Beyond Static Headspace: Automated techniques to extend the limits of headspace analysis for VOCs Edward Pfannkoch Director, Technology Development Gerstel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hit esc to quit hit any key to continue A New Forensics Technique to Investigate the Presence of Chemical FingerPrints in Human Breath.
Advertisements

Gas Chromatography.
Gas Chromatography 427 PHC.
Gas Chromatography.
Chromatography.
Gas Chromatography There an be many parts to a gas chromatography system but the basic components include: An injection system. A column (controllable.
Hit “esc” to quit hit any key to continue Analysis of Beverages using Large Volume Static Headspace / GCMS.
The Foundations: Classical Split and Splitless Injection
Chromatography Integration and Trouble-shooting
How to Recognize and Eliminate Ghost- and Deformed Peaks in Gas Chromatography Jaap De Zeeuw, Restek Corporation, Middelburg, The Netherlands Summary The.
Week 3 Collection and Analysis of Biodiesel
Analysis of Residues. Laboratory Analysis of Debris and Other Samples 1. Preparation of Liquid Samples: Liquid samples are simply drawn into a special.
HPLC 1. Introduction 1.Introduction CHROMATOGRAPHY Chromatography basically involves the separation of mixtures due to differences in the distribution.
Created by Introduction The need for increased sensitivity and selectivity is a constant challenge facing many industries. One such technique that is becoming.
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ADSORPTION PERFORMANCE OF A MULTI- SORBENT BED (CARBOTRAP, CARBOPACK X, CARBOXEN 569) AND A RADIELLO ® ADSORBENT TUBE FOR THE.
1 Chapter 24 GC Gas Chromatography. 2 GC Mechanism of separation is primarily volatility. Difference in boiling point, vapor pressure etc. What controls.
Methods Monitoring Polar Compounds Using Membrane Extraction and High-Speed Gas Chromatography Authors: Jonathan Maurer, Dr. Anthony J. Borgerding* Department.
Figure Figure 2 Chem 334 Expt. #3
B IOCHEMICAL INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS -11 Dr. Maha Al-Sedik.
LECTURE 4: CHROMATOGRAPHY Content: - Chromatographic separation - classifying analytical separations; column chromatography, planar chromatography - gas.
Adsorption Liquid Chromatography. Open Column Chromatography Silica gel Glass Tube Eluent Vial for fraction collection.
Comparison and classification of methamphetamine seized in Japan and Thailand using gas chromatography with liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase microextraction.
Extraction Methods Static Headspace (HS) Dynamic Headspace
Introduction to High Performance Liquid Chromatography.
Gas Chromatography Carrier Gas Flow Control Injector Port Column Column Oven Detector Recorder The GC system consists of gas supplies for the mobile phase.
GAS – LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY BY M. GLORY HEPSIBAH M.PHARM (PH. ANALYSIS) BHARAT COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
Gerstel 頂空進樣 Headspace MPS 三合一系統 ( 液體,頂空, SPME) Page 2.
April , 2007 The Effect of Temperature on the Uptake Rates of a New PDMS-Based Permeation Passive Sampler for VOCs in Air Suresh Seethapathy, Tadeusz.
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY CHEM 3811 CHAPTER 22 DR. AUGUSTINE OFORI AGYEMAN Assistant professor of chemistry Department of natural sciences Clayton state university.
Chromatography Chapter 6.
Magnet Analytical Chemistry Unit 4
John R. Stuff, Ph.D., Jackie A. Whitecavage, and Ed Pfannkoch
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS CHEM 4811 CHAPTER 12 DR. AUGUSTINE OFORI AGYEMAN Assistant professor of chemistry Department of natural sciences Clayton state university.
Experiment 2 DISTILLATION AND GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY OF ALKANES.
Utilization of Accuracy Profiles as a Tool for the Validation of Analytical Methods A. Ceccato, P. Jacobs, A. Flament, M. Gibella and W. Dewé Lilly Development.
Overbrook Scientific.
Development of a headspace solid-phase microextraction method coupled to gas chromatography (HS-SPME GC-MS) to capture and analyze the volatile organic.
Analysis of semi-volatile organic compounds in aqueous samples by microwave-assisted headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-electron.
Application of solid-phase microextraction to the recovery of explosives and ignitable liquid residues from forensic specimens K.G. Furton, J.R. Almirall,
Automated SPE for NDMA and Metaldehyde in water using GC-QqQ
Gas Chromatography Experiment. Gas Chromatography - Gas Chromatography (GC) is a common technique used to separate and identify volatile organic compounds.
Analytical Separations
HPLC – High Performance Liquid Chromatography
HPLC.
Chapter 28 High Performance Liquid Chromatography.
Biochemical instrumental analysis - 11 Dr. Maha Al-Sedik 2015 CLS 332.
Micro Analytical GC System for Tea Aroma in Product Quality Control Fred Lewis, Principal Chemist, Analytical Science Laboratory, Unilever John Crandall,
Chem. 231 – 2/11 Lecture.
HPLC.
PURIFCATION OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
INVESTIGATION OF MONO-ISOPROPYLNAPHTHALENE, DI-ISOPROPYLNAPHTHALENE AND TRI-ISOPROPYLNAPHTHALENE IN THE ENVIRONMENT AROUND THE PAPER RECYCLING PLANT Suzuki.
Introduction to Gas Chromatography
Evolution GC-MS/MS: Pesticide analysis in canola oil Evolution GC-MS/MS: Pesticide analysis in canola oil Vivian Watts 1, Ingo Christ 1, Mark Misunis 2.
Experiments in Analytical Chemistry
Robert Kettner Determination of the Relevant Impurity Toluene in Formulations by Headspace Gas Chromatography and Flame Ionisation or Mass Spectrometric.
Gas Chromatography Chap 27 Types: Gas-solid chromatography (GSC)
Monitoring of Malodorous Compounds from a Swine Waste Lagoon by an Equilibrium Technique Monitoring of Malodorous Compounds from a Swine Waste Lagoon by.
American Chemical Society, Fall 2012
Chem. 133 – 5/2 Lecture.
Chem. 133 – 5/9 Lecture.
Overview Determining Identity Quantitative Analysis
Chem. 133 – 5/11 Lecture.
Determination of Algae Compounds in Drinking Water
Evaluation and Application of SPME Arrows
Headspace Analysis – A Summary of Possibilities
524.3 Purge Flow Study Anne Jurek – Sr. Applications Chemist
Gas Chromatography.
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
David Thornton1, Xiqin Yang1, Gary Yanik2 and Leo Hsu1*
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
Presentation transcript:

