Studying Distance Students: Methods, Findings, Actions Fifteenth Distance Learning Services Conference Memphis, Tennessee April 20, 2012 Beth Avery and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
Advertisements

Reading Rodski: User Surveys Revisited The 25 th IATUL Annual Conference Krakow 2004 Dr. Grace Saw University of Queensland Cybrary Brisbane, Australia.
Studying Ourselves: Libraries and the User Experience at UNT Diane Wahl.
Queen’s Libraries User Surveys Selected information from the Faculty and Student surveys June 2002.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Bound for Disappointment Faculty and Journals at Research Institutions Jim Self University of Virginia Library USA 7 th Northumbria Conference Spier, South.
Andrea Eastman-Mullins Information & Technology Coordinator University of North Carolina, Office of the President Teaching and Learning with Technology.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
NWACC Library Instruction Program Teaching information literacy skills for academic success and lifelong learning.
Teaching Library Research Strategies for Credit: Lessons for Librarians from LSP101 Ida Martinez (im58) CUL Professional Development Week 2006.
Origins SERVQUAL IS SERVQUAL LibQual+. Theoretical Model Define services from the end user point of view Understand that end user expectations are shifting.
How Assessment Will Inform Our Future 1. Administration of on-going user surveys and focus groups to enhance reference services 2. Analysis of LibStats.
Improving Technology Expertise in Mathematics Instructors Maria H. Andersen, Muskegon Community College We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
Temple University Russell Conwell Learning Center Office of Senior Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies GETTING INVOLVED IN RESEARCH AT TEMPLE UNIVERSITY.
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Department of Institutional Research.
TAMU 2012 Enrollment Undergrads40,100 Graduates9,600 Professional527 Faculty3,810 TAMU HSC 2012 Enrollment Undergrads206 Graduates959 Professional1,121.
Library User Studies Hsin-liang Chen SLIS, Indiana University.
LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter.
Employer perceptions of international education and UK degrees Cliff Young, Managing Director, Ipsos Public Affairs International Legal Education Abroad.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian
Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
WVU Libraries LibQual Surveys 2003, 2005, 2007 “ The WVU library system is outstanding. I honestly cannot think of anything that needs improvement within.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
Faculty Survey Results Buswell Memorial Library, 2014.
Proposition: Digital Collections Are Easier to Find and Use through DLF Aquifer’s American Social History Online Katherine Kott, Aquifer Director Library.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
U SING ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES TO GUIDE LIBRARY SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS Diane Wahl Beth Avery Annie Downey University of North Texas.
Group. “Your partner in developing future Lifelong Learners” UROWNE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
Usability, the User Experience & Interface Design: The Role of Reference July 30, 2013.
What Works in Distance Learning (for me) TACTYC - Atlanta, GA May 20, 2006 Andy Williams - Edmonds Community CollegeEdmonds Community College
Noel Levitz Priorities Survey for Online Learners (PSOL) Joan Costello —Chief Academic Officer, Inver Hills Community College Deborah Proctor —eCurriculum.
Susan A. Mee Shirley L. Bower Rochester Institute of Technology Off-Campus Library Services Conference April 29, 2010.
Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies.
Effectively utilising LibQUAL+ data J. Stephen Town.
June 25, 2007 ALA Washington, DC Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College Using Your LibQUAL+ Results Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Kirstin Dougan Music and Performing Arts Librarian, Music and Performing Arts Library, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign “YouTube Has Changed.
Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
4Faculty.org Online Professional Development Resources.
Texas State University LibQUAL Survey 2015 Core Survey Section IC 1-8 Information Control Ray Uzwyshyn Director, Collections and Digital Services Texas.
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
® LibQUAL+ ® Implementation Procedures The Third Lodz [Poland] Library Conference Technical University of Lodz June, 2008 Presented by: Bruce Thompson.
LibQual at UAB Lister Hill Library Pat Higginbottom Associate Director for Public Services
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
LibQUAL 2005 at London South Bank and a Lincolnshire man in Chicago.
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
STUDENT ACTIVITIES OFFICE KARA ADAMS, NICOLE JULIANO, CATIE STURN, & EMILY WOLFKIEL SEATTLE UNIVERSITY SDAD591 MARCH 15,
Focus on SCONUL Institutions: Cranfield University – DCMT Campus Stephen Town.
Using LibQUAL+ to Rethink Public Services June 2003.
A CADEMIC L IBRARIES : C ONTRIBUTIONS TO T EACHING A SSOCIATION OF R ESEARCH L IBRARIES (ARL) L IBRARY A SSESSMENT C ONFERENCE A UGUST, 2014 Rachel A.
Susan Ariew Academic Services Librarian for Education and Philosophy University of South Florida Jim Eison Professor of Higher Education University of.
Web Optimization Project Presented By Stephanie Bluth, Elisa Crossland and Diane McCormick September 24, 2012.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
Good, Fast, and Cheap: The Pioneering Reference Chat Service at the University of North Texas Presented by Martha Tarlton and Donna Arnold Music Library.
Library Assessment Tools & Technology
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
Presentation transcript:

Studying Distance Students: Methods, Findings, Actions Fifteenth Distance Learning Services Conference Memphis, Tennessee April 20, 2012 Beth Avery and Diane Wahl University of North Texas

Introduction Assessment at UNT LibQUAL+® results Focus groups Ethnographic study Triangulation How we responded What we learned

Assessment of User Needs at UNT LibQUAL+® survey starting in 2005 Identifies Need input on how to improve/change

Total Spring 2012 Headcount

On Campus Students I don't use the physical library on campus, but the online resources are excellent. The only problem I have ever had is with journal articles only being available at the actual library. Commuting from Plano makes it difficult to access those articles as I am only on campus 1-2 nights per week and only get there from work just in time for class. Thank you for the valuable online resources.! [sic] I am very busy and generally do not have time to physically visit the on-campus library.

Cost of attendance Value for the price Merit scholarships available Extracurricular opportunities Availability of recreational facilities Cost of attendance Value for the price Merit scholarships available Extracurricular opportunities Availability of majors Quality of majors Quality of on- campus housing Cost of attendance Value for the price Availability of majors Quality of majors Cost of attendance Academic reputation Personal attention Quality of academic facilities Quality of on- campus housing Availability of majors Quality of majors Academic reputation Personal attention Quality of academic facilities Academic reputation Personal attention Quality of academic facilities Quality of on- campus housing Merit scholarships available Academic reputation Personal attention Quality of academic facilities Quality of on- campus housing Merit scholarships available Availability of majors Quality of majors Value for the price Enrollment Management, Spring 2012 Very Important & UNT Rated Higher Very Important & UNT Rated Lower Admitted Students’ Ratings of UNT on Characteristics that they consider “Very Important”

: What It Measures minimum desired perceived superiority gap adequacy gap Thermometer Chart

Recruiting Convenience sample Eliminating bias – Selection bias – Nonresponse bias

Distance Learners

Data Analysis PRIORITIES Item #Item Description2009 Rank IC-1Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office1(8.55) IC-4The electronic information resources I need2(8.52) IC-2A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own3(8.49) IC-8Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work4(8.49) IC-6Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own5(8.4) LARGEST SUPERIORITY GAPS Item #Item Description2009 Rank IC-2A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own1(-1.43) IC-6Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own2(-1.3) LQ-1Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources3(-1.27) IC-8Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work4(-1.17) IC-4The electronic information resources I need5(-1.15) LARGEST ADEQUACY GAPS Item #Item Description2009 Rank IC-2A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own1(0) IC-8Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work2(0) IC-6Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own3(0.05) LQ-1Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources4(0.19) IC-4The electronic information resources I need5(0.23)

Comment Analysis I am an online student and while the online library is probably very good (and probably deserves higher marks than I gave it above), I do not know how to use it and don't think that I've ever really been made very aware of it (until now). I have not been introduced to the library or library services. I have found that the internet and my company library give me what I need. By the way, I have yet to see a link to the libray [sic] on any of the pages I visit. It is not on web CT [sic] that I can see. In short, Where [sic] is it? If a person who is predominently [sic] an on-line [sic] student has to look for a library services link and the link to is not on the pages visited regularly then the library does not exist. It's the old saw, Location, Location, Location.

2009/2011 Comparison LARGEST SUPERIORITY GAPS Item # Item Description 2011 Rank 2009 Rank LQ-4 Online course support (readings, links, references)1(-1.01) IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own2(-1)2(-1.3) LQ-3 Making me aware of library services3(-1) IC-2 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own4(-0.99)1(-1.43) IC-4 The electronic information resources I need5(-0.93)5(-1.15) LQ-1 Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources 3(-1.27) IC-8 Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work 4(-1.17) LARGEST ADEQUACY GAPS Item # Item Description 2011 Rank 2009 Rank LQ-4 Online course support (readings, links, references)1(-0.06) IC-1 Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office2(0.14) LQ-3 Making me aware of library services3(0.19) IC-5 Modern equipment that lets me easily access needed information4(0.24) IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own5(0.26)3(0.05) IC-2 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 1(0) IC-8 Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work 2(0) LQ-1 Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources 4(0.19) IC-4 The electronic information resources I need 5(0.23)

Focus Groups: IRB Approval Required to use results for Produces a plan for how the research will be conducted PresentationsPublications

Focus Groups: Recruiting Blackboard Announcements Incentives Distance Location Cohort

Focus Groups: Recruiting Online Student Focus Group Invitation HOW TO VOLUNTEER: Send an before June 12 to SPONSORED BY: UNT Libraries WHAT & WHO WHEN THANKS!

