Interactions Between Vitamin D and Androgen Receptor Signaling in Prostate Cancer Cells Nancy L. Weigel, Ph.D. Baylor College of Medicine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RNA INTERFERENCE RNAI RELATION TO P53 USING RNAI TO SILENCE MUTANT P53 IN BLADDER CANCER CELLS & SIRNA BAR CODE SCREENING By: Chelsey Maag.
Advertisements

METHODS Cell Culture LNCaP human prostate cancer cells obtained from ATCC (Cat # CRL-1740) (Rockville, MD) were cultured in RPMI-1640 (supplemented with.
SERUM DEPRIVATION INDUCES EWING SARCOMA CELLS TO ADOPT A MORE INVASIVE PHENOTYPE AND TO UP REGULATE RHO-MKL TRANSCRIPTIONAL SIGNALING Merlin Airik, Melanie.
MiRNA-drug resistance mechanisms Summary Hypothesis: The interplay between miRNAs, signaling pathways and epigenetic and genetic alterations are responsible.
Larry Marnett Cellular Responses to Aldehydic Products of Lipid Peroxidation.
Cell Cycle and Cancer. Cancer Terms Neoplasm – new, abnormal growth of cells Benign – not cancerous Malignant - cancerous Cancer – cellular growth disorder.
Kyoto University, Japan
Isosteviol derivatives induced apoptosis in Human lung cancer via targeting MEK/MAPK pathway: An in vitro and in vivo study Ahmed M Malki 1,,PhD Stephen.
Hypothesis/Strategy Identify genes downstream of AR that are important for survival of prostate cancer cells – AR signature genes – Regulators of AR signature.
1 Science, Vol. 314, p 294~297 (2006) 講者 : 賴金美 日期 : CDK2-Dependent Phosphorylation of FOXO1 as an Apoptotic Response to DNA Damage Haojie Huang,
Functional interactions between calmodulin and estrogen receptor-α
Discussion The C13orf19 mRNA inhibition by D5 has no effects on cellular growth properties. We suppose that the inhibition leads to reduced apoptosis in.
Greg Brooke Molecular Oncology. Prostate Cancer - Leading Cause of Cancer- related death in men - Growth dependent on androgens - Therapy targets androgen.
HOMING Ewing vs Paget Trapping vs homing (controlled arrest) “Seed and soil” Organ-specific metastatic colonization of favorable microenvironment.
The early testosterone-induced actin reorganization in colon cancer is independent of iAR signalling control 15min30min60min + TAC control 15min 30min60min.
Relationship Between STAT3 Inhibition and the Presence of p53 on Cyclin D1 Gene Expression in Human Breast Cancer Cell Lines Introduction STAT3 and p53.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Potentially Harmful Effect of a Testosterone Dietary.
SIP, a novel ankyrin repeat containing protein, sequesters steroid receptor coactivators in the cytoplasm by Ying Zhang, Hua Zhang, Jing Liang, Wenhua.
Figure 1. Schematic location of the amino acid substitutions and truncations of the androgen receptor. NTD, N-terminal domain; DBD, DNA binding domain;
Cell Physiol Biochem 2017;42:2582– DOI: /
Immune Keytruda.
P14/19ARF as Tumor Suppressor
Fig. 1 UGT2B15 mRNA levels are stimulated by E2 in a time- and dose-dependent manner in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. A, Time course for E2 treatment. Cells.
Mouse Double Minute 2 (MDM2)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Yu-fang huang, yi-hui wu, cheng-yang chou*
The Long Non-Coding RNA XIST Interacted with MiR-124 to Modulate Bladder Cancer Growth, Invasion and Migration by Targeting Androgen Receptor (AR) Cell.
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 154, Issue 5, Pages (August 2013)
Figure 1 Cellular processes involved in cancer development
miR-133a positively regulated p53/p21 pathway.
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 antagonizes the effects of retinoids in myeloid leukemia cells by Takayuki Ikezoe, Sakae Tanosaki, Utz Krug,
Sp1 Suppresses miR-3178 to Promote the Metastasis Invasion Cascade via Upregulation of TRIOBP  Hui Wang, Kai Li, Yu Mei, Xuemei Huang, Zhenglin Li, Qingzhu.
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
HOMING
Figure 1 Treatment-induced resistance and evolution to lineage crisis
therapy and to block androgen action
Volume 73, Issue 1, Pages 4-8 (January 2018)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Michèle Algarté-Génin, Olivier Cussenot, Pierre Costa  European Urology 
K107R induces gene expression in an adipocyte-autonomous manner.
Coordinate Transcriptional Regulation by ERG and Androgen Receptor in Fusion- Positive Prostate Cancers  Yu Chen, Charles L. Sawyers  Cancer Cell  Volume.
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
A Novel Role for BMI1 in Prostate Cancer
Uc.454 Inhibited Growth by Targeting Heat Shock Protein Family A Member 12B in Non- Small-Cell Lung Cancer  Jun Zhou, Chenghai Wang, Weijuan Gong, Yandan.
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Schematic model of effector pathways that mediate tumor suppression by p53. Schematic model of effector pathways that mediate tumor suppression by p53.
Control of Smad7 stability by competition between Acetylation and Ubiquitination Gronroos et al., 2002, Mol Cell.
Destruction of Full-Length Androgen Receptor by Wild-Type SPOP, but Not Prostate- Cancer-Associated Mutants  Jian An, Chenji Wang, Yibin Deng, Long Yu,
Spatial and Temporal Recruitment of Androgen Receptor and Its Coactivators Involves Chromosomal Looping and Polymerase Tracking  Qianben Wang, Jason S.
Apoptosis Cell Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages (January 2002)
Nat. Rev. Urol. doi: /nrurol
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Negative Regulation of Tumor Suppressor p53 by MicroRNA miR-504
Fig. 1 AVPR1A is regulated by the AR coactivator VAV3 and AR-V7 and is increased in advanced human PC. AVPR1A is regulated by the AR coactivator VAV3 and.
Formation of the Androgen Receptor Transcription Complex
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
CDDO-Me induces apoptosis independent of Bcl-2 level as well as p53 status in human NSCLC cells. CDDO-Me induces apoptosis independent of Bcl-2 level as.
Active AR signaling in enzalutamide-resistant xenograft tumors.
Antitumor effects of celastrol in vitro and in vivo.
Per1 inhibits growth and induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cell lines. Per1 inhibits growth and induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cell lines. LNCaP,
BAF57 is highly expressed in human prostate cancer specimens.
Effect of NO and eNOS on prostate cancer cell growth.
Expression data from genes involved in regulation of transit through the cell cycle in response to treatment with E2 and OHT. A. Expression data from genes.
Effects of W. chinensis extract on androgen activity and growth of prostate cancer cells. Effects of W. chinensis extract on androgen activity and growth.
6BIO Enhances Oligonucleotide Activity in Cells: A Potential Combinatorial Anti- androgen Receptor Therapy in Prostate Cancer Cells  Xiaowei Zhang, Daniela.
Presentation transcript:

Interactions Between Vitamin D and Androgen Receptor Signaling in Prostate Cancer Cells Nancy L. Weigel, Ph.D. Baylor College of Medicine

Androgen Receptor in Prostate GF DHT Stromal Cell Androgen Receptor is Required for Prostate Development Androgen Receptor is Active in Adult Stromal and Epithelial cells AR PSA DHT

Prostate Cancer Primary tumors are androgen dependent and express PSA Tumors treated with androgen ablation Tumors become ablation resistant—express PSA Tumors still androgen receptor dependent?

LNCaP and C4-2 Human Prostate Cancer Cells Isolated from lymph node metastasis Androgen dependent in vivo Express AR (mutant) Express wt p53 Derived from LNCaP cells Androgen independent in vitro and in vivo LNCaP C4-2

Androgen Dependence of LNCaP Cell Growth Zhao et al. (1997) Endocrinology 138: Fig 3A

Androgen Receptor is Required for Growth of Androgen Independent C4-2 Cells AR

AR siRNA Reduces PSA Expression in C4-2 Cells Actin PSA Csi ARsi

PC Ethanol 10nM 1,25D 10nM 1,25D (Rec) 100nM 1,25D 100nM 1,25D (Rec) Day 9Day 15Day 12 ************ LNCaP Differential Growth Inhibition of Prostate Cancer Cells

1 α Dihydroxyvitamin D 3 (1,25 D) Dependent Growth Inhibition of LNCaP Cells Is Reversed by Casodex Cell Number (X10 -4 ) Control 10nM 1,25 D 1nM DHT DHT+1,25 D 1uM Cas Cas+1,25 D

Is Androgen Activity Essential for 1,25 D Growth Inhibition of Prostate Cancer Cells? Is this phenomenon unique to LNCaP lineage cells? Would 1,25 D effectively inhibit cancers that have failed androgen ablation therapy?

