Heather Dorsey Cheryl Vance.  Participants will: Explore SBAC Theory of Action Be Introduced to Evidence-Based Design and Assessment Claims Review Depth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Smarter Balanced Assessment a Closer Look Level 1 Part 6.
Advertisements

Assessment Report January 2013 Department of Teaching & Learning.
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
CCCS = California Common Core Standards.  Common Core standards corresponds with the original NCLB timeline of 2014  Students need real world skills.
Supporting Participating Teachers Through the CCSS Transition
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Robyn Seifert February 6,  smarterbalanced.org  K-12 EDUCATION  Administrators 2.
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Structure of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Research-based learning progressions Internationally.
M-Step Math Prep Grades 3-5 February 25, 2015 KRISTI HINEMAN, TRISH DUNN, MARIANNE SROCK,
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Calculators Not! Why Not? Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE SDCTM Feb.8, 2014.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Get Smarter!. OAKS Transition Calibrate Smarter Balanced to OAKS Option 1 Set achievement level on Smarter Balanced that represents equivalent rigor.
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
TESTING to the TEACHer Smarter Balanced and Evidence-Centered DesignMathematics Terri Sappington Coordinator, Office of Assessment and Accountability West.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium A Peek at the Assessment System 1 Rachel Eifler January 30, 2014.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. Today’s Agenda Stipends SCECH’s Sign-in and out! Moodle
Collaborative Curriculum Groups
Introduction to the Common Core State Standards Sandy Christie PSESD 1.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Common Core State Standards
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Key System Features and Next Steps. Features: Computer Adaptive Testing Adaptive assessment provides measurement across the breadth of the Common Core.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
Connie Locklear March 4, 2013 COMMON CORE MATH UPDATES PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF ROBESON COUNTY.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics Assessment and Performance Tasks Jane Liang, Ed.D.
 Develop a deeper understanding of how students progress in their understanding of the CCSS,  Engage in hands-on activities that connect content to.
The 8 Standards for Mathematical Practice in the Common Core State Standards Names Here Content Created by June Apaza and Vicki Kapust.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. 3 Day Goals Planning: Writing Assessment Items and Choosing a 3 Act Task Create a 3 Act Task.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL CAASPP INFORMATION NIGHT How to Understand Your Child’s report
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
Understanding the 2015 Smarter Balanced Assessment Results Assessment Services.
Walnut Valley Unified School District “Understanding Your Child’s 2015 CAASPP Report” California Assessment and Accountability System Performance and Progress.
Thomas Suarez TED Talk. Mathematics Performance Task Planting Tulips 1.Classroom Activity 2.Student Task 3.Task Specifications 4.Scoring Rubric Smarter.
Common Core State Standards What you need to know Cambrian School District.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress CAASPP Insert Your School Logo.
Assessment in Common Core. Essential Questions How is CAASPP different than STAR? How is SBAC different than CST? What do students have to know and be.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
MTSS District Coaches Network March 22, 2013 Lea McAllister Marianne Srock.
California Common Core State Standards for School Counselors.
Linking Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment in Mathematics March 10, 2016 CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
June 25,  Overview of Sessions  Session 1: Instructional Shifts  Session 2: Assessment of the CCSS-M  Session 3: Student Goal Setting  Session.
Update on State Assessment and CCSS Presentation to the West Hartford Parent Teacher Council.
What about the Assessment System?
Language Arts Assessment Update
Presentation transcript:

Heather Dorsey Cheryl Vance

 Participants will: Explore SBAC Theory of Action Be Introduced to Evidence-Based Design and Assessment Claims Review Depth of Knowledge Goals

“ Everyone is good at mathematics because everyone can think. And mathematics is about thinking.” -Yeap Ban Har National Institute of Education Singapore

So the question is - What are they thinking… and how do we know if it is what we think they are thinking? And is it what we thought they were thinking about….

Assessment – Assessment – in its many forms in its many forms And the answer is

What is the purpose of assessment?... to gather evidence of learning.

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium – SBAC Partnership for Assessment of College and Career Readiness – PARCC / National Assessment Consortiums

Implementation Timeline Phase 1: CCSS Exploration Phase 2: Build Awareness & Begin Building Statewide Capacity Phase 3: Build State & District Capacity and Classroom Transitions Phase 4: Statewide Application and Assessment Ongoing: Statewide Coordination and Collaboration to Support Implementation Gear Up - CCSS

Smarter Balanced Assessment System: A National Consortium of States 27 states representing 43% of K-12 students 21 governing, 6 advisory states Washington state is fiscal agent WestEd provides project management services 9

A Balanced Assessment System School Year Last 12 weeks of the year* DIGITAL CLEARINGHOUSE of formative tools, processes and exemplars; released items and tasks; model curriculum units; educator training; professional development tools and resources; scorer training modules; and teacher collaboration tools. English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics, Grades 3-8 and High School Computer Adaptive Assessment and Performance Tasks Computer Adaptive Assessment and Performance Tasks Scope, sequence, number and timing of interim assessments locally determined *Time windows may be adjusted based on results from the research agenda and final implementation decisions. PERFORMANCE TASKS ELA/Literacy Mathematics Re-take option COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TESTS ELA/Literacy Mathematics Optional Interim Assessment Optional Interim Assessment 10