Focus Groups: Demographics Basic demographics – 5 men, 11 women – Most over 30 – 1 African American; 1 Asian American; 14 Caucasian – 1 foreign student College – College of Business – College of Education – College of Information – College of Public Affairs and Community Service

Focus Groups: Technology

Focus Groups: Analysis Microsoft Office Access Microsoft Office Excel

Focus Groups: Follow Up Committees Outreach Services

Focus Groups: Quotes COB Male: How would I like to learn--right as a distance learner I wish there were more mention of the UNT Library on the main UNT page, or my UNT page, or in ….. Blackboard so that way I don’t have to go to any course to look at that library. It should just pop out right there. MLS Female: The only thing that I find out about these things that ya’ll have on campus like training for graduate students with RefWorks and graduate research. It seems like they are always on campus, and maybe ya’ll do have it where distance students can access that or get transcripts somehow. But, I’ve never seen it, but I would like to do something like that. But I just live too far away from Denton to try to actually go to one. Applied Technology Male: Well I will say this about the UNT Library. When I was going there in 1994 and 1995, um I actually had somebody lead me around and show me pretty much everything I needed to know at the physical library. But that was probably my most memorable experience was having somebody actually there with me. So that’s why I’m saying it would be great to have somebody online with me showing me.

Focus Groups: Recommendations Summer 2009 Online Student Focus Group Recommendations Increase the Libraries’ presence and visibility in Blackboard Make the UNT Libraries’ website easier to search Obtain, publicize, and provide instruction in the use of a discovery tool Provide library instruction that doesn’t require being at the physical library Communicate and collaborate more effectively with faculty members that teach online classes

Ethnographic Study: Anthropology Graduate Students Fall 2010 Graduate level Anthropology Dept. qualitative and ethnographic analysis classes Campus and online Used a variety of methods: – Focus groups – Interviews – Observations

Ethnographic Study: Recruiting Was difficult – What didn’t work – What was missing – What worked

Ethnographic Study: Demographics Represent 6 colleges and schools, including 3 with online degree programs Represent 6 colleges and schools, duplicating only 3 from the online student study

Ethnographic Study: Observations On campus students: In person at various physical locations on campus Distance students: Wimba and shared the desktop

Ethnographic Study: Interviews Biggest problem: Memory blips. Recommendations for the future – Conduct the interview soon! – More observations

Ethnographic Study: Recommendations Fall 2010 Anthropology Class Recommendations Improve user experience with the UNT Libraries website; (includes problems with access tools) Improve library instruction Improve communication

Triangulation Benefit: Addresses the issue of biases in social science research Types: – Data – Researcher – Theory – Method

Comparing Results of Different Methods for Online Students RankSpring 2009 LibQUAL+ Survey Items with Largest Superiority Gaps – Online Students 1A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 2Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 3Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources 4Print and/or Electronic journal collections I require for my work 5The electronic information resources I need Summer 2009 Online Student Focus Group Recommendations Increase the Libraries’ presence and visibility in Blackboard Make the UNT Libraries’ website easier to search Obtain, publicize, and provide instruction in the use of a discovery tool Provide library instruction that doesn’t require being at the physical library Communicate and collaborate more effectively with faculty members that teach online classes Fall 2010 Anthropology Class Recommendations Improve user experience with the UNT Libraries website; (includes problems with access tools) Improve library instruction Improve communication

Comparing Results of Different Methods for Online Students RankSpring 2009 LibQUAL+ Survey Items with Largest Superiority Gaps – Online Students 1A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 2Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 3Availability of online help when using my library’s electronic resources 4Print and/or Electronic journal collections I require for my work 5The electronic information resources I need Summer 2009 Online Student Focus Group Recommendations Increase the Libraries’ presence and visibility in Blackboard Make the UNT Libraries’ website easier to search Obtain, publicize, and provide instruction in the use of a discovery tool Provide library instruction that doesn’t require being at the physical library Communicate and collaborate more effectively with faculty members that teach online classes Fall 2010 Anthropology Class Recommendations Improve user experience with the UNT Libraries website (includes problems with access tools) Improve library instruction Improve communication RankSpring 2011 LibQUAL+ Survey Items with Largest Superiority Gaps – Online Students 1Online course support (readings, links, references) 2Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 3Making me aware of library services 4A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own 5The electronic information resources I need

Actions Creation of a library presence in Blackboard Making subject librarians accessible to online students Collaboration with faculty to develop “library gateways to the content needed for the classes”

Actions (cont.) Federated search engine implemented Library web-site redesign with user input Library liaison/faculty relationships New position: Director of Communications and Marketing.

Lessons Learned Benefits to students Value of LibQUAL+® Use of standard surveys Antidote to survey burn out and timing

Lessons Learned (cont.) Importance of listening Access to a variety of viewpoints in small samples using non-probabilistic sampling College students and incentives Importance of the right technology

Lessons Learned (cont.) Benefits of unbiased perspective of outside researchers Importance of including groups likely to be required to make changes in planning change Triangulation of data achievable at low cost

Questions?