Agricultural Stakeholder Committee August 3, 2011 Proposed Methodology for Quantifying the Efficiency of Agricultural Water Use Proposed by: Thaddeus Bettner,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services Evaluation of the SME Funding Schemes - summary European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.
Advertisements

FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.
Regional Water Planning Senate Bill 1 Introduction and Status as of August 01, 1999.
Vision For the Future of Water in Kansas. 1.Technology and Crop Varieties 2.Water Management 3.Water Conservation 4.New Sources of Supply Breakout Topic.
Borrego Valley Borrego Valley Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Integrated Regional Water Management Planning.
Annex 2001 Water Diversions, Withdrawals, and Uses Jon W. Allan Presented to the Groundwater Conservation Advisory Council 26, February 2004.
THE EXPANDING ROLE of RECYCLED WATER The Need, Benefits and Cost Effectiveness Make Recycled Water an Increasingly Valued Resource Harry Ehrlich, SDA Principal.
NGO work with the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Finland Hannele Ahponen Water project coordinator Finnish Association for Nature Conservation.
Improvement of Water Resources Management in Egypt Hesham Moustafa.
Slide 1 Oakdale Irrigation District Water Resources Plan.
Governor’s State Water Law Review Committee Recommendations 1982: Implementation Update David G. Baize Bureau of Water.
Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region Regional Criteria for Evaluating Water Management Plans for the Sacramento River Contractors.
California Reasonable Use Law: Lessons from the Russian River Frost Protection Litigation PAUL STANTON KIBEL Golden Gate University School of Law / Water.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Permitting and Compliance Committee Agenda Item F (Board Item 5) September 8, 2009 Permitting and Compliance.
The Compact  Legally enforceable contract among the Great Lakes States  Provided for in the U.S. Constitution  Ratification by State legislatures 
Compensatory Mitigation in Coastal Louisiana Keith Lovell, Administrator Office of Coastal Management Department of Natural Resources 10/03/121.
Jordan River Rehabilitation Project March 22 nd /6/20151.
Integrated Projects Spetember 2013 Maja Mikosinska DG Environment European Commission.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Where Results Begin. “We don’t have a health care delivery system in this country. We have an expensive plethora of uncoordinated, unlinked, economically.
SB 1070 Overview California Water Quality Monitoring Council –MOU CalEPA and Resources (Dec 2007) –Monitoring Inventory (April 2008) –Monitoring Recommendations.
Agricultural Stakeholder Committee August 3, 2011 DWR’s Discussion Paper on Proposed Methodology for Quantifying the Efficiency of Agricultural Water Use.
Virginia Assessment Scenario Tool VAST Developed by: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
1 Influence of Main River Basin District Plans on Environment Czech University of Life Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Miroslav Martis,Vladimir.
WLE Strategy Results Framework. Challenges that we have been tasked with CGIAR process to develop coherent IDOs Developing a coherent a logical frame.
An Interregional Water Solution with Conjunctive Use of Groundwater Haskell L. Simon President, Coastal Plains Groundwater Conservation District Vice President,
Setting the Murray-Darling Basin Scene R. Quentin Grafton 1.
Non-point Source Update Marc T. Aveni Regional Manager.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
Maintenance / restoration of environmental flows entails caps to water abstraction and regulation.
Idaho Energy Plan Proposal (RFI) Energy Policy Institute (EPI)
15 – 19 JULY 2009 By P. Ncube. Initial Intentions Work with social groups to address the two tier system of reporting (refer to organogram). To bridge.
Managing the Great Lakes— St. Lawrence River Basin David Naftzger, Executive Director Council of Great Lakes Governors (312)
Regional Water Availability Rulemaking Chip Merriam Water Resources Advisory Commission February 8, 2007 Chip Merriam Water Resources Advisory Commission.
Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Cindy Damons 28 May 2008 The role of municipalities in managing and giving effect to.
 Learn how to identify and categorise stakeholders.  Consider different stakeholder structures and responsibilities in groundwater management.  Get.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Noelle Patterson and Charlow Arzadon State Water Resources Control Board.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Regional Peer Learning Workshop: Accelerated Landscape Restoration Siuslaw Stewardship Model and Collaborative Engagement.
Governance and Institutional Arrangements What they have to do with Regional Water Planning (RWP)
Flint Hills Map Exhibit Unit: Flint Hills Region Map Activities
Transition to High-value Agriculture Project
Draft Strategy To Optimize Resource Management of Storm Water
Clean Water Fund Grants
EIUG Energy Intensive Users Group Comments on the Energy Bill
MAIN FINDINGS OF NEEDS ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
Draft Mandate Johannes Grath Balázs Horvath (DG Env)
ENV 400 STUDY Education for Service- -env400study.com.
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
Remleh Scherzinger P.E., MBA Nevada Irrigation District
Workshop with the 8 PAF related Proposals & the Habitats Committee
SCP in the 7th Environmental Action Programme
A new financial instrument
State of play of French progress in cost-effectiveness analysis
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
The Commission Communication on implementation (COM (2012) 95) in relation to Water Industry Directives (Urban Waste Water Treatment, Drinking Water,
IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 9
WG C Groundwater Draft Mandate
22nd WG D Meeting, 15/4/2012 Jacques Delsalle, European Commission
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s Water Resources
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
PIANC, Chair of WFD Navigation Task Group
Proposed Agricultural General Order for Bard Valley Regional Board WORKSHOP May 15, 2019 Logan Raub, Env. Sci.
Subcommittee on Minnesota Water Policy
Subcommittee on Minnesota Water Policy
Presentation transcript:

Agricultural Stakeholder Committee August 3, 2011 Proposed Methodology for Quantifying the Efficiency of Agricultural Water Use Proposed by: Thaddeus Bettner, GCID

Legislative Intent – Unclear  Unspoken Assumptions Water use efficiency – easy and cheap Water use efficiency – easy and cheap Ag is efficient, just not efficient enough Ag is efficient, just not efficient enough Ag is wasting water, its going where? Ag is wasting water, its going where?  Unspoken Outcomes Ag will be more efficient – a number? Ag will be more efficient – a number? New water goes to environment – how, when, where? New water goes to environment – how, when, where? Legislation – Phase 2 Legislation – Phase 2  A1 – Need Values and Objectives If methodology only meets the legislation, a great disservice will be done If methodology only meets the legislation, a great disservice will be done 2

General Overview of the Proposed Method  Establish a Priority of scales Basin then District/sub-region then field Basin then District/sub-region then field  Ag Waiver Process – looking upstream Water community initiated Water community initiated Costly but affordable Costly but affordable Established targets for a basin/watershed Established targets for a basin/watershed If exceedences, looks upstream to smaller scale If exceedences, looks upstream to smaller scale  Avoid Confusion/Duplication - Must fit into Planning and Reporting activities (A1 data should match other data) i.e. Basin/Watershed and Water Plan should match i.e. Basin/Watershed and Water Plan should match SBX7-7 measurement/reporting SBX7-7 measurement/reporting SWRCB Diversion Reports SWRCB Diversion Reports 3

Basic Procedures to Quantify the Efficiency of ag Water Use 1. Learn from the A2 Process. 2. Form subcommittee(SC) of A1 consisting of SME’s 3. Allow SME SC to develop white paper on quantifying a methodology of ag water use. 4. SME SC makes presentation to A1 5. A1 determines if white paper does the following: a. Is understandable and sensible. b. Meets legislation. c. Can be implemented if mandated. d. Can address assumptions or outcomes. e. Fits into existing planning processes 4

Consideration of efficiency levels based on crop type and irrigation system DU  OK to say leg author had no clue - used buzz words  Likely becomes a non-issue because of huge data and interpretation lift  Could do…..time consuming and costly  Data in a vacuum could result in unintended consequences and impacts New Mexico Report (Brinegar & Ward 2009) New Mexico Report (Brinegar & Ward 2009) Irrigation Sagacity (Solomon and Burt, 1999) Irrigation Sagacity (Solomon and Burt, 1999) 5

Estimate of implementation costs  Depends on our values and outcomes Be efficient at any cost? (impacts to other users) Be efficient at any cost? (impacts to other users) Respect other uses of water and then be efficient? Respect other uses of water and then be efficient? Where do we want efficiency improvements to show up? Where do we want efficiency improvements to show up? At field level, may just be shifted to another field or cropAt field level, may just be shifted to another field or crop At District/sub-region, water rights, permits, contracts often require water not leave that regionAt District/sub-region, water rights, permits, contracts often require water not leave that region At basin, often intersects major water bodies (rivers, streams) where water can be realizedAt basin, often intersects major water bodies (rivers, streams) where water can be realized Based on above responses, can identify local, regional, and basin actions needed Based on above responses, can identify local, regional, and basin actions needed DSC Delta Plan – regional water balance DSC Delta Plan – regional water balance 6

Types of Data needed to support the methodology  Utilize existing data if possible. Water Plan Water Plan Basin/sub-basin Basin/sub-basin Districts Districts  Need Regional candidates to test data  What about models? Can they answer efficiency changes and benefits? CALSIM II CALSIM II SWAN SWAN 7

Other Considerations 8