TMDL Development West Fork River Watershed July 27 th, 2010 WV DEP WV DEP James Laine James Laine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AMD and Extent in West Virginia Patrick Campbell - April 22, 2008.
Advertisements

WV Watershed Network Wastewater Treatment Activities Roundtable Discussion March 15, 2006.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Patrick Campbell - March 17, 2009.
Ann D Hirekatur Project Manager State of Lake Wisconsin Meeting July 13, 2013 Wisconsin River Basin Water Quality Improvement Project.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Middle Ohio North Watershed
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Louisville, KY August 30, 2011.
TMDL Development Rockymarsh Run Watershed May 8, 2013 WV DEP.
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
TMDL Development Tygart Valley River Watershed May 9 th & 10 th 2012 WV DEP WV DEP James Laine James Laine.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Cheat River Watershed TMDLs Draft TMDL Public Meetings August 3,2010 Kingwood, WV August 4, 2010 Blackwater.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
By: Carrie Turner Prepared for: New Jersey Association of Environmental Authorities Annual Conference March 12, 2013 Watershed Management Planning Provides.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Status of Pennsylvania’s AMD Set-Aside Program By Pam Milavec Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
CWA §319 Grants General Conditions Grant Types Grant Format Timelines The Awards Reporting Note: § 319 monies are reimbursable grants.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection November 6, 2014 Cabela’s Conference Room Wheeling, WV Upper Ohio North Tributary Watersheds Draft.
Lower Kanawha Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings September 28, 2011 Winfield High School.
Elk Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings September 27, 2011 Elkview Middle School.
Texas Clean Rivers Program Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
West Fork River Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings April 21, 2014.
TMDL Development Monongahela River Watershed June 30th, 2009 WV DEP WV DEP James Laine James Laine.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
TMDLs on the Clearwater River Fecal Coliform Impairment of the Trout Stream Portion of the Clearwater River By Corey Hanson Water Quality Coordinator Red.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
1 IDEM Overview of March 14, 2008 Draft Antidegradation Rule Presented at the April 29, 2008 Antidegradation Stakeholder Meeting.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
TMDL Development Upper Guyandotte River Watershed May 4 th & 5 th, 2015.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Staci Goodwin Senior TMDL Project Manager Office of Water Quality
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection August 6, 2014 Moorefield City Hall South Branch Potomac & Shenandoah Hardy Watersheds TMDL Status.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection October 13 & 14, 2015 Draft TMDLs for Tygart Valley River Watershed.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Water Resources Workshop Standards, Use Attainability, Impairments and TMDLS Richard Eskin Maryland Department of the Environment February 20, 2004.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection August 31, 2011 Ravenswood High School Middle Ohio South Watershed TMDL Status Update Meeting.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Monongahela River Watershed TMDLs West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Draft TMDL Public Meetings August 20, 2013.
WVDEP TMDL Development Nutrient Management Training December 16, 2009 Dave Montali, WVDEP.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
Mulberry River Watershed
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
Beaver River Watershed PCB Investigation
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Marco island water quality monitoring
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Presentation transcript:

TMDL Development West Fork River Watershed July 27 th, 2010 WV DEP WV DEP James Laine James Laine

Agenda  Background information on Water Quality Standards, impaired waters and TMDLs  Brief history of WV TMDL development  Overview of WVDEP’s TMDL process  Discussion of local impaired waters and their TMDL timeline  Pre-TMDL Monitoring Plan for local waters  Discussion – Free form questions and answers

What’s a TMDL?  “Total Maximum Daily Load” – How much pollutant a stream can receive and remain healthy  TMDL development is required by Clean Water Act for all impaired streams  TMDL is a pollution budget – prescribes reduction of pollutants that result in the restoration of an impaired stream

What’s an impaired stream?  Stream that doesn’t meet water quality standards  West Virginia Water Quality Standards are codified at 47 CSR 2  Standards include designated uses for WV waters and water quality criteria to protect those uses  Criteria can be numeric or narrative  Impaired streams (streams that are not meeting criteria) are on the 303(d) List

Criteria Examples  Human Health Protection  Fecal Coliform bacteria (Water Contact)  200 counts/100ml as a monthly geometric mean  no more than 10% of samples in a month exceed 400 counts/100ml  Human Health/Aquatic Life Protection  Total Iron  1.5 mg/l as a 4 day average concentration  Not to be exceeded more than once every 3 years

Criteria Examples  Human Health/Aquatic Life Protection  Chlorides  230 mg/l (Aquatic Life)  250 mg/l (Human Health) salty taste  Aquatic Life  Dissolved Aluminum  750 ugl/l as a 4 day average concentration  Not to be exceeded more than once every 3 years

Criteria Examples  Biological Impairment  Conditions Not Allowable in State Waters  (47 CSR 2-3.2i) “.....no significant adverse impact to the chemical, physical, hydrologic or biological components of aquatic ecosystems shall be allowed.”  Benthic macroinvertebrate assessment  West Virginia Stream Condition Index (WVSCI)

Criteria Examples  West Virginia Stream Condition Index (WVSCI)  Standardized method for assessing benthic macroinvertebrates (aquatic bugs)  WVSCI stream scores are normalized to range  Streams scoring less than the 60.6 threshold value are labeled as “impaired” and placed on the 303(d) list  Streams listed as impaired are then slated for TMDL development  “Biologically Impaired” streams are evaluated for source/s of impairment during the TMDL development process (Stressor Identification Process)

