Page 1 Service Organization Overview October, 2006 Oakland Unified School District Redesign Oakland Unified School District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
Elementary School Counselor
The Out of School Time System. CBASS-City of Racine Partnership Purpose: Advise on the development of a comprehensive out-of-school time strategy that.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
Providence School Board September 10, 2012 Introductory Briefing Providence Public School District Comprehensive Information Technology Blueprint Center.
SEM Planning Model.
Do You Know ???.
Human Resource Management Lecture-25. Career (cont..)
IT Project Management Office
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Chapter 16 Strategically Managing the HRM Function Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
CS&T Strategy Articulation Project Results Summary June 2006 “CS&T will be the recognized leader for high quality and innovative Enterprise Information.
Total Quality, Competitive Advantage, and Strategic Management
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Katherine Kingston EDLD May 15, 2011 This presentation will see just how well Galena Park ISD’s technology plan compares with the National.
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ William E. Harner, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Principal Effectiveness: Domains Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural.
Principal Effectiveness: Domains Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural.
Redesigning Central Office Support for Increased School Autonomy October 21, 2010.
Secondary Experience and Achievement TASK FORCE Staff Leads: Matt Duffy, Brigitte Marshall, Alison McDonald.
Stabilization, Recovery and Renewal A plan for educating Oakland’s children within, through and beyond financial crisis October 2003.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Logistics and supply chain strategy planning
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California P-16 Council Recommendations The State’s Transformational.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Introduction to the Baldrige Excellence.
OHRMD Recognition Award & DHS Supervisor Leadership, Education and Development Academy (LEAD) Presenter: Johnanna Weathers Presentation to: DHS Board Date:
OVERVIEW 1. WHAT IS FIP YOUR SCHOOL? 2 What is a FIP School? Our goal is to make every school in Ohio a FIP School – a school committed to embracing.
Imran Ghaznavi Course Code: MGT557 COMSATS Strategic Human Resource Management.
Transforming Elementary Education Management : a perspective on institutional development Dr Pramila Menon NUEPA, New Delhi.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Supply Chain Doctors SCM Fundamentals Introduction Planning Sourcing Making Warehousing Transporting Sharpening the Saw.
Oregon’s Future Starts Here Superintendents’ vision for turning our good schools into great schools.
20 What is our plan? Bold, comprehensive, approach to transformation – focused on students and student achievement High achieving, engaged students Effective.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Professional Development Academy Patricia Hughes (251) Brenda Haskew (251) MOBILE COUNTY PUBLIC.
The Value Driven Approach
The Balanced Scorecard
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
District Support Staff Category Sort District Strategic Directions: Highest Student Achievement Responsive Governance Effective Use of Resources Strategic.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
FAPPO Meeting November 5, 2004 Jacksonville, FL. 2 DMS Mission FY To become a customer focused agency providing effective and efficient services.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Superintendent’s Entry & Learning Plan Jeremy Ray.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Student-Based Budgeting Task Force November 3, 2010 Matt Hill.
SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT October 8, 2009 PBIS National Forum.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
V03 Toastmasters City Manager, Jeff Fielding Strategic Leadership March 2, 2016.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Organizational resources and competitive advantage
RESULTS EXCELLENCE INNOVATION
Student and Family Support
Organizational resources and competitive advantage
Margaret Boorady Mary Jo Conrad Casandra Wright
Accounting Discipline Overview
Presentation transcript:

Page 1 Service Organization Overview October, 2006 Oakland Unified School District Redesign Oakland Unified School District

Page 2 Focuses the transformation of central office to a Service Organization. To date, accountability in education has solely been focused on the school and academic performance Central Office, as a new Services Organization is now willing to be held to the measurable standards which creates a parallel accountability system. Why is the Services Organization key to Performance Management? Align all departments around student achievement Long Term Goal of the Services Organization: Transform traditional central office into professional services organization that provides services in a school based market economy so that Schools and the Educational Leadership Group can focus on instruction and student achievement.

Page 3 The leadership team of the Services Organization has created a business plan the consists of five key strategies that will enable the Services Organization to achieve its goal of becoming a high quality, cost effective service provider. CultureTechnology Professional Development Service Economy Infrastructure Performance Management The Services Org A high quality, cost effective service provider

Page 4 1. Technology Description Initiatives Expected Outcomes Building an on-line training and performance support environment and improving current transactional systems that empower service providers and customers. Online training and performance support system IFAS enhancements to ensure effective delivery of services Service Org Intranet enhancement Data governance & monitoring Reliable, cost-effective services Sustainable, efficient training models that increase the performance levels of all employees

Page 5 2. Culture Description Initiatives Expected Outcomes Developing a shared vision and culture that recognizes employees and managers for providing outstanding service on all five dimensions of customer focus (e.g. RATER model) and for continuous process improvement. Roll out of customer focus professional development to reframe Service Economy Reward and recognition program Development of a continuous process improvement culture (e.g. Six-Sigma, Baldridge) Shared understanding and commitment to Service Economy as social justice and business perspective (i.e. parents viewed as having assets). High ratings for customer satisfaction Lower turnover amongst Services Organization staff

Page 6 3. Professional Development Description Initiatives Expected Outcomes Implementing a comprehensive professional development plan for all managers and staff within the Service Organization and at schools that build competency in customer focus, technology proficiency and operational effectiveness. Non Instructional professional development plan Instructional professional development plan Support of the development of instructional capacity of principals and teachers Higher quality service High customer satisfaction ratings Technological proficiency for staff and customers

Page 7 4. Performance Management Description Initiatives Expected Outcomes Clearly defining, tracking, and reporting on service delivery for each service area and ensuring that all leaders provide staff with fair and timely performance feedback and evaluation. Integrating Use Your Voice survey results into daily operations Tracking and reporting of service standards for each service area to key customers (e.g. SG, NxOs, Principals) Data-driven performance evaluations Improved staff performance High levels of customer service

Page 8 5. Service Economy Infrastructure Description Initiatives Expected Outcomes Building the infrastructure necessary to operate effectively. This includes setting service offerings according to demand, developing a billing system, and creating an organizational structure to best meet demand for services. Make core services visible to schools using service standards and cost per service Vendor Management process and tools Service delivery tools (e.g. internal billing) Quarterly budget reconciliations for central office Timely fulfillment of customer demand Timely and reliable billing of services Cost-effective organizational structure

Page 9 The customer value chain starts by viewing all Oakland families as having financial assets that can be converted into revenue for the district when families enroll their children in OUSD versus a charter or private school. Ultimate consumers: Children, families and the community All of our decisions and services should focus on children, families and the community. Direct customers: Strategy Group, Network Executive Officers, and Principals The Services Org’s primary point of contact for “purchasing” decisions. Beneficiaries: Teachers and classified staff Leverage our services to increase student achievement, but they do not directly acquire (“purchase”) services from the us. Service Org will support them to improve working conditions. Partners: Regulators (state, federal and local) and vendors Stakeholders that we work with to ensure that our services are the highest level of quality for our customers. Principals/ SSCs Network Leaders The Strategy Group The Services Org Direct Customers Ultimate Consumers Vendors Regulators Partners Classified Staff Teachers The Board High level of service High level of student achievement High level of leadership Serve each other cost is included in total price Beneficiaries Students & Families

Page 10 Creating a Positive Customer Service Experience Climbing the Satisfaction-Loyalty Curve means moving the customer experience from random, to predictable, to differentiated. Consistent Intentional Consistent Intentional Distinct Valuable Random Experience Predictable Experience Differentiated Experience Customer Loyalty Stage 1 Stage 2