How special are brightest group and cluster galaxies? Anja von der Linden et al., 2007, MNRAS, 379, 867 On the prevalence of radio-loud active galactic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cosmology and extragalactic astronomy Mat Page Mullard Space Science Lab, UCL Revision Lecture.
Advertisements

arvard.edu/phot o/2007/m51/. Confronting Stellar Feedback Simulations with Observations of Hot Gas in Elliptical Galaxies Q. Daniel Wang,
Xavier Barcons Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC-UC) On behalf of The Athena+ Co-ordination Group, the Athena+ Working Groups and Supporters A theme.
Sravani Vaddi 1, Chris O’Dea 1, Stefi Baum 1, Christine Jones 2, Bill Forman2, Samantha Whitmore 3 and Rabeea Ahmed 3 1 Astrophysical Sciences & Technology,
Low-frequency radio maps for the REXCESS cluster sample S.R. Heidenreich, University of Southampton In collaboration with J.H. Croston, University of Southampton;
Paul AlexanderThird Cavendish-KAIST Symposium September 2006 Extragalactic Astrophysics and Cosmology in the Cavendish Astrophysics Group Paul Alexander.
18 July Monte Carlo Markov Chain Parameter Estimation in Semi-Analytic Models Bruno Henriques Peter Thomas Sussex Survey Science Centre.
An Evolutionary Connection between AGNs and GALEX UV-excess Early-type Galaxies Hyun-Jin Bae*, Kiyun Yun, Yumi Choi, and Suk-Jin Yoon Department of Astronomy.
The W i d e s p r e a d Influence of Supermassive Black Holes Christopher Onken Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics Christopher Onken Herzberg Institute.
Xiaohu Yang Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Partner group of MPA Collaborators: Yu Wang (SHAO), H.J. Mo (UMass), F.C. van den Bosch (MPIA), Neal Katz.
AGN-controlled gas cooling in elliptical galaxies and galaxy clusters Christian R. Kaiser, Edward C.D. Pope, Georgi Pavlovski, Hans Fangohr, Southampton.
Quasar Clustering from SDSS DR7: Dependencies on FIRST Radio Magnitudes Andria C. Schwortz, Sarah Eftekharzadeh, Adam D. Myers, Yue Shen Clustering is.
Chapter 16 Dark Matter And The Fate Of The Universe.
Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution Springel et al., 2005 Presented by Eve LoCastro October 1, 2009.
Network requirements from Ukrainian Physics and Astronomy communities Dr. Peter Berczik Main Astronomical Observatory Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences.
The Dark Age… before the stars, beyond the galaxies…
Dark Halos of Fossil Groups and Clusters Observations and Simulations Ali Dariush, Trevor Ponman Graham Smith University of Birmingham, UK Frazer Pearce.
The Regulation of Star Formation by AGN Feedback D AVID R AFFERTY (Penn State / Ohio U.) Collaborators: Brian McNamara (Waterloo) and Paul Nulsen (CfA)
Star & Planet Formation Alyssa A. Goodman Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Research Astronomy In Southern NM: Insights From the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Jon Holtzman NMSU Department of Astronomy.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation Section 4: Semi-Analytic Models of Galaxy Formation Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael.
Prospects and Problems of Using Galaxy Clusters for Precision Cosmology Jack Burns Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy University of Colorado,
AGN and Quasar Clustering at z= : Results from the DEEP2 + AEGIS Surveys Alison Coil Hubble Fellow University of Arizona Chandra Science Workshop.
Physics 202: Introduction to Astronomy – Lecture 22 Carsten Denker Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
Statistical Properties of Radio Galaxies in the local Universe Yen-Ting Lin Princeton University Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Yue Shen, Michael.
Subaru Observations of Galaxy Clusters at z
KNAW colloquium “Cosmic Voids” December 12-15, 2006 Cosmic Voids, Void Galaxies, and Void AGN Michael S. Vogeley Department of Physics Drexel University.
Statistical Properties of Radio Galaxies in the local Universe Yen-Ting Lin Princeton University Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Yue Shen, Michael.
Claudia Lagos U. 8 Abril 2008 Seminario de Astrofísica “Semi-analytic galaxies (SAG) model: results on BH and galaxy population” Claudia Lagos (PUC, Chile)
“ Testing the predictive power of semi-analytic models using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey” Juan Esteban González Birmingham, 24/06/08 Collaborators: Cedric.