West Virginia TMDL History  TMDL development required by Clean Water Act for all impaired streams  If State doesn’t develop TMDLs, EPA must  WV couldn’t (resources), EPA didn’t  EPA was sued in 1995, settled suit by entering into consent decree with plaintiffs, and began developing WV TMDLs  In 2004, WV finalized its first group of TMDLs developed under state direction

WVDEP TMDL Process  Stream Selection  Pre-TMDL monitoring, source identification and characterization  Contract to model water quality and hydrology  Allocation  Report development  Finalization

Synchronized with WV Watershed Management Framework 48 month process (Stream selection– EPA approval) Multiple opportunities for public outreach/stakeholder input Pre-TMDL water quality monitoring Source identification and characterization Process Highlights

TMDL Stream Selection Process  Spread development over State  Evaluate list of impaired waters  Consider WMF  Maximize efficiency  focus geographically  address all known or suspected impairments  Resources

Watershed Management Framework  32 watersheds (8-digit HUC)  5 Hydrologic Groups (A – E)  Geographical way to organize water resource management – Within DEP, watershed assessment, NPDES Permit reissuance and nonpoint source project funding synchronized  WVDEP TMDL development synchronized

TMDL/WMF Synchronization  Pre-TMDL monitoring occurs concurrently with WMF assessment year  TMDL completion six months prior to start of WMF implementation year  5yr WMF cycle/15 year plan 3 bites at each HG apple

TMDL Development Stream Selection Process Watershed Management Framework Consideration  Within HG E 2, candidate watersheds = Big Sandy, Cacapon, Dunkard, Lower Ohio, Twelvepole, Upper Guyandotte, Upper Ohio South and West Fork TMDL Development Hydrologic Group E2

 Statewide Coverage Considerations  TMDL development has occurred in Cacapon, Dunkard, Lower Ohio, Twelvepole, Upper Guyandotte and Upper Ohio South watersheds.  Older, EPA-developed TMDLs exist for the West Fork watershed; revision required due to significant changes in aluminum and manganese water quality standards TMDL Development Stream Selection Process

 DEP proposed TMDLs for dissolved aluminum, total iron, total manganese, fecal coliform bacteria, pH and biological impairments of the West Fork River and tributaries  DEP advertised proposal and provided opportunity for comment (March 23 – April 30, 2010) - No Comments received  Final selection – West Fork River and tributaries from headwaters to its confluence with the Tygart River

TMDL Development Stream Selection Process  Due to the technical knowledge required and current resource constraints, TMDLs for PCBs and Hg are not proposed as part of this effort  Draft 2010 Integrated Report proposes delisting of West Fork River for Zn based on the Spelter remediation project and recent water quality data

HG E2 TMDL Timeline  Stream selection 3/10 – 4/10  Monitoring plan development 3/10 - 6/10  Outreach (TMDL process + monitoring plan specifics) 7/10 – 8/10  Stream Monitoring and Source Tracking 7/10 – 6/11

HG E2 TMDL Timeline  Modeling 10/11 – 6/12  Outreach (Allocation scenarios) 7/12 - 9/12  Draft TMDLs (Internal Review) 3/13  Outreach (PN/PC on Drafts) 4/13 – 6/13

HG E2 TMDL Timeline  Finalization (including EPA approval) 12/13  Implementation begins 7/14 – NPDES Water Permits 1/15 – NPDES Mining Permits

Pre-TMDL Monitoring Plan Goal – to generate robust/ recent data to:  Make accurate impairment assessments  Calibrate watershed models  Quantify the impacts of significant pollutant sources Today’s presentation is a preliminary plan; to be refined via WVDEP field recon and stakeholder input

Pre-TMDL Monitoring Plan  See handouts – detailed map on DEP webpage  Impairments/potential impairments being evaluated:  Biological Integrity  Total Iron, Dissolved Aluminum, Total Manganese, pH  Fecal coliform bacteria  301 sites on 244 streams  GIS coverage available upon request

Pre-TMDL Monitoring Plan  Monitoring period = July 10 – June 11  Sampling frequency  Benthic macroinvertebrates - during index period (Apr – Oct)  Habitat evaluations (RBP)  1/Month for water chemistry parameters  pH, D.O., Specific Conductance, Temp.  Sampling will include flow measurement at select locations

Total Dissolved Solids & constituent ions  Recent concern of elevated levels in Monongahela River watershed  Efficiencies gained by sampling as part of an ongoing effort rather than separate effort  Data collected could be useful to Pennsylvania’s efforts on TDS and stressor identification process for biologically impaired streams  Primary Goal is collection of data to document current conditions  Continuous monitors for pH and conductivity to be placed at select locations within the watershed

Source Tracking Efforts  Abandoned Mine Lands  Limits of POTW collection systems  AFOs, Livestock counts  Riparian zone condition  Unmapped road density  Qualitative assessment of sediment sources  Active Mining Point Source Info

Stakeholder Input  General comments regarding plan’s adequacy in addressing goals  Does the plan provide for monitoring of particularly bad or good streams that you know about?  Does the plan provide monitoring sufficient to characterize significant pollutant sources?  Do you have water quality data to contribute?

Future Input Opportunities Public Meeting to present Draft TMDL and formal Public Notice/Public Comment – Spring 2013 Public meeting to present allocation scenarios – Summer 2012

WVDEP Contact Information  Contact: Steve Young –  Tele: (304) Ext 1042;  FAX: (304)  th Street SE, Charleston WV   Select Water and Waste Home  On left select Watershed Management, click on “ Total Maximum Daily Load”

Questions???