PUBLIC RELATIONS PURDUE UNIVERSITY CALUMET EDFA 51600: SCHOOL COMMUNITY RELATIONS DR. PAM FRAMPTON Kimberly J. Cummings June 20, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.
Advertisements

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Title I School Improvement in North Carolina. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) determines if a Title I school goes into Title I School Improvement.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
The Effects of the No Child Left Behind Act: An Exploration of the Standardized Test Scores of Special and General Education Student Populations Amber.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Update on Data Reporting April LEAP Changes LEAP software will be released shortly. Final LEAP software will not be available before mid-July. We.
Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.
Poway Unified Board of Education Academic Performance Index (API) and Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) October 15, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2008.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Northwestern Consolidated School District of Shelby County Office of the Superintendent 4920 W. 600 N. Fairland, IN “State of the Corporation” 2013.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Park County School District #6 MAP and PAWS DATA REPORT FOR
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
SCHOOL AND DISTRICT ACCOUNTABILITY/ESEA Ann M. Renker, Ph.D. Sequim School District August 17, 2015.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
The Pike County School Corporation “The Role of the School Administrator In School Improvement” The Learning Conference Indianapolis, IN January 30, 2006.
RECYCLE Jenkins Independent District Data STATE NCLB DATA 103 of 175 school districts (58.9%) met 100% of their No Child Left Behind (NCLB) AYP goals.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). About AYP  Initiated by NCLB  Student performance and participation rates on ISTEP+ in English/language arts and mathematics.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS ADVISORY TEAM MEETING WELCOME Brenda B. Blackburn, Superintendent Berkeley County School District November 17, 2015, 5:30 pm.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Adequate Progress Gina LaPlaca Grand Canyon University
How Do We Identify Standards and Write Objectives?
Title 1 Annual Parent Meeting
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

PUBLIC RELATIONS PURDUE UNIVERSITY CALUMET EDFA 51600: SCHOOL COMMUNITY RELATIONS DR. PAM FRAMPTON Kimberly J. Cummings June 20, 2014

CONTENTS PUBLIC RELATIONS PROJECT 1 Clark-Pleasant Community School Corporation 2 Whiteland Elementary School 3 AYP Staff Interview Video 4 Review

Clark-Pleasant Community School Corporation (CPCSC) is approximately 15 miles south of Indianapolis in Johnson County. The district encompasses the town of Whiteland, IN and parts of larger surrounding communities. It includes 10 schools that serve approximately 6,300 students in grades pre-k through 12. It is one of the fastest growing corporations in the state. CPCSC has square miles of land area. As of 2010, the total population was 32,318. The median household income was $59,857 and the median house value was $122,200 from CPCSC was listed by the U. S. Directory as a Low-Income School from CPCSC was rated 4 out of 5 by USA.com. PUBLIC RELATIONS PROJECT

CPCSC ADMINISTRATION WHITELAND HIGH SCHOOL NINTH GRADE SCHOOL CP INTERMEDIATE CP MIDDLE SCHOOL BREAK-O-DAY ELEMENTARY CLARK ELEMENTARY HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMY PLEASANT CROSSING ELEM. SAWMILL WOODS ELEMENTARY WHITELAND ELEMENTARY

PUBLIC RELATIONS PROJECT

Report Card A Letter Grade

NCLB and AYP  In 2001, congress passed No Child Left Behind. The first thing to understand about the law is that it pretty much means what its name suggests: every child should be passing state tests on math and reading.  Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) requirements mandated by the federal NCLB law gave the states control over how they would measure whether a student was “proficient.” States set the standards, wrote the standardized tests, and set the formula for student growth.  The goals of NCLB are that all schools and districts receiving funds for socially and economically disadvantaged children (Title I) must bring all students up to state standards by PUBLIC RELATIONS PROJECT

Indiana and AYP  Schools in Indiana that do not show growth will be on improvement status which consists of a series of interventions that become more extensive for each additional year a Title I school does not make AYP. It takes two consecutive years of NOT MAKING AYP in the same subject area (English or Math) to enter school improvement status and two consecutive years of MAKING AYP in that subject to be removed from improvement status.  Corporations and school in improvement status that make AYP for one year remain at the current year of improvement. If the corporation or school makes AYP the following year, it is removed from improvement. If AYP is not made the following year, improvement status interventions continue to progress.  One of the requirements to a school being on AYP is developing an intervention plan which is where Whiteland Elementary School has been for PUBLIC RELATIONS PROJECT

REVIEW Whiteland Elementary School received our students’ scores. YEAH! Now, we await the g r o w t h scores due to be release in July or August. UGH! PUBLIC RELATIONS PROJECT 4 th Grade ISTEP+ Passing Percentages Language Arts 84%Language Arts 91% Math 80%Math 93%