Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4 January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Real Air-time Occupation by Beacon and Probe Date: 2012-01-12.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.:IEEE /1523r4 Submission November 2011 Access Delay Reduction for FILS: Network Discovery & Access congestion Improvements Slide 1 Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1031r0 Submission July 2011 Hitoshi MORIOKA, ROOT Inc.Slide 1 Air-time Consumption by Beacon and Probe Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0567r1 Submission May 2012 Huawei Slide 1 Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1019r1 Submission July 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Supporting Large Number of STAs in ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1380r0 Submission Efficiency Measurement for RTS/CTS October 2014 B. Zhao and K. Yunoki, KDDI R&D LabsSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide ai simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0028r1 Submission January 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Power Saving Possibilities for Networks Supporting.
Doc.: IEEE /0112r4 Submission Supporting Authentication/Association for Large Number of Stations September 2012 Slide 1 I2R Date:
Submission Jan 2012 doc.: IEEE 11-12/69r2 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Consideration on Max Idle Period Extension for ah Power Save Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1268r0 Submission November 2010 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Consumption Opportunity in Sub 1 GHz Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0060r1 Submission January 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Capability Support for ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0130r0 Submission January 2012 Seunghee Han, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Beacon Reception of Long Sleeper Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 March 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 CID 266 & CID 281 Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0246r2 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC Corp. 1F, 6-3 Baoqiang Road, Xindian district, New Taipei City,
Doc.:IEEE /0129r3 May 2012 Santosh Abraham, Qualcomm Inc. Short Beacon Slide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0246r0 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC Corp. 1F, 6-3 Baoqiang Road, Xindian district, New Taipei City,
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1414r2 November 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Probe Request and Response in TGai Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0801r1 Akira Kishida, NTT Issues of Low-Rate Transmission Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0281r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Recommendations for association Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE ai March 2012 InterDigital, KDDI, Nokia, Huawei, IntelSlide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai Passive Scanning Improvement.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0523r2 May 2013 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Understanding Current Situation of Public Wi-Fi Usage - Possible.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0030r0 January 2013 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 User Level Performance Date: Authors:
SubmissionSlide 1Dwight Smith, Motorola Mobility Nov 2012doc.: IEEE 11-12/1332r0 Other Service Discovery Concepts Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1288r1 November 2015 K. Yunoki, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 An issue of wider bandwidth operation at real denser environment.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/535r1 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Scanning and FILS requirements Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1349r0 November 2013 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 Access Control Enhancement Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1073r0 September 2013 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Access Control Enhancement Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/0761r0 July 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Operating Channels Information Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0568r0 Submission May 2012 Young Hoon Kwon, Huawei Slide 1 AP Discovery Information Broadcasting Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r1 Nobember 2011 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Real Air-time Occupation by Beacon and Probe Date:
Doc.:IEEE /1523r1 Submission November 2011 Access Delay Reduction for FILS: Network Discovery & Access congestion Improvements Slide 1 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Scanning with FILS Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0206r1 March 2012 Slide 1 Necessity of Probe Reduction Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1359r0 November 2015 Yu Wang, Ericsson et al.Slide 1 System Performance Evaluation of ae Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0294r2 Submission March 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Active Scanning Reply Window Date: Authors:
Possible Approaches for HEW
AP Power Saving Date: Authors: May 2017 Month Year
Month Year doc.: IEEE /0523r0 May 2013
Some Findings from Real World Measurement
AP Discovery Information Broadcasting
WUR Discovery Frame Content
TGaq Pre-Association Summary
WUR Discovery Frame Content
Real Air-time Occupation by Beacon and Probe
Real Air-time Occupation by Beacon and Probe
WUR Discovery Frame Content
Consideration on WUR frame for Fast Scanning
Consideration on WUR frame for Fast Scanning
Real Air-time Occupation by Beacon and Probe
Real Air-time Occupation by Beacon and Probe
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
WUR Discovery Frame Content
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
Probe Request and Response in TGai
WUR Discovery Frame Content
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Follow-Up on WUR Discovery Frame and Discovery Channel
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
AP Status Broadcast Date: Authors: November 2011
Consideration on Max Idle Period Extension for ah Power Save
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
802.11ai – Improving WLAN System Performance
Power Efficient WUR AP Discovery
Cooperative AP Discovery
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4 January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Real Air-time Occupation by Beacon and Probe Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4 January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 2 Abstract This document shows retry numbers of Probe Response as the answer for discussion in Atlanta. (Slide 9)

