Section 2.3 I, Robot Mind as Software.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Turing’s Test, Searle’s Objection
Advertisements

Summer 2011 Thursday, 07/14. Machine Functionalism Claims that the mind is a (very complex) computer program. One that arises naturally, not one thats.
Minds and Machines Summer 2011 Monday, 07/11.
LAST LECTURE. Functionalism Functionalism in philosophy of mind is the view that mental states should be identified with and differentiated in terms of.
Dark Rooms and Chinese Brains Philosophy of Mind BRENT SILBY Unlimited (UPT)
Section 2.2 You Are What You Eat Mind as Body 1 Empiricism Empiricism claims that the only source of knowledge about the external world is sense experience.
John Coleman DACE LWP How to reach Functionalism in 4 choices (and 639 words) Pack your baggage – mine includes Pack your baggage – mine includes.
B&LdeJ1 Theoretical Issues in Psychology Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Mind for Psychologists.
Artificial intelligence. I believe that in about fifty years' time it will be possible, to programme computers, with a storage capacity of about 10.
Philosophy 4610 Philosophy of Mind Week 9: Computer Thinking (continued)
Chapter 10: What am I?.
SEARLE THE CHINESE ROOM ARGUMENT: MAN BECOMES COMPUTER.
Mind and Body I Bodies and Ghosts, Qualia, and Mind-Brain identity.
Artificial Intelligence u What are we claiming when we talk about AI? u How are Turing Machines important? u How can we determine whether a machine can.
CPSC 533 Philosophical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence Presented by: Arthur Fischer.
The Turing Test What Is Turing Test? A person and a computer, being separated in two rooms, answer the tester’s questions on-line. If the interrogator.
The Mind-Body Relation Dualism: human beings are composed of a material body and an immaterial mind which are distinct from each other (Descartes) Problems:
CS 357 – Intro to Artificial Intelligence  Learn about AI, search techniques, planning, optimization of choice, logic, Bayesian probability theory, learning,
Acting Humanly: The Turing test (1950) “Computing machinery and intelligence”:   Can machine’s think? or Can machines behave intelligently? An operational.
The Chinese Room Argument Joe Lau. Readings n Searle and Churchland’s articles in Scientific American. n Ned Block’s “Computer Model of the Mind” n Online.
Humans, Computers, and Computational Complexity J. Winters Brock Nathan Kaplan Jason Thompson.
COMP 3009 Introduction to AI Dr Eleni Mangina
The Mind-Body Problem. Some Theories of Mind Dualism –Substance Dualism: mind and body are differerent substances. Mind is unextended and not subject.
Doing Philosophy Philosophical theories are not primarily about facts. Therefore, there is no right or wrong. Philosophical arguments are well-argued opinions.
The Computational Theory of Mind. COMPUTATION Functions.
© Michael Lacewing Functionalism and the Mind- Body Problem Michael Lacewing
Functionalism and the Mind-Body Problem
Philosophical Foundations Chapter 26. Searle v. Dreyfus argument §Dreyfus argues that computers will never be able to simulate intelligence §Searle, on.
Functionalism Mind and Body Knowledge and Reality; Lecture 3.
Chapter 6: Objections to the Physical Symbol System Hypothesis.
Turing Test and other amusements. Read this! The Actual Article by Turing.
LECTURE EIGHT SOME FURTHER REFLECTION UPON CHINESE ROOM ARGUMENT 对于汉字屋论证的一些 反思.
Intentionality and artificial intelligence Michael Lacewing
Bloom County on Strong AI THE CHINESE ROOM l Searle’s target: “Strong AI” An appropriately programmed computer is a mind—capable of understanding and.
CONSCIOUSNESS Frank Jackson, ‘Epiphenomenal Qualia’
Philosophy 4610 Philosophy of Mind Week 9: AI in the Real World.
AI History, Philosophical Foundations Part 2. Some highlights from early history of AI Gödel’s theorem: 1930 Turing machines: 1936 McCulloch and Pitts.
Materialism: Minds and Machines
UNIVERSITI TENAGA NASIONAL 1 CCSB354 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AI Debates Instructor: Alicia Tang Y. C.
A New Artificial Intelligence 5 Kevin Warwick. Philosophy of AI II Here we will look afresh at some of the arguments Here we will look afresh at some.
Artificial Intelligence By Michelle Witcofsky And Evan Flanagan.
Introduction to Machine Learning Kamal Aboul-Hosn Cornell University Chess, Chinese Rooms, and Learning.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Minds and Bodies #3 (Jackson) By David Kelsey.
Section 2.3 I, Robot Mind as Software McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
Functionalism and consciousness
Roger Penrose’s Argument Against Though Computation.
The Myth of the Computer April 11. Reductio ad Absurdum Is a common means of reasoning consisting of the following steps: 1.Make an assumption (X) 2.Determine.
© Michael Lacewing Kant on conceptual schemes Michael Lacewing osophy.co.uk.
Are Expert Systems Really Experts? Introduction to Expert Systems Slide 1 Università di Salerno: April 2004 Are Expert Systems Really Experts? Different.
Section 2.2 You Are What You Eat Mind as Body McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
The Mind And Body Problem Mr. DeZilva.  Humans are characterised by the body (physical) and the mind (consciousness) These are the fundamental properties.
The Chinese Room Argument Part II Joe Lau Philosophy HKU.
EECS 690 April 2.
The zombie argument: objections Michael Lacewing
Computational Functionalism. Motivations A functionalist general purpose input-output device certainly sounds like a computer A functionalist general.
Artificial Intelligence Skepticism by Josh Pippin.
Uses and Limitations Fall 2013 COMP3710 Artificial Intelligence Computing Science Thompson Rivers University.
FUNCTIONALISM
Functionalism Computational Role
COMP3710 Artificial Intelligence Thompson Rivers University
PHILOSOPHY 100 (Ted Stolze)
ATS2840 Philosophy of Mind Semester 1, 2017
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Minds and Bodies #3 (Jackson)
Unscramble The Words What are these key terms from the current theory we’re looking at? Finicalmounts Callaroues Ipunt Optutu Relegatedgunkmown Nupmat.
Mind-Brain Type Identity Theory
True or False: Materialism and physicalism mean the same thing.
Searle on Artificial Intelligence Minds, Brains and Science Chapter 2
COMP3710 Artificial Intelligence Thompson Rivers University
Which of these things are defined functionally? What function?
Presented by Tim Hamilton
Presentation transcript:

