Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference 2004 1 Use Your Evaluation Information to Communicate Your Results Your State AgrAbility Project November.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guideposts --Quality Work-Based Learning Programs
Advertisements

EuropeAid PARTICIPATORY SESSION 2: Managing contract/Managing project… Question 1 : What do you think are the expectations and concerns of the EC task.
Response to Recommendations by the National Association of Child Care Resource & Referral Agencies (NACCRRA) The Massachusetts Child Care Resource & Referral.
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Excellence in Service and Programming Writing Group: Kim Arrendell, Lisa Blazer, Eric Cooper, Andrew Haring, Anne Jimenez, Jennifer Lilly, Bob Miller,
Develop and Validate Minimum Core Criteria and Competencies for AgrAbility Program Staff Bill Field, Ed.D., Professor National AgrAbility Project Director.
Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.
 A strategic plan is a guiding document for an organization. It clarifies organizational priorities, goals and desired outcomes.  For the SRCS school.
What Gets Measured Gets Done Presented by Frances Head George Elliott.
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Healthy Schools Alberta HSA is the hub for the implementation of CSH in Alberta and effectively connects the health and education sectors. Services and.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Evaluation of Wisconsin AgrAbility and Vocational Rehabilitation Relationship R. T. Schuler, R. J. Straub, P. Leverenz and R. H. Meyer 2010 AgrAbility.
2005 North American Pesticide Applicator Certification and Safety Education Workshop 1 Evaluate Your Applicator Training Outcomes Heather H. Boyd, Ph.D.
NIDRR-funded AATT Project (Agricultural Assistive Technology Training) DOE/OSERS Project # H133G TRAINING OVERVIEW On-line and In-person Evaluations.
The Business Solutions Professional Approach: Connecting Extension to Workforce and Economic Development Presentation to members of the North Central Regional.
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
Association of University Staff (AUS) Annual Conference 2003.
Risk Management Education Reaching Farm Women Audiences Bob Wells Tim Eggers Kelvin Leibold Extension programs are available to all without regard to race,
Goodwill ® and AgrAbility: Linking Rural Americans with Vocational Rehabilitation Services Presented by Eric Olson Manager National AgrAbility Project.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
EXCELLENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY BUILDING COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
The SWHISA approach to extension:. The SWHISA approach extension:  participatory, farmer led,  open-ended and interactive relationship among farm families,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
D ecreasing P atient-Provider C onflict University of Utah Dialysis Program.
Indicators of Success -- Applying the TOC What will change? You must be able to test your theory!
Building Collaborative Initiatives that Enhance Student Learning Nancy Mitchell and Linda Major.
The Evaluation Plan.
Oregon State Board of Education January 19, 2012.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Centering PBIS Apps and Data Rewards and celebrations Coaches Network Buy-in with referral system Bus driver training School Climate and PBIS Wrap up.
1. 2 Collaborative Partnerships It’s that evolution thing again! Adult education has been partnering and collaborating for years.
Field Review Accountability: What is it? To whom? For what?
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
Telemedicine Technology Use Plan Brenda Janot Telemedicine Coordinator
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Building relationships and bridging social capital: An inclusive approach to immigrant civic engagement within libraries A PROCESS AND OUTCOME EVALUATION,
New Staff Training AgrAbility NTW Minneapolis, MN April 8, 2013.
Jan Johnston, Ph.D. Oklahoma State University Lynn Jeffries, PT, Ph.D., PCS Langston University Linking Community Partners to Improve Services for Ag Families.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
NEW STAFF ORIENTAION October 30, 2007 Sacramento, CA Agenda Introductions-please provide: –Your name –State project –How long you have been employed on.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center MCWIC Purpose Our purpose is to facilitate the implementation of systemic change to improve outcomes for children.
Erik Augustson, PhD, National Cancer Institute Susan Zbikowski, PhD, Alere Wellbeing Evaluation.
This material is based upon work supported by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES), U.S. Department of Agriculture.
New Staff Training AgrAbility National Training Workshop Indianapolis, Indiana Brad Rein, Division Director.
Copyright © 2002 Center for Farm Financial Management, University of Minnesota.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
1 SUBURBAN AGING AND DISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER Jonathan Lavin, AgeOptions John Jansa, Progress Center for Independent Living A Partnership between AgeOptions.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Colorado Alternative Cooperative Education (ACE) CTE Redesign CACTE July 2017 Key Messages for Early Implementation & Change Management in SY
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
Networks and Involvements: Session Outputs
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Gem Complete Health Services
A Framework for Program Evaluation
Proposal Development Support & Planning
What is Planning? Start at 9:15—10 minutes to do this. Finish at 9:25.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Use Your Evaluation Information to Communicate Your Results Your State AgrAbility Project November 19, 2004 Heather H. Boyd, Ph.D. Evaluation Specialist University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Goals of Session Goal One –Clarify the goals of your state project

