The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Two-dimensional Effects on the CSR Interaction Forces for an Energy-Chirped Bunch Rui Li, J. Bisognano, R. Legg, and R. Bosch.
Advertisements

Erdem Oz* USC E-164X,E167 Collaboration Plasma Dark Current in Self-Ionized Plasma Wake Field Accelerators
CO 2 laser system M. Polyanskiy, I. Pogorelsky, M. Babzien, and V. Yakimenko.
Physics of a 10 GeV laser-plasma accelerator stage Eric Esarey HBEB Workshop, Nov , C. Schroeder, C. Geddes, E. Cormier-Michel,
Beam characteristics UCLA What is a “perfect” beam? It comes from the Injector. It is affected by many factors A few highlights from contributed talks…
Particle acceleration in plasma By Prof. C. S. Liu Department of Physics, University of Maryland in collaboration with V. K. Tripathi, S. H. Chen, Y. Kuramitsu,
Contour plots of electron density 2D PIC in units of  [n |e|] cr wake wave breaking accelerating field laser pulse Blue:electron density green: laser.
Plasma wakefields in the quasi- nonlinear regime J.B. Rosenzweig a, G. Andonian a, S. Barber a, M. Ferrario b, P. Muggli c, B. O’Shea a, Y. Sakai a, A.
Particle-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration James Holloway University College London, London, UK PhD Supervisors: Professor Matthew wing University College.
UCLA Experiments with short single e-bunch using preformed and beam ionized plasma Retain ability to run short single bunch with pre-ionized plasma Ken.
西湖国际聚变理论与模拟研讨会 西湖国际聚变理论与模拟研讨会 M. Y. Yu 郁明阳 Institute for Fusion Theory and Simulation Zhejiang University Hangzhou
Modeling narrow trailing beams and ion motion in PWFA Chengkun Huang (UCLA/LANL) and members of FACET collaboration SciDAC COMPASS all hands meeting 2009.
High-charge energetic electron beam generated in the bubble regime Baifei Shen ( 沈百飞 ) State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics, Shanghai Institute.
Enhancement of electron injection using two auxiliary interfering-pulses in LWFA Yan Yin ( 银燕 ) Department of Physics National University of Defense Technology.
Chengkun Huang | Compass meeting 2008 Chengkun Huang, I. Blumenfeld, C. E. Clayton, F.-J. Decker, M. J. Hogan, R. Ischebeck, R. Iverson, C. Joshi, T. Katsouleas,
Physics of fusion power Lecture 11: Diagnostics / heating.
Simulations of Neutralized Drift Compression D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation Albuquerque, NM S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National.
Lecture 3: Laser Wake Field Acceleration (LWFA)
Full-scale particle simulations of high- energy density science experiments W.B.Mori, W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, B.Winjum, J.Fahlen,F.S.Tsung, C.Huang,J.Tonge M.Zhou,
Introductio n The guiding of relativistic laser pulse in performed hollow plasma channels Xin Wang and Wei Yu Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics,
1 Pukhov, Meyer-ter-Vehn, PRL 76, 3975 (1996) Laser pulse W/cm 2 plasma box (n e /n c =0.6) B ~ mc  p /e ~ 10 8 Gauss Relativistic electron beam.
UCLA Evidence for beam loading by distributed injection of electrons in a Plasma Wakefield Accelerator. Presented by Navid Vafaei-Najafabadi Advisor: Chan.
Measurement of Magnetic field in intense laser-matter interaction via Relativistic electron deflectometry Osaka University *N. Nakanii, H. Habara, K. A.
2 Lasers: Centimeters instead of Kilometers ? If we take a Petawatt laser pulse, I=10 21 W/cm 2 then the electric field is as high as E=10 14 eV/m=100.
1 Gas-Filled Capillary Discharge Waveguides Simon Hooker, Tony Gonsalves & Tom Rowlands-Rees Collaborations Alpha-X Basic Technology programme (Dino Jaroszynski.
Parameter sensitivity tests for the baseline variant Konstantin Lotov, Vladimir Minakov, Alexander Sosedkin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS,
Progress of Novel Vacuum Laser Acceleration Experiment at ATF Xiaoping Ding, Lei Shao ATF Users’ Meeting, Apr. 4-6, 2007 Collaborators: D. Cline (PI),
