Greg Melroy Manager, West Monroe Partners. © 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Why, What and How of Disaster Recovery Plan Testing Presented By: Ed Deveau.
Advertisements

Course Material Overview of Process Safety Compliance with Standards
WAREHOUSING MANAGEMENT
WAREHOUSING MANAGEMENT
Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
Cargo Services Head Office Cathay Pacific Cargo
Teacher Evaluation Model
Avoiding Plant Operating Errors AT&T NP&E April 10, 2012 © 2012 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks.
Implementation: SLA & SOP Processes Purpose Strategy Foundation We Deliver Competitive Advantage to our Customer's Global Supply Chain.
Team Building & Teamwork
ISO Culture SHOQ Quiz 1. This program must be run in MS PowerPoint and requires sound. 2. Click “View” and then “Slide Show”. 3. Click “Continue”
ICASAS305A Provide Advice to Clients
Introduction to 6S.
Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme
Academic Advisor: Prof. Ronen Brafman Team Members: Ran Isenberg Mirit Markovich Noa Aharon Alon Furman.
Annual Review Process Georgi Lowe UWSA Office of Human Resources & Workforce Diversity.
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA MANAGEMENT & SHALE GAS PROGRAMS INTERNATIONAL PETROLEUM ENVIRONMENTAL CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 14, 2013.
APPLIED LOGISTICS The Productivity Improvement Program for Warehousing and Transportation.
SystematicSystematic process that translates quality policy into measurable objectives and requirements, and lays down a sequence of steps for realizing.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
1 SMS Pilot Program at PIT ACAA Training & Development1 SMS Pilot Program at PIT Safety Management System (SMS) Pilot Program Experience at Pittsburgh.
4 OFFICE WEEKLY MEETING Why 4 Office DMS?. Challenge Companies today are overwhelmed with information that comes to them on many formats: , electronic.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Training and Procedural Manuals Section A 1.
PECS Picture Exchange Communication System
Chapter 3 Internal Controls.
Lalitanjali Supply Chain Management India Pvt. Ltd “Our Motto” To introduce professional practices in this chaotic and unchartered domain of mere “Trading”
Slide 1 D2.TCS.CL5.04. Subject Elements This unit comprises five Elements: 1.Define the need for tourism product research 2.Develop the research to be.
Implementing a Change to TeammateTime Internal Message for RDOs and Store Managers.
Comparing Training Needs 4 th November In a brief report, using tables where appropriate, compare the likely training needs for a person starting.
Material Handling & Lifting Resource
Performance Planning & Evaluation Classified & Operational Form.
Root Cause Tutorial Page 1 More on Hazard Identification Techniques 1.Identify potential hazards that could threaten the safety of your employees,
October SYS 1 Quality Audit and ISO9000 Quality Standard Kinnison, Chapter 17.
Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme Presented by (facilitator name) Managing Complexity in the Face of Uncertainty Ch08: How to Close.
Elements of Effective Behavior Based Safety Programs
© BMGI. You may freely modify, distribute and/or reproduce this only if BMGI's logo is not altered or removed. Finance Process 22 May 2006.
ISO NON-CONFORMANCE, CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTION.
For ABA Importance of Individual Subjects Enables applied behavior analysts to discover and refine effective interventions for socially significant behaviors.
America West Airlines : Staffing Issues Presented By Derrick David Masafumi Ishii.
Al Sulokeyat Al Salema and Al Sulokeyat Al Salema and Accountability for Safety.
Behavior Observation ASA/AEA SAFETY +. Unsafe Acts Are Responsible For 98% Of All Incidents.
Inaccurate Cycle Billing Records in OMD - Northeast Black Belt: Jim Palmer Division: Operations/Northeast BU – Steering Comm Presentation.
1  2002 North Haven Group 1 Six Sigma Improvement Process Improve Phase Activities Introduction Identifying Solutions Evaluating Potential Solutions Solution.
COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING
Performance Evaluation
The Implementation of BPR Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
A BRIEF LOOK AT THE COMPONENTS THAT MAKE UP THE SYSTEM LIFE CYCLE.
May 4, Evaluations 6 sections: Section I General performance standard Section II Core values Section III Goals (last years’) Section IV Goals (next.
CBER Common Problems on Source Plasma Inspections Judy Ellen Ciaraldi BS, MT(ASCP)SBB, CQA(ASQ) CBER, OBRR, DBA September 16, 2009.
OSHA Guidelines for Employers to Reduce Motor Vehicle Crashes
A brief look at the components that make up the system life cycle.
MH...CH LECT-021 SYSTEMS CONCEPT Adopting a materials handling systems from overall optimization point of view. Adopting a materials handling systems.
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
DOCUMENTATION ISO/IEC 17025:2005 Documentation.
MANAGING MANUAL HANDLING
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
SMOKE Process Make time for the work that matters Simplify Move
TM 720: Statistical Process Control DMAIC Problem Solving
LEAN ORGANIZATION SUMMARY
(Additional materials)
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Predetermined Motion Time Systems (PMTS) BY okolie jude…………
2016 CRO recurrent course.
Personal Protective Equipment
New MCT Standards Are you ready?
Material Handling & Lifting Resource
University of Hawaii Bookstores Cash Handling Training
Setting Individual Objectives
Safety toolbox Johnnie Stanton-MECA
SAFETY + Behavior Observation.
Presentation transcript:

Greg Melroy Manager, West Monroe Partners

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Agenda I. The System, the Process, the Problem II. The Engineered Labor Standard Process III. Engineering a Labor Standard IV. Managing with a Labor Standard V. Faster, Safer, More Accurate VI. Questions and Comments 2

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Labor Standards Engineers see more than the bags and the handler The System, the Process, the Problem 3

