Update on a 0 (980) P.Gauzzi. 2 Main problem From event counting: Br(  0  ) = (6.70  0.26)  10 -5 with  Br(  0  ) = (7.22  0.52)  10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2006 Status of analysis.
Advertisements

Recent Results on Radiative Kaon decays from NA48 and NA48/2. Silvia Goy López (for the NA48 and NA48/2 collaborations) Universitá degli Studi di Torino.
KLOE GM Capri May 2003 K charged status report DE/Dx development vs PiD (next talk by E.De Lucia) →K e3 studies: initial design of efficiency measurement.
Status of the  ee analysis Mauro Raggi, LNF INFN 29 th August 2013 NA48/2 rare decay session NA62 Collaboration meeting Liverpool.
Phi Radiative decays at KLOE Camilla Di Donato* for the KLOE Collaboration *Sezione I.N.F.N. Napoli.
Measurement of the absolute BR(K  +  -  + ) : an update Patrizia de Simone KLOE Kaon meeting – 21 May 2009.
Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.
1 Baryonic Resonance Why resonances and why  * ? How do we search for them ? What did we learn so far? What else can we do in the.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
Biagio Di Micco13/02/ Radiative Phi Decays Meeting 1  Biagio Di Micco Università degli Studi di Roma III results.
Luca Lista L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli Rare and Hadronic B decays in B A B AR.
CMD-2 and SND results on the  and  International Workshop «e+e- Collisions from  to  » February 27 – March 2, 2006, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Outline: (1) The data sample (2) Some news on the analysis method (3) Efficiency revised (4) Background revised (5) Data: spectrum + “phi-curve”
NA48-2 new results on Charged Semileptonic decays Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Kaon 2005 Workshop 14 June 2005.
Study of the decay   f 0 (980)    +  -  C.Bini, S.Ventura, KLOE Memo /2004 (upd. 06/2005) C.Bini, KLOE Memo /2005 (upd. 06/2005)
 0  fit update P.Gauzzi. 2 Outline Kaon Loop – Systematics on the fit parameters – Fit with fixed VDM No Structure –systematics – fit with free VDM.
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
Victor Ryabov (PNPI) for the PHENIX Collaboration QM2005 Budapest Aug,06, First measurement of the  - meson production with PHENIX experiment at.
Initial State Radiation and Inclusive Hadron Production at B A B AR Fabio Anulli University of Perugia, INFN – Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati On behalf.
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
1 New Results on  (3770) and D Mesons Production and Decays From BES Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Presented by Yi-Fang Wang Charm07 Cornell University,
 0  5  Outline Event selection & analysis Background rejection Efficiencies Mass spectrum Comparison data-MC Branching ratio evaluation Systematics.
Preliminary results for the BR(K S  M. Martini and S. Miscetti.
Dynamics of  →       F. Ambrosino T. Capussela F. Perfetto.
Recent BESII Results of Charmonium Decays Gang LI CCAST&IHEP, Beijing for Ψ(2S) Group Topical Seminar on Frontier of Particle Physics 2005: Heavy Flavor.
Scalar and pseudoscalar mesons at BESII Xiaoyan SHEN (Representing BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, China Charm06, June 5-7, 2006,
Semileptonic D Decays from CLEO and BELLE Yongsheng Gao Southern Methodist University (CLEO Collaboration) ICHEP04, Beijing, Aug. 16 ─ 23, 2004.
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
Experimental setup Data taking Vus CPT a  had f 0 KLOE - May 20, The KLOE experiment at the Frascati  -factory.
Preliminary Measurement of the Ke3 Form Factor f + (t) M. Antonelli, M. Dreucci, C. Gatti Introduction: Form Factor Parametrization Fitting Function and.
Recent results from KLOE Cesare Bini Universita’ “La Sapienza” and INFN Roma 1.The KLOE physics program 2.The KLOE detector 3.Status of the experiment.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
Achim Stahl RWTH Aachen University Beijing, June 2006.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
D. LeoneNovosibirsk, , 2006Pion Form KLOE Debora Leone (IEKP – Universität Karlsruhe) for the KLOE collaboration International Workshop.
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
European Physical Society International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics EPS July 17th-23rd 2003 Aachen, Germany Camilla Di Donato INFN Napoli.
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Charm Form Factors from from B -Factories A. Oyanguren BaBar Collaboration (IFIC –U. Valencia)
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
Recent results on non-DDbar decays of  (3770) at BES HaiLong Ma [For BES Collaboration] The IVIIth Rencontres de Moriond session devoted to QCD AND HIGH.
ICHEP2002, Amsterdam Zhengguo Zhao, Weiguo Li1 Test of QCD in 2-5 GeV with BESII Weiguo Li, Zhengguo Zhao (Representing BES Collaboration) IHEP of CAS,
1 Tau 2010 – Manchester Andreas Hoecker – Muon g – 2 : Update and conclusions Andreas Hoecker (CERN) Tau Workshop, Manchester, UK, Sep 13 – 17, 2010 —
KLOE results on light mesons properties Cesare Bini Sapienza Universita’ and INFN Roma on behalf of the KLOE collaboration ICHEP08, Philadelphia 30/07/2008.
Marianna Testa University of Rome La Sapienza & INFN for the KLOE collaboration “XLIst Rencontres de Moriond: Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories”,
The η Rare Decays in Hall D
the charged kaon lifetime
Status report on   f0  00
Progress report on p0 p0 g analysis S. Giovannella, S.Miscetti
Measurement of inclusive branching fraction for y(3686)fX
KLOE results on scalar and pseudoscalar mesons
KLOE General Meeting - LNF March,
Scalar mesons and d0-d2 at KLOE
Progress on Pion Form Factor at KLOE (large photon polar angle)
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
CVC test in e+e−→KK cross section and data on τ−→K−K0ντ decay
Experimental Measurement
Study of the radiative decays f  f0(980)g and f  a0(980)g
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
Update of the Milano Dalitz Plot Analysis
Update of
Recent BESII Hot Topics
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

