Multivariate Mx Exercise D Posthuma Files: \\danielle\Multivariate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multivariate Twin Analysis
Advertisements

Bivariate analysis HGEN619 class 2007.
Fitting Bivariate Models October 21, 2014 Elizabeth Prom-Wormley & Hermine Maes
Univariate Model Fitting
Estimating “Heritability” using Genetic Data David Evans University of Queensland.
Factor analysis Caroline van Baal March 3 rd 2004, Boulder.
Path Analysis Danielle Dick Boulder Path Analysis Allows us to represent linear models for the relationships between variables in diagrammatic form.
Multivariate Analysis Nick Martin, Hermine Maes TC21 March 2008 HGEN619 10/20/03.
Introduction to Multivariate Analysis Frühling Rijsdijk & Shaun Purcell Twin Workshop 2004.
Multivariate Genetic Analysis: Introduction(II) Frühling Rijsdijk & Shaun Purcell Wednesday March 6, 2002.
Bivariate Model: traits A and B measured in twins cbca.
Extended sibships Danielle Posthuma Kate Morley Files: \\danielle\ExtSibs.
Coeffecient of relatedness and predictions of complex genetic influences The coefficient of relatedness (r) between two individuals is defined as the percentage.
Developmental models. Multivariate analysis choleski models factor models –y =  f + u genetic factor models –P j = h G j + c C j + e E j –common pathway.
(Re)introduction to Mx. Starting at the beginning Data preparation Mx expects 1 line per case/family Almost limitless number of families and variables.
Univariate Analysis in Mx Boulder, Group Structure Title Type: Data/ Calculation/ Constraint Reading Data Matrices Declaration Assigning Specifications/
Multivariate Analysis Hermine Maes TC19 March 2006 HGEN619 10/20/03.
Genetic Growth Curve Models Practica Boulder, March 2008 Irene Rebollo & Gitta Lubke & Mike Neale VU Amsterdam NL & Notre Dame, US & VCU, US.
Gene x Environment Interactions Brad Verhulst (With lots of help from slides written by Hermine and Liz) September 30, 2014.
Regressing SNPs on a latent variable Michel Nivard & Nick Martin.
Introduction to Multivariate Genetic Analysis Kate Morley and Frühling Rijsdijk 21st Twin and Family Methodology Workshop, March 2008.
Raw data analysis S. Purcell & M. C. Neale Twin Workshop, IBG Colorado, March 2002.
Linkage Analysis in Merlin
Karri Silventoinen University of Helsinki Osaka University.
Karri Silventoinen University of Helsinki Osaka University.
Continuously moderated effects of A,C, and E in the twin design Conor V Dolan & Sanja Franić (BioPsy VU) Boulder Twin Workshop March 4, 2014 Based on PPTs.
Introduction to Multivariate Genetic Analysis (2) Marleen de Moor, Kees-Jan Kan & Nick Martin March 7, 20121M. de Moor, Twin Workshop Boulder.
Cholesky decomposition May 27th 2015 Helsinki, Finland E. Vuoksimaa.
Univariate modeling Sarah Medland. Starting at the beginning… Data preparation – The algebra style used in Mx expects 1 line per case/family – (Almost)
Practical SCRIPT: F:\meike\2010\Multi_prac\MultivariateTwinAnalysis_MatrixRaw.r DATA: DHBQ_bs.dat.
Longitudinal Modeling Nathan Gillespie & Dorret Boomsma \\nathan\2008\Longitudinal neuro_f_chol.mx neuro_f_simplex.mx jepq6.dat.
Power and Sample Size Boulder 2004 Benjamin Neale Shaun Purcell.
The importance of the “Means Model” in Mx for modeling regression and association Dorret Boomsma, Nick Martin Boulder 2008.
Gene-Environment Interaction & Correlation Danielle Dick & Danielle Posthuma Leuven 2008.
Attention Problems – SNP association Dorret Boomsma Toos van Beijsterveldt Michel Nivard.
Mx modeling of methylation data: twin correlations [means, SD, correlation] ACE / ADE latent factor model regression [sex and age] genetic association.
Family Based Association Danielle Posthuma Stacey Cherny TC18-Boulder 2005.
Mx Practical TC20, 2007 Hermine H. Maes Nick Martin, Dorret Boomsma.
Continuous heterogeneity Danielle Dick & Sarah Medland Boulder Twin Workshop March 2006.
Frühling Rijsdijk & Kate Morley
Categorical Data Frühling Rijsdijk 1 & Caroline van Baal 2 1 IoP, London 2 Vrije Universiteit, A’dam Twin Workshop, Boulder Tuesday March 2, 2004.
Welcome  Log on using the username and password you received at registration  Copy the folder: F:/sarah/mon-morning To your H drive.
Linkage in Mx & Merlin Meike Bartels Kate Morley Hermine Maes Based on Posthuma et al., Boulder & Egmond.
Copy folder (and subfolders) F:\sarah\linkage2. Linkage in Mx Sarah Medland.
Introduction to Multivariate Genetic Analysis Danielle Posthuma & Meike Bartels.
Developmental Models/ Longitudinal Data Analysis Danielle Dick & Nathan Gillespie Boulder, March 2006.
QTL Mapping Using Mx Michael C Neale Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics Virginia Commonwealth University.
March 7, 2012M. de Moor, Twin Workshop Boulder1 Copy files Go to Faculty\marleen\Boulder2012\Multivariate Copy all files to your own directory Go to Faculty\kees\Boulder2012\Multivariate.
Multivariate Genetic Analysis (Introduction) Frühling Rijsdijk Wednesday March 8, 2006.
Extended Pedigrees HGEN619 class 2007.
Genetic simplex model: practical
Bivariate analysis HGEN619 class 2006.
Univariate Twin Analysis
Gene-environment interaction
Introduction to Multivariate Genetic Analysis
Re-introduction to openMx
Path Analysis Danielle Dick Boulder 2008
Behavior Genetics The Study of Variation and Heredity
Univariate modeling Sarah Medland.
GxE and GxG interactions
(Re)introduction to Mx Sarah Medland
Sarah Medland faculty/sarah/2018/Tuesday
Lucía Colodro Conde Sarah Medland & Matt Keller
Bivariate Genetic Analysis Practical
Univariate Linkage in Mx
Multivariate Genetic Analysis: Introduction
Multivariate Mx Example D Posthuma & M Bartels
Presentation transcript:

Multivariate Mx Exercise D Posthuma Files: \\danielle\Multivariate

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Short summary of terminology Genetic correlation for MZ twins Genetic correlation for DZ twins Genetic correlation Proportion of the observed correlation (or covariance) explained by correlation at the genetic level

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Univariate ACE Model for a Twin Pair P2P2 1 P1P1 A A C C E E 1/.5 x yzyxz = Correlation between the sets of genes that influence the same trait in twin 1 and in twin 2. 1 for MZs as they share 100% of their genes, 0.5 for DZs as they share ~50% of their genes.

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 y 22 1/.5 A 1 A 2 y 21 P1 1 P2 1 x 22 x 21 E 1 E 2 z 11 z 21 z 22 C 1 C2 y 11 y 22 x 11 A 1 A 2 y 21 P1 2 P2 2 x 22 x 21 E 1 E 2 z 11 z 21 z 22 C 1 C 2 y 11 x = Correlation between the sets of genes that influence the same trait in twin 1 and in twin 2. 1 for MZs as they share 100% of their genes, 0.5 for DZs as they share ~50% of their genes. Bivariate ACE Model for a Twin Pair

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 y 22 1/.5 A 1 A 2 y 21 P1 1 P2 1 x 22 x 21 E 1 E 2 z 11 z 21 z 22 C 1 C2 y 11 y 22 x 11 A 1 A 2 y 21 P1 2 P2 2 x 22 x 21 E 1 E 2 z 11 z 21 z 22 C 1 C 2 y 11 x Bivariate ACE Model for a Twin Pair

TC 19 - Boulder /.5 A 1 A 2 x 11 P1 1 P2 1 x 22 x 21 A 1 A 2 x 11 P1 2 P2 2 x 22 x 21 Twin 1Twin 2 Genetic correlation Matrix Function in Mx: T = \stnd(A)

TC 19 - Boulder /.5 A 1 A 2 x 11 P1 1 P2 1 x 22 A 1 A 2 x 11 P1 2 P2 2 x 22 Twin 1Twin 2 Standardized drawing or correlated factors solution

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Genetic and (non-)shared environmental correlations T = \stnd(A): U = \stnd(C): V = \stnd(E):

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Genetic correlation & contribution to observed correlation A 1 A 2 x 11 P1 1 P2 1 x 22 Twin 1.86 If the rg = 1, the two sets of genes overlap completely If however x11 and x21 are near to zero, genes do not contribute to the observed correlation The contribution to the observed correlation is a function of both heritabilities and the rg

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Proportion of the observed correlation explained by correlation at the genetic level Observed correlation is the result of correlation at The genetic level Common environmental level Unique environmental level

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 rgrg XY h2xh2x A 1 A 2 h2yh2y C1C1 C2C2 rcrc c2xc2x c2yc2y r ph due to A r ph due to C r ph due to E Genetic contribution to observed correlation (h 2 xy ) is a function of rg and both heritabilities rere e2xe2x E 1 E 2 e2ye2y

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Observed correlation

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Observed correlation and contributions Proportion of the observed correlation (or covariance) explained by correlation at the genetic level: 0.43/0.58 = 0.74 Proportion of the observed correlation (or covariance) explained by correlation at the shared environmental level: 0.16/0.58 = 0.27 Proportion of the observed correlation (or covariance) explained by correlation at the non-shared environmental level: 0/0.58 = 0