Beyond Static Headspace: Automated techniques to extend the limits of headspace analysis for VOCs Edward Pfannkoch Director, Technology Development Gerstel Inc.

MPS 2 Advanced Headspace Capabilities

Advanced Headspace Injection Modes with the MPS 2 Autosampler  Static Headspace (SH)  Multiple Headspace Sample Enrichment (MHSE)  MPS-Hot Injection and Trapping Mode (HIT)  Dynamic Headspace Sampling (DHS)  Full Evaporation Dynamic Headspace Sampling (FEDHS)

Static Headspace Analysis  Equilibration of the solid/liquid samples in crimped vials at a constant temperature

Static Headspace Analysis  Straightforward technique for liquids  Solid samples can present challenges  Limited sensitivity  Limited vial options  Large inj volume = broad early peaks  Distribution coefficient can bias results

Multiple Headspace Sample Enrichment (MHSE) Several samples are taken from the same vial. The analytes are cyro- focused or focused on a packed bed liner in the PTV liner during multiple sample Introductions. Benefit: Improved detection limit

CIS 4 (PTV injector)

MHSE of an Herbal Based Liqueur

MPS-HIT Mode Hot Injection and Trapping

Cooled Injection System - CIS Thermal Desorption Unit - TDU TDU tube TDU No Transfer line !

MPS-HIT Mode  New Versions of Maestro ( and up)  Headspace and SPME Injections can be made into the TDU  CIS can be cooled for trapping or heated for direct transfer to the column  For SHS, allows trapping of analytes in cold inlet while avoiding discrimination of higher boiling components  For SPME, allows trapping/refocusing of volatile analytes from the fiber which can help sharpen early eluting peaks  Allows quick change from thermal desorption to SPME or SHS without removing the TDU

SLH with CIS Hot SLH with CIS Cold HIT with CIS Cold HIT with CIS Hot Peak #1 = 1,1-DichloroethenePeak #26 = 1,2-Dichlorobenzene

Dynamic Headspace (DHS)

Dynamic Headspace Option for MPS 2

Tube Types

Parameters  Incubation temperature:  40 °C (Coffee powder)  25 °C (Shower gel)  Incubation time: 5 min  Purge flow: 20 mL/min  Extraction time:  10 min (Coffee powder, shower gel)  Trap temperature: 25 °C  Trap: TDU tube filled with Tenax-TA  TDU temperature program: 30°C; 720°C/min; 280°C (8 min)  TDU pneumatic setting: Splitless  CIS temperature program: -100°C; 12°C/s; 280°C (8 min)  CIS pneumatic setting: solvent vent (Split 10:1)

