Active Water Resource Management in the Lower Rio Grande TOOLS FOR A NEW ERA IN WATER MANAGEMENT presented by Peggy Barroll, Hydrologist New Mexico Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J2 Regulating Reservoir Project
Advertisements

Water Law and Institutions – rights and binding agreements U.S. water rights traditionally based on common law: Riparian doctrine in East – land owners.
Idaho Conjunctive Management Rules & Ground Water District Formation
A History of the Gila River Basin in New Mexico Events, Adjudications and Limitations Presented by: Tink Jackson District 3 Manager, OSE NM Gila River.
LRGWUO New Mexico Lower Rio Grande Regional Water Plan Presentation to the Interstate Stream Commission: July 21, 2004 Lower Rio Grande Water Users Organization.
Lower Rio Grande Water Users’ Organization Who are we? Where to get more information: 1 Organization The City of Las Cruces*
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Billings, Montana October 18, 2007 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Responses to the New Normal Creative Partnerships for Innovative Water Solutions Colorado Water Workshop – July 17, 2013.
Governor Napolitano’s Listening Tour2004 Water Management Within Active Management Areas.
Main San Gabriel Basin Management BASIN REPLENISHMENT by Anthony C. Zampiello San Gabriel Valley Water Forum Presented August 28, 2012 SAN GABRIEL VALLEY.
Department of Water Resources Role in Water Transfers Jerry Johns, DWR
Water Resources Issues in the Lower Rio Grande June 3, 2005 J. Phillip King, P.E. Assc. Professor/Assc. Dept. Head Dept. of Civil Engineering, NMSU Consultant,
SUSTAINABLE OPERATION OF THE YAQUI RESERVOIR SYSTEM.
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Historical Water Management in the Lower Rio Grande Lower Rio Grande Water Users Organization August 19, 2005 J. Phillip King, P.E., Ph.D.
Active Water Resource Management in the Lower Rio Grande
Conjunctive Management in Idaho A State Perspective Rexburg, Idaho December 9, 2014Mat Weaver, IDWR.
SNAKE RIVER GROUND WATER TRANSFERS Climate Impacts Group May 13, 2003 Don Reading Richard Slaughter.
Nathan VanRheenen Richard N. Palmer Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Recasting the Future Developing.
WESTCAS - Shortage Impacts on AZ CAP General Manager David Modeer October 29, 2014.
Climate Change and Water Resources Management WEB pages on water management activities Max Campos San Jose – Costa Rica.
How Much Do We Have Left? Coming to Terms With the Colorado River Water Availability Study Annual Colorado Water Workshop July 21, 2010 Ben Harding – AMEC.
Colorado River Overview February Colorado River Overview Hydrology and Current Drought Management Objectives Law of the River Collaborative Efforts.
Making the Linkage Between Water Management & Planning Rita P. Maguire, President and CEO ACMA 2006 Summer Conference July 27, Tucson, AZ.
Upper Colorado River Basin Current Water Rights Issues Division of Water Rights April 2005.
Demands, Supplies & Priorities. Demand Sectors Irrigation Livestock Mining Industrial Commercial Ecosystems Domestic Total Water Demand Major Cities.
Helping Business manage water more efficiently, why and how Anna Hall Principal Officer Land Management 20 th October 2009 Royal Agricultural College,
Colorado Basin Roundtable Basin Implementation Plan Colorado Water Conservation Board July 16, 2014.
Introduction to Water Law & the Central Arizona Project (CAP)
Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.
Modeling Impacts of Policy Responses to Prolonged and Severe Drought in the Upper Rio Grande River Basin Dr. James F. Booker, Siena College Douglas T.
Kathy Alexander, Ph.D. Technical Specialist Water Availability Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Colorado River Sustainability, Drought Response & Central Arizona Project Urban Water Institute August 27, 2015.
BCGWA Ground Water Protection Regulation Workshops 2005 BCGWA Conference Penticton, B.C. March 3-4, 2005 Gilles Wendling Kaya Forest.
Rodman & Renshaw Conference September 2015 This presentation contains forward-looking statements that are subject to significant risks and.
Urban Water Institute August 27, 2015 Managing the Colorado River during Drought.
Colorado River System & California’s Drought: an Overview Arizona League of Cities and Towns – Water Panel August 20, 2015.
CALIFORNIA LAW OF SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER
Declaring Beneficial Use in Water Use Groups R
SOUTH METRO WATER SUPPLY STUDY DECEMBER 2003 Stretching our Water Supplies South Metro Denver Area Gunnison Water Conference July 28, 2004.
FLOWS FOR THE FUTURE 2005 Environmental Flows Conference Texas State University – San Marcos November 1, 2005 Bob Brandes Region M Water Planning Study.
Nebraska Water Law Conference Wyoming Ground Water Laws.
INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN HAI BASIN OF CHINA BY LIPING JIANG WORLD BANK OFFICE BEIJING PRESENTED IN THE WORLD BANK WATER WEEK FEBRUARY 17-19,
Adjusting Supply and Demand: Technical Analysis to Support the ESPA Management Plan Idaho Water Resource Board Meeting May 17, 2007.
Central Valley Project Cost Allocation Study -- Irrigation and Municipal & Industrial (M&I) Benefits Public Meeting August 9, 2013.
PCWA MFP Operations Model All Models are Wrong But Some Models are Useful.
Special Water Users Associations in Southern New Mexico Sunday, January 03, 2016 Elephant Butte Irrigation District.
Governor Napolitano’s Listening Tour2004 Water Management Within Active Management Areas.
Oakdale Irrigation District Agricultural Water Management Plan Briefing on 2015 Update January 5, /5/2016 OID AWMP Update Briefing.
Water Supply Planning in Hampton Roads: Options for an Uncertain Future The State of Virginia’s Water Resources October 28, 2015 Whitney S. Katchmark,
Uneasy Times Along the Colorado River Doug Kenney Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado 30 th Colorado River Workshop July 28, 2005 Gunnison,
Navajo Nation Basin Transfer Issues Stanley M
PROJECT PLAN: The Nature Conservancy Corps of Engineers ICPRB Presentation Potomac Watershed Roundtable January 9, 2009.
Reservoir Development Update Region K Meeting July 11, 2012 Karen Bondy, P.E. Manager of Resource Strategy 1.
Impacts of Salinity on El Paso’s Surface Water Supply presented at the Annual Salinity Management and Desalination Summit December 8, 2003 Michael P. Fahy.
1. 2 Required under water right Establishes limit on LCRA firm water contract sales from lakes Industry standard for evaluating available water supply.
Scarcity on the Upper Rio Grande Valley (WORK IN PROGRESS) GIS FOR WATER RESOURCES, FALL
Council of Economic Advisors Water Rights Overview Utah Division of Water Rights Jerry Olds.
Will there be Enough Water in the Future? Respecting Mother Nature Managing Human Desire.
Colorado’s Water Plan Presentation for Kiwanis Club of Grand Junction January 7, 2016 Hannah Holm, Coordinator Ruth Powell Hutchins Water Center at Colorado.
New Mexico Universities Working Group on Water Supply Vulnerabilities: The Lower Rio Grande Presented to the Paso del Norte Watershed Council Phil King.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
Background The Mae Yom Operation and Maintenance Office was established to manage water from a weir. The weir supplies water for the irrigation areas of.
River Basin Simulation with WEAP Water Evaluation and Planning System David Rosenberg CEE 5460 – Water Resources Engineering.
The Future of the Colorado River – Business as Usual or ???
Kansas Experience in Technical Negotiations for Tribal Water Right Settlements Symposium on the Settlement of Indian Reserved Water Rights Claims, Great.
Integrating data, modeling and tools into Basin Planning
2018 Kern County Water Summit
Resource Management and Climate Protection Committee Meeting:
Presentation transcript:

Active Water Resource Management in the Lower Rio Grande TOOLS FOR A NEW ERA IN WATER MANAGEMENT presented by Peggy Barroll, Hydrologist New Mexico Office of the State Engineer Lower Rio Grande Water Users Association 8/19/05

This Presentation More details on the problem More details on the problem How will our draft regulations address this problem How will our draft regulations address this problem The basis for administration The basis for administration

The Problem Demand and use of water is increasing Demand and use of water is increasing Groundwater use is increasing Groundwater use is increasing Junior Groundwater use impacts senior surface water rights Junior Groundwater use impacts senior surface water rights

Even Though EBID Irrigated Acreage is Down…

Depletion of Water within EBID Has Increased

With Additional Depletion on Groundwater-only Lands

Plus Increasing Municipal and Industrial water use

The Facts We Must Deal With Groundwater and surface water behave as single resource Groundwater and surface water behave as single resource State Engineer Reynolds did not declare state’s jurisdiction over most of the LRG’s groundwater until 1980 and 1982 State Engineer Reynolds did not declare state’s jurisdiction over most of the LRG’s groundwater until 1980 and 1982  Most pumping already established

The Facts We Must Deal With Groundwater pumping has been increasing in the LRG Groundwater pumping has been increasing in the LRG Groundwater pumping for irrigation use alone may be as high as: Groundwater pumping for irrigation use alone may be as high as:  50, ,000 AFY in full project supply years  200, ,000 (?) AFY in low project supply years

