1.2) 7 (1.1) Missing data @ week 48 1 (0.3) Stopped EFV due to VF 3 (0.5) Stopped EFV for other reason 16 (5.0) 21 (6.8) 40 (6.4) pVL <200 copies/mL 289 (90.0) 265 (85.8) 554 (87.9)

Mean change from baseline to week 48 pVL mean difference (95%CI) -0.06 log10 copies/mL (-0.19, 0.07), p=0.350

Mean change from baseline to week 48 CD4+ T cells mean difference (SD) 25 cells (6, 44) p=0.009* Time (weeks)

Adverse events - overall EFV400 n (%) EFV600 Total Number of AEs 1,173 (49.8) 1,182 (50.2) 2,355 (100) Grade 1/2 1,119 (47.5) 1,118 (47.4) 2,237 (95.0) Grade 3/4 54 (2.3) 65 (2.7) 117 (5.0) Serious adverse events N=321 N=309 Difference (95%CI) p Total numbers of SAEs 31 (46.2) 36 (53.7) Number with SAE 23 (7.17) 22 (7.12) 0.05% (-3.98, 4.07) 0.980 Number with SAE related to study drug 3 (0.93) 4 (1.29) 0.36% (-1.98, 1.27) 0.670

Adverse events - related to study drug EFV400 N=321 EFV600 N=309 Difference (95%CI) p Number (%) patients reporting AE 286 (89.1) 273 (88.4) Number (%) patients with study drug related AE 118 (36.8) 146 (47.2) -10.5% (-18.2, -2.8) 0.008* Number (%) patients stopping drug due to related AE 6 (1.9) 18 (5.8) -3.96 (-6.96, -0.95) 0.010*

Efavirenz adverse events* EFV400 EFV600 272 231 105 68 13 12 62 78 1 21 22 *categorised according to the EFV Product Information

Conclusions 400 mg EFV was non-inferior to 600 mg EFV when combined with Truvada in a treatment-naive, HIV-infected adult population over 48 weeks Evidence of reduced EFV-related side effects with lower dose 400 mg EFV should be considered for initial ARV treatment.

Acknowledgments We extend our grateful thanks to all the volunteers who have been participating in this study. The study was funded from the following sources: an unrestricted grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant ID 51040); the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; the University of New South Wales. We thank Gilead Sciences Inc for their very kind donation of Truvada™ to undertake this project and Matrix Laboratories (Mylan Inc.) for their supply of efavirenz and matched placebo. The Kirby Institute is affiliated with the Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia. Protocol Steering Committee – Waldo Belloso, Marta Boffito, David Cooper, Chris Duncombe, Sean Emery, Sharne Foulkes, Andrew Hill, Heiko Jessen, Suresh Kumar, Man Po Lee, Brenda Crabtree-Ramirez, Marcelo Losso, Praphan Phanupak, Rebekah Puls, Jim Rooney, Eduardo Shahar, Alan Winston, Marcelo Wolff, Barnaby Young DSMB – Matthew Dolan, David Dunn, Roy Gulick Sydney coordinating team – Sean Emery, Rebekah Puls, Dianne Carey, Carlo Dazo, Anna Donaldson, Mark Boyd, Kymme Courtney-Vega, Janaki Amin, Sarah Pett, Jessica Taylor, Enmoore Lin, Tanya Johannesen, Tony Kelleher, Philip Cunningham, Kate Merlin, Julie Yeung, Ansari Shaik, Bertha Fsadni, Alex Carrera, Melanie Lograsso Buenos Aires coordinating team – Marcelo Losso, Waldo Belloso, Cecilia Abela, Marina Delfino, Lucas Roby, Alejandra Moricz, Silvia Pizzuto, Silvana Marangón Bangkok coordinating team – Praphan Phanupak, Amanda Clarke, Kanitta Pussadee, Louise Tomkins, Parinya Sutheerasak, Peeraporn Kaew-on, Sasiwimol Ubolyam