2-Methylbutanal Methylpyrazine Dimethylpyrazine Furfural 5-Methyl-2-furancarboxaldehyde 2-Methoxyphenol % Peak areas in % (DHS = 100 %) HS SPME DHS ,3-Pentadione 1-Hydroxy-2-propanone Ethyldimethylpyrazine Furfurylacetat Furfurylalcohole 100 mg coffee powder – Relative Peak Areas

SHS and DHS HS vial volume: mL Sample volume: 1-15 mL GC SHS TD-GC HS vial volume: mL Sample volume: 1-15 mL DHS SHS is equilibrium technique which is controlled by the partitioning coefficient of the solutes between two phases (headspace and sample matrix). DHS prevents the establishment of an equilibration state, causing more of the volatile dispersed in the sample matrix to leave the sample and pass into the headspace.

SHS and DHS HS vial volume: mL Sample volume: 1-15 mL GC SHS TD-GC HS vial volume: mL Sample volume: 1-15 mL DHS These techniques are generally biased toward recovering more volatile compounds or more hydrophobic compounds.

“Matrix independent headspace gas chromatographic analysis. The full evaporation technique” M. Markelov, J. P. Guzowski, Analytica Chimica Acta, 276 (1993) 235. GC FET is the headspace technique of introducing a small amount of sample (mg level) and vaporizing the analytes in the headspace vial at elevated temperatures (typically at 100 ºC), without having to rely on establishing equilibrium between two phases. 100 ℃ A few μL ~ Full Evaporation Technique (FET) FET provides more uniform recovery for a variety of compounds and sample matrix independent analysis.

Fragrance profiling by FEDHS 7) A. Hoffmann et al, GERSTEL AppNote 8/2009. In 2009, Hoffman et al demonstrate fragrance profiling of consumer products by FEDHS-GC-MS [7]. Purge gas in 80 ℃ Adsorbent packed tube 8 μL The FEDHS-GC-MS method enables quantitative extraction of fragrance compounds across a wide range of volatility, leading to results that are closer to the actual fragrance composition than those obtained with other commonly used analysis technique such as simultaneous distillation/extraction (SDE). Shower gel (MeOH blend) A. Hoffmann

8) N. Ochiai, K. Sasamoto, A. Hoffmann, K. Okanoya, in preparation. Purge gas in 80 ℃ 100 μL Adsorbent packed tube FEDHS In this study, we demonstrate uniform enrichment of a wide range of odor compounds in aqueous samples by FEDHS-GC-MS. The optimized purge condition allow complete vaporization of 100 μL of an aqueous sample, and drying it in an adsorbent packed tube, while recovering odor compounds and leaving the low volatile matrix behind.

Influence of purge volume on the water residue in the Tenax TA trap Purge volume (mL) GC-TCD response (a.u. x ) 100 μL of water is calculated to be 1.8 L of water saturated gas at 40ºC of trap temperature. The purge volume of more than 2.6 L was required to eliminate water. This might be due to re-condensation of a part of water vapor in the vent line of the DHS module at ambient temperature. Water management is very important step in FEDHS because large amount of water up to 100 μL can be condensed and accumulated in the adsorbent trap.

Recovery (%) Butyrolactone2,5-Dimethylpyrazine2-Acetyl thiazoleol Phenethyl alcohol GuaiacolIndoleNonalactoneLinaloolNonanalCitronellolDamascenone log WS 5.65 (mg/L) log WS 4.51 (mg/L) log WS 4.40 (mg/L) Phenethyl acetate log WS 4.34 (mg/L) log WS 3.86 (mg/L) log WS 3.18 (mg/L) log WS 3.08 (mg/L) log WS 2.85 (mg/L) log WS 2.83 (mg/L) log WS 2.11 (mg/L) log WS 2.04 (mg/L) log WS 1.08 (mg/L) DHS Sample: 1 mL DHS Temp: 25ºC Purge vol.: 3 L DHS Sample: 1 mL DHS Temp: 80ºC Purge vol.: 0.35 L HS-SPME Sample: 1 mL Temp: 80ºC Fiber: CAR/DVB/PDMS Incub. time: 20 min Ext. time: 30 min Comparison of recovery between conventional DHS, HS-SPME, and FEDHS for test odor compounds in water at 100 ng/mL WS > log 3.0 mg/L WS < log 3.0 (mg/L)

