The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS. 10:00 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 11:00 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Advertisements

Process – Resource Evaluation Design and perform a set of geographically based resource assessments Develop a methodology for prioritizing land according.
AN M3 EAGLE LLC PROPOSAL. Acting Field Manager Coeur d’Alene Field Office (208)
Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative James Broska Science Coordinator
Prioritizing Species and Actions Protocol Rita Dixon Idaho Department of Fish and Game.
Peace Connectivity Network A Presentation By Brian Churchill, Phacet, 2004.
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Wisconsin’s Wildlife Action Plan and Citizen-Based Monitoring Tara L.E. Bergeson Wildlife Action Plan Implementation Coordinator Wisconsin Department of.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level The Economy and Conservation Agendas:
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Santa Fe County Focal Species Workshop Thank you all for participating with a special thanks to: –Santa Fe County –NM Department of Game and Fish –The.
Public Land for the Taking A Disturbing Tale. Outline What is native prairie and what remains? Of what value native prairie? Stewardship of native prairie.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America How does the surrogate species effort relate to other ongoing efforts? Birds of Management.
New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.
WLCI Update July 23, 2010 Conserving World-class Wildlife Resources Facilitating Responsible Development.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
Virginia Wildlife Action Plan David K. Whitehurst Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.
JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.
Bird Conservation on Private Lands Why Birds Matter.
Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan (CWCP) and Citizen-based Monitoring Signe Holtz Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
The 2012 Revision of Nevada’s Wildlife Action Plan State Wildlife Action Plan Workshop – June 5, 2013  Jon C. Sjöberg Chief of Fisheries Nevada Department.
Conservation Action Planning (CAP) Process Quick Tour Project-level planning & measures within The Nature Conservancy.
CSG West Energy and Environment Committee July 28, 2015 Dustin T. Miller Governor’s Office of Species Conservation.
Steering Committee Meeting December 19-20, 2013 UPDATES.
Review of the KBA process in Indo-Burma First iteration of KBAs identified by BirdLife International in collaboration with the Bird Society of Thailand,
Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative An Approach to Landscape Scale Conservation in Southwest Wyoming October 23, 2014.
Conservation Design and the Sagebrush Ecosystem Russell George Executive Director Colorado Dept. of Natural Resources.
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives The Right Science in the Right Places.
Bird Conservation on Private Lands Proactive Conservation.
PRESENTATION FOR TAMARISK COALITION WEBINAR 18 DECEMBER 2013.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Great Plains Landscape Conservation Cooperative December 4, 2009 Dr. Benjamin Tuggle and Steve Guertin Regional Directors,
Overview of the KBA Process : A report card for Melanesia Insert representative image or map here Outcome definition for CI Melanesia through Moore- funded.
Symposium in Context of Yellow Rail Conservation JENNIFER WHEELER, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Waterbird Conservation for the Americas JANE AUSTIN, US.
The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS. 9:30 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 10:30 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying.
OECD World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge and Policy Measuring and Fostering the Progress of Societies Istanbul, 29 June 2007 BIODIVERSITY.
Conservation Action Planning Kathy Moser, Acting State Director The Nature Conservancy of New York.
Solutions on the Horizon: Integrated Planning in the 21 st Century Trisha White Defenders of Wildlife.
Seabird Monitoring in the California Current System U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey.
US Fish and Wildlife Service Focal Species Strategy for Migratory Birds.
The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS. 9:00 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 10:00 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying.
Utah’s Watershed Restoration Initiative Mule Deer.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Incorporating Climate Change into Department Activities Panel Presentation North Pacific LCC Steering Committee.
Conservation planning strategies at the landscape scale.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
AREAS OF CONSERVATION EMPHASIS ACE-II Photos courtesy of USFWS National Image Library Melanie Gogol-Prokurat California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
CAP Quick Tour Whooping Crane CAP – Kearney, NE.
Landscape Analysis Project: Craig Mountain Wildlife Management Area For/Range 527 Landscape Ecology.
GREATER SAGE-GROUSE COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION Strategy Conservation in Sagebrush Ecosystems San Stiver Sage-Grouse Coordinator Western Association of.
1. Adaptation – management actions to help fish and wildlife and their habitats adapt to climate change, using a Strategic Habitat Conservation Framework.
Setting a Course for a Sustainable Landscape Sept Steering Committee Call code:
Progress Under Guidance Documents Northeast Conservation Framework LCC Conservation Science Strategic Plan USFWS Science Investment and Accountability.
SAGE GROUSE INITIATIVE OREGON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY USDA – NRCS – Oregon.
1A - 1B. Define Project Team, Scope, Vision & Targets.
What are Rangelands? Presentation (ppt.)
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
Overview & Implementation January 30, Large geographic area (22,360 square miles primarily in VA, NC, and TN)
Impact of climate change on Himalayan Forest Ecosystems Prof. Ravindranath Indian Institute of Science Bangalore.
Options and Starting Points for Developing for Multi-Species ESA Conservation Programs Specifically for Threats Resulting in Habitat Loss Sean Kyle WAFWA.
Conserving habitat through partnerships
Prioritizing Species for Biological Planning in the North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (NALCC) USFWS Region 5 Strategic Habitat Conservation.
Landscape Conservation Strategy
Sagebrush Steppe.
Conserving habitat through partnerships
The Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process
The Blackfoot Community Project
Management Indicator Species
Jay Carlisle, Coordinator
Presentation transcript:

The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS

10:00 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 11:00 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying focal areas 3:00 Wrap-up 3:30 Adjourn Today’s Agenda

Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy “…provide a framework for conserving ‘species of greatest conservation need’ and the habitats upon which they depend.”

State Wildlife Grant Program in 2001 CWCS required by 2005 Strategic document, not prescriptive Dynamic and adaptive “…enable agency and private partners to individually or cooperatively implement conservation actions that will benefit priority species and habitats.”

229 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) 18 priority habitats 14 ecological sections

Current Implementation BLM: Challenge Cost Share funding and Resource Management Plans specify SGCN USFS: Forest Plan updates incorporate SGCN NRCS: Farm Bill programs target SGCN USFWS: LIP targets SGCN Doris Duke Charitable Foundation: specifies implementation of CWCS

From the Strategy… …to the ground … to Action Plans…

SGCN Prioritizing Tool Species by section filters Based on user interests

NatureServe Conservation Status Ranks Assessment of the species condition statewide (S) and rangewide (G). G1 or S1Critically imperiled G2 or S2Imperiled G3 or S3Vulnerable G4 or S4Apparently secure G5 or S5Secure

A Vision for Focal Areas 1. Select Species Species A Species B Species C Species D Overlay Known Distributions Richness = High Low

A Vision for Focal Areas 3. Compare with other priorities Winter Range Focus Streams Unique Habitat Richness 4. Your Focal Areas High Low

Resource Focal Area: a geographical area necessary for the long-term persistence of SGCNs and their habitats (aka High Resource Value Areas or Biologically Important Areas) Management Focal Area: a general geographical area that targets resources and efforts where they can benefit the largest number of species and habitats in need of conservation (likely includes species/habitats other than SGCN and may incorporate factors such as ownership, urgency of threat, etc.). What are Focal Areas? Resource Focal Area: a geographical area necessary for the long-term persistence of SGCNs and their habitats (aka High Resource Value Areas or Biologically Important Areas) Management Focal Area: a general geographical area that targets resources and efforts where they can benefit the largest number of species and habitats in need of conservation (likely includes species/habitats other than SGCN and may incorporate factors such as ownership, urgency of threat, etc.).

Hypothetical Example SGCN Richness Harlequin breeding Important Corridors … Focal Areas

In or Out? General areas important for SGCN but by no means are intended to imply that conservation actions should be restricted to these areas.

Regional Workshops SGCN Richness Maps Final Focal Area Maps Partner Input Idaho Falls (Apr 11, 25) Boise (Mar 19, Apr 3) Coeur d’Alene (Feb 11, 22) IDFG Input IDFG Focal Area Maps

Workshop Objectives 1.Capture regional expertise and local knowledge. 2.Create ecological section-level focal area maps identifying areas of high conservation value. 3.Enable use of maps and action plans as a conservation tool for on the ground implementation and prioritization.

1.Are there specific areas that need to be included as focal areas for SGCNs and their habitat (e.g., waterfalls for black swift)? Are there areas we currently have identified that should not be (e.g., errors in the models)? 2.Do these focal areas also include species or habitat significant to conservation for other reasons (e.g., migration corridors, big game winter range). 3.What conservation actions are necessary in each area? Specific Questions

North & Southwest Idaho Draft

1 Amphibian 38 Birds 16 Fishes (1) 31 Invertebrates (17) 14 Mammals (3) 1 Reptiles 101 Species of Greatest Conservation Need Southeast Idaho Species (#) = Number of species lacking essential information pertaining to their status in Idaho.

Dry conifer forest Dune, canyon, and rockland RM Alpine Bedrock and Scree, RM Dry Tundra Subalpine forest NRM Subalpine Dry Parkland Mesic deciduous shrubland Upland deciduous forest RM Aspen Forest and Woodland, RM Bigtooth Maple Ravine Woodland Southern xeric shrubland and steppe IMB Montane Sagebrush Steppe, IMB Mountain Mahogany Woodland and Shrubland, IMB Greasewood Flat Arableland (Herbaceous Planted and Cultivated) Non-native herbaceous (Seeded Perennial Grassland) Southern wetland Riparian woodland Open water Priority Habitats & Systems

Edit, embellish focal area boundaries Define criteria Identify actions The Maps… What’s Expected?