Hazardous Waste Program Solvent Wipes Rule 2014. 1980s – EPA received petitions from industry who stated that the hazardous waste regulations were too.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
Advertisements

METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE ANNUAL 2011 RCRA Hazardous Waste Training.
Definition of Solid Waste (DSW) Update John Crawford, Chief Industrial Waste Compliance Section Office of Land Quality.
1 Impact of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials Rule 2012 Annual ARIPPA Tech Convention August 22, 2012 Presented by: John Slade, Senior Consultant, All4.
EPA EMS General Awareness Training Presented by David Guest, Esq. U.S. EPA Washington, D.C.
Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule Public Meeting Charlotte Mooney Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The Arsenic Rule Waste Disposal Options. Impacts on Disposal Alternatives Concentration of contaminants in the waste stream Concentration of contaminants.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Hazardous Waste Issues Associated with Municipal Operations Dan Sowry Environmental Specialist Office of Compliance Assistance and Pollution Prevention.
1 MASSACHUSETTS UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) PROGRAM Baseline Compliance Assessment 1 MassDEP 8/2/2011.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
Laboratory Chemical Waste Management
F006-F008 Metals Reclamation Rule Presentation to SBA Environmental Roundtable Meeting October 21, 2005.
What is RCRA? The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) was passed in 1976 as an amendment to the Solid Waste Disposal Act. Amendments were added.
Susan Palachek TCEQ Pollution Prevention & Education.
WELCOME: EPA PUBLIC MEETING
Appendix 8.1 – Waste Management Plan Oil Spill Contingency Plan – Land Document Number: KOC.SA.020 Incident Name: Incident Date/Time: Incident Location:
Collision Repair Hazardous Waste Environmental Compliance Paid for, in part, by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment.
RCRA 101 Michael Gage New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection County Environmental and Waste Enforcement Special Investigations and Oversight.
The Cost of Clean Air FEES REVISED: 2011 NACAA Membership Meeting Cleveland, OH October 5, 2011.
UNIVERSAL WASTE SAFETY TRAINING CLASS. AGENDA Identifying Universal Waste Identifying Universal Waste Universal Waste Handlers Universal Waste Handlers.
OMNI FACILITY SERVICES Copyright  Progressive Business Publications Handling Hazardous Wastes.
HOW TO DO Pollution Prevention & Good Housekeeping NC STATE UNIVERSITY.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Waste Management Overview & Land Disposal Restrictions.
Joseph G. Maternowski Moss & Barnett, P.A. Minnesota Environmental Institute April 21, 2011 Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Revised Definition of Solid Waste Rule Jesse Boultinghouse Waste Permits Division May 6, 2015 TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair.
David Dippel, P.G. Frank Zeng, P.E. Waste Permits Division Municipal Solid Waste Permits Section 2015 TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair.
Underground Storage Tank Compliance Act of 2005 Bill Torrey UST/LUST Regional Program Manager US EPA – New England EBCNE April 19, 2006.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM Land Division Update Chip Crockett Chief, Industrial Hazardous Waste Branch Air & Waste Management Association Southern Section Pine.
Presented to Georgia Airports Association Conference October 21, 2009 EPA Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures – Update Also – What’s Coming with.
October Mary Louise Hendrickson Solid Waste Section – Technical Lead
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair
Web Resources Michael Gage New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection County Environmental and Waste Enforcement Special Investigations and Oversight.
Presumptive MACT For Municipal Solid Waste Landfills July 1999 Emission Standards Division US Environmental Protection Agency.
Environmental Regulations. Learning Objectives TLW understand the history of environmental regulations TLW be able to describe key content of environmental.
Ch WAC Geologic Sequestration of Carbon dioxide John Stormon Hydrogeologist Washington Department of Ecology Seattle, WA October.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
1 Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal General Overview March 1, 2006 US EPA.
Understanding the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Hazardous Waste Definition Exemption Jeff Bowman, TEEX.
Hazardous Waste Rule Amendments ___________________________ Training Dec. 9, 2015.
Status Report On Staff Review Of Board Regulations For Alternative Daily Cover, Food And Green Waste Composting, Farm And Ranch Composting, Compostable.
Item 21 May 11-12, 2004 CIWMB Meeting Discussion And Request For Rulemaking Direction To Formally Notice Proposed Regulations For RCRA Subtitle D Program.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Sustain Noblesville Committee September 19, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Copyright J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc. Content may be modified by subscriber per KellerOnline ® service Terms of Use. Hazardous Waste.
David Mann Waste Section Manager Waco & Austin Region Offices.
30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 210, Subchapter E Presented by Kara Denney September 23, 2015.
Pollution Prevention & Management DentalBMPs. Overview Amalgam in POTW New EPA Guidelines City of Tulsa Dental BMPs.
Ohio-Specific Universal Wastes
Lecture (11): Waste Recycling
Automotive Engines Theory and Servicing
2017 Environmental Trade Fair Shannon Gibson
2015 Definition of Solid Waste Rule
Introduction to the Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
Solid Waste Handling Standards
Arkansas Environmental Federation
Jesse Boultinghouse Waste Permits Division TCEQ Trade Fair May 3, 2016
Waste Disposal / Zero Waste to Landfill
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal
Exceptional and Natural Events Rulemaking
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
2018 Environmental Trade Fair Shannon Gibson
Automotive Engines Theory and Servicing
Presentation transcript:

Hazardous Waste Program Solvent Wipes Rule 2014

1980s – EPA received petitions from industry who stated that the hazardous waste regulations were too stringent for solvent- contaminated wipes based on the risks they pose – EPA developed a policy that deferred determinations to authorized states and EPA regions. (RO 11813) 2003 – EPA published a proposed rule to conditionally exclude reusable wipes and disposable wipes from hazardous waste regulation. (68 FR 65586) 2009 – EPA published a NODA requesting comment on a revised risk analysis for the rule. (74 FR 55163) 2013 – EPA publishes final rule (78 FR 46448). The final rule supersedes the 1994 policy. History of the Final Rule

Along with the final rule, EPA published its final risk analysis, which incorporates public comments from the 2009 NODA as well as the latest health benchmarks for trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene. The final risk analysis demonstrates that 19 of the 20 listed solvents evaluated do not pose significant risk when disposed in a landfill with a composite liner. Only one solvent, trichloroethylene, was found to exceed target risk criteria for disposal in a landfill with a composite liner. Therefore, solvent-contaminated wipes that are hazardous due to the presence of trichloroethylene are not eligible for the disposable wipes exclusion. Final Risk Analysis

On July 31, EPA published a final rule that modifies its RCRA hazardous waste regulations for solvent-contaminated wipes (78 FR 46448). The purpose of the final rule is to provide a consistent regulatory framework that is appropriate to the level of risk posed by solvent-contaminated wipes in a way that maintains protection of human health and the environment, while reducing overall compliance costs for industry. The rule supersedes the 1994 Shapiro memo which allowed states and Regions to make determinations regarding management of solvent-contaminated wipes. Purpose of the Rule

The rule was published on July 31, 2013, and becomes effective on January 31, Because the rule excludes solvent-contaminated wipes from RCRA hazardous waste regulation, the rule is considered less stringent than the base federal program. Thus, authorized states have the option of whether or not to adopt the exclusions into their regulations. (States operating under policies that are less stringent than the federal exclusions will need to incorporate the federal rule into their regulations.) The rule will go into effect on January 31 in states and territories that are not authorized for the RCRA program (Alaska, Iowa, U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, and tribal lands). Status of the Final Rule

The final rule is estimated to impact 90,549 generators (576 LQGs and 89,973 SQGs) as well as 3,730 solid waste management facilities (landfills and combustors) and 359 industrial laundries and dry cleaners. $18 million in net annual savings from reduced RCRA regulation. $3.7 – $9.9 million in annual benefits from pollution prevention (recycling of free liquid spent solvent); fire prevention (closed containers, no free liquids, labeling); and removal of “waste” label for reusable wipes. Total annual benefits from rule estimated to be between $ $27.8 million per year. Impacts of the Final Rule

The final rule provides a definition for “wipe” and “solvent- contaminated wipe” in 40 CFR –Wipe means a woven or non-woven shop towel, rag, pad, or swab made of wood pulp, fabric, cotton, polyester blends, or other material. –Solvent-contaminated wipe means A wipe that, after use or after cleaning up a spill, either: –Contains one or more of the F001 through F005 solvents; –Exhibits a hazardous characteristic when that characteristic results from a listed solvent; or –Exhibits only the hazardous waste characteristic of ignitability due to the presence of solvents that are not listed. Scope of the Final Rule

Solvent-contaminated wipes that contain listed hazardous waste other than solvents, or exhibit the characteristic of toxicity, corrosivity, or reactivity due to contaminants other than solvents, are not eligible for the exclusions. Important Note

Specifically, the rule includes: – A conditional exclusion from the definition of solid waste for solvent- contaminated wipes sent for cleaning (“reusable wipes”) – 40 CFR 261.4(a)(26) “Reusable Wipes”

– A conditional exclusion from the definition of hazardous waste for solvent-contaminated wipes sent for disposal (“disposable wipes”) – 40 CFR 261.4(b)(18) “Disposable Wipes”

Details of the Final Rule - Conditions  The final rule includes two conditional exclusions, meaning that if one or more of the conditions are violated, the solvent-contaminated wipes could lose their excluded status and become subject to hazardous waste regulation from the point of generation.  The conditions for both the reusable wipes exclusion and disposable wipes exclusion are practically the same, which should ease implementation and compliance.

