Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) 1 EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN DIVISION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
Advertisements

Use the date (six digit number – 00/00/00) for when services are to begin. This should be implemented as soon as possible following the meeting – but.
Special Education Continuum of Services Oswego City School District October 9, 2009.
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
Students with IEPs and the One-to-One Aide
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Rationale Participation with Peers (Section X of IEP)
Working with Parents of a Child with Disabilities Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.
Least Restrictive Environment: A World of Options and Opportunities Training provided by the Connecticut State Department of Education in cooperation with:
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
A Guide for IEP Teams Including Students with Disabilities in State and District- wide Assessment.
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
KRISTIN HENNESSEY SOUTH SOUND PARENT TO PARENT THURSDAY, MARCH 21, 2013 IEPs: The Big Picture… and a bit of the Nitty-Gritty.
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
 Dianna vs. the Board of Education 1970 Filed on behalf of 9 students who were Mexican American Placed in classes for special education after a test.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Laws and Regulations.
Special Education Adrienne Lacey-Bushell, Ed.D. Director Special Education.
Special Education Review & Update for Regular Educators.
State Testing Accommodations For Students with Disabilities August, 2009 By Mitzi Delker EXED Supervisor Secondary Education.
Bibb County School District Program for Exceptional Children Paired Zone Meeting November 7 and 9, 2011.
Preparing for Success: The Individualized Education Program August 2015 New Teacher Institute 1.
True or False A student’s need for AT must be considered at every ARD.
Inclusion or Mainstreaming Jenn Combest and Liz Raymer.
Produced by NICHCY, 2007 Least Restrictive Environmen t D ecision M aking L R E Take me to my LRE. I’m ready to roll! Me, too. What about me? Yes. Count.
Produced by NICHCY, 2007 Least Restrictive Environme nt D ecision M aking L R E.
PLOP, Goals & Objectives Notes PLOP – Free of grammatical and spelling errors – Statement describing how the student is performing the annual goal currently.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
12/4/2014ECSE 602 Dr. Y. Xu1 ECSE 602 Instructional Programming for Infants and Young Children with Disabilities This session will cover:  Child Activity.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
The IEP: Individual Education Plan. The IEP Team  (1) The parents of the child;  (2) At least one regular education teacher of the child (if the child.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
At Your Table – IEP Goals Is it measurable? Yes – what makes it measurable? No - How could you make it measurable? 1.
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
January ESE Meeting Chapter 5 – Special Education and Related Services – ESE Reminders – Reviewing Measurable Goals – Services 1.
In the State-Required Assessment and Accountability Programs 703 KAR 5:070 1.
Emily Day.  The state of North Carolina requires that all students be assessed at the end of the school year (middle and high school) or at the end of.
Placement ARC Chairperson Training 1 Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children.
Individual Education Plans 101 DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPLIANT AND INSTRUCTIONALLY RELEVANT IEP COURTNEY WARD NOVEMBER 2010.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Training Goals ► To define “Educational Benefit” ► To learn a process for reviewing your district’s IEPs.
Accessing Special Education Services for Your Child
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
The New IDEA in Special Education
ACCOMMODATIONS Using Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment in the classroom.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Laws and Regulations.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
…program and placement decisions are based on students strengths, potential, and needs?
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Accommodations: Decide, Document, Monitor Carrie Perkis NCDPI Division of Accountability Services Conference on Exceptional Children November 2010.
Pre-Applicant Training| SC Public Charter School District| Beckie Davis Serving Students with Special Needs.
And Amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Effective December 8, 2010.
LRE: THE PLACE TO BE How to Document Least Restrictive Environment
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Least Restrictive Environment - LRE
Teaching Students with Disabilities
BOY Accommodations Training
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Least Restrictive Environment
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Seven: Determining the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) SBIEP Module Seven: Determining the.
Least Restrictive Environment
Presentation transcript:

Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) 1 EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN DIVISION