Update on a 0 (980) P.Gauzzi

2 Main problem From event counting: Br(  0  ) = (6.70  0.26)  with  Br(  0  ) = (7.22  0.52)  with  +    0 Compatible at 2  level (excluding the common uncertainty) Combined fit to the spectra: Br(  )/Br(       )= 1.58  0.04 (free parameter) Br(  )/Br(       )=1.73  0.03 from PDG Marginally compatible ( 8-9% discrepancy  3  ) Checks on efficiencies  OK Checks on background subtraction procedure  OK  Check the normalization: 1) check integrated luminosity 2) Bhabha lumin. vs  3  0

3 Check on bad runs N 5  /L N final /L Criterion: reject runs 5  far from the average (N 5  /L = 1.7) : from to pb : from to pb -1

4 Final sample datadata ω  0  7 f 0   DATA  7  % % % ω0ω % % %  0  0  (f 0  ) % % %  3  920.8%1100.6% %  5  380.3%600.3%980.3 % Tot. Bckg % % %  0  events (-101 evts.)

5 Final sample

6 Branching ratio N -  i B i = 4994 ; 8271  = 38.5 % ; 38.8 % L = pb -1 ; pb -1   = 3090 nb from  (  ) = (40.2  1.0) nb (M.Dreucci – Capri ’03) Br(  ) = (39.38  0.26) % Br = 6.61  ; 6.93  (  5% difference) [ Weighted average: (6.80  0.09  0.24)  ]

7 Normalization to  3  0 events N  7 = 1.5  10 6 ; 2.6  10 6 (contam. = 1.5 % ; 1.2 % )   7 (MC) 73.1 % ; 81.2 % Br(  ) = 1.3% Br(  3  0 ) = % Br = 6.90  ; 6.98  (  1% difference) Weighted average : (6.95  0.09  0.22)   s (MeV)

8 Kaon loop fit Neutral 22 Br(  0  ) = 7.0  Br(  a 0  ) = 6.8  (only scalar part)

9 Kaon loop fit Combined fit (Br(  )/Br(       )=1.73  0.03 from PDG) now discrepancy  2-3% (instead of 8-9%) (  ) (  π + π  π 0 ) Including last point of the charged spectrum  2  181, P(  2 )  0.6% 22 22

10 No structure fit If mass free  non reasonable values: M < 900 MeV 22 Br(  0  ) = 7.1  Br(  a 0  ) = 6.6  (only scalar part)

11 No structure fit (  ) (  π + π  π 0 ) 22 22

12 Conclusions on normalization Two effects: 1)Bad runs:  10 pb -1   2.5% increase in Br (neutral) 2)Spread in  s (especially for 2001)   2.5% increase in Br  Br from 6.7  to  7.0  difference with respect to the charged channel   3% (compatible with the uncertainties on Br(  ) and Br(       ))

13 SU(3) couplings KL and NS models do not make predictions on the structure Relations among couplings can be derived from SU(3) These relations are different for the qqbar and 4q cases For example, for the a 0 (980): KL NS (L  M) g a0  /g a0KK

14 f 0 /  couplings Complicated by mixing Achasov:  S = 0 or 90° for qqbar;  S = 90° for 4q (no mixing) Bugg: 17.3° or -29° “ ;  15.7° “ (g f0  /g f0KK from BES, J/  +  ,  K + K  ) Escribano: -8° C.Gatti: -13°

15 Claudio’s suggestion:  S can be derived from the ratio g  f0  /g  a0  It could work for 4q, but... In the qqbar case  does not couple to a 0  OZI violating contributions have to be taken into account ? SU(3) couplings for f 0 and  s s q q  a0a0 g  f0  /g  a0  KL NS

16 SU(3) couplings for f 0 and  Exercise: get  S from  couplings, fixed in KL fit to Dalitz plot, taken from Achasov-Kiselev paper  g  ππ = 2.4 GeV; g  KK = 0.55 GeV

17 f 0 couplings KL π 0 π 0 NS π 0 π 0 KL π + π ─ NS π + π ─ (Escribano L  M) g f0π  /g f0KK (BES data: J/  π + π ─,  K + K ─  0.49)

18 f 0 /a 0 ratio g f0KK /g a0KK Kaon loop No Structure (f 0  0  0 ) (f 0  +   ) (f 0  0  0 ) (f 0  +   )

19 g SKK KL NS g a0KK (Escribano L  M) Not SU(3) predictions KL π 0 π 0 NS π 0 π 0 KL π + π ─ NS π + π ─

20 Br(  0  ) CMD-2 SND KLOE ’00 KLOE ’01-02 Event counting Kaon Loop No Structure KLOE ’00 (Not SU(3) predictions)

21 gSgSgSgS The coupling g  S  can be related to the strange quark contents of the mesons Meson g  M  (GeV -1 ) 00  0.13  0.71 ´´  0.75 a 0 (980)1.5 – 1.8 f 0 (980)1.2 – 4.1 Increasing s-quark content  2

22 Conclusions on couplings Data do not seem incompatible with an SU(3) picture This can be used to discriminate between qqbar and 4q (at the moment qqbar model seems slightly preferred, but no conclusions can be drawn) A trial to fit all f 0 and a 0 spectra together within SU(3) can be done: all the couplings can be written in terms of few parameters: g SPP,  S, g VS , and  P (already measured in  /  decays) However the KL fit on a 0 (neutral spectrum only), by fixing the ratio g a0  π /g a0KK, does not converge