Details of the Final Rule - Conditions 1.Storage  The rule uses a performance-based standard, rather than specifying types of containers.  Solvent-contaminated wipes must be accumulated, stored, and transported in non-leaking, closed containers.  The containers must be able to contain free liquids, if they occur (for example, from compression of the wipes).  Containers do not need to be sealed during accumulation (must be closed except when adding or removing wipes).  A container must be sealed when the container is full, when the wipes are no longer being accumulated, and during transportation.

Storage: “Closed Container” ? Standard is performance-based; facilities have flexibility in determining how to meet the standard.  Wipes accumulated in an open-head drum or container would be considered closed when the cover makes complete contact between the fitted lid and the rim.  After accumulation and during transport, this same container must be sealed to meet this standard; thus, the rings must be clamped or bolted to the container. Note, these examples are consistent with EPA's closed container guidance (RCRA online 14826, 12/3/09 and 11/3/11).

Storage: “Closed Container” ? OpenClosed

Storage: “Closed Container” ? OpenClosed

Storage (cont’d) Other examples that may meet the standard:  Containers with covers opened by a foot pedal (e.g., flip-top or spring-loaded lid) or with a self-closing swinging door;  Bags can be used, provided they meet the standard (i.e., the neck of the bag is tightly bound and sealed, the bag is able to contain liquids, and is non-leaking). Examples that do not meet the standard:  Bags leaving a trail of liquid on the ground;  Cardboard boxes.

Details of the Final Rule - Conditions 2.Labeling  Containers of solvent-contaminated wipes must be labeled “Excluded Solvent-Contaminated Wipes.”  Containers must be labeled during accumulation, storage, and transportation.

Details of the Final Rule - Conditions 3.Accumulation Time Limit  Solvent-contaminated wipes may be accumulated by the generator for up to 180 days from the start date of accumulation for each container.  Generators must keep documentation that the 180-day accumulation time limit is being met. Note: Since wipes may not be accumulated for more than180 days from the start date, including a start date on the accumulation container would add a degree of certainty to that process. However, that is not required. There are other methods to document that the 180-day accumulation is being met, such as an established schedule for pickups, a log of container dates, etc.

Details of the Final Rule - Conditions 4.“No free liquids” – the Heart of the Rule  Solvent-contaminated wipes may not contain free liquids at the point of being sent for cleaning on-site or sent off-site for cleaning or disposal.  “No free liquids” is defined in and is determined using the Paint Filter Liquids Test (Method 9095B in SW-846).  Paint Filter Liquids Test consists of placing a portion of the solvent- contaminated wipe into a paint filter, and if any of the material passes through and drops from the filter within five minutes, the material is deemed to contain free liquids.  Generators must document the process they are using to meet the “no free liquids” condition.  Free liquid spent solvent that is removed from the wipes is subject to hazardous waste regulation.

Details of the Final Rule - Conditions 5.Recordkeeping  Generators must maintain the following documentation at their site:  Name and address of the destination facility (laundry, combustor, or landfill) that is receiving the solvent-contaminated wipes.  Documentation that the 180-day accumulation time limit is being met.  Could include a service contract specifying frequency of pick-up, a log that lists the start date of each container, or container labels with the start date.  Description of the process the generator is using to meet the “no free liquids” condition.  Description of technologies, methods, sampling, or knowledge that a generator is using to ensure wipes contain no free liquids at the point of transport.

Details of the Final Rule - Conditions 6.Handling Facilities  Reusable wipes must be sent to a laundry or dry cleaner whose discharge, if any, is regulated under sections 301 (effluent discharge restrictions) and 402 (permitting requirements) or section 307 (indirect discharge to a POTW) of the Clean Water Act.  Disposable wipes must go to either  a combustor regulated under section 129 of the Clean Air Act or a hazardous waste combustor, boiler, or industrial furnace regulated under 40 CFR 264, 265, or 266 subpart H; or  a municipal solid waste landfill regulated under 40 CFR 258 or a hazardous waste landfill regulated under 40 CFR 264 or 265.  Storage/labeling requirements continue to apply if solvent- contaminated wipes are stored at handlers. Any free liquids found by handling facilities must be removed and managed as hazardous waste.

Details of the Final Rule

 For more information on this rulemaking, go to: tm tm  Website includes a summary chart of the rule as well as FAQs.  _fnl_rul_ pdf _fnl_rul_ pdf  EPA Contacts: Mary Beth Sheridan, US EPA (ORCR) Amanda Kohler, US EPA (ORCR) Tracy Atagi Resources

Questions ?