2 LRE REQUIREMENTS

History of LRE LRE has been a part of the federal special education law from its inception – beginning in 1975 LRE’s basic statutory provision has remained intact for the past 30+ years. 3

4 Defining LRE To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities are educated with children who are nondisabled Each public agency must ensure that— and… NC Adapted from NICHCY 2007

5 Defining DeLRE Special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of children with disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs only… … if the nature or severity of the disability is such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily. Produced by NICHCY 2007 Defining LRE

Placement decisions must be based on a child’s unique needs and IEP, not on administrative convenience, disability/program label, or allocation of funds. 6

What Are LEA Requirements for LRE? Each LEA must have a continuum of alternative placements to meet the needs of students with disabilities for special education and related services. The continuum refers to the entire spectrum of placements where a student’s special education program can be implemented. NC

8 The child’s placement is: – Determined at least annually; – Based on the child’s IEP; and – As close as possible to the child's home, unless child’s IEP requires another arrangement. Defining LRE Placements Adapted from NICHCY 2007

Consideration must be given to any potential harmful effect on the child or on the quality of services that the child needs. A child with a disability may not be removed from education in age-appropriate regular classrooms solely because of needed modifications in the general education curriculum. 9 Defining LRE Placements Produced by NICHCY 2007

10 Special education is not a place. It’s a set of services and supports. Where a child with a disability receives special education services is that child’s placement. The first “where” to consider is the general education environment. Summarizing LRE Produced by NICHCY

Children with disabilities must always be considered general education students first. 11 Produced by NICHCY

GENERAL EDUCATION PROGRAM PARTICIPATION 12

How can this child participate and progress in regular classes and nonacademic settings with the use of supplementary aids and services? THE OPENING QUESTION… 13 Given the age and assigned grade level of the child, and considering ALL of the general education opportunities this child would have if he/she were NOT a child with a disability…

General Education Program Participation The LRE consideration on the continuum always begins in the regular education classroom. The LRE must be considered for the provision of nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities. NC

Terminology Nonacademic Settings Each public agency must ensure that: The child has supplementary aids and services determined appropriate and necessary by the child’s IEP Team to participate in nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities. –Examples: meals, recess, assemblies, clubs, athletics NC

Terminology Supplementary aids and services mean aids, services, and other supports that are provided in regular education classes, other education-related settings, and in extracurricular and nonacademic settings to enable students with disabilities to be educated with nondisabled children. 16

Terminology Technical Assistance and Training Activities ensure that teachers and administrators in all public agencies: Are fully informed about their responsibilities for implementing LRE requirements. Are provided with technical assistance and training necessary to assist them in this effor t. 17

Accommodations ≠ Modifications! 18

Terminology Accommodations Do not change the construct of the assignment/ assessment Give student equal access to learning without “watering down” the content Are not to be provided for score enhancement Must be aligned or matched between classroom instruction, classroom assessments, district-wide and state-wide assessment 19

Terminology Accommodations allow a student to complete the same assignment/test as the other students but with adjustments in time, format, setting, presentation and/or response. 20

Examples of Accommodations Modified Test Formats Braille/Braillewriter Large Print One Test Item Per Page AT Devices and Special Arrangements Dictation to Scribe Magnification Devices Interpreter/Transliterator Graphic Organizer 21

Examples of Accommodations Student Marks in Book Student Reads Test Aloud to Self Test Administrator Reads Test Aloud Special Test Environments Extended Time Multiple Test Sessions Testing in Separate Room Audio Tapes Preferential Seating Study Guide Preferential Seating 22

Terminology Modifications are adjustments to the requirements of an assignment or test (changes in what a student is expected to learn and demonstrate, changes in the instructional level, changes in the number of key concepts mastered, and changes in content). 23

Terminology Modifications change the construct through altering language load, content complexity, and/or cognitive complexity. Other examples of modifications: Simplified reading passages Reduced response choices 24

Examples of Modifications Modified Grading –10 Point Grading scale or Pass/Fail –Rubric grading – specify details –Assign weights to daily work/tests – specify details –Retake tests and average/highest score Modified Assignments Alternative Materials Portfolio 25