Time and format Summative: For each content area - ELA & Math – Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) Selected response (MC), Constructed Response (open- ended), Technology enhanced (e.g., drag and drop, video clips, limited web-interface) – Performance Tasks (like our CBAs) Up to 2 per content area in grades 3-8 Up to 6 per content area in High School Gear Up - CCSS

Time and format Summative: - Administration window is last 12 weeks of school - For each content area - ELA & Math – Shorter option for states (~3 hours ELA, ~2 hours Math) Scale score on comprehensive test (met/not met determination) – Longer option for states (~5 hours ELA, ~3 hours Math) Able to report data on claims for individual students Gear Up - CCSS

Time and format Interim assessments – Can be used as often as needed – Can be customized by districts/schools To focus on selected strands To clone summative test – Will use Computer Adaptive Technology – Released items from summative item bank Gear Up - CCSS

Washington’s Testing System Transition Current Testing System  Reading and Math: Grades 3–8 and 10  Writing: Grades 4, 7, 10  Science: Grades 5, 8, 10 SBAC/CCSS Testing System  English/Language Arts and Math: Grade 3–8 and 11*  Science exams are required under ESEA but are not included in SBAC * 11 th grade to measure college and career readiness. We are working with higher ed to explore the possible use of these measures as an alternative for college placement (or entrance). () Gear Up - CCSS

Washington’s Context… Proposed Summative Assessments in 2014–15 English/LAMathematicsScience Grade 3SBAC Grade 4SBAC Grade 5SBAC MSP Grade 6SBAC Grade 7SBAC Grade 8SBAC MSP Grades 9-10HSPE Reading & Writing ??? EOC Algebra/Geometry ??? EOC Grade 11SBAC SBAC=SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium MSP= Measurements of Student Progress HSPE = High School Proficiency Exams EOC= End of Course exams Gear Up - CCSS

Will 11 th grade exam be used for graduation (exit exam) in Washington? If these exams are our exit exams what will the CAA options be? Will the Summative SBAC test replace our End of Course exams or will SBAC have End of Course exams too? How will Washington’s science tests mesh with these tests? Still to be worked out: Washington’s Policy Discussion… Gear Up - CCSS

Calculator Use At grades 3–5, all items should be written so they can be answered without using a calculator At grades 6-8, most items should be written so they can be answered without using a calculator. However, some targets may require the use of an online calculator tool in order to efficiently problem solve. In these cases, the calculator tool will appear in the specification table under “allowable tools.” Graphing and scientific calculators may be used for many items in high school mathematics assessments, even if unnecessary to solve the problem. An online version will be available for most items during the CAT portion of the assessment, except when specifically “turned off” because of the particular content of the item being assessed.

Seven Key Principles SBAC: Theory of Action, pp. 1 & 2 1.An integrated system 2.Evidence-based approach 3.Teacher involvement 4.State-led with transparent governance 5.Focus: improving teaching and learning 6.Actionable information – multiple measures 7.Established professional standards

On-line video course for item writing Understand and be able to use sample items and examples at a greater depth Increase ability to evaluate both instructional materials and assessment items Create own classroom items aligned to new standards 3. Teacher Involvement

2. Evidence Based Design

Traditional Approach to Item Development

Introduction to Evidence-Centered Design Modern Approach to Designing Items and Tasks Traditional Item Development versus Evidence-Centered Design Keys to Evidence- Centered Design Task Models Claims Assessment Targets Evidence

Traditional Approach to Item Development Item: Beth says that = 6. Explain why Beth is correct. Content Standard 2.2.3: Perform addition accurately for single and two digit numbers.

Applying Evidence-Centered Design to Item and Task Development Beth says that = 6. Explain why Beth is correct. Content Standard 2.2.3: Perform addition accurately for single and two digit numbers. Weak Evidence

Applying Evidence-Centered Design to Item and Task Development = ____ Content Standard 2.2.3: Perform addition accurately for single and two digit numbers. Stronger Evidence

Applying Evidence-Centered Design to Item and Task Development Beth says that = 6. Explain why Beth is correct = ____ Content Standard 2.2.4: Perform mathematical operations and justify solutions. Content Standard 2.2.3: Perform addition accurately for single and two digit numbers.

Review of Cognitive Demand Depth of Knowledge (DOK)

Cognitive Rigor and Depth of Knowledge The level of complexity of the cognitive demand. – Level 1: Recall and Reproduction Requires eliciting information such as a fact, definition, term, or a simple procedure, as well as performing a simple algorithm or applying a formula. – Level 2: Basic Skills and Concepts Requires the engagement of some mental processing beyond a recall of information. – Level 3: Strategic Thinking and Reasoning Requires reasoning, planning, using evidence, and explanations of thinking. – Level 4: Extended Thinking Requires complex reasoning, planning, developing, and thinking most likely over an extended period of time.

