COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Module 3: Support Teaching and Learning of the Standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

SESSION 2.2 Programme of Assessment Grades
Department of Mathematics and Science
Marshal Hurst LDC/MDC Coordinator Professional Development (501)
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
EXTENDED ESSAY, CONTINUED Assessment Criteria and Subject Areas.
K–12 Session 4.3 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 3: Looking for the Practices through Observation Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core.
The Foundation Statements and the Stage 1 outcome for designing and making place an emphasis on students:  responding to investigations of needs and wants.
Choral Counting. Agenda Choral Counting as an instructional activity –Experiencing the instructional activity as a learner –Observing & unpacking the.
 Sticky Note Chart paper  Markers, Glitter markers, highlighters  Ream of Paper  Video (Individual) Handout 1- The Standards (Class Sets) Handout 2-
Session 6: Writing from Sources Audience: 6-12 ELA & Content Area Teachers.
ELA Common Core State Standards Job Alike #8 Assessment.
1 Formative Assessment Debbie Owens AMSP University of Kentucky Kathy Strunk AMSP University of Tennessee.
Customer Focus Module Preview
Being a teacher educator Observing teaching. Aims To examine and develop observation feedback practices.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Write to Learn K-3 Partner Share With your partner discuss your current understanding and use of writing to learn.
Grade 3-8 PARCC Math: Let’s Get Ready ! PARCC Math Readiness and Action Planning January 16, 2015 Sponsors:
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events Design and Manufacture: Advanced Higher Course Assessment.
Copyright © 2008 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Puget Sound ESD– Session 3 December 12,
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Chapter 8 Building and Activating Background Knowledge is Our Job Fisher, D. & Frey, N. (2009). Background Knowledge: The Missing Piece of the Comprehension.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
SESSION 4 COLLECTING EVIDENCE OF LEARNER PERFORMANCE CAT AND IT.
Today’s Outcomes  Gain shared knowledge of the “In Common” Collection of K-5 student writing samples  Use the “In Common” writing samples to highlight.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Invention Convention Seth Krivohlavek Angie Deck.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
THE PROCESS OF PLANNING The “Back Story” for teachers…..
Tier 1 Sheltered Instruction & Academic Language Collaboration Module 2: Standards.
Teaching a Technology- Enriched Science Investigation Unit What is Scientific Inquiry? iLearn Science Session 2.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Session Four Language Arts & Social Studies. If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there. -Africa American Proverb.
Assessing Scientific Inquiry  Presented by:. Goals for Scoring Sessions  Learn to reliably score student work using the Scoring Guide.  Understand.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
PBL for the 21 st century. Getting Started Planning & Preparing Managing Reflect Perfect & Planning and Preparing Entry event Culminating products/rubrics.
SCS TNCore Rollout 2013 Study Group #4 Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Arrive At Essential Understandings: Part 2- Asking Advancing Questions.
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades Note to Presenter:
Digging Deep into Reading Informational Text CCSS Standards 1-3.
Alabama Reading Initiative Session 1. Parameters: 1. All participants - no observers. 2. Use time wisely. 3. Stay focused. Please keep sidebar.
COMMON CORE INFORMATIONAL WRITING UNIT GRADE 7-LOOKING AT GRADE 6/YEAR 1.
COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Module 4: Differentiation.
COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Module 1: Read and Know the Standard.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus- Grade 3.
The New Face of Assessment in the Common Core Wake County Public Schools Common Core Summer Institute August 6, 2013.
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
Independent Reading Writing Balanced Literacy Teachers choose material for students to read and a purpose for the reading, and then guide them to use.
Learning AP ILD November 8, 2012 Planning and Monitoring for Learning.
GOALS 1. To understand RIBTS 9.5 as part of the process of assessing student learning. 2. To self-reflect on assessment information (e.g. pre-, post-,
ASSESSMENT IN THE WRITING WORKSHOP Module #3 Highline Public Schools Literacy Team.
Formative Assessment February Fraction Action.
Learning Management System
Kristen A Condella MCSD Mathematics Coordinator. Mathematics Formative Assessment System (MFAS) Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and.
Activity 8b Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades K–5: Supporting All Students in Writing and Research.
Implementing Common Core: A Focus on Early Literacy Module- 1 ELA/ELD Connections Presented by: September 2014.
Department of social sciences best practices
Thinking with Technology Course Module 9
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Module 3: Support Teaching and Learning of the Standards

COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Support Teaching and Learning of the Standard  Purpose  Identify resources that support the standards at all grade levels.  Outcome  Complete a thorough analysis of a writing prompt.  Evaluate a variety of technologies that can support writing across all content areas and grade levels.  Materials  BYOD  Writing Prompt Analysis tool  Here’s What/So What?/Now What? recording sheet

COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS  Session Plan  Watch  Examine Writing Standards 4-9  Analyze and dissect effective writing prompts  Share  Investigate technology tools using Here’s What/So What?/Now What? protocol  Discuss  Use Writing Prompt Analysis tool to build a prompt and establish necessary and available resources  Wrap Up  Application Support Teaching and Learning of the Standard

COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Watch: Examine Writing Standards 4-6: Production and Distribution of Writing Support Teaching and Learning of the Standard Task, Purpose, and Audience Technology The Writing Process

COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Watch: Examine Writing Standards 7-9: Research to Build and Present Knowledge Support Teaching and Learning of the Standard Investigate Different Aspects of a Topic Use Evidence to Support Analysis Categorize and Sort Information from a Variety of Sources

COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Watch: Analyze and dissect effective writing prompts Support Teaching and Learning of the Standard WHO Identify the audience WHAT Identify the topic Identify the purpose HOW Determine a format Identify any resources needed DO Organize and start writing

COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Watch: Analyze and dissect effective writing prompts Support Teaching and Learning of the Standard WHOWHATHOWDO 1.Work with a partner. 2. Use the Writing Prompt Analysis tool to identify each element of the sample prompt. 3. Is anything missing? 4. How would you improve this prompt?

COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Share: Investigate technology “Here’s What! So What? Now What?” Step 1: Salsa Line Step 2: Groups of five move to stations Step 3: Investigate three technology resources Step 4: Generate facts and information for Here’s What! column Step 5: Consider applications in the So What? column Step 6: Brainstorm next steps in the Now What? column Support Teaching and Learning of the Standard

COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Discuss: Build a prompt and establish necessary and available resources Step 1: Draw a topic card Step 2: Use the Writing Prompt Analysis tool to create a prompt that  Specifies Audience  Specifies topic and purpose  Identifies the task  Offers examples Step 3: Trade prompts with another table and use the Analysis tool as a rubric to evaluate the prompt Support Teaching and Learning of the Standard

COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Wrap Up: Application  What is our expectation for teachers in terms of using writing in their instruction?  How will we communicate our expectations?  How will we support teachers to encourage more writing? Support Teaching and Learning of the Standard