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 3 Motivation 3G mobile operators have demand to offload their data traffics to WLAN network. Especially, they have higher demands for the locations where many people meet or stay for data offloading, because high data traffics occur at those locations. It’s highly expected that FILS will realize transition from 3G to WLAN in very short time.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 4 Real world (1) Number of Smart-phone is increasing. iPhone, Android, Windows-phone, Blackberry… Smart-phone holders always touch its screen. While its screen is activated (backlight turned on), Smart-phone starts searching surrounding WLAN-APs.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 5 Real world (2) Many Smart-phone holders are in the crowded commuter train. Imagine what happens when the train arrives at the station. Air monitoring was executed at a train station in Tokyo. Results are explained in the following slides.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 6 Conditions Time/Date: Around 18:00 / October 11(Tue), 2011 Location: Shinjuku station (Keio line), Tokyo Monitoring CH: 6CH(2,437MHz) Monitoring period: 300 seconds (5 minutes) Measured CH Thinkpad X200 Windows XP USB Wireless Monitor Adoptor (Air Pcap NX) Wireshark

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 7 Result Observed frames FramesBytes Count% % Beacon13, ,689, Probe Request7, , Probe Response24, ,941, Other46, ,581, Total92,159 17,201,802

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 8 Result (cont.) Time occupation is more important. Doc. IEEE /1031r0 was referred for time occupation analysis. BytesFrames

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 9 Transmission Rate Rate [Mbps] BeaconProbe RequestProbe ResponseOthers Frames% % % % 113, , , , , , , , , Total13,871 7,139 24,687 46,462

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 10 Transmission Rate (cont.) Rate [Mbps] BeaconProbe RequestProbe ResponseOthers Bytes% % % % 1 1,688, , ,849, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,285, , , ,034, Total 1,689, ,797 2,941, ,581,63 4

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 11 Occupied Time Calculation (Beacon) Occupied Time DIFSCWTX TIME aSlotTime:20us aSIFSTime:10us aPreambleLength:144us aPLCPHeaderLength:48bits aCWmin:31 aCWmax:1023 DIFS:50us CW:310us Occupied Time = ∑((DIFS + CW + aPreambleLength + aPLCPHeaderLength/DATARATE) * TotalFrames + (TotalBytes * 8/DATARATE)) = (( / 1.0) * 13,861 + (1,688,640 * 8 / 1.0) + (( / 11.0) * 2 + (80 * 8 / 11.0) + (( / 24.0) * 7 + (280 * 8 / 24.0) + (( / 54.0) * 1 + (40 * 8 / 54.0) = 21,165,613 us (7.06%) Beacon

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 12 Occupied Time Calculation (Probe Request) Occupied Time = ∑((DIFS + CW + aPreambleLength + aPLCPHeaderLength/DATARATE) * TotalFrames + (TotalBytes * 8/DATARATE)) = (( / 1.0) * 6,547 + (838,510 * 8 / 1.0) + (( / 2.0) * 21 + (10,019 * 8 / 2.0) + (( / 5.5) * 13 + (12,633 * 8 / 5.5) + (( / 6.0) * 2 + (1,590 * 8 / 6.0) + (( / 9.0) * 3 + (2,631 * 8 / 9.0) + (( / 11.0) * (76,565 * 8 / 11.0) + (( / 12.0) * 2 + (3,060 * 8 / 12.0) + (( / 18.0) * 7 + (10,198 * 8 / 18.0) + (( / 24.0) * 4 + (3,154 * 8 / 24.0) + (( / 48.0) * 10 + (13,509 * 8 / 48.0) + (( / 54.0) * 20 + (17,928 * 8 / 54.0) = 10,754,454us (3.58%) Occupied Time DIFSCWTX TIME Probe Request

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 13 Occupied Time Calculation (Probe Response) Occupied Time DIFSCWTX TIME Probe ResponseACK TX TIMESIFS aSlotTime:20us aSIFSTime:10us aPreambleLength:144us aPLCPHeaderLength:48bits aCWmin:31 aCWmax:1023 DIFS:50us CW:310us ACKRate:1Mbps ACKLength:14Bytes

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 14 Occupied Time Calculation (Probe Response) (Cont.) Occupied Time = ∑((DIFS + CW + aPreambleLength + aPLCPHeaderLength/DATARATE +aSIFSTime + aPreambleLength + aPLCPHeaderLeangth / ACKRATE + ACKLength * 8 / ACKRATE) * TotalFrames + (TotalBytes * 8/DATARATE)) = (( / /1.0+14*8/1.0) * 24,606 + (2,849,896 * 8 / 1.0) + (( / / * 8 / 1.0) * 4 + (5,257 * 8 / 2.0) + (( / / * 8 / 1.0) * 7 + (10,710 * 8 / 5.5) + (( / / * 8 / 1.0) * 1 + (1,530 * 8 / 6.0) + (( / / * 8 / 1.0) * 1 + (1,530 * 8 / 9.0) + (( / / * 8 / 1.0) * 15 + (13,848 * 8 / 11.0) + (( / / * 8 / 1.0) * 4 + (6,120 * 8 / 12.0) + (( / / * 8 / 1.0) * 7 + (8,212 * 8 / 18.0) + (( / / * 8 / 1.0) * 6 + (5,279 * 8 / 24.0) + (( / / * 8 / 1.0) * 3 + (4,590 * 8 / 36.0) + (( / / * 8 / 1.0) * 2 + (2,259 * 8 / 48.0) + (( / / * 8 / 1.0) * 31 + (32,100 * 8 / 54.0) = 44,215,439us (14.74%)

