Xiaolong Zheng, Zhichao Cao, Jiliang Wang, Yuan He, and Yunhao Liu SenSys 2014 ZiSense Towards Interference Resilient Duty Cycling in Wireless Sensor Networks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of a reliable communication system for grid-style traffic light networks Junghoon Lee Dept. of Computer science and statistics Jeju National University.
Advertisements

Is There Light at the Ends of the Tunnel? Wireless Sensor Networks for Adaptive Lighting in Road Tunnels IPSN 2011 Sean.
SoNIC: Classifying Interference in Sensor Networks Frederik Hermans et al. Uppsala University, Sweden IPSN 2013 Presenter: Jeffrey.
A 2 -MAC: An Adaptive, Anycast MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Hwee-Xian TAN and Mun Choon CHAN Department of Computer Science, School of Computing.
Transmission Power Control in Wireless Sensor Networks CS577 Project by Andrew Keating 1.
Fault-Tolerant Target Detection in Sensor Networks Min Ding +, Dechang Chen *, Andrew Thaeler +, and Xiuzhen Cheng + + Department of Computer Science,
Improvement on LEACH Protocol of Wireless Sensor Network
RadioSense: Exploiting Wireless Communication Patterns for Body Sensor Network Activity Recognition Xin Qi, Gang Zhou, Yantao Li, Ge Peng College of William.
Walking down the STAIRS: Efficient Collision Resolution with Constructive Interference Xiaoyu Ji Xiaoyu Ji, Yuan He, Jiliang Wang, Wei Dong, Xiaopei Wu.
Medium Access Control in Wireless Sensor Networks.
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS Gizem ERDOĞAN.
Presented at ICC 2012 – Wireless Network Symposium – June 14 th 2012.
FLIGHT: Clock Calibration Using Fluorescent Lighting Zhenjiang Li, Wenwei Chen, Cheng Li, Mo Li, Xiang-Yang Li, Yunhao Liu Nanyang Technological University,
1 ENERGY: THE ROOT OF ALL PERVASIVENESS Anthony Ephremides University of Maryland April 29, 2004.
1/24 Passive Interference Measurement in Wireless Sensor Networks Shucheng Liu 1,2, Guoliang Xing 3, Hongwei Zhang 4, Jianping Wang 2, Jun Huang 3, Mo.
1-1 Topology Control. 1-2 What’s topology control?
1 C-MAC: Model-driven Concurrent Medium Access Control for Wireless Sensor Networks Mo Sha ; Guoliang Xing ; Gang Zhou ; Shucheng Liu ; Xiaorui Wang City.
Robust Topology Control for Indoor Wireless Sensor Networks Greg Hackmann, Octav Chipara, and Chenyang Lu SenSys 2009 S Slides from Greg Hackmann at Washington.
1 Ultra-Low Duty Cycle MAC with Scheduled Channel Polling Wei Ye Fabio Silva John Heidemann Presented by: Ronak Bhuta Date: 4 th December 2007.
Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks Joseph PolastreJason HillDavid Culler Computer Science Department University of California,Berkeley.
Distributed Structural Health Monitoring A Cyber-Physical System Approach Chenyang Lu Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
Energy Conservation in wireless sensor networks Kshitij Desai, Mayuresh Randive, Animesh Nandanwar.
Radio-Triggered Wake-Up Capability for Sensor Networks Soji Sajuyigbe Duke University Slides adapted from: Wireless Sensor Networks Power Management Prof.
MAC Layer Protocols for Sensor Networks Leonardo Leiria Fernandes.
Locating Sensors in the Wild: Pursuit of Ranging Quality Wei Xi, Yuan He, Yunhao Liu, Jizhong Zhao, Lufeng Mo, Zheng Yang, Jiliang Wang,
Study of Actual State of Wireless Technology in Residential Environments Mo Sha Peng Li Jing Xia.
COGNITIVE RADIO FOR NEXT-GENERATION WIRELESS NETWORKS: AN APPROACH TO OPPORTUNISTIC CHANNEL SELECTION IN IEEE BASED WIRELESS MESH Dusit Niyato,
Secure Localization Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks proposed by A. Boukerche, H. Oliveira, E. Nakamura, and A. Loureiro (2008) Maria Berenice Carrasco.
Sensor Network MAC protocol & Applications KIRAN KUMAR REDDY V LENIN THUMMALAPALLI.
Understanding the Real-World Performance of Carrier Sense MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Networks and Mobile Systems
RushNet: Practical Traffic Prioritization for Saturated Wireless Sensor Networks Chieh-Jan Mike Liang †, Kaifei Chen ‡, Nissanka Bodhi Priyantha †, Jie.
Stochastic sleep scheduling (SSS) for large scale wireless sensor networks Yaxiong Zhao Jie Wu Computer and Information Sciences Temple University.
ARES: an Anti-jamming REinforcement System for Networks Konstantinos Pelechrinis, Ioannis Broustis, Srikanth V. Krishnamurthy, Christos Gkantsidis.