Decide: Making Accommodations Decisions

Instructional Accommodations Testing Accommodations drive 27

Considerations for Committee Decision-Making Base accommodations on individual student need Refer to the list of state-approved testing accommodations Understand purpose of the accommodation and make sure it is relevant to the student’s need and the demands of the test Take into account other identifications a student may have (e.g., LEP), which may require specific accommodations based on area of need and/or content All relevant teachers should be informed of accommodations 28

Considerations for Committee Decision-Making Students should be using accommodations ROUTINELY during instruction and similar classroom assessments – accommodations should not be a surprise on test day! Routine use = at least 30 days prior to test date 29

Documentation of Testing Accommodations in the IEP IEP DEC4 Page 6 of 10 30

Kara’s Story Kara is a bright, 9 year old student in the 4 th grade. Kara is identified as OHI. Kara displays grade level skills in the area of reading, interacts appropriately with her peers, and follows directions from authority figures. Kara has been diagnosed with ADD, which manifests itself in an inability to follow steps in sequence and complete multi-step tasks. This results in poor math calculation and problem solving skills along with general organizational difficulties in school. 31 Adapted from NICHCY 2007

Kara’s Story The IEP Team convened to conduct Kara’s annual review. IEP goals were developed in calculation and reasoning and organizational skills. She is not in need of assistive technology. The team must begin discussion of least restrictive environment, beginning with discussion of general education program participation. 32 Adapted from NICHCY 2007

Kara’s Story Question 1 for the IEP Team: In what general education classes and nonacademic activities would all 4 th grade students in Kara’s school participate? Question 2 for the IEP Team: Given Kara’s individual needs, what supplemental aids, services, modifications, accommodations (if any) are needed in order for Kara to participate in the general education program for 4 th grade with her nondisabled peers? 33 Adapted from NICHCY 2007

Kara’s Story IEP Team Summary: The IEP Team determined that Kara can participate in the following general education classes and nonacademic activities using the following supplemental aids, services, modifications, and accommodations: Language ArtsNone Needed ScienceGraphic Organizer HistoryNone Needed LunchNone Needed RecessNone Needed LibraryNone Needed 34 Adapted from NICHCY 2007

Kara’s Story IEP Team Summary: The IEP Team determined that Kara cannot participate in the following general education class even with the use of supplemental aids, services, modifications, and accommodations: Math Math instruction will be delivered in a small group setting in the special education classroom because of Kara’s distractibility. Kara’s skill deficits in sequencing, calculation and problem solving are of such significance that they require intensive pre-teaching and re- teaching, which cannot be provided in the general classroom setting. 35 Adapted from NICHY 2007

Kara’s Story IEP Team Summary: The IEP Team determined that Kara’s general education science teacher required technical assistance to develop the graphic organizer that was listed on her IEP as an accommodation. The IEP Team documented that the science teacher would receive technical assistance from Kara’s EC teacher in developing an appropriate graphic organizer. All of Kara’s general education teachers requested technical assistance in working with students who have ADD. 36 Adapted from NICHCY 2007

SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICE DELIVERY 37

What does special education service delivery include? Specially Designed Instruction –Anticipated frequency, duration and location Related Services –Anticipated frequency, duration and location Nonacademic Services and Activities –Anticipated frequency, duration and location 38

Frequency Frequency refers to the number of sessions in which services will be delivered. Typical frequency intervals are per week, month, reporting period or year. 39

Frequency The IEP Team should choose intervals that will sufficiently allow the student to make progress toward the annual goals. Frequency of sessions must not be assigned based on administrative convenience, providers’ schedules, or the master schedule of the school. It must be based on the individual needs of the student. 40

Duration Duration refers to the amount of time per service session. Session length must be specific. “As needed” is not an acceptable session length. 41

Duration Related Services Support Descriptions do not require a session length; just indicate that a support description is being used. Session duration must not be assigned based on administrative convenience, providers’ schedules, or the master schedule of the school. It must be based on the individual needs of the student. 42