FACET and beam-driven e-/e+ collider concepts Chengkun Huang (UCLA/LANL) and members of FACET collaboration SciDAC COMPASS all hands meeting 2009 LA-UR.
W.B.Mori UCLA Orion Center: Computer Simulation. Simulation component of the ORION Center Just as the ORION facility is a resource for the ORION Center,
Particle acceleration by circularly polarized lasers W-M Wang 1,2, Z-M Sheng 1,3, S Kawata 2, Y-T Li 1, L-M Chen 1, J Zhang 1,3 1 Institute of Physics,
Free Electron Lasers (I)
Recent Results on the Plasma Wakefield Acceleration at FACET E 200 Collaboration 1)Beam loading due to distributed injection of charge in the wake reduces.
Institute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taiwan National Taiwan University, Taiwan National Central University, Taiwan National Chung.
Nonlinear Optics in Plasmas. What is relativistic self-guiding? Ponderomotive self-channeling resulting from expulsion of electrons on axis Relativistic.
R. Kupfer, B. Barmashenko and I. Bar
LASER-PLASMA ACCELERATORS: PRODUCTION OF HIGH-CURRENT ULTRA-SHORT e - -BEAMS, BEAM CONTROL AND RADIATION GENERATION I.Yu. Kostyukov, E.N. Nerush (IAP RAS,
W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C.Joshi, W.B.Mori
SIMULATIONS FOR THE ELUCIDATION OF ELECTRON BEAM PROPERTIES IN LASER-WAKEFIELD ACCELERATION EXPERIMENTS VIA BETATRON AND SYNCHROTRON-LIKE RADIATION P.
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
Consideration for a plasma stage in a PWFA linear collider Erik Adli University of Oslo, Norway FACET-II Science Workshop, SLAC Oct 14,
UCLA Positron Production Experiments at SABER Presented by Devon Johnson 3/15/06.
1 1 Office of Science C. Schroeder, E. Esarey, C. Benedetti, C. Geddes, W. Leemans Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory FACET-II Science Opportunities.
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
Erik Adli CLIC Project Meeting, CERN, CH 1 Erik Adli Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway Input from: Steffen Doebert, Wilfried Farabolini,
Design Considerations of table-top FELs laser-plasma accelerators principal possibility of table-top FELs possible VUV and X-ray scenarios new experimental.
Non Double-Layer Regime: a new laser driven ion acceleration mechanism toward TeV 1.
Prospects for generating high brightness and low energy spread electron beams through self-injection schemes Xinlu Xu*, Fei Li, Peicheng Yu, Wei Lu, Warren.
Ultra-short electron bunches by Velocity Bunching as required for Plasma Wave Acceleration Alberto Bacci (Sparc Group, infn Milano) EAAC2013, 3-7 June,
Helical Accelerating Structure with Controllable Beam Emittance S.V. Kuzikov 1, A.A. Vikharev 1, J.L. Hirshfield 2,3 1 Institute of Applied Physics RAS,
Ionization Injection E. Öz Max Planck Institute Für Physik.
Matching free space propagation to plasma focusing S. Barber UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy FACET II Workshop October 15, 2015.
Introduction to Plasma Physics and Plasma-based Acceleration Wakefield acceleration Various images provided by R. Bingham.
V.N. Litvinenko (SBU) C. Joshi, W. Mori (UCLA)
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration in hollow plasma
Electron acceleration behind self-modulating proton beam in plasma with a density gradient Alexey Petrenko.
The 2nd European Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop
8-10 June Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris, France
Stefano Romeo on behalf of SPARC_LAB collaboration
Wakefield Accelerator
Control of laser wakefield amplitude in capillary tubes
All-Optical Injection
E-164 E-162 Collaboration: and E-164+X:
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
Key Physics Topics for Plasma Wakefield Accelerator Research
High-power laser pulse propagation in silica
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
2. Crosschecking computer codes for AWAKE
EX18710 (大阪大学推薦課題) 課題代表者  矢野 将寛 (大阪大学大学院 工学研究科) 研究課題名
Presentation transcript:

The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi, W.B.Mori UCLA, USA L.O. Silva, R.A.Fonseca IST, Portugal

Outline Motivation. Physical picture : Illustration of what the ultrarelativistic blowout regime looks like, what the fields are, how the electrons behave and evolution in time. Theory : Ideas behind the theory. Description of how the characteristic quantities of this regime relate to each other. Scaling laws : Scaling of beam energy, beam charge and energy conversion efficiency with laser and plasma parameters. Comparison between the theory and published (as well as unpublished) results, both experimental and simulation. Extrapolation to exotic cases. The possibilities of building single stage 10Gev, 100Gev and even TeV laser electron accelerator and additional issues need to be addressed. Conclusion.

Motivation Recent results 3 Nature papers (September 2004) where monoenergetic electron beams with energy 70~170MeV by using 10TW 30fs class lasers were measured. Phys. Rev. Lett. by Tsung et al. (September 2004) where monoenergetic beam with energy 260 MeV by using a 13TW 50fs laser were observed. How can we scale this regime to higher energy and better beam quality?

Questions we try to answer …… Is there a consistent physical picture behind all the experiments and simulations? What is the condition for self-injection of the electron beam? What are the energy, charge and efficiency scaling and their scalabilities? What is the condition for self-guided laser propagation? What is the optimal conditions to choose the parameters? What determines the beam quality ( energy spread, spot size and emittance) ?

Physical picture Geometry - fields The ponderomotive force of the laser pushes the electrons out of the laser’s way. The particles return on axis after the laser has passed. The region behind the pulse is void of electrons but full of ions (ion channel). The resulting structure moves with the speed of laser’s group velocity, supporting huge accelerating fields and strong focusing force. The ponderomotive force of the laser pushes the electrons out of the laser’s way. The particles return on axis after the laser has passed. The region behind the pulse is void of electrons but full of ions (ion channel). The resulting structure moves with the speed of laser’s group velocity, supporting huge accelerating fields and strong focusing force.

Physical picture Evolution of the nonlinear structure The front of the laser pulse interacts with the plasma. As a result it loses energy (Local pump depletion) and etches back. The shape and size of the accelerating structure slightly change. Electrons are self-injected in the ion channel at the tail of the ion channel due to the accelerating and focusing fields. The trapped electrons slightly elongate the back of the spheroid. The front of the laser pulse interacts with the plasma. As a result it loses energy (Local pump depletion) and etches back. The shape and size of the accelerating structure slightly change. Electrons are self-injected in the ion channel at the tail of the ion channel due to the accelerating and focusing fields. The trapped electrons slightly elongate the back of the spheroid.

Physical picture Evolution of the nonlinear structure The blowout radius remains nearly constant as long as the laser power doesn’t vary much. Small oscillations due to the slow laser envelope evolution have been observed. Beam loading eventually shuts down the self injection. The laser energy is depleted as the accelerating bunch dephases. The laser can be chosen long enough so that the pump depletion length is matched with the dephasing length.

Theory the spherical ion channel and the constant wake slope A spherical ion channel for ultra- relativistic blowout A fully nonlinear theory for the blowout regime for both beam and laser driver can show that for large blowout radius (ultra-relativistic blowout ),the ion channel will become a sphere. A constant wakefield slope (1/2) The wakefield depends linearly on the distance from the center of the ion channel, and has a deep spike near the tail.