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited  Labor Standards Engineers see the process and tasks Walk 23 steps around a fuel hose from the tug to the baggage cart, open the luggage cart curtain (A 42 B 6 G 3 A 1 B 0 P 3 A 0 ) Walk 5 steps to obtain the scan gun, return to baggage cart ( A 10 B 0 G 1 A 0 B 0 P 0 A 10 ) Reach and grab for the luggage, (A 1 B 6 G 3 M 3 X 0 I 0 A 0 ), scan the tag (A 1 B 0 G 1 A 1 B 0 P 3 A 0 ), turn the bag (A 1 B 6 G 3 M 3 X 0 I 0 A 0 ), and finally place the bag (A 3 B 0 G 0 A 0 B 0 P 1 A 0 ) The System, the Process, the Problem 4

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited We want faster, safer, more accurate, more dependable  What happens if we simply build a standard on this process?  Will we achieve the desired results?  Would the process we’re watching get better? The System, the Process, the Problem 5

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited  We can easily build a standard on this process, and the employees may do well  But there will be no improvement in the system or the throughput, despite their achievements The System, the Process, the Problem 6

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited So, how do we do it?  How do we build and use an Engineered Labor Standard to get the most out of the system?  How do we get safe, efficient, productive employees to support the overall needs of our systems and processes if an ELS alone is not the answer? The System, the Process, the Problem 7

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited The Engineered Labor Standard Process 8

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited An Engineered Labor Standard (or “ELS”) is only as good as the process for which it is built  The system must first be properly dissected and optimized for efficiency  Methods development and documentation followed by workforce training ensure operational success and accountability The Engineered Labor Standard Process 9

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited The Engineered Labor Standard Process 10

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited The Engineered Labor Standard Process 11

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Define the Processes of the System The Engineered Labor Standard Process 12

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Define the Sub Processes Process = Baggage Handling Unload Aircraft Load Baggage Cart Drive to/from Aircraft Load Aircraft The Engineered Labor Standard Process 13

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Define the Tasks of a Sub Process Sub Process = Unload Baggage Cart Walk from Tug to Baggage Cart 1 Open Baggage Curtain Obtain Scan Gun Scan Baggage Tag Obtain Bag Place Bag on Belt The Engineered Labor Standard Process 14

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited The Engineered Labor Standard Process 15

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Optimize each process  Eliminate non-value added tasks  Change the procedure  Change the job set-up  Look at the process in its entirety – can a simple methods change upstream eliminate a task later?  If necessary, re-build the process from the ground (tasks) up, using the safest, most efficient job set-ups and methods The Engineered Labor Standard Process 16

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited  The question and answer phase of the ELS process may raise as many questions as it answers  The solutions developed during this phase could mean everything to success of the overall system once the ELS has been implemented The Engineered Labor Standard Process 17

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Optimizing the Baggage Handler  Can the tug be parked in a different position?  Can the walk to the carts be shortened?  Can the luggage tag be scanned before it is removed from the cart to eliminate the extra handle?  What can be done upstream to improve the efficiency in this process? The Engineered Labor Standard Process 18

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Optimizing the Baggage Handler  Improved positioning of the tug eliminates the need to walk around the fuel hose, eliminating 10 steps ( A 24 B 6 G 3 A 1 B 0 P 3 A 0 )  Adding a holster for the scanner eliminates the need to retrieve the scan gun ( A 1 B 0 G 1 A 0 B 0 P 0 A 0 )  Methods change in loading eliminates the need to turn the bag allowing handler to scan the tag in the cart (A 1 B 0 G 1 A 1 B 0 P 3 A 0 ) then reach and grab for the luggage (A 1 B 6 G 3 M 3 X 0 I 0 A 0 ), and place the bag on the belt without turning it (A 3 B 0 G 0 A 0 B 0 P 1 A 0 ) The Engineered Labor Standard Process 19

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Optimizing the Baggage Handler  The sum of the MOST values for the original process: 1120 TMU (40.28 sec)  The sum of the MOST values once optimized: 620 TMU (22.30 sec)  This is for the first bag only, remaining bags would benefit from only the tag scan and handling (original: 360 TMU, optimized: 230 TMU)  At Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport where Delta Airlines handles approximately 100,000 bags per day, eliminating the excess bag turn would translate into 130 fewer hours of bag handling per day The Engineered Labor Standard Process 20

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited The Engineered Labor Standard Process 21

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Once the process has been optimized at the task level, it must be documented thoroughly to avoid any confusion during the training and follow-up phases The Engineered Labor Standard Process 22

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited The Engineered Labor Standard Process 23

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Training, Follow-up and Demonstration  Have an effective trainer  Include both written and verbal communication  Include demonstration in the work environment  Schedule follow-up to check for understanding and ensure compliance  Results should be documented The Engineered Labor Standard Process 24

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Engineering the Labor Standard 25

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited  Begin work sampling and operational observation  Build elements based on the written methods and observation  Engineer appropriate allowances  Engineer appropriate variances for conditions  Test and Validate the new ELS Engineering the Labor Standard 26

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Managing with an Engineered Labor Standard 27

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited  Front-line management people are the “keepers of the standard”  130% is as bad as 70% on the Operation Reports  Recognition, re-training and accountability are continuous processes  Update the ELS with changing conditions to maintain accuracy Managing with an Engineered Labor Standard 28

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Faster, Safer, More Accurate 29

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited  The Engineered Labor Standard is not the “silver bullet” to “Faster, Safer, More Accurate”  An ELS is the final measuring stick for the greater Engineered Labor Standard Process  Successful Engineered Labor Standards are rooted in the properly defined work processes and tasks that are enforced with proper training and follow-up Faster, Safer, More Accurate 30

© 2012 West Monroe Partners | Reproduction and distribution without West Monroe Partners prior consent prohibited Questions / Comments 31