Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G010057-00-W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

Global longitudinal quad damping vs. local damping G v8 1.
8/13/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford 1 Length and angular control loops in LIGO Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Hanford.
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),
LIGO-G W LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting – LLO March Summary of recent measurements of g factor changes induced by thermal loading.
NSF : Nov. 10, LIGO End to End simulation overview  Time domain simulation written in C++  Like MATLAB with Interferometer toolbox  Major physics.
LIGO-G W S5 Calibration Status and Comparison of S5 results from three interferometer calibration techniques Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Angular Noise in a Suspended Interferometer with DC Readout Royal Reinecke Co-Mentors: Alan Weinstein and Rana Adhikari.
LIGO-G W Where Did the LSC Signals Come From? Fred Raab 27 June 02.
LIGO-G W S5 Calibration Status and Comparison of S5 results from three interferometer calibration techniques Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO- G060XXX-00-R E2E meeting, September How to design feedback filters? E2E meeting September 27, 2006 Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
Use ofSiesta in VIRGO commissioning Lisa Barsotti University of Pisa – INFN Pisa For the Virgo collaboration Caltech, December 19th 2003.
Frequency Response of LIGO Interferometers Andrew Weber University of Maryland (no relation) SURF Student Lecture Series Advisor: Andri Gretarsson.
SIESTA for Virgo locking experience L. Barsotti University of Pisa – INFN Pisa on behalf of the Virgo Locking Group Cascina, March 16th 2004 Simulation.
Calibration of TAMA300 in Time Domain Souichi TELADA, Daisuke TATSUMI, Tomomi AKUTSU, Masaki ANDO, Nobuyuki KANDA and the TAMA collaboration.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Virgo Control Noise Reduction
Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.
LIGO-G I S5 calibration status Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory for the LSC Calibration Committee LSC/Virgo Meeting May 22, 2007 Cascina,
LIGO-G W Detector Commissioning Meeting – March 7, H1 arm cavity g factor changes resulting from 1064 nm heating Rick S, Malik R, Keita.
Displacement calibration techniques for the LIGO detectors Evan Goetz (University of Michigan)‏ for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration April 2008 APS meeting.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 DC Readout Experiment at the Caltech 40m Laboratory Robert Ward Caltech Amaldi 7 July 14.
Matt Evans, LSC March 2003 (G E)1 Lock Acquisition in LIGO  Who am I? »Matt Evans »Caltech graduate  What is Lock Acquisition? »The process.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
LIGO- G R Aspen winter conference, January Toward the Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype Aspen winter.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Hanover LSC Meeting, August 18, 2003 LIGO S2 Calibration Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Representing the calibration.
Loïc Rolland LSC-Virgo, Orsay- June 11th Virgo ‘timing’ calibration Loïc Rolland Note: Timing calibration during VSR1 in the Virgo codifier (VIR-028A-08,
Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration Group 8/21/2013.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
G Z Test Mass Butterfly Modes and Alignment Amber Bullington, Stanford University Warren Johnson, Louisiana State University LIGO Livingston Detector.
TCS and IFO Properties Dave Ottaway For a lot of people !!!!!! LIGO Lab Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of.
Aligning Advanced Detectors L. Barsotti, M. Evans, P. Fritschel LIGO/MIT Understanding Detector Performance and Ground-Based Detector Designs LIGO-G
Development of a Readout Scheme for High Frequency Gravitational Waves Jared Markowitz Mentors: Rick Savage Paul Schwinberg Paul Schwinberg.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1 Alan Weinstein Caltech Burst UL WG LSC meeting, 8/21/02.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
LIGO-G Z LIGO’s Thermal Noise Interferometer Progress and Status Eric D. Black, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, and Shanti Rao (Caltech) Seiji Kawamura.
LOGO Gravitational Waves I.S.Jang Introduction Contents ii. Waves in general relativity iii. Gravitational wave detectors.
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
LIGO Commissioning June 10, 2002
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Demonstration of lock acquisition and optical response on
Photon Calibrator Investigations During S6
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype
Calibration of TAMA300 in Time Domain
Detection Of High Frequency Gravitational Waves At LIGO W. Butler , A
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report
Lock Acquisition Real and Simulated
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Variable reflectivity signal-recycling mirror and control
First look at Injection of Burst Waveforms prior to S1
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Detector Characterization Session
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Calibration: S2 update, S3 preliminaries
Advanced Optical Sensing
Presentation transcript:

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit Mours, Peter Shawhan California Institute of Technology Spring LSC Meeting 2001 Baton Rouge, Louisiana March 15, 2001 LSC Session : Detector Characterization

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W outline l how good do we need to do? Assume 1-10 events with SNR , the physical results should not be limited by the systematic uncertainties of the calibration l +/- 1% amplitude, +/-10 microseconds Sigg, D. LIGO-T A-D I.ITM, ETM calibrations II.Carm, Darm calibrations III.Swept sines and transfer functions IV.Sensitivity curves

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W interferometer control loops Power Recycled Michelson Interferometer with Fabry-Perot Arm Cavities Power Recycled Michelson Interferometer with Fabry-Perot Arm Cavities Recombined Interferometer with Fabry-Perot Arm Cavities Recombined Interferometer with Fabry-Perot Arm Cavities E2: Now (well, pre-quake): pitched recycling mirror Laser recycling mirror Laser darm L - : u.g.p. 200 Hz carm L + : u.g.p. 400? Hz mich l - : u.g.p. 6 Hz darm L - : u.g.p. 60 Hz carm L + : u.g.p. 150 Hz mich l - : u.g.p. 20? Hz prc l + : u.g.p. ? Hz

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W ITM calibration Calibrations for the ITM’s are then  ITMX = 3.6 +/- 0.2 nm/count  ITMY = 3.5 +/- 0.2 nm/count Basic idea: drive mass with known force and measure displacement Drive the ITM with a slow sinusoid (0.1 Hz) and count the number of fringes that are read out at the antisymmetric port. AS DC ITM control signal

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W To extrapolate the calibration of the input test masses (ITM’s) to the end test masses: Assuming identical coil drivers (E1=E2) and pendulum transfer functions (P1=P2), and using equal excitations on both masses, Calibrations for the ETM’s are then  ETMX = 2.3 nm/count  ETMX = 2.0 nm/count ETM calibration

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W darm, carm calibration } } } } Control signals (counts) Output matrix ETM calibrations (nm/counts) Definition of L - and L + } New output matrix to diagonalize above Non-diagonal! } nm

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W measurement stability stable for measurements made same day differences at low frequencies, up to 30% at 15Hz sweep test mass, take transfer function between AS error signal and excitation TF Magnitude (AS_Q/ITMy_exc) Result: Experiment: TF Phase (AS_Q/ITMy_exc)

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W arm comparison Significant differences at low frequency TF Magnitude (AS_Q/ITM_exc) TF Phase (AS_Q/ITM_exc)

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W calibration lines ITMx ETMx ITMy ETMy R. Coldwell et al., “Narrow Resonances in the E2 Data”, DCC

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W fit to ETM y transfer function Y arm well represented fit : 2 zeroes at 0Hz, 5 poles (1 single, 2 double) LSC servo : 2 zeros at ~0Hz, at high freq., should see mechanical TF and cavity response TF Magnitude (AS_Q/ETMy_exc) TF Phase (AS_Q/ETMy_exc)

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W fit to ETM x transfer function X arm more complicated TF Magnitude (AS_Q/ETMx_exc) TF Phase (AS_Q/ETMx_exc)

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W time delay TF Phase (AS_Q/ETMy_exc)

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W Sensitivity to y-arm displacement Scale set by absolute calibration of ITMy Shape set by parametrization Visible calibration lines (denoted with“c”) approximately 30% calibration accuracy c c c c sensitivity

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W noise comparison

Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W conclusions Recombined IFO best sensitivity during E2 was approximately 6x m/Hz 1/2 at 1kHz carm and darm mixing apparent output matrix changed: ETMs given equal push calibrations very similar when taken same day, somewhat different days apart differences noted in X and Y arms earthquakes are bad anticipate revisiting of these measurements in order to see the affect of the many changes since E2