Theory Choosing the laser parameters - matched profile Matched laser spot size For given laser power P, there is a matched laser spot size W 0, which is approximately equal the blowout radius R b Laser For given laser power P and given plasma density n p, this matching condition gives: Ponderomotive : Ion channel : Balance of forces : Approximately :

Theory Condition for self injection The condition for self injection 1.In the ultra-relativistic blowout regime ( k p R b >>1 and spherical ion channel), the plasma electrons will get parallel speed close to c when they reach the axis near the tail of ion channel. 2.When the electrons reach the axis, their initial velocities are typically smaller than the phase velocity of the wakefield. If they can get enough energy before dephaing through a narrow region near the tail of ion channel, which has both strong accelerating field and focusing force, they get trapped and keep gaining energy. Both conditions can be satisfied if the matched a0>4~5: Simulations show that for even very low plasma density like n p =1*10^15 cm-3 (very high wake phase velocity ), trapping can be achieved by this condition

Absorption by ponderomotive particles 1D like absorption Electron density 100 TW, cm -3 Two types of absorption: By ponderomotive particles 1D like absorption Theory Local pump depletion For a0 around 4~5, these two absorption are comparable. For a0 around 10 or larger, the 1D like absorption dominates.

Theory Etching velocity, phase velocity of the wake and dephasing length The laser front etches back by local pump depletion. After pump depletion, it diffracts. The etching back velocity V etch is in principle depends on a0 ( for 1D, V etch is independent of a0). More detail calculation can show that the 3d Vetch is close to 1D results even the energy loss mechanism changes when a0 gets large. This yields the dephasing length and the pump depletion length: Due to the laser etching 100 TW, cm -3 The same scaling for L dp and L pd. Typically we can choose to match dephasing and pump depletion.

Scaling laws Energy gain, charge and energy conversion efficiency Energy gain : or Total charge : or Energy conversion efficiency : or

Scaling laws Verification of the scaling through simulations As long as the laser can be guided ( either by itself or using shallow plasma density channel), one can increase the laser power and decrease the plasma density to achieve a linear scaling on power.

Self-guiding condition The laser self-guiding is based on two effects: 1.The main part of the laser is inside a index of refraction channel made by the laser blowout. 2.The laser front keeps etching back, which prevents the leading front from diffraction before pump depletion. A fully nonlinear theoretical analysis based on the index of refraction gives the following critical a0 for guiding: For all the 3D simulations we have done ( np>1*10^18cm-3), a0~4 is enough for guiding. For density like n p = 2*10^17cm-3, this gives a0 aroud 5~6. In the future, 3D simulations will be used to test this condition for low density.

Parameter designs for Gev,10Gev,100Gev,1Tev P(PW)τ (fs)np (cm- 3 ) W0 (μm)L(m)a0a0 Δn c /n p Q(nC)E(Gev) e % e <20% e <20% e <20% e % e % e % e %

Conclusions We have developed a theory that allows us to design laser plasma accelerators operating in the ultrarelativistic blowout regime. We have found that a laser with ”matched” profile achieves stable, self- focused propagation for the entire interaction length. Given the power of a laser we can: 1. Pick the density for self-focused propagation. 2. Choose the rest of the laser parameters. 3. Predict the energy of the monoenergetic beam. For these accelerators, since the energy is proportional to the laser power: -we have shown via numerical simulations that nC, GeV electron bunches can be generated by TW lasers. -According to the scaling, TeV laser plasma accelerators will become possible for PW lasers.

formulas Matched a0 and spot size : Pump depletion length: Dephasing length: Energy gain: Charge: Efficiency: Critical a0 for self-guiding:

Beam quality and X-ray loss Except the Tev designs, the X ray losses are small comparing with the beam energy. For the Tev designs, the X ray losses are less than 200Gev. X-Ray emission Energy spread For higher laser power and lower plasma density ( longer dephasing length), the uncertainty in the energy shot by shot will decrease.