1,25 D Inhibits LN3 and C4-2 Cell Growth In Androgen Depleted Medium Cell Number (X10 -4 ) LN3 C4-2 Control1,25 D Control1,25 D

Casodex Reverses 1,25 D Mediated Growth Inhibition of LN3 and C4-2 Cells in Medium with Androgens Cell Number (% Control) LNCaPLN3C4-2 control 1,25 D Casodex Cas + 1,25 D

Non-LNCaP Derived Prostate Cancer Cell Lines Expressing AR LAPC4 cells – –Androgen dependent –wt AR –Mutant p53 PC-3 AR cells – –PC-3 cells stably transfected with wt AR –Lack p53 22Rv1 cells – –Derived from androgen dependent CWR22 xenograft –Mutant AR –Functional p53

1,25 D Inhibits PC-3 AR and LAPC4 Cell Growth in Androgen Depleted Medium Control1,25 DControl1,25 D Cell Number (X10 -4 ) PC-3 ARLAPC

Casodex Does Not Alter 1,25 D Mediated Growth Inhibition of PC-3 AR, LAPC4 and 22Rv1 Cells in Medium Containing FBS Cell Number (% Control) PC-3 ARLAPC422Rv1 control 1,25 D Casodex Cas + 1,25 D

Summary Endogenous androgens are not required for 1,25 D mediated growth inhibition Reversal of 1,25 D action by anti- androgens is peculiar to LNCaP/ LNCaP- derived cells

Potential Mechanisms for 1,25 D – Androgen Interaction in LNCaP Cells Altered transcriptional activation by AR and/or VDR Interactions downstream of receptor activity Androgens AR AR Target Gene Transcription 1,25 D VDR VDR Target Gene Transcription Co-factors

DHT Cas+ 1,25 D 1,25 D Does Not Alter Transcriptional Activity of AR in LNCaP Cells RLU/bgal (X10 -3 )

VDR Activity in LNCaP Cells is Not Altered by Androgens/Anti-androgens 1,25 D DHT+ Cas RLU/bgal (X10 -3 )

DHT Inhibits Induction of CYP24 Lou and Tuohimaa(2006) J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 99:44-49 Fig. 2

VDR Dependent Induction of IGFBP-3 Requires Androgen in LNCaP Cells, but not in PC-3 Cells % FCS10% sFCS R1881 1,25D IGFBP-3 PC3LNCaP C IGFBP-3  Actin Fold Increase:

Effect of Casodex Co-treatment on Downstream Actions of 1,25 D Cell cycle arrest – partially blocked Protects against induction of apoptosis Protects against bcl-2 down-regulation following 1,25 D treatment

1,25 D / Anti-Androgen Interactions Downstream of Receptor Activation 1,25 D VDR Target Genes Androgens ARTarget Genes Growth Inhibition Anti-androgens A.Common downstream effector for the VDR and AR dependent growth inhibitory pathways. B. Common (growth inhibitory) target gene induced by 1,25 D and androgens

Novel gene ( Geck et al, Tufts ) induced by androgens in LNCaP cells Induced only at doses that cause growth inhibition Essential for androgen induced growth inhibition of MCF-7/AR cells Hypothesis – AS3 may be a common target for androgen and 1,25 D induced growth regulation of LNCaP cells AS3 (APRIN)– A Gene Involved in Androgen Induced Growth Inhibition of LNCaP Cells

TreatmentRelative Expression of AS3 (w/o CHX) Relative Expression of AS3 (+ CHX) Vehicle1.00 R ± ± ,25 D23.24 ± ± AS3 Induction by 1,25 D is Independent of de novo Protein Synthesis

Hypothetical Model for AS3 Regulation RXR Coactivators VDRE ARE ?? ? AR VDR VDRE ARE ?? ? RXR VDR Coactivators + Androgens + 1,25 D + Casodex Coactivators Corepressors VDRE ARE ?? ? RXR VDR Coactivators

TreatmentRelative Expression of AS3 Vehicle1.00 R ± ,25 D28.82 ± 9.74 Casodex1.29 ± ,25 D + Casodex15.18 ± 3.76 Casodex Blocks 1,25 D Mediated Induction of AS3 *

AS3 is not Induced in 22RV1 Cells Where Casodex Does Not Reverse 1,25D Mediated Growth Inhibition Casodex + 1,25 D * * * Cell number (% Control) * * *   AS3/18S PSA/18S F. G. AS3/18S IGFBP3/18S * *

Conclusions There are functional interactions between androgen receptor and vitamin D receptor signaling. Reversal of 1,25 D mediated growth inhibition by anti-androgens is not universal. AS3 is a common target for androgens and 1,25 D in LNCaP cells, but not in 22RV1 cells.

Acknowledgments Shalini Murthy LaMonica Stewart Irina Agoulnik Tara Polek