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Percentage of correlation explained MATRIX S This is a computed FULL matrix of order 2 by 6 [=A%(A+C+E)|C%(A+C+E)|E%(A+C+E)] h 2 P1h 2 P2 Proportion of observed correlation between P1 and P2 explained by genetic factors c 2 P1c 2 P2 Proportion of observed correlation between P1 and P2 explained by shared environmental factors e 2 P1e 2 P2 Proportion of observed correlation between P1 and P2 explained by non- shared environmental factors

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Baaré et al. Cer Cort 2001 Posthuma et al. Behav Genet 2000 Exercise dataset: Brain volume Heritability Grey Matter 0.82 White matter 0.87 Cerebellar Vol. 0.88

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 P M Thompson, et al. Genetic influences on brain structure. Nat. Neurosci 2001 Brain Volume (MRI) Frontal gray matter volume positively related to IQ P M Thompson, et al. Genetic influences on brain structure. Nat. Neurosci 2001

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Nature of the correlation? Grey matter – IQWhite matter – IQ Observed correlation 0.25*0.24* MZ cross trait / cross twin correlation 0.26*0.22* DZ cross trait / cross twin correlation Genetic contribution to observed correlation 100%

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Brain volume-IQ dataset IQ: 688 subjects from 271 families (twins and siblings) MRI: 258 subjects from 111 families (twins and siblings) Overlapping: 135 subjects from 60 families

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 This example We will use Brain volume-IQ dataset, but twins only, no additional siblings Variables: Grey matter, White matter, Working memory dimension of the WAISIII IQ test Data have been corrected for age and sex on SPSS \danielle\Multivariate Copy the files Open Mx script

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Now run it and open the output

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Results MATRIX S This is a computed FULL matrix of order 2 by 6 [=A%(A+C+E)|C%(A+C+E)| |E%(A+C+E)] A1 A2 C1 C2 E1 E2 GREYM WMEM heritabilities Non-shared environmentability

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 MATRIX T This is a computed FULL matrix of order 2 by 2 [=\SQRT(I.A)~*A*\SQRT(I.A)~] Correlation due to A is a function of the heritabilities and rg: sqrt(a 2 grey)*Rg* sqrt(a 2 wmem) = sqrt(.82)*.36 * sqrt(.69) =.27 Rg or genetic correlation between grey matter and working memory

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 MATRIX V This is a computed FULL matrix of order 2 by 2 [=\SQRT(I.E)~*E*\SQRT(I.E)~] Correlation due to E: sqrt(e^2grey)* Re*sqrt(e^2wmem) = sqrt(.18)* -.18 * sqrt(.31) = -.04 Re or environmental correlation between grey matter and working memory

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Correlation due to A: 0.27 Correlation due to E: Total (phenotypic) correlation between Grey Matter and Working Memory: 0.23 % due to A= 0.27/0.23 *100=118% % due to E= -.04/0.23 *100= -18%

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Results MATRIX S This is a computed FULL matrix of order 2 by 6 [=A%(A+C+E)|C%(A+C+E)|E%(A+C+E)] A1 A2 C1 C2 E1 E2 GREYM WMEM %contribution to the phenotypic correlation due to A, and E

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Exercise Add a third variable (white matter volume ‘whitem’) Fit the model in this order: Grey matter - White matter - Working memory Use these starting values: Start 400 G 1 1 G 1 2 Start 70 G 1 3 st 18 X 1 1 Z 1 1 X 2 2 Z 2 2 st 4 X 3 3 Z 3 3  If correctly: -2ll = , df = 929

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Exercise What are the genetic correlations between grey matter, white matter and working memory? What are the correlations of unique E factors? What are a 2 and e 2 ? What determines the phenotypic correlation?

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 A GreyWhiteWmem Grey a2a2 contrib White rg a2a2 contrib Wmem rg a2a2 Contrib=bivariate heritability=rg*sqrt(a 2 1 ) *sqrt(a 2 2 )

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 E GreyWhiteWmem Grey e2e2 contrib White re e2e2 contrib Wmem re e2e2 Contrib= bivariate environmentability=re*sqrt(e 2 1 ) *sqrt(e 2 2 )

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 A GreyWhiteWmem Grey.82.68*sqrt.82*sqrt.87 =.57.34*sqrt.82*sqrt.69 =.26 White *sqrt.87*sqrt.69 =.16 Wmem

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 E GreyWhiteWmem Grey.18.0*sqrt.18*sqrt.13 = *sqrt.18*sqrt.31 = -.04 White *sqrt.13*sqrt.31 =.00 Wmem

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Contr A + Contr E = Pheno corr Grey – White = 0.57 Grey – Wmem = 0.22 White – Wmem = 0.16 You could further test whether the -.04 = zero, by constraining the re to be zero or by dropping the Z 2 1 parameter

TC 19 - Boulder 2006 Central place for Mx scripts genetic analyses Funded by the GenomEUtwin project (European Union Contract No. QLG2-CT ).