Bottle Closure Sealing System Mark Nauman Andrew Seagraves Jeff Staniszewski Vincent Uathavikul Design Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to CAD/CAM/CAE
Advertisements

Finite element method Among the up-to-date methods of stress state analysis, the finite element method (abbreviated as FEM below, or often as FEA for analyses.
Injection Molding Dr.Apiwat Muttamara.
FEA Reference Guide See additional material herehere.
Optimal Shape Design of Membrane Structures Chin Wei Lim, PhD student 1 Professor Vassili Toropov 1,2 1 School of Civil Engineering 2 School of Mechanical.
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
LECTURER 2 Engineering and True Stress-Strain Diagrams
Melih Papila, Piezoresistive microphone design Pareto optimization: Tradeoff between sensitivity and noise floor Melih PapilaMark Sheplak.
Beams and Frames.
Berry Plastics Liner-less Detergent Cap
Fundamentals of Metal Forming Chapter 18
SCIENCE FAIR PERMANENT SHARPIE? CATEGORY: SOLUTIONS BY NATALIE BRIGGS.
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
Section 4: Implementation of Finite Element Analysis – Other Elements
How far can you shoot a melon? Andrew Jessup Physics TSP Project 2001, The University of Sydney.
Hydro-Forming a Steel Tube Finite Element Model Design Greg Wilmes Finite Element Method MIE 605 – Spring 2003.
EXPERIMENT # 3 Instructor: M.Yaqub
Mike Burgstrom Jeff Cosgrove Trevor DiMarco Laura Wong This picture shows the amount of Maximum Sheer Stress that is created when a load of 565 pounds.
Identified Company (CompositeX) to manufacture Custom Composite Pressure Vessel ● Working pressure 1000psi ● Holds 8 kg Nitrous Oxide ● 700 cubic inch.
Physical and Mechanical Characteristics of Pb-free Solder - Copper Joints Project funded by OFES (Switzerland) Within the framework of :Cost Action 531:
Tolerance Analysis of Flexible Assemblies Michael Tonks.
ME104Q PAPER RIVER CHASM BRIDGE Team Boomerang Mechanical Engineering University of Rochester Executive Summary The premise of this experiment is built.
Electronic Module Extraction Tool Final Review University of Delaware December 12, 2003 Team 7: Allison Bruton, John Fitzgibbons Rich Herseim, & Greg Spalding.
Child Proof Dispensing Closure Senior Design – Final Review Team 8: Ken Cardillo, Patrice Hughes Ben Raab, Mike Washko Ben Raab, Mike Washko Company Sponsor:
FUNDAMENTALS OF METAL FORMING
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
DMAIC DefineMeasureAnalyzeImproveControl D Define M Measure A Analyze I Improve C Control Implementing Six Sigma Quality at Better Body Manufacturing.
ERC NSM Development of Forming Processes for Copper Components for The Stanford Linear Accelerator Master’s Thesis Project for Dan Hannan Graduate Research.
Introduction to virtual engineering László Horváth Budapest Tech John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering.
Environmental Simulation of Circuit Board Epoxy Group Members Greg Kurtz Brad Walsh Brad Grimmel Jeff Baudek.
Robert Gleim Oct. 27 th,  Pipe is designed to handle the following load conditions: ◦ A minimum design life of 20 years at MAOP and MAOT ◦ Hydro.
Engineering Doctorate – Nuclear Materials Development of Advanced Defect Assessment Methods Involving Weld Residual Stresses If using an image in the.
ZTF Cryostat Finite Element Analysis Andrew Lambert ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
Mechanical Properties
COMPRESSION AND TRANSFER MOLDING. Compression Molding The process of molding a material in a confined shape by applying pressure and usually heat. Almost.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
Ken YoussefiMechanical Engineering Dept. 1 Design Optimization Optimization is a component of design process The design of systems can be formulated as.
BEHAVIOUR OF MATERIALS
Open die forging Shapes generated by open die forging are simple; examples include shafts, disks and rings. An example of open die forging in the steel.
FUNDAMENTALS OF METAL FORMING
Team: Charlie Haggart, Gabriel J. Martínez-Díaz,
Author: Luke Blanchard Professor: Dr. D. Tretheway Class: ME 447 Date: 6/4/2015.
Aerospace Engineering Laboratory I  Basics for Physical Quantities and Measurement  Physical Quantity  Measured Quantity VS Derived Quantity.
12/02/99Team #12 Optimized Magnet Support EML 4551 Optimized Magnet Support EML 4551 Senior Design Dr. Luongo 12/02/99 Deliverable #3 Team #12 David Moore.
CHAPTER 6_PART 1 FUNDAMENTALS OF METAL FORMING
FUNDAMENTALS OF METAL FORMING
PHF110: Basic Physics and Materials Dr Mark A. E. Jepson Room: S227
1 CHAP 8 STRUCTURAL DESIGN USING FINITE ELEMENTS FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Nam-Ho Kim Edited and audio Raphael Haftka.
Cooling of GEM detector CFD _GEM 2012/03/06 E. Da RivaCFD _GEM1.
Viscoelasticity.
Extrusion Plastics 001 Profile Extrusion. Extrusion Plastics 001 Introduction – Extrusion is a process that can make long parts with a constant cross-section.
Industrial Engineering Department
Finite element mesh and load definition
3-D Printed Pressure Vessel Design to Maximize Volume to Weight
End of Line “Pass Through” Conveyor
MANUFACTURING PROCESSES 5/27/2018 5/27/2018 1
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Nonlinear Analysis: Riks Analysis.
FEA Introduction.
326MAE (Stress and Dynamic Analysis) 340MAE (Extended Stress and Dynamic Analysis)
Team Members: Sagar Sheth Team Leader Leonardo Silva Industrial Eng.
By; Noor Azira binti Mohd Noor
Gasket Fabricators Association Technical Committee Presentation
Implementing Six Sigma Quality
Physical Properties of Rocks
Designing and Manufacturing of a hand operated plastic injection moulding machine envisioned for the mesoscale range. Freddy Travieso
Electro-Thermal Analysis of Contact Resistance
LECTURER 9 Engineering and True Stress-Strain Diagrams
Realistic multiphysics analysis
LECTURER 2 Engineering and True Stress-Strain Diagrams
Presentation transcript:

Bottle Closure Sealing System Mark Nauman Andrew Seagraves Jeff Staniszewski Vincent Uathavikul Design Report

Background Berry PlasticsBerry Plastics -New child resistant timed-closure developed -Cap intended to seal without a liner Dome designed to flexDome designed to flex Initial FEAInitial FEA -Cap showed plastic deformation -Inadequate for sealing as is

Problem Definition To design a liner for their existing closureTo design a liner for their existing closure Constraints Process: Compression MoldingProcess: Compression Molding Material: Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE)Material: Thermoplastic Elastomer (TPE) System Level Wants Create a seal for a liquidCreate a seal for a liquid Maintain seal for 1 yearMaintain seal for 1 year Minimize cost per unitMinimize cost per unit Achieve seal within tolerance rangeAchieve seal within tolerance range

Project Scope Project WantsProject Wants Create a waterproof sealCreate a waterproof seal -in a leak test -in an accelerated creep test At nominal dimensionsAt nominal dimensions Within tolerance rangeWithin tolerance range Minimize cost per unit byMinimize cost per unit by -Minimizing material costs -Minimizing tooling costs Project MetricsProject Metrics Performance in aPerformance in a -standard leak test -elevated temperature leak test Nominal bottles and capsNominal bottles and caps Max bottle with min capMax bottle with min cap Min bottle with max capMin bottle with max cap VolumeVolume Machining time of toolingMachining time of tooling

Terminology

Compression Molding

Initial Concepts Constant Thickness Variable Thickness Cutaway Concept

Comparative Leak Test Purpose Compares the sealing performance of Constant and Variable conceptsCompares the sealing performance of Constant and Variable conceptsSpecifics 6 Different Torques6 Different Torques -From 2 to 12 inch-pounds -3 samples per torque level -Constant volume of water + food coloring Results No leaks with any sample after 48 hoursNo leaks with any sample after 48 hoursConclusions Constant and Variable are equivalent in sealingConstant and Variable are equivalent in sealing

Comparative Cost Study At 50 million units… Cost / Unit Total Cost of Production Cutaway$0.0114$570,000 Constant$0.0126$630,000 Variable$0.0118$590,000 Assumptions Production: 50 Million parts/yrProduction: 50 Million parts/yr TPE bulk cost: $2 / poundTPE bulk cost: $2 / pound Cost of Machining Punches: $70/hrCost of Machining Punches: $70/hrResults Constant concept costsConstant concept costs -9.5% more than the Cutaway -6.3% more than the Variable At 50 million parts, material costs account for ~ 16% of the total costs and 50% of the controllable costsAt 50 million parts, material costs account for ~ 16% of the total costs and 50% of the controllable costs