BMAC - Versatile Low Power Media Access for Wireless Sensor Networks.
Power Save Mechanisms for Multi-Hop Wireless Networks Matthew J. Miller and Nitin H. Vaidya University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign BROADNETS October.
1 An Adaptive Energy-Efficient and Low-Latency MAC for Data Gathering in Wireless Sensor Network Gang Lu, Bhaskar Krishnamachari, and Cauligi Raghavendra.
A Survey of Spectrum Sensing Algorithm for Cognitive Radio Applications YaGun Wu netlab.
MOJO: A Distributed Physical Layer Anomaly Detection System for WLANs Richard D. Gopaul CSCI 388.
/42 Does Wireless Sensor Network Scale? A Measure Study on GreenOrbs Yunhao Liu, Yuan He, Mo Li, Jiliang Wang,Kebin Liu, Lufeng Mo, Wei Dong,
SENSOR NETWORKS BY Umesh Shah Mayuresh Patil G P Reddy GUIDES Prof U.B.Desai Prof S.N.Merchant.
Improving Link Quality by Exploiting Channel Diversity in Wireless Sensor Networks Manjunath D, Mun Choon Chan, and Ben Leong National University of Singapore.
Versatile Low Power Media Access for Wireless Sensor Networks Sarat Chandra Subramaniam.
Data Collection and Dissemination. Learning Objectives Understand Trickle – an data dissemination protocol for WSNs Understand data collection protocols.
Efficient Energy Management Protocol for Target Tracking Sensor Networks X. Du, F. Lin Department of Computer Science North Dakota State University Fargo,
RushNet: Practical Traffic Prioritization for Saturated Wireless Sensor Networks Chieh-Jan Mike Liang †, Kaifei Chen ‡, Nissanka Bodhi Priyantha †, Jie.
ELECTIONEL ECTI ON ELECTION: Energy-efficient and Low- latEncy sCheduling Technique for wIreless sensOr Networks Shamim Begum, Shao-Cheng Wang, Bhaskar.
Secure In-Network Aggregation for Wireless Sensor Networks
Department of Computer Science and Engineering UESTC 1 RxLayer: Adaptive Retransmission Layer for Low Power Wireless Daibo Liu 1, Zhichao Cao 2, Jiliang.
SenProbe: Path Capacity Estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks Tony Sun, Ling-Jyh Chen, Guang Yang M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla.
An Adaptive Energy-Efficient and Low- Latency MAC for Data Gathering in Wireless Sensor Networks Gang Lu, Bhaskar Krishnamachari, and Cauligi S. Raghavendra.
SEA-MAC: A Simple Energy Aware MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks for Environmental Monitoring Applications By: Miguel A. Erazo and Yi Qian International.
Energy-Efficient Wake-Up Scheduling for Data Collection and Aggregation Yanwei Wu, Member, IEEE, Xiang-Yang Li, Senior Member, IEEE, YunHao Liu, Senior.
Link Layer Support for Unified Radio Power Management in Wireless Sensor Networks IPSN 2007 Kevin Klues, Guoliang Xing and Chenyang Lu Database Lab.
Defeating Energy-Efficient Jamming in IEEE based Wireless Networks By: y D. Wood, John A. Stankovic, and Gang Zhou, University of Virginia Presented.
Toward Reliable and Efficient Reporting in Wireless Sensor Networks Authors: Fatma Bouabdallah Nizar Bouabdallah Raouf Boutaba.
AUTO-ADAPTIVE MAC FOR ENERGY-EFfiCIENT BURST TRANSMISSIONS IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS Romain Kuntz, Antoine Gallais and Thomas No¨el IEEE WCNC 2011 Speaker.
Z-MAC : a Hybrid MAC for Wireless Sensor Networks Injong Rhee, Ajit Warrier, Mahesh Aia and Jeongki Min ACM SenSys Systems Modeling.
1 Media Access Control in Wireless Sensor Networks - I.
Frame counter: Achieving Accurate and Real-Time Link Estimation in Low Power Wireless Sensor Networks Daibo Liu, Zhichao Cao, Mengshu Hou and Yi Zhang.
OPPCAST Exploiting Spatial and Channel Diversity for Robust Data Collection in Urban Environments Mobashir Mohammad Xiang Fa Guo Mun Choon Chan IPSN 2016.
Wireless Sensor Networks 4. Medium Access
Data Collection and Dissemination
BlueScan: Boosting Wi-Fi Scanning Efficiency Using Bluetooth Radio
Ultra-Low Duty Cycle MAC with Scheduled Channel Polling
Data Collection and Dissemination
RushNet: Practical Traffic Prioritization for Saturated Wireless Sensor Networks Chieh-Jan Mike Liang†, Kaifei Chen‡, Nissanka Bodhi Priyantha†, Jie Liu†,
Xin Qi, Matthew Keally, Gang Zhou, Yantao Li, Zhen Ren
Gang Lu Bhaskar Krishnamachari Cauligi S. Raghavendra
Investigating Mac Power Consumption in Wireless Sensor Network
E-MiLi: Energy-Minimizing Idle Listening in Wireless Networks
Presentation transcript:

Xiaolong Zheng, Zhichao Cao, Jiliang Wang, Yuan He, and Yunhao Liu SenSys 2014 ZiSense Towards Interference Resilient Duty Cycling in Wireless Sensor Networks

Existing low-power method Radio : major source of energy consumption Duty cycling: Low Power Listening –Schedule nodes: sleep (radio off) or wake up (radio on) 2

CCA (Clear Channel Assessment) Decides a node wake up or not –Energy detection by threshold –High energy on channel  Busy channel  Possible transmissions  Wake up nodes –Effective energy efficient method in clean environments 3 Interference is ignored!

Channel overlapping 4 No clean channel away from interference all the time

Impacts on LPL False wake-up problem –Heterogeneous interference unnecessarily wakes up the receiver! 5 False wake-up, energy waste

Adaptive Energy Detection Protocol [1] [1] Mo Sha et al. Energy-efficient low power listening for wireless sensor networks in noisy environments, IPSN’13 6 No wake-up K readings ≥ threshold  wake up

Limitation 7 Min packet > Wake-up threshold > Max noise

Key insight Energy detection is too simple to filter out the interference –High energy on channel  Busy channel  possible ZigBee transmissions –No matter how good the threshold is set, false wake-up problem still exists 8 Can we recognize ZigBee by some other information instead of energy?

Roadmap Background Motivation Observations Design of ZiSense Evaluation Conclusion 9

Recognize ZigBee Limited information provided by the radio hardware –RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indicator) Key observation: –Different technologies in 2.4GHz leave distinguishable patterns on the time-domain RSSI sequence. 10

Observations 11

Feature #1: on-air time 12 Shorter on-air time Valid range of on-air time longer on-air time

Feature #2: packet interval 13 Shorter packet interval Fixed packet interval longer packet interval

Feature #3: PAPR (Peak-to-Average Ratio) 14 Large variation Flat sequence

Feature #4: RSSI < noise floor 15 TRUE FALSE

Roadmap Background Motivation Observations Design of ZiSense Evaluation Conclusion 16

ZiSense: Design Sense ZigBee and wake up nodes only when ZigBee signal is detected. 17

ZiSense: Identify ZigBee Adopt the decision tree as the classification algorithm 18

ZiSense: Identify ZigBee Rule-based identification algorithm – Simple yet effective, because features are stable –Universal to directly use in another system, without training. Four conditions as rules –C1 : PAPR ≤ PAPRZigBee; –C2 : Ton ≥ Tmin; –C3 : |MPI − MPIvalid| ≤ δ; –C4 : UNF = FALSE. Valid conditions (C1, C2, C3, C4) –(T,T,T,T)  –(F,T,T,T) –(T,F,T,T) 19 in strict conformance with valid ZigBee sequence deal with some corrupted features

ZiSense: Identify ZigBee Decision tree trained by C4.5 20

TP(True Positive): correctly recognize ZigBee signals FN(False Negative): missing valid ZigBee packets TN(True Negative): correctly recognize non-ZigBee FP(False Positive): false wake-ups Identification Accuracy 21 AlgorithmTP rateFN rateTN rateFP rate Rule-based97.5%2.5%97.6%2.4% Decision tree97.3%2.7%99.1%0.9%

ZiSense: Identify ZigBee Comparable accuracy –Compared with specially trained decision tree Effective algorithm: –False positive (false wake-up) rate: 2.4% –False negative (missing packet) rate: 2.5% General algorithm: –Stable features which are extracted from hardware and standard specifications –Directly used in other systems 22

Roadmap Background Motivation Observations Design of ZiSense Evaluation Conclusion 23

Different Interference Type False wake-up ratios under different heterogeneous interference environments 24

Different Interference Intensity Duty cycle = radio-on time / total time 25

Integrated with Routing Protocol Integrated with CTP –41 nodes deployed in a 50*100m2 office –Each method runs 24 hours 26

Integrated with Routing Protocol Integrated with CTP –Improve energy efficiency without extra overhead 27

Side effects NO Side effects 28 End-to-end ETXRouting link RSSI

Conclusion ZiSense: interference-resilient duty cycling technique –Solve false wake-up problem –Recognize valid ZigBee signals by only RSSI sequence Keep low energy consumption, ZiSense consumes –BoX-MAC-2: 24% (extreme case) and 38% (office) –AEDP: 27% (extreme case) and 50% (office) 29

Thank You!