Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL DYNAMIC TESTING OF A DOUBLE HELIX SCREW PILE
Advertisements

1 MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE PROJECT AND THEIR POSSIBLE INCLUSION IN EUROPEAN STANDARD -Major findings -Major findings suitable for inclusion in European Standard.
A controlled-source experiment to investigate the origin of wavefield polarization in fault zones Giuseppe Di Giulio 1, Antonio Rovelli 2, Fabrizio Cara.
Oasys SIREN.
Educational Resource Library
P-wave S-wave Particles oscillate back and forth Wave travels down rod, not particles Particle motion parallel to direction of wave propagation Particles.
JP Singh and Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., P.E. Gary Norris, Ph.D., P.E. March 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM S-SHAFT FOR LATERALLY LOADED.
3-D Dynamic Base Shaking Model 2-D Static BNWF Pushover Model
An-Najah National University
Pore-Pressure Generation During CPT Probe Advancement By Michael Fitzgerald.
Direct Evaluation of Effectiveness of Prefabricated Vertical Drains in Liquefiable Sand Wen-Jong Chang, National Chi Nan University Ellen M. Rathje, University.
Impacts of Seismic Stress on Pore Water Pressure in Clayey Soil By: Qazi Umar Farooq Lecturer Civil Engineering Dept Univ of Engg & Tech Taxila.
Advanced Site Monitoring and Characterization of Site Dynamic Properties Mourad Zeghal, Tarek Abdoun and Vicente Mercado Department of Civil and Envir.
ENGR 166 – Foundations in Engineering Structural Engineering Module Dynamics of Structures.
The Liquefaction Resistance and Maximum Shear Modulus of Frozen Samples Yao-Chung Chen Department of Construction Engineering National Taiwan University.
Lessons Learned and Need for NEES Instrumented Liquefaction Sites T. Leslie Youd Brigham Young University.
PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting Performance of Improved Ground u Elizabeth A. Hausler and Nicholas Sitar.
OUTLINE SPATIAL VARIABILITY FRAGILITY CURVES MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS CONCLUSIONS EFFECTS DESIGN RECOMMEND BEARING CAPACITY OF HETEROGENEOUS SOILS APPENDIXOUTLINE.
Application of CPT data for evaluation of ground liquefaction in Chi-Chi Earthquake, Taiwan D.H. Lee 1, C.S. Ku 2, C.S. Chen 1, C.H. Juang 3 &J.H. Wu 3.
Basic design of stilts based on the CPT Julio R. Valdes Geo-Innovations Research Group Civil Engineering SDSU.
Time-dependent increase in CPT tip resistance following explosive compaction. Time-dependent increase in V s following explosive compaction, as measured.
“LIQUEFACTION” Prepared By: Husni M. Awwad Talal Z. Zammar
Insitu Testing Methods Breakout Session Research Collaboration Field Testing Research Needs Ken Stokoe, Breakout Moderator.
Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation Laboratory 1 Task 1 (1g Tests) Experimental and Micromechanical Computational Study of Pile Foundations.
By Ray Ruichong ZHANG Colorado School of Mines, Colorado, USA HHT-based Characterization of Soil Nonlinearity and Liquefaction in Earthquake Recordings.
Recent Enhancements and Research Highlights at the Permanently Instrumented Field Sites Jamison H. Steidl.
Record Processing Considerations for Analysis of Buildings Moh Huang California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program California Geological Survey Department.
Seismic Wave Propagation
SURFACE WAVE SURVEYS LIMITED
Data centres and observablesModern Seismology – Data processing and inversion 1 Data in seismology: networks, instruments, current problems  Seismic networks,
4 th NEES Annual MeetingKenneth H. Stokoe, II Washington, DCJune 22, 2006 Collaborative Activities of a NEES Equipment Site: Examples from