Groundwater Pumping Dries up Drains

Drain Flows are Part of the Water Supply of the Rio Grande Project Historically drain flows have added about 20% to Project diversions Historically drain flows have added about 20% to Project diversions When the drains are dry, the Rio Grande Project water supply is reduced, and Project water cannot be delivered efficiently When the drains are dry, the Rio Grande Project water supply is reduced, and Project water cannot be delivered efficiently Surface water rights associated with the Rio Grande Project are senior in priority Surface water rights associated with the Rio Grande Project are senior in priority

This Effect has been Evident in the Recent Drought Groundwater pumping has been high during the recent drought Groundwater pumping has been high during the recent drought The drains have been dry The drains have been dry The drains dried up rapidly, and have not yet recovered. The drains dried up rapidly, and have not yet recovered.

To Address this Problem: The State Engineer is Increasing Regulation of Groundwater Use Metering Order Metering Order District Specific Regulations District Specific Regulations  Enforcement against over diversion

In Addition, the District Specific Regulations Will Include Priority Administration Junior groundwater rights will be curtailed in priority, as necessary Junior groundwater rights will be curtailed in priority, as necessary  to protect the historical operations of the Rio Grande Project  to ensure protection of senior surface water rights owners

The Regulations Depend on a Priority Administration Target This target has been set as the historical operating efficiency of the Rio Grande Project since the 1950s (the D2 curve) This target has been set as the historical operating efficiency of the Rio Grande Project since the 1950s (the D2 curve) Once a new operating agreement is developed, and is accepted by all parties, the State Engineer will administer to that agreement Once a new operating agreement is developed, and is accepted by all parties, the State Engineer will administer to that agreement

What is D2? D2 is a plot of Project Release vs. Project Supply Using data from Project Release: Water released from Caballo for the Rio Grande Project Project Supply: Divertible Water at River Headings: includes release from Project Storage, return flows, and any useable inflows to the Rio Grande

D2 is an Efficiency Relationship IN: Release from Reservoir Storage IN: Release from Reservoir Storage OUT: Delivery at River Headings or Project Supply OUT: Delivery at River Headings or Project Supply Efficiency: OUT / IN Efficiency: OUT / IN If it really were a pipe Efficiency would be 100% If it really were a pipe Efficiency would be 100% IN Out

Actual Project (River) Efficiency In good years, drain flows come back in to the River, and thus water is recycled. In good years, drain flows come back in to the River, and thus water is recycled. Full Supply Year Efficiency: 120% Full Supply Year Efficiency: 120% IN

Actual Project (River) Efficiency In bad years, drain flows dry up, and water is lost to the River conveyance losses. In bad years, drain flows dry up, and water is lost to the River conveyance losses. Bad Supply Year Efficiency: % Bad Supply Year Efficiency: % IN Losses

D2 Curve with All Data Through 1992: Reflects Historical Operating Efficiency

In Recent Years? BOR has said that Project still operates at close to D2 efficiency, except for during the recent drought BOR has said that Project still operates at close to D2 efficiency, except for during the recent drought

How are we using D2 in our Regulations? Junior groundwater will be curtailed, if necessary, to ensure that the Rio Grande Project can operate at the level of efficiency described by D2 Junior groundwater will be curtailed, if necessary, to ensure that the Rio Grande Project can operate at the level of efficiency described by D2 Under Depletion Limit Administration this curtailment would be either Under Depletion Limit Administration this curtailment would be either  Temporary, for critical years, or  Long term if necessary

Why Administer to the Historical Operating Condition? Gives us a quantified target for surface water delivery Gives us a quantified target for surface water delivery Documented in US BOR Rio Grande Project Water Supply Allocation Procedures Documented in US BOR Rio Grande Project Water Supply Allocation Procedures It has been the basis of Rio Grande Project operations for 50 years It has been the basis of Rio Grande Project operations for 50 years It is generally favorable to New Mexico It is generally favorable to New Mexico

Priority Administration Will Not Be Easy or Pleasant Seniors get a full supply before juniors get any Seniors get a full supply before juniors get any When determining who gets curtailed: only seniority counts When determining who gets curtailed: only seniority counts  although the State Engineer will not curtail essential domestic uses Groundwater rights are generally junior Groundwater rights are generally junior The burden imposed by shortages is not shared The burden imposed by shortages is not shared

The State Engineer Prefers Alternative Administration Local water users agree on a workable alternative solution Local water users agree on a workable alternative solution For example For example  Shortage sharing  Reserve pools of water in reservoir storage to ensure Project deliveries  Other options

Your Comments & Ideas Agri- culture Municipalities Industries

End