Location Location is the physical setting in which the service will be delivered. The discussion and determination of location by the IEP Team is critical as it ultimately determines the continuum of educational placement. The key to the location of services as it relates to continuum of education placement is the composition of the student group in that location. 43

Location Location of services must not be assigned based on administrative convenience, providers’ schedules, or the master schedule of the school. It must be based on the individual needs of the student. 44

Related Services Related services means developmental, corrective, and other supportive services, such as transportation, that are required to assist a child with a disability to benefit from special education. The list of related services is not exhaustive. Related services do not include a medical device that is surgically implanted, the optimization of device functioning (e.g. mapping), maintenance of the device, or the replacement of that device. Eligibility is not determined for related services. The decision that related services are necessary for a student to benefit from specially designed instruction must be based on relevant data. 45 NC

Related Services Support Description These services support the student’s access and participation in his/her special education program. These services are supports on behalf of the student rather than skill-based services. The Support Description constitutes related services and may not be considered in the calculation of educational placement. These services are not billable through Medicaid. 46

Removal from Nonacademic Settings If the student will not participate with nondisabled peers during nonacademic services and activities, these services and activities must be recorded on the IEP document. This time will be considered during the calculation of the educational placement. Nonacademic settings include but are not limited to lunch, recess, electives, and assemblies. 47

Kara’s Story The IEP Team has discussed special education service delivery for Kara. During the general education program participation discussion, it was determined that Kara would receive math instruction in the special education setting. The following reflects Kara’s service delivery: Special Education Frequency: 5 times per week Duration: 60 minutes per session Location: Special Education Classroom 48 Adapted from NICHCY 2007

Kara’s Story The IEP Team also determined that Kara was not in need of related services to benefit from special education. Kara will not be removed from her nondisabled peers for nonacademic services and activities. 49 Adapted from NICHCY 2007

PLACEMENT DECISION AND JUSTIFICATION 50

Determination of Continuum of Alternative Educational Placements Remember the instructional day is defined as the time from bell to bell, so educational placement is calculated based upon total minutes of the instructional day. The percentage of the instructional day that a student spends with his/her nondisabled peers is used to determine the continuum (DEC 4, page 8, section VI) 51

Placement Decision The educational placement decision is determined based on the percentage of time a student remains with his/her nondisabled peers. –Regular (80% or more of the day with nondisabled peers) –Resource (40%-79% of the day with nondisabled peers) –Separate (39% or less of the day with nondisabled peers) 52

Kara’s Story Kara’s school day begins at 8:00 am and dismisses at 2:30 pm. There are 390 minutes in the instructional day. Kara is removed from her nondisabled peers for 60 minutes per day. 60/390 x 100=15.4% Kara is removed from her nondisabled peers for 15.4% of the instructional day, meaning that Kara spends 84.6% of her day with nondisabled peers. This places Kara in the regular placement on the continuum. 53 Adapted from NICHCY 2007

LRE Decisions The LRE Justification Statement is recorded on the DEC 4 page 9. The LRE statement must answer the question “why” the student’s education cannot, even with supports and services, be achieved in the regular education class/environment and thus the student must be removed from his/her typically developing peers for specially designed instruction. This statement should not just restate the disability category or the setting…but focus on the educational needs of the student that require the removal from nondisabled peers. 54

Kara’s Story When the IEP Team discussed general education participation, it was determined that Kara’s math instruction would occur away from her nondisabled peers. This decision was based upon the significance of her skills deficits and the intensity of instruction required to meet her individual needs. The statement below reflects the justification of this decision: Math instruction will be delivered in the special education classroom because Kara’s skill deficits in sequencing, calculation and problem solving are of such significance that they require intensive pre-teaching and re- teaching which cannot be provided in the general classroom setting. 55 Adapted from NICHCY 2007

The IDEA requires all students with disabilities to be provided a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) in the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE). Thank you for your advocacy for children! 56