Correction of sextupole resonances. w.p. (6.36,6.22) - N=0.6*10^14, Correction of 3Qx=19 at low intensity Total emittance pi mm mrad % outside blue –

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ring tuning spread 2 MW beam at 1 GeV – Space charge tune spread about 0.2 (green) – Chromatic tune spread must be controlled by sextupoles (red: beam.
Advertisements

Transparent Re-alignment of the Diamond Storage Ring M. Apollonio – Diamond Light Source Ltd ESLS – XXII Workshop, ESRF Grenoble, November 25 th /11/2014M.
Study of Resonance Crossing in FFAG Masamitsu Aiba (KEK) Contents 1.Introduction 2.Crossing experiment at PoP FFAG 3.Crossing experiment at HIMAC synchrotron.
March 14-15, 2007ECloud Feedback, IUCF1 Electron-Cloud Effects in Fermilab Booster K.Y. Ng Fermilab Electron-Cloud Feedback Workshop IUCF, Indiana March.
Author - Title (Footer)1 LINEAR LATTICE ERRORS AT THE ESRF: MODELING AND CORRECTION A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, T. Perron.
ILC BDS Alignment and Tuning Studies Glen White SLAC/QMUL 8 November 2005 Progress report and ongoing plans for BDS alignment and tuning strategy.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
ELENA Tracking studies P.Belochitskii, O.Berrig With thanks to: C.Carli, L.Varming Jørgensen, G.Tranquille.
Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014
AC dipole for LHC Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Resonance Crossing Experiment in PoP FFAG (preliminary report) M. Aiba (Tokyo Univ.) for KEK FFAG Group FFAG W.S. KEK.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
On the Possibility of Using Landau Damping Octupoles in the Recycler Y. Alexahin, A. Burov, E. Gianfelice-Wendt, V. Lebedev, A. Valishev Abstract: To provide.
H. Bartosik, K. Cornelis, A. Guerrero, B. Mikulek, G. Rumolo, Y. Papaphilippou, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova June 16 th, 2011.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy High Intensity Effects in the SNS Accumulator Ring Jeff Holmes HB 2008 August 27, 2008.
Dynamic Aperture Study for the Ion Ring Lattice Options Min-Huey Wang, Yuri Nosochkov MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 Jefferson Lab, Newport News,
Experiment in PS G. Franchetti, GSI CERN, 20-21/5/ /05/14G. Franchetti1.
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Project March 20-21, Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
1 Dynamic aperture of non-scaling FFAG with sextupole Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 21 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
2 nd Muon Collider Design workshop, JLab, Newport News VA December 8-12, 2008 Update on the Muon Collider lattice design with chromatic correction in IR.
Study and Optimization of Dynamic Aperture for the SuperKEKB LER E.Levichev and P.Piminov, BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
1 NICA Collider: status and further steps O.S. Kozlov LHEP, JINR, Dubna for the NICA team Machine Advisory Committee, JINR, Dubna, October 19-20, 2015.
1 Dynamic aperture studies in e+e- factories with crab waist IR’07, November 9, 2007 E.Levichev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk.
Simulation of resonances and beam loss for the J-PARC Main Ring Alexander Molodozhentsev (KEK) Etienne Forest (KEK) for the ICFA HB08 Workshop ICFA HB08.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Frequency map analysis workshop - Orsay 1 - 2/04/04Mahdia Belgroune 1 Role of the frequency map analysis in the choice of the working point of SOLEIL M.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
The nonlinear dynamics of SIS100 at injection G. Franchetti Beam dynamics meet Magnets II 18/4/2012G.Franchetti1 Magnet multipoles: Dipole: Akishin et.
Status of RHIC Polarization Studies. Summary of Polarization Studies during Run09 Tune scans: – Nearby 0.7 – Near integer tune Polarization ramp measurement.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
Resonance Compensation Raymond WASEF S.Gilardoni, A.Huschauer, D.Schoerling Acknowledgments M.Delrieux, J.C.Dumont, H.Genoud, C.Hernalsteens and all PS.
Choice of L* for FCCee: IR optics and DA A.Bogomyagkov, E.Levichev, P.Piminov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk HF2014, IHEP Beijing, 9-12.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Beam test of slow extraction from the ESR
Alignment and beam-based correction
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
JLEIC simulations status April 3rd, 2017
Review of new High Energy Rings
Space charge studies at the SPS
Low Emittance Tuning Tests at the Diamond Light Source (Rutherford Labs) Dec R. Bartolini, S. Liuzzo, P. Raimondi SuperB XV Meeting Caltech, CA,
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
Impact of remanent fields on SPS chromaticity
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
Acceleration of Polarized Protons and Deuterons at HESR/FAIR
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
FCC-ee Lattice with Misalignments
Multiturn extraction for PS2
SC Overview 2013 White & Rouge The Codes in Comparison The Noise Issue
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
Nonlinear Field Quality Checks
The new 7BA design of BAPS
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Analysis of Chromaticity of WD-PDR4
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
100th FCC-ee Optics Design Meeting
Status of RCS eRHIC Injector Design
Presentation transcript:

Correction of sextupole resonances

w.p. (6.36,6.22) - N=0.6*10^14, Correction of 3Qx=19 at low intensity Total emittance pi mm mrad % outside blue – no errors red – errors, no correction green – correction of islands

w.p. (6.36,6.22) – N=2.0*10^14 Blue – no sextupole errors, Grey – sextupole errors, no correction Green – sextupole errors, 3Qx=19 corrected

w.p. (6.36,6.22) 3 rd order resonances excited by sextupole errors For intensity >1*10^14 requires simultaneous correction of 3Qx=19 and 2Qy-Qx=6 resonances

w.p. (6.36,6.22) – N=2.0*10^14, simultaneous correction of 3Qx=19 and 2Qy-Qx=6 resonances Blue – no errors Grey – errors, no correction Green- errors, correction of 3Qx=19 Pink – errors, simultaneous correction of 3Qx=19 and 2Qy-Qx=6

Towards VERY high intensity, w.p. and crossed resonances No that we found that we can have good correction in the presence of space charge, we want to see whether we can push intensity very high by considering the w.p. far away from coherent structure resonance at integer. We then take (6.4,6.3) and perform simultaneous correction of Qx+2Qy=19 sum resonance and 3Qx=19 with only sextupole errors being introduced.

w.p. (6.4,6.3) – towards very high intensity, Simultaneous correction of both sum coupling and 1D resonance blueblue Blue – no errors, Red – errors, no correction, N=2*10^14 Green – errors, correction of Qx+2Qy=19 and 3Qx=19 resonances, N=2*10^14 Pink – errors, correction of Qx+2Qy=19 and 3Qx=19 resonances, N=3*10^14 Grey – errors, correction of Qx+2Qy=19 and 3Qx=19 resonances, N=4*10^14

Correction of sextupole resonances: w.p. (6.36,6.22) - Correction of 3Qx=19 and 2Qy-Qx=6 Total emittance pi mm mrad % outside N=0.6*10^14 blue – no errors red – errors, no correction green – errors, correction of 3Qx=19 N=2*10^14 blue – no errors grey – errors, no correction green – errors, correction of 3Qx=19 pink – errors, simultaneous correction of 3Qx=19 and 2Qy-Qx=6 resonances 3Qx 2Qy-Qx Qx Qy

Correction of sextupole resonances: w.p. (6.4,6.3) - Correction of sum coupling resonance Qx+2Qy=19 and 3Qx=19 resonance N=0.6*10^14 blue- no errors red – errors, no correction pink – errors, correction of Qx+2Qy=19 N=2.0*10^14 blue- no errors red- errors, no correction green- errors, simultaneous corrections of Qx+2Qy=19 and 3Qx=19 resonances N=3.0*10^14 pink – errors, corrections of Qx+2Qy=19 and 3Qx=19 resonances Total emittance pi mm mrad % outside

Tentative conclusions (based on correction of sextupole resonances – March 2003) For the test cases of local errors, we found out that detailed correction of resonance without space charge gives good results for the case when such resonance are crossed at high intensity. Strength of correctors used is well within the range. These studies suggest important conclusions: For high intensity operation one can chose working point above the dangerous nonlinear resonance and cross these resonance with relatively low losses at high intensity, provided that one did careful correction of these resonance – it was demonstrated that it is possible to do so.

Correction of octupole resonances: w.p. (6.36,6.22), N=1*10^14, Correction of octupole resonance 2Qx+2Qy=25 blue – no errors red – b3=60 units, no correction green – b3=60 units plus correction of 2Qx+2Qy=25 resonance

Correction of octupole resonances: w.p. (6.36,6.22)- N=1*10^14 correction of strong octupole resonance 2Qx+2Qy (b3=120 units) blue – no errors gray – b3=120 units, no correction pink – b3=120 units plus correction of 2Qx+2Qy resonance

Correction of sextupole and octupole resonance simultaneously: w.p. (6.36,6.22) – N=2*10^14 blue – no errors red – b2=30 units, b3=60 units, no correction green – simultaneous correction of sextupole: 3Qx=19, 2Qy-Qx=6 and octupole: 2Qx+2Qy resonances

Correction of skew octupole resonances We do not have skew octupole correctors. However, these resonances are there. For completeness, we thus explore their importance and their correction.

Correction of skew octupole resonance: w.p. (6.36, 6.22) – Qx+3Qy=25 –sum resonances red – a3 errors, no correction green – a3 errors plus skew-octupole correction

Effective strength of resonances Approximate strength of resonances for the case of lumped errors in units of Ks of Qx+2Qy=19 resonance: Sext. (1,2)=19 –> Ks Skew sext. (2,1)=19 -> Ks Oct. (0,4)=25 -> 0.3*Ks Skew oct. (1,3)=25 -> 0.7*Ks Oct. (2,2)=25 -> 0.9*Ks Sext. (3,0)=19 -> 0.6*Ks Skew Oct. (3,1)=25 -> 0.7*Ks Sext. (1,-2)=6 -> Ks Skew oct. (3,-1)=12 -> 0.7*Ks

Error budget In resonance correction studies we assumed lumped b2=30 units and b3, a3 = 60 units which corresponds to 1)5 times stronger random sextupole errors than measured 2)10 times stronger skew octupole errors than measured With the present error budget coming just from arc dipoles and arc quadrupoles the dominant contribution comes from normal sextupole and normal octupole resonances – good correction. If the budget of skew octupole errors becomes factor of 5 stronger than the present - one will need skew octupole correctors.