Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, 21-23 March 2005, Brighton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Challenges of Joint Programmes The View of the Universities Tia Loukkola 10 June, 2010.
Advertisements

1 Bologna Shaping the Agenda Bologna today and tomorrow Lesley Wilson Secretary-General, European University Association.
ENQA’S CONSULTATIVE MEMBERSHIP IN THE BFUG - WHAT DOES IT ENTAIL
Future Trends on Student Involvement in Quality Assurance Agencies
The European University Associations Institutional Evaluation Programme Nina Arnhold European University Association Birmingham, 09 December 2005.
EUA Position on Quality Assurance [Padraig Walsh, Irish Universities Quality Board, IUQB] on behalf of Andrée Sursock, EUA ENQA Workshop, Berlin June 2008.
The European standards and guidelines for quality assurance Peter Williams President, ENQA.
ENQA, Bologna, London and beyond
Bergen Communiqué – results and implications for quality assurance Christian Thune President, ENQA Presentation at ENQA workshop: "AFTER THE BERGEN MINISTERIAL.
Executive Director of the Danish Evaluation Institute (EVA)
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Axel Aerden 17 April Set up in the framework of the Bologna Process Bi-national organisation Established by treaty Safeguards for independence procedures,
Building Internal Quality Assurance System Andy Gibbs Beirut 2013.
ARMENIA: Quality Assurance (QA) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Tbilisi Regional Seminar on Quality Management in the Context of National.
An Overview of Quality Assurance in the EHEA by Prof. Andreas G. Orphanides President of EURASHE, Rector of European University Cyprus, and Ex-President.
The role of students alongside other stakeholders in the Bologna Process Colin Tück 26/27 May 2008, Baku Council of Europe seminar.
Quality Assurance: Dimension of the Bologna Process Gayane Harutyunyan Bologna Secretariat June 10-11, 2014 Munich.
Irish Universities Quality Board Internal Quality Assurance at Universities: The Irish perspective Dr Padraig Walsh Chief Executive Irish Universities.
Bologna Process and Quality Assurance
Role of Universities in Quality Assurance Quality Culture Project OAQ-CRUS Conference Internal quality assurance at higher education institutions – requirements.
Improving Institutional Quality in Europe: The role of the European University Association Kate Geddie, EUA Brussels Tor Vergata, 27 November 2003.
External Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area: Challenges and Trends Rolf Heusser, Switzerland TechnoTN Forum, Brussels, 4 May 2007.
Quality Assurance from you to them or them to you! Anthony J Vickers UK Bologna Expert.
The challenge of accreditation in Europe Peter Cullen Head of research and policy analysis Higher education and training awards council IRELAND EFQM Education.
European Quality Assurance Register for Higher Education Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Colin Tück 26/27 May 2008, Baku Council.
The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova.
HOW CAN YOU HELP EMU TOWARDS INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION BY EUA?
Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Fiona Crozier QAA
Conference on the Bologna Process: European Higher Education Policies and Reform Baku, April 2005 The Social Dimension of Higher Education in Europe-Current.
The Bologna Process and the European Higher Education Area Ensuring Worldwide Competitiveness of Master’s and PhD Programmes at European Universities of.
Quality Assurance in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities Maria Helena Nazaré EUA President Former Rector Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal.
Quality Assurance in the European HEA Enrique Lopez-Veloso University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain Agustin Merino National Team of Bologna Experts.
European Quality Assurance Register for Higher Education Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Colin Tück St Paul’s Bay, 22 June 2015 Peer Expert Training.
Higher Education and Research: Mission and Interaction David Crosier CONFERENCE TO LAUNCH WORK ON A MASTER PLAN FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN ALBANIA Tirana,
The European standards and guidelines for quality assurance Séamus Puirséil, Vice – President, ENQA.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto ENQA Rogaska Slatina, 30 November 2007.
The European Dimension of Quality Assurance Henrik Toft Jensen EUA Conference “Quality Assurance in Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training.
BFUG Work Program on QA Agenda Gayane Harutyunyan Astana, Kazakhstan Ensuring quality higher education is one of the most important.
ENQA a key player in the European Higher Education Area Meeting of the Belarus University System representatives Minsk, March 2013 Josep Grifoll / Жузэп.
EUA and the implemention of the Bologna process David Crosier Programme Development Director European University Association (EUA) Council of Europe/Austrian.
Andrée Sursock, PhD Mexico–EU Policy Dialogue Seminar on transparency tools, internationalisation and excellence in higher education September 2015.
European Higher Education in Flux – challenges for the next decade - Lesley Wilson Secretary General, EUA EAIR, Vilnius, 24 August 2009.
Dr Vladimir Radevski Ohrid, 4 April 2012 National Frameworks and their associated Quality Assurance.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
Internal quality development and assurance in HEIs Seminar on quality assurance in higher education in Armenia Yerevan, 4 June 2007 Karin Riegler Senior.
WORKSHOP 6: Quality Assurance after Bergen: Implementing the European Standards Contributions from Quality Assurance Networks Francisco Marcellán Director.
An overview in slides. A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001.
Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.
University autonomy and governance Baku Bologna Seminar - Current issues in the Bologna process Bastian Baumann, Baku, 26 May 2008.
Outline of the presentation Historic development Main principles Standards and guidelines Areas Stakeholders Internal QA, external QA, QA agencies Trends.
The European Students’ Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE 1982 Cristi Popescu – Executive Committe Member European context of QA ESPAQ Training Yerevan,
Student involvement in the work of ENQA and of its member agencies INQAAHE conference in Abu Dhabi, 31 March - 2 April 2009 Emmi Helle Secretary General.
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto Vice-President, ENQA Ljubljana, 20 October 2009.
ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
The European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education Dr. Fabrizio Trifiro’, Manager International, QAA IQA Workshop: Quality in Higher Education.
Role of Quality Assurance in the Establishment of the EHEA presentation given at the conference ”Bologna Process Implementation in Turkey after 10 Years”,
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
The European University Association (EUA) The Voice of European Universities at European level Lesley Wilson EUA Secretary General EAIE, Porto, Sept.
Implementing the European Standards and Guidelines on Quality Assurance in Higher Education Peter Williams President, ENQA.
European Higher Education Area: focus from structures to better learning Head of Higher Education Unit Helka Kekäläinen, PhD.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
THE GROWING IMPORTANCE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES
Implementing the European Standards and Guidelines
Introduction of ENQA Art of self-reflection for constant enhancement: the purpose and objectives of the review Paula Ranne, Deputy Director European Association.
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
Introduction to the training
- Quality Assurance – Current perspectives
Quality assurance of higher education in the European Higher Education Area - developments and ways forward Paula Ranne, Deputy Director European Association.
quality culture in the EHEA
Presentation transcript:

Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton

…2… EUA  Membership organisation of 753 members: universities and national rector conferences in 45 countries (increase of around 200 members in 4 years)  UK members: 82 universities + UUK  Mission: To ensure that universities can fulfill their three-fold public mission (research, teaching and service to society)  Activities: Policy development, projects, research and publication

…3… Bologna: Who does what? Involves many actors: Intergovernmental NGO’s: EUA, ESIB, EURASHE QUANGO’s and other bodies HEIs Decisions are prepared through “Bologna conferences” Emphasis on consensual decision-making

…4… Bologna: State of play Majority of countries have adapted legislation to fit the two- degree structure (exceptions: Spain, Sweden) Many countries are implementing the various “Bologna tools” Trends IV: 60 site visits in 28 countries: A great deal of enthusiasm for the reform process: an opportunity to bring about profound changes (curricular, administrative, management, links to stakeholders) A very ambitious and challenging change agenda that will enhance the international profile of many universities across Europe

…5… Changes in the quality debate Bologna Declaration (1999): quality is not a key issue Prague Communiqué (2001): the role of QA agencies predominates Berlin Communiqué (2003): Quality moves to the top of the agenda The responsibilities of HEIs is acknowledged

…6… The QA action lines of the Berlin Communiqué (2003) “The primary responsibility for quality lies in HEIs" Invites ENQA, in co-operation with EUA, ESIB and EURASHE (= E4), To develop an agreed set of standards, procedures and guidelines on quality assurance To explore ways of ensuring an adequate peer- review system for QA & A agencies

…7… EUA’s interpretation of the Berlin Communiqué  Standards take as their starting points key policy objectives for HE: institutional autonomy, diversity, innovation, etc.: i.e., link the EHEA and the ERA  These key objectives are developed into guidelines to evaluate QA agencies  QA and HE communities must work together in partnership

…8… Agreement: Institutional level HEIs must play a key role in order to ensure real accountability Internal Quality Culture

…9… Institutional level - EUA’s interpretation: Develop a quality culture in institutions Avoid a bureaucratic, top-down, managerial approach Promote quality as a shared value and collective responsibility Begin with a shared understanding of the institutional profile Ensure that results are fed back into institutional planning Focus on capacity for change Fitness for purpose approach

…10… Agreement: National level Diversity of national QA procedures must be accepted because: It reflects national priorities Choosing a specific procedure is a national prerogative But we need to develop a European dimension

…11… E4 Agreement: European level (I) QA agencies will be subject to a cyclical review These reviews will be undertaken nationally wherever possible A European register of QA agencies A European Register Committee as a gatekeeper to the Register A European Consultative Forum for QA in HE European standards for HEIs and QA agencies

…12… Agreement: European level (II) Standards for QA agencies Independence of agencies from governments and higher education institutions: i.e., conclusions are not affected by ministry or HEIs and QA agency is autonomous QA procedures must include a self-evaluation report, a visit by an external panel and a public report QA procedures must be transparent and fair

…13… Agreement: European level (III) Standards for HEIS: Develop a quality culture policy Formal approval and monitoring of programmes and awards Policy concerning students’ assessment Quality assurance of teaching staff Adequate learning resources and student support Information systems Public information

…14… Key issues at European level Fitness for purpose or agreed standards? i.e., how specific should be the agreed standards given the need to promote diversity and innovation? Peer-review process and structure? i.e., What should be the role of stakeholders and the articulation with the national level

…15… Engineering education and Bologna: 2004 SEFI survey Most countries are implementing a 3+2 structure, with no selection for access to 2nd cycle Bologna reforms in engineering are limited and difficult: How to define ECTS (workload/outcomes/both)? How to define employability at bachelors level? How to convince employers that the change is positive? Will this change cause mission drift in binary systems (proliferation of masters degree in all types of institutions)?

…16… Engineering and Quality EUR-ACE project launch, September 2004 aims at setting up a European system for accreditation Based on agreed common standards Tested and retested through pilots Operational in five years Aspiring to become a model for other professional fields

…17… What does this means for you?  Ensure that professional associations and employers understand the European discussions  Most importantly, get involved in the European policy discussion to ensure that: The voice of academics is heard: the future “European dimension of QA” must be congruent with academic values A role for the academic community in defining standards and any QA process at European level