24 May 2007 PROGRESS & PROMISE ON DR/AMI Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Fully Engaging Demand: Lessons and Insights from the Olympic Peninsula GridWise ® Demonstration Demand Response Town Meeting June 2-3, 2008 Washington,
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
© USCL Corporation - All Rights Reserved USCL Corporation 2737 Eastern Avenue Sacramento, California A managed approach to the successful.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
The future Role of VPPs in Europe Pan European Balancing Market: EU-FP7-Project eBadge Workshop on DSM Potentials, Implementations and Experiences 20 th.
0 © 2011 Silver Spring Networks. All rights reserved. Building the Smart Grid.
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
24 May 2007 DEMAND RESPONSE BENEFITS Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
Home Area Networks …Expect More Mohan Wanchoo Jasmine Systems, Inc.
Vendor Briefing May 26, 2006 AMI Overview & Communications TCM.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
SmartGridCity™: A blueprint for a connected, intelligent grid community Presented to the Utah Public Service Commission May 13, 2009.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
Smart Meters, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency GRIDSCHOOL 2010 MARCH 8-12, 2010  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ARGONNE NATIONAL.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
EStorage First Annual Workshop Arnhem, NL 30, Oct Olivier Teller.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
SmartMeter Program Overview Jana Corey Director, Energy Information Network Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
How Energy Efficiency and Demand Response can Help Air Quality Presentation to the California Electricity and Air Quality Conference October 3, 2006 Mary.
ON IT 1 Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs Sustaining our Future Rebecca Craft Director of Energy Efficiency.
September 15, 2006 Mending the Fractured Value Chain Through Functional Use of Demand Response.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 14 Energy Efficiency Module 14: DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
Power Utilities in the Telecom Business in the USA: Past Failures and Future Trends Mike Oldak Vice President & General Counsel Utilities Telecom Council.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
REGULATORY MECHANISMS TO ENCOURAGE DR/AMI Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
Getting ready for Advanced Metering Infrastructure Paper by : Rajesh Nimare Presented by : Prashant Sharma.
Demand Side Management The Natural Purview of Utilities The Customer Viewpoint Rates on the Rise in a Rough Economy - Responding to New Realities Marketing.
Over 3,300 Megawatts and Counting Growing and Transforming One of Nation’s Largest DSM Portfolios.
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
Pricing Enabled by AMI What Types? What are the Benefits? Dr. Steven D. Braithwait Christensen Associates Energy Consulting EUCI Webinar September 12,
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Innovative approach to DSM through Open Access Jayant Deo MD & CEO, Indian Energy Exchange
Presentation for: Energy Advancement Leadership Conference Demand Response Programs & Technologies Frank A. Magnotti President, Global Sales & Marketing.
Smart Metering and the Smart Grid How does it work and what can it do? Will Chaney 1Energy Awareness Week, 3-8 May 2010.
Overview of Distributed Generation Applications June 16, 2003 Harrisburg, PA Joel Bluestein Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
OVERVIEW OF ISSUES DR AND AMI HELP SOLVE Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
Energy Analysis Department Cost-Effectiveness Valuation Framework for Demand Response Resources: Guidelines and Suggestions Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Smart Grid: What’s In It for the Customer? Wharton Energy Conference 2010 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing & Regulatory Services.
ERCOT ELTF – Overview and Brief Proposal Dr. Eric Woychik – Strategy Integration LLC representing Comverge, Inc. 8 November 2006.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
BPA’s DR Experience Karen Meadows Bonneville Power Administration May 2, 2007.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Page 1 Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project  Largest Smart Grid Demonstration.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
GoodCents SELECT Powered by Technology Driven by Economics Controlled by the Customer.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Smart Grid Value Proposition October 4, 2010 Lynda Ziegler.
SMART GRID A smart grid for intelligent energy use. By: Suhani Gupta.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Demand Response
Smart Grid Schneider Electric Javier Orellana
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
1 Proposed Policies to Increase the level of Demand Response Energy Action Plan Update April 24 th, 2006, Sacramento, CA Mike Messenger, CEC.
Demand Response as a Distributed Energy Resource presented by: Mark S. Martinez Manager, Program Development PLMA Fall Conference September 2004.
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
DER Provide Grid Services for the 21 st Century Electric System Lorenzo Kristov, Ph.D. Principal, Market & Infrastructure Policy More Than Smart Conference.
SMECO Demand Response filing
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer

Solar Energy Commercialization
Presentation transcript:

24 May 2007 PROGRESS & PROMISE ON DR/AMI Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI

l Avoided Capacity Costs

l Successful Utility DR Programs in the U.S. Utility Direct Load Control: Residential & Commercial Austin Energy Long-Term Fully Outsourced DR Contracts Rocky Mountain Power SDG&E, ISONE, PG&E Real-Time-Pricing and Time-of-Use Pricing Gulf Power WattSpot (ComEd) Let’s discuss the what’s, why’s, and challenges

l A Some What’s, Why’s, & Challenges What’s are to define the technology used, customer acquisition, & communications Technologies are Digital Control Units, Smart Thermostats, optimizer controls, energy management systems … Customers are acquired by marketing & incentives Communications are by pager frequencies/VHF, AMI, and web-based Why’s define the motivations for using DR Expand the portfolio, meet reliability needs, locational constraints, environmental concerns, preferred resource… Challenges are areas that need further focus & refinement E.g., integration with supply-side dispatch, program design…

l Recap of the Why’s for Use of DR Provides, flexible, location-specific, dispatchable capacity, with certainty Adds portfolio diversity and reliability benefits Facilitates greater use of non-dispatchable resources Defer G + T + D + env. mitigation + congestion Provides lower market prices and market power mitigation Positive rate-impact measure (RIM) results Provides significant environmental benefits Provides greater customer choice