Manufacturing Concerns Easier to seal off in the land area instead of ridgeEasier to seal off in the land area instead of ridge Variable and Cutaway concepts now virtually the sameVariable and Cutaway concepts now virtually the same Cap Sleeve Punch Ridge Liner

Concept Elimination Constant and Variable liners have the same sealing performanceConstant and Variable liners have the same sealing performance Variable liner will cost less than ConstantVariable liner will cost less than Constant Cutaway and Variable are the same because of manufacturingCutaway and Variable are the same because of manufacturing  Variable Concept will be prototyped be prototyped

Simple Model Cap Liner Bottle Select Section View

Instron Testing Linear Correlation found between Torque and Pressure can be used for FEA and also by Berry PlasticsLinear Correlation found between Torque and Pressure can be used for FEA and also by Berry Plastics

Finite Element Analysis Model of Cap, Liner and BottleModel of Cap, Liner and Bottle Force applied to contact areaForce applied to contact area Boundary Conditions Boundary Conditions - Cap sides are stationary - Cap sides are stationary - Bottle can move in y-direction - Bottle can move in y-direction

Finite Element Analysis Results A cap with no liner contained stresses above yield limitA cap with no liner contained stresses above yield limit A cap with a liner was close to yield limitA cap with a liner was close to yield limit

Validation of Test Design O-ring and compression liners compared with FEAO-ring and compression liners compared with FEA O-ring liner performs similar to actual design under same loadO-ring liner performs similar to actual design under same load -Within 8% on all stresses -Within 2% on all deflections O-ring is an accurate approximation geometryO-ring is an accurate approximation geometry

Standard Leak Test Procedure Bottles are sealed to predetermined range of torqueBottles are sealed to predetermined range of torque Opening torque immediately applied and measuredOpening torque immediately applied and measured Bottles are resealed and checked for leaking over 2 week timeBottles are resealed and checked for leaking over 2 week time Opening torque is applied and measuredOpening torque is applied and measuredResults No bottles leak in this timeNo bottles leak in this time Opening torque slightly lower after 2 weeksOpening torque slightly lower after 2 weeks D outer = 1.42” D inner = 1.06” Thickness =.04”

Elevated Temperature Test Used to simulate relaxation over timeUsed to simulate relaxation over time Sealed bottles are put in environmental chamberSealed bottles are put in environmental chamber -2 weeks at 100 °F ~ 2 months All bottles remained sealed over periodAll bottles remained sealed over period Relaxation curve made using existing dataRelaxation curve made using existing data -Immediate opening torque -Opening torque after 2 weeks -Opening torque after simulated 2 months -Match shape of current relaxation curves

Elevated Temperature Test Results 10 in lb may be inadequate to seal10 in lb may be inadequate to seal -Cap relaxes too much over the period Higher than 12 in lb will seal over timeHigher than 12 in lb will seal over time -Curves flatten out

Conclusions Testing ShowsTesting Shows -Prototype maintains short term waterproof seal Performance Metric of Standard Leak test satisfiedPerformance Metric of Standard Leak test satisfied -Waterproof seal intact after simulated 2 months Performance Metric of Elevated Temperature test satisfiedPerformance Metric of Elevated Temperature test satisfied FEA ShowsFEA Shows -Prototype design and actual design behave similar -Higher torques could cause plastic deformation Analysis ShowsAnalysis Shows -Seal would survive simulated year PrototypePrototype -Simulates the actual liner design to be implemented by Berry

Implementation Plan Test the cap for relaxation over a simulated yearTest the cap for relaxation over a simulated year Optimize liner thickness to reduce production costsOptimize liner thickness to reduce production costs Small scale production of punch for further physical and consumer testingSmall scale production of punch for further physical and consumer testing Large scale production of punch for commercial use of cap and linerLarge scale production of punch for commercial use of cap and liner

Questions Elevated Temperature FEA Stress Manufacturing Simple Model Instron Setup Tolerance Variation

Elevated Temperature Back to Questions

Stress

Liner Cap and Punch Cap Sleeve Punch Ridge Liner Back to Questions

Simple Model Cap Liner Bottle Select Section View Back to Questions

Instron Setup Back to Questions

Tolerance Variation Back to Questions