Liquefaction: Behavior Evidence, Prediction, and Prevention Richard P. Ray, Ph.D, P.E.
Reflection Processing and Analysis Bryce Grimm Mayo Thompson Shallow Subsurface Investigation across many areas of the V-line and Truckee Canal Fallon,
Soils Investigation Soil Investigation
The Use of MASW in the Assessment of Soil Liquefaction Potential Chih-Ping Lin C-C Chang, I-L Chen, T-S Chang National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan November.
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
Liquefaction Analysis For a Single Piled Foundation By Dr. Lu Chihwei Moh and Associates, Inc. Date: 11/3/2003.
Evaluating paleoseismic ground motions using dynamic back analysis of structural failures in archaeological sites Ronnie Kamai (1), Yossef Hatzor (1),
Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation Laboratory 1 Task 1 (1g Tests) Experimental and Micromechanical Computational Study of Pile Foundations.
Reference Manual Chapter 9
1 Interpretation and Visualization of Model Test Data for Slope Failure in Liquefying Soil Bruce L. Kutter Erik J. Malvick R. Kulasingam Ross Boulanger.
University of Missouri - Columbia
Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation Laboratory Experimental and Micromechanical Computational Study of Pile Foundations Subjected to Liquefaction-Induced.
A Study on Liquefaction Evaluation Using Shear Wave Velocity for Gravelly Sand Deposits Ping-Sien Lin, National Chung-Hsing University Fu-Sheng Chen, China.
Estimation of Groundwater Recharge in a Stony Soil Based on Monitoring of Soil Hydraulic Data Emerstorfer N., A. Klik and G. Kammerer Institute of Hydraulics.
Field Testing & Monitoring of Structural Performance University of California, Los Angeles CPT Truck and RSA Jonathan P. Stewart, co-PI NSF Site VisitJune.
June 21, NEES 4 th Annual Meeting Instrumentation for the NEESR Sand Aging Field Experiment David A. Saftner University of Michigan PhD Student.
GVDA NEES Field Facilities: A Resource for Earthquake Engineering (and Seismology) Research and Practice Bob Nigbor UCLA.
Class A Centrifuge Prediction of future SG1 of Full Scale Test with Pile Foundation by Marcelo Gonzalez Tarek Abdoun Ricardo Dobry Rensselaer Polytechnic.
SASW – an in situ method for determining shear modulus
Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation Laboratory SG-1: Lateral Spreading – Observations & Analysis Raghudeep B. & Thevanayagam S. 20 Aug 2007:
Laval University’s experience with the wide-base single tires
MODELING OF SEISMIC SLOPE BEHAVIOR WITH SHAKING TABLE TEST Meei-Ling Lin and Kuo-Lung Wang Department of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University.
Department of Civil Engineering National Taiwan University National Taiwan University Generation of Uniform Hazard Accelerogram Representing from “Dominant.
U.S. – Taiwan Workshop on Soil Liquefaction November 4, 2003 Physical and Numerical Modeling Breakout Session.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
Liquefaction Mitigation using GeoComposite Vertical Drains
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
Station Metadata: What do I Need?
FE: Geotechnical Engineering
U.S.-Taiwan Workshop on Soil Liquefaction
How the ground shakes? Dr. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim M.Tech., Ph.D., by
QuakeCoRE Project Update
WHAT IS LIQUEFACTION.
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
Seismic Wave Propagation
Creating a Conference Poster
Comparison of Seismic and Well Data
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS
Presentation transcript:

Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of Texas at Austin W.-J. Chang National Chi-Nan University U.S.-Taiwan Workshop on Soil Liquefaction November 3-5, 2003

Goal: develop an in-situ testing procedure that can be used to evaluate directly the cyclic liquefaction resistance of soil in terms of u vs.  for different numbers of cycles Key Characteristics: involves a limited volume of material shakes soil like an earthquake

Elements of the In-Situ Liquefaction Test Dynamic loading source (similar to EQ shaking) Embedded instrumentation array (to monitor ground motion and measure pore pressure generation and dissipation) Analysis procedure(s) to permit shear strain time histories to be evaluated

Pore pressure generation curve Similar to Cyclic Strain Approach Used in Laboratory Testing (Dobry et al. 1982) tt

Schematic Layout of Field Setup in First-Generation Testing Backfill soil 3.3 m Footing Vibroseis Waterproof liner m 0.3 m 5 Liquefaction sensor Accelerometer Settlement plate

Dynamic Field Source uniform cyclic amplitude (  ) specified frequency (f) specified number of cycles (N) Well-Controlled Dynamic Loading: Dynamic Sources: First Generation-Vertical Vibroseis Second Generation – T-Rex and Liquidator

First-Generation Source: Vibroseis - Involves Rayleigh Waves Z Direction

Second-Generation Source: T-Rex - Involves Shear Wave Loading in X, Y or Z Directions

Frequency, Hz Force, kN Vertical Mode Horizontal Modes 12 Hz 5 Hz Theoretical Performance of T-Rex: Vertical and Horizontal Modes (60 kips) (30 kips)

Loading in X or Z Directions Second-Generation Source: Liquidator – Involves Shear Waves

Frequency, Hz Force, kN T-Rex-Vertical Liquidator 1.3 Hz Comparison of the Vertical Force Outputs of T-Rex and Liquidator (20 kips)

Embedded Instrumentation Array measure soil particle motion (2-D and 3-D geophones) measure pore pressure generation all measurements at same location “Liquefaction Sensor” Settlement Plates

Shoe 8.9 cm 2.5 cm 3.8 cm V. Geophone PPT H-Geophone Filter First-Generation Liquefaction Sensor

Instrumentation Van during Preliminary Field Trials Sercel 408XL System, up to 2000 channels VXI Technology System, 48-channel analyzer

Seismic testing Settlement-plate elevations Apply dynamic loading for a specific number of cycles Data analysis Rest for 30 minutes to 2 hours Final settlements Final S-wave velocities Retrieve sensors Saturation evaluation In-situ density measurement Staged testing Interactive testing Field Testing Procedure

Shear strain calculations 1.Processing of Geophone data 2.Strain calculation methods Pore Pressure Generation Curves Data Analysis Pore pressure processing 1.PPT data processing 2.Hydrodynamic and Residual pore pressure

Schematic Layout of Field Setup in First-Generation Testing Backfill soil 3.3 m Footing Vibroseis Waterproof liner m 0.3 m 5 Liquefaction sensor Accelerometer Settlement plate

QUARRY TEST SITE IN AUSTIN, TEXAS First-Generation Vibroseis First-Generation Instrumentation Van

Shear Strain (x10 -3 %) Time (sec) Test T1-3 at center of the array Pore Pressure Ratio, r u (%) Time (sec) (Band-pass filtered)  v = 6.4 kPa Test Series T1 – Small-Strain Level

Time (sec) Recorded r u Residual r u Test T1-6 at center of the array Test Series T1 – Large-Strain Level SDM method AW average Shear Strain (x10 -3 ) Pore Pressure Ratio, r u (%)

Mean shear strain amplitude (%) Note:  xz calculated by the SDM method Pore Pressure Ratio, r u (%) D r = 35% n=5 cycles n=10 cycles n=20 cycles Pore Pressure Generation Curves for Different Numbers of Loading Cycles tt n=2 cycles

Hollow Push Rod Liquefiable Layer Liquefaction Sensor Wire Rope and Electrical Cable Hydraulic Ram Installation of Embedded Sensors

Shallow Instrumented Zone Rayleigh Waves (Vertical Particle Motion) Loading with Rayleigh (R) Waves

Shallow Instrumented Zone Horizontally Polarized Shear (SH) Waves Loading with Shear (SH) Waves

Vertically Polarized Shear (SV) Waves Shallow Instrumented Zone Loading with Shear (SV) Waves

Instrumented Zone at Depth Vertically Polarized Shear (SV) Waves Loading with Shear Waves (SV) at Depth

Conclusions Development of the basic elements of a field liquefaction test have been initiated with first-generation equipment. Successful measurements of ground motion and pore pressure generation have been conducted. Second-generation dynamic sources, liquefaction sensors, and data acquisition equipment are nearly developed. The test will continue to evolve over the next few years, but there are already numerous applications.

Thank you National Science Foundation United States Geological Survey George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) Many graduate students at the University of Texas