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Goals of Session Goal Two –Determine the evidence you need to demonstrate project results

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Goals of Session Goal Three –Consider ways to better incorporate people with disabilities into your state project’s program planning, evaluation and communication Especially farmers, ranchers, growers, producers and non-farm agribusiness professionals

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Goals of Session Goal Four –Learn how to focus your evaluation energy on outcomes, impacts and results that your funders, persons with disabilities and other program partners value most

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference By the end of the session… You will –Be able to articulate your state’s goals in relationship to the national project’s goals –Have a draft of an evaluation plan for your state project, including one type of evidence that helps you demonstrate results –Be able to name one way to include more people with disabilities in your program planning, implementation or evaluation

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Background What do these words make you think about? –Evaluation –Inclusion –Outcomes and Impacts

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Let’s agree on a few things Evaluation can include gathering and analyzing credible evidence about the results (or lack of) your programming Including people with disabilities in your planning and evaluation improves your program, including its credibility and results People want things to change as a result of the programs they are involved in

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Your State Project Goals What are your goals? Do your staff and stakeholders share these goals? How did you create them? How are people with disabilities included in creating your project’s goals?

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference National AgrAbility Project Goal “AgrAbility increases the likelihood that individuals with disabilities and their families engaged in production agriculture (AgrAbility’s customers) become more successful.” html#PURP

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Your Credible Evidence Refer back to your state goals. What are some ways that you can tell that you are reaching them? –Examples of credible evidence from participants How are people with disabilities included in the discussion of what is “successful”?

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference National Project Credible Evidence “Measures of success may include improvements in customers’ financial stability or access to life activities and in the capacity of states and regions to deliver services this population requires in a timely and satisfying manner.”

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Credible Evidence Are the following examples of “success” for a state project? –If so, why? –If not, why? –What further information would be important to share regarding the example if you were reporting to a funder, supporter, person with a disability or other stakeholder?

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Credible Evidence? A rancher with schizophrenia met with AgrAbility staff and members of his personal support network to create a plan for consistently taking the medication that helps to keep him functioning well.

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Credible Evidence? With appropriate assistive technology provided through a local granting network, a crop grower with osteoarthritis was able to plant 400 more acres of corn this season. AgrAbility staff connected the grower with staff from the granting program.

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Credible Evidence? A dairy producer with multiple disabilities decided to leave the dairy industry and entered a non-farm agribusiness arrangement as a lender with a local financial institution. AgrAbility helped the dairy producer with his career goal clarification.

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Credible Evidence Exercise Describe one success of your project to a person sitting near you, and include the evidence of success. Now, the other person does the same. Describe what further information you would need about the success, if any, to make it more credible to you.

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Your State Framework What approaches does your state use to implement your program? How does this affect your evaluation opportunities? –Discuss example of person-centered planning

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Person-Centered Planning Some common elements (O’Brien & Lovett, referred to at –Persons with disabilities are at the center of support networks that respect their dignity and desires –Group learns together through shared experience with the person –Goal is to enlist and engage a wider circle of support for the person in the person’s community

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Person-Centered Planning If you use it for your program, you can also use it for your evaluation –Clarifies goals for individuals –Uses information from individuals and their networks to determine progress toward goals –Depends upon continuous improvement and collaborative action

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Inclusion and Evaluation Person-Centered Planning Asking people with disabilities to participate in planning, implementing and evaluating programming Asking people with disabilities to serve on advisory boards

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Your State Project and Inclusion Where and how do you already include people with disabilities in program planning, implementation and evaluation? Where and how do you already include farmers, ranchers, producers, growers?

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Your State Project and Inclusion Where could you do more to include people with disabilities in program planning, implementation and evaluation? Where and how do you already include farmers, ranchers, producers, growers with disabilities?

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Focusing Your Evaluation Energy What is your evaluation question? What is credible information? Do you already have the information or do you need to gather it? How much time and money do you have?

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Focusing Your Evaluation Energy How will you and others use the information? –What formats help accommodate different learning styles and different people with disabilities? How much time and money do you have? Who will share the responsibilities?

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Wrap-Up Questions and Answers Evaluation Planning Worksheet

Evaluation Session AgrAbility National Conference Acknowledgements Thank you to those who improved this presentation with their feedback: –Beth Swedeen, Waisman Center –Jenny Wagner, Waisman Center –Leah Nell Adams, AgrAbility –Bob Meyer, Biomedical Engineering –John Klatt, Program Development & Evaluation –Wintford Thornton, Program Development & Evaluation