Recovery (%) Butyrolactone2,5-Dimethylpyrazine2-Acetyl thiazoleol Phenethyl alcohol GuaiacolIndoleNonalactoneLinaloolNonanalCitronellolDamascenone log WS 5.65 (mg/L) log WS 4.51 (mg/L) log WS 4.40 (mg/L) Phenethyl acetate log WS 4.34 (mg/L) log WS 3.86 (mg/L) log WS 3.18 (mg/L) log WS 3.08 (mg/L) log WS 2.85 (mg/L) log WS 2.83 (mg/L) log WS 2.11 (mg/L) log WS 2.04 (mg/L) log WS 1.08 (mg/L) DHS Sample: 1 mL DHS Temp: 25ºC Purge vol.: 3 L DHS Sample: 1 mL DHS Temp: 80ºC Purge vol.: 0.35 L HS-SPME Sample: 1 mL Temp: 80ºC Fiber: CAR/DVB/PDMS Incub. time: 20 min Ext. time: 30 min FEDHS Sample: 0.1 mL DHS Temp: 80ºC Purge vol.: 3 L Comparison of recovery between conventional DHS, HS-SPME, and FEDHS for test odor compounds in water at 100 ng/mL

Gerstel DHS Conditions LVFETDHS Incubation Time (min)02 Purge Volume (mL) Purge Flow (mL)5030 Sample Volume (mL) Split CISSplitless10:1 Trap Temperature: 30 deg C Incubation Temperature 80 deg C Tenax TA

FEDHS of Strawberry-Banana Juice

FEDHS of Carrot Juice

FEDHS of Cranberry Juice

FEDHS of Mango Coconut Water

SBSE of Coconut Water

SBSE of Flavored Coconut Water

Applications -Analysis of off odor compounds in apple juice by FEDHS-GC-MS - Analysis of flavor markers in vitamin drink

Apple Juice 14 2-Hexenal 15Cis 3-Hexenol 162-Hexenol 171-Hexanol 182-Acetyl furan 19Butyrolacton 20Benzaldehyde 21Methyl heptenone 22Hexyl acetate 23Cis 3-Hexenyl acetate 24Nonanal 25Dihydro methyl jasmonate * * * * * Butanal 2Ethyl acetate 2Acetic acid 31-Butanol 5Ethyl propionate 6Propyl acetate 73-Methyl butanol 82-Methyl butanol 9Ethyl butyrate 10Hexanal 11Butyl acetate 12Ethyl 2-methylbutyrate 13Furfural

Apple Juice with Off-Flavor Overlay with reference (black trace), zoom  -Decalactone  -Undecalactone * * * *

* * * * * Limonene  -Terpineol Methyl 3-(methylthio)-propanoate Ethyl 3-(methylthio)-propanoate Multi Vitamin Juice Sulfur compounds (Markers for Pineapple Juice Content)

Multi Vitamin Juice Sulfur compounds, extracted ion chromatogram (m/z 61, 74, 134, 148) Methyl 3-(methylthio)-propanoate m/z 61, 74, 134 Ethyl 3-(methylthio)-propanoate m/z 61, 74, 148

Multi Vitamin Juice Low in Pineapple Juice Content Methyl 3-(methylthio)-propanoate m/z 61, 74, 134 Ethyl 3-(methylthio)-propanoate m/z 61, 74, 148

Conclusion Using the MPS 2 autosampler with Maestro software allows automation of the following techniques that can overcome many of the limitations inherent to static headspace sampling: Multiple Headspace Sample Enrichment (MHSE) –Improves detection limit MPS-Hot Injection and Trapping Mode (HIT) –Improves peak shapes Dynamic Headspace Sampling (DHS) –Improves detection limit Full Evaporation Dynamic Headspace Sampling (FEDHS) –More uniform enrichment of analytes SBSE for analysis of nonpolar analytes at ultralow levels

Analysis Conditions DHS Incubat Temp50°C Incubat Time0 min Agi On Time10 s Agi Off Time1 s Agi Speed500 rpm Purge Volume4000 mL Purge flow100 mL/min Trap Temperature30°C Dry Volume0 mL Dry Flow0 mL/min Drying Temperature30°C Transfer Temp150°C

Analysis Conditions TDU Tube TypeCarbotrap B/X Pneumatics Modesplitless Sample Modesample remove Temperature30°C (0.1 min); 720°C/min; 280°C (3 min) Transferline Temp.320°C

Analysis Conditions CIS 4 LN2 - Cooling Liner TypeGlasswool Carrier GasHelium Pneumatics Modesolvent venting Vent Flow30 mL/min Vent Pressure51 kPa until 0.0 min Splitflow min Temperature-80°C (0.1 min); 16°C/sec; 150°C; 12°C/sec; 240°C (2 min)

Analysis Conditions GC ModelAgilent 7890 ColumnRxi-624Sil MS (Restek); 30 m x 0.25 mm x 1.4 µm Modeconstant flow, 1.0 mL/min Temperature40°C (2 min); 5°C/min; 100°C; 10°C/min; 300°C (10 min)