A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment: A Mirror with 2 Faces Accountability Reflective Practice.
Advertisements

WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
The work of the Visiting Committee Chair. Important Reminders for the Chair of a Visiting Committee: The Chair of a Visiting Committee plays a most important.
A Visiting Committee’s Work in the WCEA Process for Accreditation
Performance management guidance
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
School Improvement Plan 6 Main Areas
Campus Improvement Plans
NWCCU Standards for Accredition The new process. Revised NWCCU Accreditation Standards New Standards: reduced from 9 to 5 Standard One--Mission, Core.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Periodic Department Review A System of Affirmation LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Improving Student Learning 2012 VISITING COMMITTEE TRAINING © 2013 WCEA.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program School Improvement Plan Process.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Presented by the Faculty Affairs Office September 2013.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Accreditation Overview.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Planning for Sustainability 1 Susan Ramsey Pearls of Wisdom Consulting Lia Katz ASTHO (202)
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Welcome The Mid-Cycle Evaluation Workshop. Background and History of MCE NWCCU emphasis on outcomes Review of Year Seven Self-Evaluations – Needing more.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
National Quality Standards Framework
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
National Quality Standards Framework
Orientation for New Site Visitors
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 24, 2017 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 23, 2018 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Presentation transcript:

A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools ENSURING EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE (E3) A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools

Definition of E3: Ensuring Educational Excellence is a “pilot” Self Study Protocol for use by Catholic High Schools during the 2013 and 2014 academic years. The accreditation status granted by WCEA will be recognized by WCEA’s partnering agencies.

The new E3 Self Study Protocol embraces SEVEN principles of Catholic high school Accreditation (page 5 of the SS): The authenticity of a school’s Catholic identity; The organizational efficacy of the school; The excellence of its teaching and learning; The vitality of the school’s co-curricular programs; The school’s responsible stewardship of its material resources; The school’s commitment to improvement; and 7. The integrity of the school’s process of self studying.

E3 requires schools to assess themselves (Chapter IV) on each of FIVE categories Of standards using the evidence found in the Data Library (Pages 18-36). The Categories of Standards are: (Pages 8-11): Catholic Identity; School Organization; Teaching and Learning; Student Support; and E. Material Stewardship.

The school then creates an Educational Improvement Plan (EIP) which: A. Addresses the degree to which the school accomplished all of its previous Action Plan. B. Addresses each of the Areas for Vital Growth that the school has identified in Chapter IV. The Visiting Committee then confirms: The degree to which the school accomplishes all of the Standards. The degree to which the school’s EIP addresses the Areas for Vital Growth.

E3 Chapter I – Introduction to the School The PURPOSE of this chapter is to provide the Leadership Team and the Visiting Committee an overview of the school (pages 12-14). Items A-M consist of basic data and information about the school including the school’s address, form of governance, lists of personnel, etc. Item N is a brief narrative of the history of the school. Item O consists of the most significant developments of the school since the last accreditation visit presented in bullet format.

E3 Chapter II – School Purpose This chapter consists of the school’s Mission Statement, Philosophy Statement, and Integral Student Outcomes – ISOs (formerly known as ESLRs). (page 15). ISOs are essential attributes of an educated person. ISOs are about forming a person. As such, the emphasis is on the outcome of a Who (who the student will become) rather than a what (what the student will be able to do). ISOs are derived from the school’s mission and philosophy statements. In revising their ESLRs into ISOs, school should pay attention to creating rubrics to measure the degree to which integral student outcomes are realized. Schools should begin converting from ELSRs to ISOs and the various handbooks, etc. updated for the Accreditation Visit.

E3 Chapter III – The Self Study Process A. Organizing for the work of the self studying (page 16) 1. Identify the members of the E3 Leadership Team. 2. Identify the members of each E3 Home Group. A Home Group (e.g., departments, administrators, parents) looks at the data from that particular discipline to uncover key strengths and key growth areas. 3. Identify the members of each E3 Integral Group An Integral Group is a multi-disciplinary group formed to review data that covers multiple disciplines and/or is relevant to the entire school (e.g. mission statement) to uncover key strengths and key growth areas.

Chapter III Chronicling the Process of Self Studying 1. Establish a timeline/calendar for Leadership Team meetings, Home Group meetings, and Integral Group meetings. 2. Assign responsibilities for gathering information that will go into the Data Library. 3. Use E3 Process form (PF) on page 17 to document the meetings of the various groups.

Chapter III Gathering Data 1. Gathering representative student work in all courses Student work is gathered by home and integral groups and informs the groups about student achievement of the ISOs and other pertinent criteria. Student work is not kept in the Data Library.

Chapter III Gathering Data (continued) Construct the Data Library (DL) The DL is completed prior to Chapter IV of the Self Study. The DL is kept in a binder separate from the Self Study. The DL is primarily bulleted lists, tables, etc. Some DL information requires three years of data. The DL should be updated ANNUALLY.

Chapter III Gathering Data (continued) NOTE: The Data Library is a collection of mostly statistical information about the school and its programs. It is not a narrative, not ‘findings,’ not a listing of key strengths or key growth areas. Survey Data: For consistency of reporting, the guidelines for constructing surveys found on page 19 should be followed for every survey constructed by the school. Pages 37-38 contain a listing of survey items found in various parts of the Data Library.

