MINOS+ Starts April 2013 for three years April 2013-2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISS meeting UCIrvine 21 August 2006 Alain Blondel 1 Evaluation of « optimal » segmentation for neutrino factory far detectors A. magnetized iron sampling.
Advertisements

1 3+2 Neutrino Phenomenology and Studies at MiniBooNE PHENO 2007 Symposium May 7-9, 2007 U. Wisconsin, Madison Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia University.
Sergio Palomares-Ruiz June 22, 2005 Super-NO A Based on O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli hep-ph/ a long-baseline neutrino experiment with two off-axis.
MINOS+ Sterile Neutrino Studies J.Thomas UCL J.Evans (UCL), A.Gavrilenko (W&M), M.Matthis (W&M)A.Sousa(Harvard) UCL.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Indiana, Frascati, Gran Sasso, L’Aquila, Lecce, Michigan, Napoli, Pisa, Roma.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
Neutrino Oscillation Physics at a Neutrino Factory Rob Edgecock RAL/CERN-AB.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
Near Detector Working Group for ISS Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting 24 January 2006 Paul Soler University of Glasgow/RAL.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
November 19, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Physics of Atmospheric Neutrinos: Perspectives for the Future Topical Workshop on Physics at Henderson DUSEL Fort.
Preliminary Ideas for a Near Detector at a Neutrino Factory Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting 23 September 2005 Paul Soler University of Glasgow/RAL.
The MINOS Experiment Andy Blake Cambridge University.
INDIA-BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY (INO) STATUS REPORT Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India NUFACT Scoping Study Meeting at.
1 CC analysis update New analysis of SK atm. data –Somewhat lower best-fit value of  m 2 –Implications for CC analysis – 5 year plan plots revisited Effect.
1 Neutrinos: Past, Present and Future Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University.
2/21/2008 P5 neutrino session1 Conventional neutrino experiments Heidi Schellman P5 February 21, 2008.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
Atmospheric Neutrinos
A long baseline neutrino oscillation search - MINOS Reinhard Schwienhorst School of Physics and Astronomy University of Minnesota.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
NEW RESULTS FROM MINOS Patricia Vahle, for the MINOS collaboration College of William and Mary.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Final results on atmospheric  oscillations with MACRO at Gran Sasso Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Frascati, Gran Sasso, Indiana, L’Aquila, Lecce,
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
A VLBL experiment to Measure CP, sin 2 2  13 and  m 2 23 sign Yifang Wang.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Counting Electrons to Measure the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy J. Brunner 17/04/2013 APC.
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Detector possibilities: scintillator based detectors EUCARD 1 st Annual Meeting, RAL, 13 April 2010 Paul Soler.
E. W. Grashorn and A. Habig, UMD, for the MINOS Collaboration The Detectors of The Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS) Experiment The MINOS.
Harvard Neutrino Group DoE Review August 21, 2006.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Recent Results from Super-K Kate Scholberg, Duke University June 7, 2005 Delphi, Greece.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
The Latest MINOS Results Xinjie Qiu Stanford University (for the MINOS Collaboration) International Symposium on Neutrino Physics and Beyond Sept
TTdF – EPS Conference Manchester (UK), July 2007 Neutrino hiererchy from atmospheric and beta beam neutrinos with high density magnetised detectors [1]
Complementarity of Terrestrial Neutrino Experiments in Searching for  13 Pasquale Migliozzi INFN - Napoli P.M., F. Terranova Phys. Lett. B 563 (2003)
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Ff Neutrino Time of Flight measurements (with MINOS) Phil Adamson 12 th September 2012.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
New Results from MINOS Matthew Strait University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration Phenomenology 2010 Symposium 11 May 2010.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Wrong sign muons detection in a
Neutrino Oscillation Physics with a Neutrino Factory
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
High g Li/B b-Beam Enrique Fernández-Martínez, MPI für Physik Munich
T2KK Sensitivity of Resolving q23 Octant Degeneracy
6. Preliminary Results from MINOS
Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) NuFact05
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Will T2KK see new physics?
Presentation transcript:

MINOS+ Starts April 2013 for three years April

MINOS+ Summary of Physics Goals Search for non-standard 3x3 mixing behaviour  23 and  m 2 atm (the new precision frontier) Sterile Search Non-Standard Interactions & Extra Dimensions Atmospherics

The MINOS(+) Experiment Two detectors mitigate systematic effects beam flux mis-modeling Neutrino x-sec uncertainties L/E ~ km/GeV Magnetized: muon energy from range/curvature distinguish μ + from μ - 5 kT ~1 kT Tracking sampling calorimeters steel absorber 2.54 cm thick (1.4 X 0 ) scintillator strips 4.1 cm wide (1.1 Moliere radii) 1 GeV muons penetrate 28 layers Functionally equivalent same segmentation same materials same mean B field (1.3 T)

 23 MINOS have combined atmospheric and beam neutrinos and anti-neutrinos for most precise  m 2 and sin 2 2  23 < 1.0 Super-K have done full 3-flavor analysis Information about which octant  23 in  23 is the new  13 !!! Global fit (Fogli et al.) prefers sin 2  23 < 0.5

Non-Standard 3x3 Mixing The overarching reason to run MINOS in the NuMI- NO A beam is to look for new physics in a previously unexplored region 3000 events/year between 4-10 GeV near oscillation maximum Unique high statistics experiment with charge sign measurement – different energy region – different systematics (beam, x-sec comp )

Cross check MINOS in different energy region The overarching reason to run MINOS in the NuMI- NO A beam is to look for new physics in a previously unexplored region 3000 events/year between 4-10 GeV near oscillation maximum Unique high statistics experiment with charge sign measurement – different energy region – different systematics (beam, x-sec combination )

 23 and  m 2 Very precise measure of  m 2 23 can be achieved Combined with Nova and T2K, ~1% measurement of this parameter 1% measurements of  m 2 32 and  m 2 31 can give mass hierarchy ( / v1.pdf) Some contribution to knowledge of sin 2 2  23

MINOS+ Powerful search for sterile neutrinos Odd dip will have to wait for MINOS+ for more study Oscillation spectrum pretty insensitive to primary oscillation parameters in this region

MINOS+ sterile reach |U e4 | 2 = sin 2  14 |U  4 | 2 = cos 2  24 * sin 2  24 sin 2 (2   e ) = 4|U e4 | 2 * |U  4 | 2

NSI & Extra Dimensions J. Kopp, P.A.N. Machado and S.Parke, Phys.Rev.D82: (2010). Alexander Friedland, Cecilia Lunardini, Phys. Rev. D74 :033012, P.A.N.Machado,H.Nunokawa,R.Zukanovich Funchal, hep- ph/ v1 Dimension 5 non-standard contact interactions show up in the region of study The same ratio could show half micron sized extra dimensions

Atmospheri cs Magnetic field allows identification of m+ and m- Complementary to SuperK who ID ne events Alone not conclusive, but combined with SuperK, could give information on mass hiearchy

Summary Unique among long baseline neutrino experiments, MINOS+ has high precision and long baseline MINOS+ will pick up where MINOS leaves off – Large reach in sterile search – Any non-standard effects should be seen with MINOS+ High precision “standard parameter” measurement of  m 2 23 may be very important in the future – Another way to the mass hierarchy?