Section 2.3 I, Robot Mind as Software

Functionalism Mental states are functional states. To perform a function is to take a certain input and produce a certain output. When two things perform the same function, they are said to have the same “causal role.” The problem with this description is that it makes functionalism easy to confuse with both logical behaviorism and identity theory. 2

A functional description of a heating system http://www. mind. ilstu Give heat as output only if the temperature is less than 68 degrees. 3

A functional description of a heating system (at a more concrete level) 4

A functional description of a heating system (at an even more concrete level) 5

Now, consider just the first component of the function system Now, suppose we just consider the the thermometer. We might have an interest in the physical properties of the thermoeter, but we might not. We might instead be interested solely in the thermoeter functional properties. 6

Functionalism A thermometer is functionally defined as a device which measures temperature. Some physical change occurs in the thermometer and this physical change is converted into a readable value. We can imagine a black box which encloses the thermostat, hiding it from view. We can then do for the thermostat, what we had initially done for the entire heating system -- we can give a functional description of the thermostat. 7

Functionalism A functional description is concerned only with what it takes as input and what it gives as output, ignoring completely how it succeeds in performing that function. The function of a thing is often called its causal role. Given that there are many ways to build a thermostat that performs the "temperature detecting" function, we say that a thermostat can be realized in many different ways. 8

Functionalism 9

Artificial Intelligence The goal of artificial intelligence research is to create a machine that can think for itself; that has a mind of its own. According to “strong AI,” there’s nothing more to having a mind than running the right kind of program. Strong AI claims that the mind is to the brain as the software of a computer is to its hardware. Mental States are functional states To have a mind is to have the right kind of program being run on sufficiently rich and stable hardware.

Functionalism How is functionalism different from identity theory. Multiple Realizability Problem. How is functionalism different from logical behaviorism? 11

Frank Tipler Why would this view be important if it were true? Would would hinge on it?

Thought Experiment: Lewis’s Pained Madman

Functionalism and Feeling If functionalism were true, it would be impossible for someone to be in pain and function differently than we do when we are in pain. But, as Lewis’s pained madman shows, it’s not impossible for someone to be in pain and function differently than we do. So, functionalism is false; being in a certain functional state is not a necessary condition for being in a mental state.

Thought Experiment: Block’s Chinese Nation “Suppose we convert the government of China to functionalism, and we convince its officials that it would enormously enhance their international prestige to realize a human mind for an hour.” Suppose the people of China run a mind program. Would there now be another mind on Earth? This is known as the “absent qualia objection” to functionalism.

Block’s Argument If functionalism were true, then anything that had the right sort of functional organization would have a mind. But as Block’s Chinese nation shows, it is not the case that anything that had the right sort of functional organization would have a mind. So functionalism is false; having the right sort of functional organization is not a sufficient condition for having a mind.

Thought Experiment: Putnam’s Inverted Spectrum “Imagine your spectrum becomes inverted at a particular time in your life and you remember what it was like before that.” Imagine further that you learn to function as before.

Putnam’s Argument 1. If functionalism were true, it would be impossible for people with the same functional organization to have different mental states. 2. But, as Putnam’s inverted spectrum shows, it’s not impossible for people with the same functional organization to have different mental states. 3. So functionalism is false; having a certain functional organization is not a sufficient condition for being in a certain mental state.

Thought Experiment: The Turing Test

Thought Experiment: Searle’s Chinese Room

Searle’s Argument If a computer could understand a language solely in virtue of running a program, then the man in the room would understand Chinese (because he’s doing the same thing that a computer does, namely, manipulating symbols in accordance with a set of rules.) But the man in the room doesn’t understand Chinese. So computers can’t understand a language solely in virtue of running a program.

Syntax and Semantics How a symbol can be combined with other symbols to form a sentence is determined by its syntax. What a symbol means is determined by its semantics.

Replies to the Chinese Room: Systems reply: the man in the room doesn’t understand Chinese, but the whole system does. Robot reply: the man in the room doesn’t understand Chinese, but if the room were put in a robot, the robot would. Brain simulator reply: the man in the room doesn’t understand Chinese, but if the program simulated nerve firings, the system would. Combination reply: even if each of the above replies is inadequate, taken together they would create a system that understands Chinese.

Intentionality Intentionality is the property of being of or about something. Mental states have intentionality because they can be of or about something. The belief that the Yankees will win the pennant, for example, is about the Yankees, the pennant, and the proposition that the Yankees will win the pennant.