l Customer Response (Choice) Opportunity DR as customer choice, an alternative to retail choice? DR options can be provided as a set of customer choices Menu is possible Hassle free options are preferred Customer education for those that choose it Incentives and control over bills based on choice Less confusing than shopping for alternative electricity providers Some options: time-of-use/critical-peak pricing, direct load control, price response, and environmental dispatch

l Migrateable Technology Path SuperStat™ Direct Control Unit Enhanced Premium Migrateable Technolog Option Offers Direct Path to a Price Resnsive Future

l Smart Thermostat (T-Stat) Program Allows for customer participation in temperature adjustment, web programming, and ultimately price adjustment Can be installed as a) customer management system, b) direct load control, c) emergency reliability option, d) price response Enables customer interface at simple levels Can be used to educate customers about price response Migration of T-Stat use to price response with or without AMI Enables customers to remotely program the T-State through web access T-stats enable multiple options; facilitates customer participation

l Utility Direct Load Control Residential/Commercial Austin Energy’s Smart-thermostat Program What’s: Digital Control Units (DCUs) on AC Centralized Load Management System (LMS) control VHF communication and control to devices Whys: Goals are set for DR and EE and loading order is ‘to be taken seriously” says CPUC President Mike Peevey Challenges: Convincing generation dispatch to integrate DR resource Dialing in on the best cycling strategy

l Austin Energy Has 50 MW + installed Latest increment of DR uses Smart Thermostats Customer acceptance is very positive Program expansion is easily achieved T-Stats enable customers to lower overall electricity bills but be available for direct load control Viable, economic, with customers engaged

l Long-Term Fully Outsourced DR Contracts Rocky Mountain Power’s 90 MW residential program What’s: Technology is Digital Control Units (DCUs) on AC in residential and commercial buildings Why’s: Transmission and distribution constraints Non-spinning reserve (qualification) Challenges: Next increments…

l Rocky Mountain Power (Utah Power) A 90 MW long term contract, provides dispatchable, direct load control Mitigates both transmission and distribution constraints Provides non-spinning reserve, economic peaking capacity, and emergency reliability Uses Digital Control Units (DCUs) under utility control Viable, economic, excellent T & D constraint relief

l Long-Term Fully Outsourced DR Contracts San Diego Gas &Electric 100 MW Res & Commercial What’s: Technology is Digital Control Units (DCUs) on AC units in residential and small commercial Energy management systems for small commercial Why’s: Dispatchable capacity for economics and reliability Challenges: Flexibility in marketing to get enough customer touch

l San Diego Gas & Electric A 100 MW long term contract, 1 st phase provides direct load control 2 nd phase to provide broader services Residential Commercial More aggressive cycling strategies May incorporate other commercial customer options Aims to use Smart Thermostats to enable customer participation

l Long-Term Fully Outsourced DR Contracts ISO New England 65 MW residential & commercial What’s: Technologies are Digital Control Units (DCUs) on AC and Smart thermostats Why’s: Transmission and distribution constraints Challenges: Branding to achieve customer acceptance without using the local utility logo

l Long-Term Fully Outsourced DR Contracts Pacific Gas & Electric 50 MW commercial & industrial What’s: Technologies used are DCU’s, T-Stats, optimizer controls, electronic monitoring, and energy management systems Convenience stores, fast-food chains, and industrial Why’s: Loading order (priority), cannot build supply fast enough, hedge re. heat storms, and have transmission constraints Challenges: Installing capacity fast enough & metering-data

l Time-of Use & Real-Time-Pricing Gulf-Power’s Residential Program What’s: Customer TOU and critical peak pricing Strong incentives to move load off-peak summer/winter Why’s: Reduce G + T + D + environmental costs Increase load factor in both summer and winter Challenges: Two-way communications costs

l Gulf Power’s Maingate System About 25 MW in place (going to 80 MW) Prices reflect the time-varying character of electricity supply cost Advanced residential energy management system Gives customers control over their energy costs Allows customers to program their central heating and cooling system, electric water heater, and/or pool pump Enables automatic response to varying prices and critical peak pricing Uses advanced T-Stats to enable customer participation Also controls water heaters, pool pumps, and other appliances via load control relays Viable, economic, and customers heavily involved

l Price per kWh Critical Standard Residential Rate HighMedLow Time-varying Rate Design for Maingate

l Real-Time-Pricing (or Time-of-Use Pricing) WattSpot (ComEd) Residential Program What’s: Web-based, menu of technology and services Flow-through PJM real-time prices to customers Why’s: Cost-effectively build out AMI and enable a menu of DR and EE services – maximize benefits & customer choice Challenges: Broadening customer base to those less web-savy

l WattSpot Residential Program AMI sign-up on-line Customer education on all options Smart-thermostat (programmable on-line) Voluntary RTP pricing Customer noticing (using multiple modes) Rate Guard (automatic price response) Environmental Dispatch Bill analysis On-line energy related shopping

l Summary of DR Benefits Reduce overall system loads -- the EE effect E.g., price response that is temporary or permanent Reduce system peak and locational loads – the DR effect E.g., price response that is predictable and has some certainty Reduce existing and new generation needs Provide dispatchability, ramping, and load following Retire old plants and defer capital and operating costs Reduce existing and new transmission needs Reduce congestion Defer capital and operating costs Reduce existing and new distribution costs… Reduce environmental mitigation costs DR is faster to install and poses no NIMBY issues compared to supply-side options

l Upgradeable technology Customers save in real dollars Energy consumption is reduced Environmental benefits persist Customers have a choice in control decisions Satisfied consumers Lasting Benefits