Acknowledgments Australia: Alfred Hospital – Julian Elliot, Michelle Boglis, Janine Roney. Melbourne Sexual Health Centre – Tim Read, Helen Kent, Julie Silvers. Northside Clinic – Richard Moore, Thai Lim, Jeff Wilcox. AIDS Medical Unit – Mark Kelly, Abby Gibson, Lucy Bird. Royal Perth Hospital – David Nolan, Julie Robinson, Laura Barba. Albion St Centre: Don Smith, Jega Sarangapany, Denise Smith. Burwood Road General Practice: Nicholas Doong, Nam Phan, Jeff Hudson. Taylor Square Private Clinic: Emanuel Vlahakis, Amrita Patel, Isobel Prone. St Vincent’s Hospital: David Cooper, Sarah Pett, Karen MacRae.  Argentina: CAICI - Sergio Lupo, Liliana Trape, Luciana Peroni. Hospital Italiano - Waldo Belloso, Marisa Sanchez, Mariana de Paz Sierra. Hospital Ramos Mejia - Marcelo Losso, Mariana Kundro, Patricia Burgoa. Hospital Posadas - Hector Laplume Lucia Daciuk. Hospital Rawson - Norma Luna, Daniel David, Laura Nieto. FUNCEI - Valeria Confalonieri, Emiliano Bissio, Pablo Luchetti. CEADI - Oscar Garcia Messina, Olivia Gear, Adrian Rodriguez. CEIN - Liliana Calanni, Susana Calanni, Daniel Clafunao. Chile: – Hospital San Borja-Arriaran - Marcelo Wolff, Claudia Cortes, Gladys Allendes. Hospital de la Universidad Catolica Pontificia - Carlos Perez, Jimena Flores. Germany: Medical Group Practice Berlin – Heiko Jessen, Arne Jessen, Luca Stein, Carmen Zedlack, Maria Koch. Bonn University – Jurgen Rockstroh, Brigitta Späth, Christoph Boesecke. Israel: Rambam Medical Centre – Eduardo Shahar, Eynat Kedem, Garmal Hassoun. Hong Kong: Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Man-Po Lee, Patrick CK Li, Pansy PC Yu. Malaysia: UMMC - Raja Iskandar Shah Raja Azwa, Sharifah Faridah Syed Omar, Sasheela Sri La Sri Ponnampalavanar. Hospital Sungai Buloh - Suresh Kumar, Yasmin Gani, Henry Chang. Mexico: Hospital General de Guadalajara - Jaime Andrade Villanueva, Angeles Gonzalez, Lucero Gonzalez. INCMNSZ- Brenda Crabtree Ramirez, Juan Sierra Madero, Maru Zghaib. Singapore: Tan Tock Seng Hospital - Barnaby Young, Evelyn Chia, Andy Loh. South Africa: Desmond Tutu HIV Centre - Catherine Orrell,  Richard Kaplan, Robin Wood. Josha Research - Sharne Foulkes, Neo Tsikoane, Nadia Grace. Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital - Lerato Mohapi, Maureen Mohata, Ashaan Naidoo. Nigeria: BUTH - Chidi Nwizu, George Chima, Vera Labesa. PSSH - Chidi Nwizu, Henriatta Selle Tiri, Jonathan Bulu. Thailand: HIV-NAT - Praphan Phanuphak, Amanda Clarke, Anchalee Avihingsanon. Khon Kaen University - Ploenchan Chetchotisakd, Siriluck Anunnatsiri, Parichat Seawsirikul. RIHES - Khuanchai Supparatpinyo, Patcharaphan Sugandhavesa, Patchanee Samutarlai. United Kingdom: St. Mary’s Hospital – Alan Winston, Borja Mora-Peris, Siobhan McKenna. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital –Brian Gazzard, Marta Boffito, Chris Higgs.