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 15 Occupied Time Calculation Result Packet type Occupancy rate (%) Occupied time (sec) Beacon Probe Req Probe Res Others Total

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 16 Retry of Probe Response Probe Response frames: 24,687 Retry frames in these: 12,274 (49.7%) Almost all retry frames are transmitted in a few msec after the original transmission. The percentage of retry frames may be increased in more congested situation. See Slide 17 for detailed example.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 17 Example of retry frames (Probe Response) No.TimeSourceDestinationInfoSN XXXX_c5:83:c 1 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2066, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=ABC XXXX_c5:83:c 6 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2067, FN=0, Flags= C, BI=100, SSID=\000"" XXXX_c5:83:c 6 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2067, FN=0, Flags=....R...C, BI=100, SSID=\000"" XXXX_c5:83:c 6 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2067, FN=0, Flags=....R...C, BI=100, SSID=\000"" XXXX:c5:58:91XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=71, FN=0, Flags= C, BI=100, SSID= XXXX_c5:83:c 0 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2068, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=XYZ XXXX_c5:83:c 1 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2069, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=ABC XXXX_c5:83:c 1 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2069, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=101, SSID=ABC XXXX_c5:83:c 1 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2069, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=102, SSID=ABC XXXX_c5:83:c 6 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2070, FN=0, Flags= C, BI=100, SSID=\000"" XXXX:42:60:c4Broadcast Probe Response, SN=3699, FN=0, Flags= C, BI=100, SSID= XXXX:c5:58:91XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=72, FN=0, Flags= C, BI=100, SSID= XXXX:c5:58:91XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=72, FN=0, Flags=....R...C, BI=100, SSID= XXXX:c5:58:91XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=73, FN=0, Flags= C, BI=100, SSID= XXXX_c5:83:c 0 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2071, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=XYZ XXXX_c5:83:c 0 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2071, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=101, SSID=XYZ XXXX_c5:83:c 0 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2071, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=102, SSID=XYZ XXXX_c5:83:c 0 XXXX:16:4c:f2 Probe Response, SN=2071, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=103, SSID=XYZ XXXX:c5:58:91 XXXX:54:de:0 a Probe Response, SN=74, FN=0, Flags= C, BI=100, SSID= XXXX:c5:58:91 XXXX:54:de:0 a Probe Response, SN=74, FN=0, Flags=....R...C, BI=100, SSID= XXXX:c5:58:91 XXXX:54:de:0 a Probe Response, SN=74, FN=0, Flags=....R...C, BI=100, SSID= XXXX:c5:58:91 XXXX:54:de:0 a Probe Response, SN=74, FN=0, Flags=....R...C, BI=100, SSID= XXXX_c5:83:c 0 XXXX:54:de:0 a Probe Response, SN=2080, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=XYZ XXXX_c5:83:c 1 XXXX:54:de:0 a Probe Response, SN=2081, FN=0, Flags=..m.....C, BI=100, SSID=ABC XXXX_c5:83:c 6 XXXX:54:de:0 a Probe Response, SN=2082, FN=0, Flags= C, BI=100, SSID=\000"" 2082 Retry Sequence Number

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Slide 18 Example of Active Scanning (Probe Request) No.TimeSourceDestinationInfo 1 0a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=0, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=9, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=0, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=9, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=11, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=0, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=5, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=9, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=0, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=6, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=9, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=0, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=6, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=9, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=0, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=6, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=9, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=11, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=0, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=7, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=9, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=0, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=7, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=9, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=0, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast a0:dd:e5:XXXXBroadcastProbe Request, SN=9, FN=0, Flags= C, SSID=Broadcast This is my personal smart-phone Multiple shots of Probe request were transmitted for a timing. It may be vender implementation. The second timing is around timestamp=8.00.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 19 Considerations (Opinion) Multiple shots of Probe request were transmitted every some seconds. Because the STA didn’t know any SSIDs from surrounding APs. If the STA were in the area of the target AP, the STA would receive Beacons from the AP before sending Probe requests at the second timing. Active scanning with wildcard SSID shall be just for the first shots. Repetition of sending Probe requests isn’t effective. It only brings packet congestion.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 20 Conclusion Because of WLAN enabled devices increasing, especially Smart-phones, WLAN air circumstances are getting more crowded. In this packet monitoring, probe responses existed 5 times more than probe requests. Retry transmissions of Probe Response are frequently happened. Repetition of Probe requests is not effective. It brings packet congestion. To see the benefits of effective FILS, improvement of air circumstances would be needed by reducing unnecessary packet exchanges.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1413r4January 2012 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 21 References doc. IEEE /1031r0