Radio Sources in High-Redshift Galaxy Clusters: An Initial Look Megan Roscioli University of Chicago In collaboration with Mike Gladders, U. Chicago RCS-1,2.
PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY
Estimate* the Total Mechanical Feedback Energy in Massive Clusters Bill Mathews & Fulai Guo University of California, Santa Cruz *~ ±15-20% version 2.
In this talk we'll see that : We can only see about 1% of the Universe The dark side And ask: What is the Universe made of?
Modelling radio galaxies in simulations: CMB contaminants and SKA / Meerkat sources by Fidy A. RAMAMONJISOA MSc Project University of the Western Cape.
Radio Galaxies and Quasars Powerful natural radio transmitters associated with Giant elliptical galaxies Demo.
Gravitational Waves from Massive Black-Hole Binaries Stuart Wyithe (U. Melb) NGC 6420.
Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) Survey Sarah Brough Sarah Brough - Australian Astronomical Observatory.
Feb/19/2008 A Demography of Galaxies in Galaxy Clusters with the Spectro-photometric Density Measurement. Joo Heon Yoon 윤주헌 Sukyoung Yi 이석영 Yoon et al.
Understanding formation of galaxies from their environments Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory.
The Earliest Stages of Massive Star Cluster Evolution Kelsey Johnson, NRAO & U.Wisconsin The New Radio Universe, AAS 200.
Frontiers in Science #7 Co-evolution of Galaxies and Massive Black Holes in the Universe Masayuki Akiyama (Astronomical Institute) 2009/11/25.
The coordinated growth of stars, haloes and large-scale structure since z=1 Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
The Cosmic Web The Large Scale Structure of the Universe Szydagis University of Oregon 1 / 17.
G. Miknaitis SC2006, Tampa, FL Observational Cosmology at Fermilab: Sloan Digital Sky Survey Dark Energy Survey SNAP Gajus Miknaitis EAG, Fermilab.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
December 17, 2008 The EVLA Vision Galaxies Through CosmicTime 1 Microjansky Radio Sources: AGN or Star Formation? Ken Kellermann & EdFomalont NRAO in collaboration.
Galaxies with Active Nuclei Chapter 14:. Active Galaxies Galaxies with extremely violent energy release in their nuclei (pl. of nucleus).  “active galactic.
Major dry-merger rate and extremely massive major dry-mergers of BCGs Deng Zugan June 31st Taiwan.
Black hole accretion history of active galactic nuclei 曹新伍 中国科学院上海天文台.
Astronomy:. Here is my powerpoint from last years coaches conference. I will be updating it to reflect the changes in content in this years rules. I’m.
1 Suparna Roychowdhury Groups of galaxies in nearby universe, Santiago, Chile, december, 2005 Astronomy Group, Raman Research Institute Bangalore,
Semi-analytical model of galaxy formation Xi Kang Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS.
The Very Large Array Sky Survey
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
A Spitzer Mid-Infrared Survey of Brightest Cluster Galaxies Presented by: Andrew Fiedler Project Mentor: Dr. Eiichi Egami Special Thanks To: Dr. Linhua.
Modelling the Red Halos of Blue Compact Galaxies Zackrisson, E 1., Bergvall, N 1., Marquart, T 1., Mattsson, L 1. & Östlin, G. 2 1 Uppsala Astronomical.
The Submillimeter Array 1 David J. Wilner
Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) is a NASA infrared- wavelength astronomical space telescope launched on December 14, 2009 It’s an Earth-orbiting.
Color Magnitude Diagram VG. So we want a color magnitude diagram for AGN so that by looking at the color of an AGN we can get its luminosity –But AGN.
Selection and Photometric Properties of K+A Galaxies Alejandro D. Quintero, David W. Hogg, Michael R. Blanton (NYU), et al.
Maracalagonis, 24/05/ Semi-Analytic Modeling of Galaxy Formation PhD student: Elena Ricciardelli Supervisor: prof. Alberto Franceschini.
Galaxy Evolution and WFMOS
The formation and dynamical state of the brightest cluster galaxies
Probing Magnetized Turbulence in the Fermi Bubbles
Mapping the Universe With radio galaxies and quasars.
The “Milky Way”.
Lecture 20-21: The Formation of Structure---Galaxies, Clusters, Voids
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 3-3: Stellar mass function of galaxies Seminar: Perez-Gonzalez et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 234 Lecture: 2012/01/16.
Borislav Nedelchev et al. 2019
Presentation transcript:

How special are brightest group and cluster galaxies? Anja von der Linden et al., 2007, MNRAS, 379, 867 On the prevalence of radio-loud active galactic nuclei in brightest cluster galaxies: implications for AGN heating of cooling flows P. N. Best et al., 2007, MNRAS, 379, 894

1. Introduction to BCGs BCGs are massive end galaxies. BCGs locate at/near the cluster center. の分散 σ v,cl

1. Introduction to BCGs the density of hot gas is highest! Galaxies with X-ray emitting hot gas halo

1. Introduction to BCGs the density of dark matter is highest! Galaxies with dark matter halo By D. Coe, N. Benitez, T. Broadhurst, and H. Ford.

1. Topics related to BCGs BCGs are high-M * end galaxies! (~ETG) -ETG scaling relation → dynamical property. N-body simulation, contribution from DMH. BCGs are at cluster center! -ETG scaling relation → dynamical property. -SF from cooling flow(SFH, stellar population). High RL-AGN fraction! -Radio mode feedback to IGM/ICM. -RL-AGN fraction + radio-LF + ‘‘L(radio) → L(mechanical) relation’’ = radio-mode feedback energy. ETG: Early-Type Galaxy, DMH: Dark Matter Halo, SFH: Star Formation History, IGM/ICM: Intra Galactic/Cluster Medium, RL-AGN: Radio-Loud Active Galactic Nuclei.

2. Data SDSS DR4 spec-galaxy: ×10 5 spectra. MPA-JHU spectral measurements. Photometry within r log(1+z) 4 ] Blanton’s k-correction. Best’s FIRST-NVSS-SDSS match. SDSS: Sloan Digital Sky Survey, MPA: Max-Plank-Institute for Astrophysics, JHU: Johns Hopkins University, FIRST: Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty cm, NVSS: NRAO VLA Sky Survey, NRAO: National Radio Astronomy Observatory, VLA: Very Large Array, SDSS: Sloan Digital Sky Survey,

2. C4 catalog 0.02<z<0.16, 14.5<m r <17.7, μ<24.5 mag arcsec -2, from DR3 spec(+photo) galaxy → 1106 clusters. z cl, σ v,cl (within 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5h -1 Mpc), mean galaxy/ BCG properties. - mean galaxy: the galaxy at density peak. -BCG: the galaxy within 500h -1 kpc from the mean galaxy AND v offset <4σ v,cl AND without strong Hα emission. ~30% of the BCG were missed by fiber collision and this is corrected by photometric objects(but low-reliability).