Chapter III Data Gathering (pages 20-36) BOLD indicates a requirement of 3-years of data (generally in the form of a Table, e.g., #12 on page 21) [Items in brackets call for data from a survey constructed by the school]. Data gathering is not by ‘standard,’ but by category of standards. For example, the data gathered using the 34 data-gathering statements listed Om pages 21-22 may apply to one or more Catholic Identity Standards.

Chapter III Data Gathering – Catholic Identity Review the 34 data-gathering statements on pages 20-22 (allow about 5 minutes) Questions? Chapter III Data Gathering – School Organization Review the 41 data-gathering statements on pages 23-26 (allow about 10 minutes) Chapter III Data Gathering – Teaching and Learning Review the 36 data-gathering statements on pages 26-29 (allow about 15 minutes) Chapter III Data Gathering – Student Support Standards Review the 36 data-gathering statements on pages 30-32 (allow about 15 minutes) Chapter III Data Gathering – Material Stewardship Review the 52 data-gathering statements on pages 33-36 (allow about 10 minutes)

E3 Chapter III – Survey Items Remember that the Data Library (DL) contains a number of survey items spread over the five area of the Standards of E3. The five areas are: Catholic Identity School Organization Teaching and Learning Student Support Material Stewardship Survey Items are organized by 11 specific groups (pages 37-38) School Administration Teacher Parent Student Alumni Religion Department Academic Departments School Board Diocesan Office 11. Support Staff

E3 Chapter III – Survey Items (continued) The school is expected to create a survey relevant to the group being surveyed. The survey should be based on the items listed on pages 37-38 and the corresponding Data-gathering statements found on pages 20-36. Survey responses should be kept in a separate binder. Survey tabulations should be included in the Data Library. For example: the school needs to create a survey for Support Staff: According to the Item List on page 38, the survey is based on Standard B, #34 on page 25. Standard B #34 is “The perception of support staff concerning the degree of significance of their work in the overall accomplishment of the school’s mission.” The school designs one or more questions to address this perception. The survey response is on a scale a scale of 1-7 with 1 being to a minimal and 7 being to a great extent Extent. See page 19 for additional and important information on constructing survey questions.

E3 Chapter IV – Findings Key Questions for discussion and reflection: Takes place after the Data Library is completed. The appropriate Integral and Home Groups discuss the Key Questions for reflection and discussion found on pages 39-55. Key Questions for reflection and discussion are listed by Standards in each category. Please NOTE: Key Questions are for reflection and discussion only. The Data Library is used as evidence for the answers to the Key ` Questions.

E3 Chapter IV – Findings (continued) Written Requirements: Written requirements are found at the end of each category (e.g. Category A – Catholic Identity): 1. After a thorough reflection and discussion/analysis of the Standards (based on the Key Questions), the school is to write an overall summary paragraph that reflects the school’s evaluation of itself vis a vis these Standards.

E3 Chapter IV – Findings (continued) Written Requirements: Written requirements are found at the end of each Category: In bullet format, the school should identify any key strengths within the school experience vis a vis these Standards. Include a brief rationale and citation (s) from the Data Library as evidence in support of each identification.

E3 Chapter IV – Findings (continued) Written Requirements: Catholic Identity Standards – page 42 School Organization Standards—page 45 Teaching and Learning Standards – page 48 Student Support Standards – page 51 Material Stewardship Standards – page 55

Discerning Areas for Vital Growth: E3 Chapter IV – Findings (continued): Discerning Areas for Vital Growth: Before beginning the discernment process for identifying Areas for Vital Growth, it is recommended that the school create a list of all key growth areas. This list may facilitate the school to see all key growth areas in one place and assist the discernment process. NOTE: An Area for Vital Growth is a key growth area that must be addressed – and must be remedied – in order for the school to achieve and maintain its vitality. It is recommended that this discernment process needs to focus on the Standards for Catholic Identity and Teaching and Learning first.

E3 Chapter IV – Findings (continued) Discerning Areas for Vital Growth Two or more key growth areas could be combined into a single Area for Vital Growth. The school should limit the number of Areas for Vital Growth (see # 5 on page 56) List all identified Area for Vital Growth in bullet format for inclusion in the Self Study. Please NOTE: Each Area for Vital Growth (see previous bullet) is addressed in the form of an action plan for improvement within the Educational Improvement Plan (EIP) (Chapter V)

E3 Chapter V – Educational Improvement Plan Implementation of the Prior Plan from the last Self Study. 1. The school includes a written summary of its accomplishment of each part of its revised Action Plan from the last Accreditation Visit. 2. Summarize each goal in a single paragraph. 3. Include the mid-term progress report if one was required as a result of the last Accreditation Visit. 4. Provide a one-paragraph summary of any goals added to the Action Plan since the last Visit.

E3 Chapter V – Educational Improvement Plan (continued) Current Educational Improvement Plan (EIP) 1. Construct an Action Plan for each Area for Vital Growth that the school has identified at the conclusion of Chapter IV. 2. All Action Plans should include at least the following: a. Identify the area for vital growth b. Identify the goal being addressed c. Write a rational for the plan (reference the Data Library) d. List the strategies being employed along with the acting agents, necessary resources, assessment of progress, reporting of progress, and a timeline for completion.

__________________________________________________________ Area for Vital Growth _____________________________________________________________________________________ Goal of the Action Plan Rationale for the Action Plan (Based on findings in Chapter IV with appropriate references to data from the Data library) Action Steps: Acting Agents: ______________________________________________________________________________________ Necessary Resources Ways of Assessing Progress __________________________________________________________ Ways of Reporting Progress _______________________________________________________________________________________ Timeline for Completion