Level 1 Example Grade 8 Select all of the expressions that have a value between 0 and ∙ 8 – – ∙ (–5) 6 (–5) 10

Level 2 Example Grade 8 A cylindrical tank has a height of 10 feet and a radius of 4 feet. Jane fills this tank with water at a rate of 8 cubic feet per minute. How many minutes will it take Jane to completely fill the tank without overflowing at this rate? Round your answer to the nearest minute. A cylindrical tank has a height of 10 feet and a radius of 4 feet. Jane fills this tank with water at a rate of 8 cubic feet per minute. How many minutes will it take Jane to completely fill the tank without overflowing at this rate? Round your answer to the nearest minute.

Level 3 Example Grade 8 The total cost for an order of shirts from a company consists of the cost for each shirt plus a one-time design fee. The cost for each shirt is the same no matter how many shirts are ordered. The company provides the following examples to customers to help them estimate the total cost for an order of shirts. 50 shirts cost $ shirts cost $2370 Part A: Using the examples provided, what is the cost for each shirt, not including the one-time design fee? Explain how you found your answer. Part B: What is the cost of the one-time design fee? Explain how you found your answer. The total cost for an order of shirts from a company consists of the cost for each shirt plus a one-time design fee. The cost for each shirt is the same no matter how many shirts are ordered. The company provides the following examples to customers to help them estimate the total cost for an order of shirts. 50 shirts cost $ shirts cost $2370 Part A: Using the examples provided, what is the cost for each shirt, not including the one-time design fee? Explain how you found your answer. Part B: What is the cost of the one-time design fee? Explain how you found your answer.

Level 4 Example Grade 8 During the task, the student assumes the role of an architect who is responsible for designing the best plan for a park with area and financial restraints. The student completes tasks in which he/she compares the costs of different bids, determines what facilities should be given priority in the park, and then develops a scale drawing of the best design for the park and an explanation of the choices made. This investigation is done in class using a calculator, an applet to construct the scale drawing, and a spreadsheet.

Assessment Claims for Mathematics “Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in mathematics.” “Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in mathematics.” “Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency.” “Students can solve a range of complex well-posed problems in pure and applied mathematics, making productive use of knowledge and problem solving strategies.” “Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others.” “Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can construct and use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems.” Overall Claim (Gr. 3-8) Overall Claim (High School) Concepts and Procedures Problem Solving Communicating Reasoning Modeling and Data Analysis

Claim 1 Concepts and Procedures Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency. Grade Level Number of Assessment Targets Assessment Targets = Clusters

F-IF.8 Write a function defined by an expression in different buy equivalent forms to reveal and explain different properties of the function.

Assessment Targets Claim 2 – Problem Solving A.Apply mathematics to solve well-posed problems arising in everyday life, society, and the workplace B.Select and use tools strategically C.Interpret results in the context of the situation D.Identify important quantities in a practical situation and map their relationships. Claim 2: Students can solve a range of complex well-posed problems in pure and applied mathematics, making productive use of knowledge and problem solving strategies.

7.G.4 4.MD.3 Know the formulas for the area and circumference of a circle and use them to solve problems; give an informal derivation of the relationship between the circumference and area of a circle.

Assessment Targets Claim 3 – Communicating Reason A.Test propositions or conjectures with specific examples. B.Construct, autonomously, chains of reasoning that justify or refute propositions or conjectures. C.State logical assumptions being used. D.Use the technique of breaking an argument into cases. E.Distinguish correct logic or reasoning from that which is flawed, and—if there is a flaw in the argument—explain what it is. F.Base arguments on concrete referents such as objects, drawings, diagrams, and actions. G.Determine conditions under which an argument does and does not apply. Claim 3: Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others.

4.NBT.5 Multiply a whole number of up to four digits by a one-digit whole number, and multiply two two-digit numbers, using strategies based on place value and the properties of operations.

Assessment Targets Claim 4 – Modeling and Data Analysis A.Apply mathematics to solve problems arising in everyday life, society, and the workplace. B.Construct, autonomously, chains of reasoning to justify mathematical models used, interpretations made, and solutions proposed for a complex problem. C.State logical assumptions being used. D.Interpret results in the context of a situation. E.Analyze the adequacy of and make improvement to an existing model or develop a mathematical model of a real phenomenon. F.Identify important quantities in a practical situation and map their relationships. G.Identify, analyze, and synthesize relevant external resources to pose or solve problems. Claim 4: Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can construct and use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems.

Simpson Park Art Project Soda Cans Performance Tasks

Resources for writing CCSS-M like Assessment Items Item writing training assessments/item-writing-and-review/ assessments/item-writing-and-review/ Sample items performance-tasks/ performance-tasks/ PARCC sample items prototypes#7 prototypes#7 Illustrative Mathematics Project Materials on the Internet