2. BCG Selection z<0.1, M r <-20 galaxies, from the C4 catalog → 833 clusters. Within max(R 200, 0.5 Mpc) from the mean galaxy, two brightest BCG candidates are selected which meet the following: -c=R i90 /R i50 >2.5, fracDeV_r>0.5. -Δ(u-g)<0.6, Δ(g-r)<0.5, Δ(r-i)<0.4. -TARGET_GALAXY flag ○, SATURATED flag ×. -Δz<0.01. →Brighter one is first BCG candidate. →If the first is brighter 1 mag than the other, the other becomes second BCG candidate. Non-zero, min(σ v,cl (< 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5h -1 Mpc)) → ETG-like → similar color between C4 and this work → to remove star → it is possible that the first is foreground ETG For the first and second BGC candidates.

2. BCG Selection -c>2.3, w/o Δ(u-g), w/o TARGET_GALAXY criteria. -The other criteria are the same. →If selected one is brighter than the first and second candidate(s), this becomes third BCG candidate. If the first=second=third candidate, then it is BCG. (242 obj) Other cases, the candidates are inspected visually on 2.5’’×2.5’’ color images from DR4 CAS. (472) Other cases, inspected visually on color images(only <2Mpc, Δz<0.01 obj, w/ other criterion). (54) Otherwise, inspected visually on Finding Chart in CAS(only <2Mpc, Δz<0.01 obj, w/o other criterion). (65) [ =833] if BCG is not closest to the mean, they regarded these system as a substructures in other clusters. So rejected. (-101) CAS: Catalog Archive Server, w/: with, w/o: without. For the third BGC candidate.

2. New σ v,cl, z cl, R They developed the iterative procedure: 2.If galaxy_i is R<2R start from the new BCG and z i -z cl C4 <0.025, they(i=1,…,N) are regarded as ‘cluster’ in first iteration. 3.σ v,cl in first-cluster is σ v,cl = (Σ i=1 N |z i -z cl C4 |/N) c. (limited to σ v,cl <500 km/s) 4.From galaxy_ j that meets |v j /c| = |(z j -z cl C4 )/(1+z cl C4 )| < 3σ v,cl and R<R 200 from the BCG, z cl and σ v,cl in first-cluster re-determined by using the biweight estimator(Beers+’90). 5.z cl & σ v,cl → |v j /c| & R 200 → z cl & σ v,cl → to δz cl & δσ v,cl < ave(σ v,cl (< 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5h -1 Mpc in C4 catalog) R start ’

2. Selection results Number of galaxies Number of clusters z cl σ v,cl [km/s] If one ‘cluster’ has only two or three galaxies, they discarded it. As a result, the number of BCGs(clusters) is 625.

3. BCG image

4. BCG vs. non-BCG control sample Closest neighbor in 3 parameter space: log(M * /M ☉ ), z, g-r Upper BCG-M * limit: log(M * /M ☉ )< BCGs are from DR3, comparison non-BCGs are from DR4 → possible DR4-BCGs in comparison non-BCGs. -small number of non-BCGs in high-M * end. Comparison Sample 3-phot(CS3p) Comparison Sample 3-spec(SC3s) -w/o color and fracDeV, w/ upper M * limit. CS1p CS1s -w/ M g -M r >0.75 and fracDeV_r>0.8, w/o upper M * limit. For comparison in physical properties. For comparison in ETG scaling relations. → to select ETGs

5-1. BCG vs. non-BCG (SC3p) log(1-CL), CL in KS-test. The same distribution by sample construction. Larger in BCGs More extended in BCGs More diffuse in BCGs More strong color grad in non-BCGs

5-2. BCG vs. non-BCG (CS3s) Same!Same? Larger σ * In BCGs. Same. Slightly smaller in BCGs. Larger in BCGs.

6-1. Size-luminosity relation (SC1p) R 50 ∝ L α : Larger R 50 in BCGs. α increases with M r, slightly larger α in BCGs. Non-BCG BCG

6-2. Dynamical to stellar mass ratio Aperture correction: A Dynamical mass from observation(& Virial theorem): If NFW(’97) DM profile and Hernquist(’90) LM profile are assumed, dynamical mass becomes A M’ dyn,50 /M *,50 is...

6-2. Dynamical to stellar mass ratio Larger ratio in BCGs → larger contribution from MDH? log(1-CL) N bin /N total M’ dyn,50 /M *,50 Non-BCG BCG

6-3. Fundamental Plane (CS1s) Generic FP relation is where a~ , b~0.8. Theoretical(from Virial theorem) FP is So, a=2, b=1. (they assumed b BCGs is the same as b CS1s ) (a has large scatter, b has small scatter)

6-4. Fundamental Plane (CS1s) BCGs with small R 50 /high μ/high σ * deviate from generic FP. Non-BCG BCG a BCGs =1.96 a CS1s =1.61

6-4. Fundamental Plane Generic FP relation is where a~ , b~0.8. Theoretical(from virial theorem) FP is So, a=2, b=1. (If c 1, c 2, M *, M dyn,50 are const) This pre-factor varies for different ETGs? (the ‘tilt’ of the FP) μ e -R e : Kormendy relation. L(R e,I e )-σ v : Faber-Jackson relation.

Non-BCG BCG Generic FP BCG FP Theoretical FP expects const. Large difference at low-M * : → BCG FP is different from generic FP especially at low-M *. Smaller pre-factor variation in BCG FP: → BCG FP is more close to theoretical FP. 注 ) パワポフィット

6-5. Faber-Jackson relation Generic/theoretical FJ relation(L ∝ σ v β ) is β~4/=4. Non-BCG BCG For this sample, β=3.93(non-BCGs), β=5.32(BCGs). In dissipationless merger (Boylan-Kolchin+2006), β increases with eccentricity of the merger orbit. BCGmembers

7-1. Star formation history (CS1s) Non-BCG BCG σ v [km/s] Mgb/ Strong correlation between Mg/Fe and σ *. Higher Mg/Fe ratio in BCGs. → shorter time-scale SF.

7-2. Star formation in BCGs (CS3s) M u -M g (~Balmer break) (SP~A, F star~100 Myr) Dn(4000)(SP~K, M star~few Gyr) They don’t find enhanced SF in BCGs. Non-BCG BCG

8. Emission-line ratio (CS3s) SF TRO AGN Non-BCG BCG TOTAL (30%)119/391 in BCGs (40%)472/1173 in non-BCGs TRO (24%)29/119 in BCGs (16%)79/472 in non-BCGs AGN (70%)83/119 in BCGs (77%)364/472 in non-BCGs SF (6%)7/119 in BCGs (6%)29/472 in non-BCGs Lower optical-activity fraction in BCGs. EL-ratio distribution is the same. Diagnostics to the ionization source

Kewley+06, MNRAS, 372, 961 (Best+07) DR4 full sample DR3 BCGs DR3 RL-BCGs Almost the same?

9-1. RL-AGN fraction in BCGs △ : All galaxies, ●: BCGs. MrMr Log(M * /M ☉ ) △ : All galaxies, ●: BCGs. → Hδ A -Dn(4000) plane, L(1.4GHz)>10 23 W/Hz → possible radio emission from AGN(jet+lobe)! BCG is higher RL-fraction!

9-2. RL-AGN % in BCGs. RL-BCG fraction in high/low-σ v,cl cluster Almost same between σ v,cl bin! Best et al., 2007, MNRAS, 379, 894

Higher RL-% in r=0-0.2r 200. RL-% in different cluster centric radius 9-3. RL-AGN % in BCGs.

Summary (BCG vs. non-BCG) BCG vs. non-BCG: M *, z, g-r, controlled sample. More diffuse, extended surface brightness. Larger σ * & M’ dyn,50 /M *,50 & a(in FP) & β(in FJ). BCG FP is different from that of non-BCG in low-M *. BCG FP is more close to theoretical FP. Larger Mgb/. Slightly negative larger Hδ A. Lower optical-activity fraction. EL-ratio typical of high-M * galaxies. Higher RL-AGN fraction.