1 National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of the Incredible Years TODDLER Parent Training Programme for nursery staff working with 2-3 year old children living in ‘high risk’ disadvantaged.
Advertisements

Assessment of Intervention Outcomes Workshop: Thursday 7th February IYW Conference, Llandrindod Wells Dr Dave Daley & Dr Tracey Bywater.
Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem
Sources: NIMH Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General Copyright © Notice: The materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as the property of The.
1 National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop Kessler 10.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
The Ohio Mental Health Consumer Outcomes System A Training for Family Members Prepared by Velma Beale, M.A. NAMI Ohio For the Ohio Department of Mental.
A joint Australian, State and Territory Government Initiative Rater and Clinical Utility Training Child and Adolescent “Sharing Information to Improve.
Dr. Tracey Bywater, Prof Judy Hutchings, Dr. Dave Daley, Dr. Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Ms Pat Linck, Prof Ian Russell The IY BASIC Parenting Programme: Focuses.
Making Social Work Count Lecture 4 An ESRC Curriculum Innovation and Researcher Development Initiative.
Research Insights from the Family Home Program: An Adaptation of the Teaching-Family Model at Boys Town Daniel L. Daly and Ronald W. Thompson EUSARF 2014/
Is Caregiver Depression Associated with Children’s ADHD Symptoms and Overall Functioning? Randi Scott SUMR Final Presentation August 07, 2008.
Manager, Solihull SEMH Team
Jane Acton nature workshops. Aim 1 ‘to assess and investigate the impact of nature workshops on children’s self esteem, confidence and emotional literacy’
Trauma Informed Care: Assessment Susan Sturges, MA, MPA Mental Health Coordinator Brooklyn Treatment Court.
A joint Australian, State and Territory Government Initiative Rater and Clinical Utility Training Older Persons “Sharing Information to Improve Outcomes”
EVALUATING THE IY TODDLER PROGRAMME WITH NURSERY STAFF BACKGROUND: Parenting programmes are an effective early intervention for the prevention and treatment.
Project Partners: Funded by: Societal Age Disparities in Health Care: Observation from HK compared with the UK B Mak, J Woo, A Bowling, F Wong, PH Chau.
DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder (APA, 2013) A pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image.
Visit our websites: PhD Study: Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Incredible.
1 National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop Child and Adolescent All Service Settings.
1 Co-occurring Alcohol and Other Drug and Mental Health Conditions in Alcohol and other Drug Treatment Settings Session 3: Identifying Comorbidity.
Emotional Well Being on an Acute Stroke Unit Implementation of a Mood Screening Pathway Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust Dr Amanda Campbell - Clinical Psychologist.
National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop
Pre-work Baseline Data Analysis I. Quality Measures (Annual Dental, Dental Varnishing, ED Utilization, WCV) II. New Measures (BMI, ABCD, Autism, Soc-Emot)
1 Children and Youth at Risk Branch Ministry of Children and Youth Services March 2012 Working Together for Kids’ Mental Health: Screening tools for early.
1 Evaluation Taking Care Nico Jabin Senior evaluation officer Last updated: March 2013.
CONTINUITY CLINIC ADHD Evaluation. CONTINUITY CLINIC "Think of an absentminded professor who can find a cure for cancer but not his glasses in the mess.
OMS Questionnaire Changes for Version 3
Primary school-based counselling: Is it associated with reductions in psychological distress? Mick Cooper Professor of Counselling.
Treatment 101 Substance Abuse Basics West Coast Consulting Wanda King
Mental Health and NCHS data: an under-explored resource Laura A. Pratt, PhD National Center for Health Statistics Data Users’ Conference July 11, 2006.
Categories of Mental Disorders 1 Child and youth mental health problems can be classified into two broad categories: 1Internalizing problems  withdrawal.
Children’s Functional Assessment Rating Scale (CFARS)
Small Children in Care: A Danish Longitudinal study Anne-Dorthe Hestbæk, Senior Researcher The Danish National Institute of Social Research Copenhagen.
HELP IDENTIFYING ADHD Signs, symptoms and help This powerpoint has been created to help parents understand ADHD and give them tools to help their children.
1 National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop Older Persons Inpatient.
Evaluating the Incredible Years School Readiness Parenting Programme Kirstie Cooper.
DART – Evaluation of a large scale project Matt Barnard Head of Evaluation NSPCC.
Programme Information Incredible Years (IY)Triple P (TP) – Level 4 GroupPromoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS) IY consists of 12 weekly (2-hour)
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND MENTAL HEALTH Focus: Physical Activity and self esteem.
1 National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop Adult Ambulatory.
Part 2 ADHD. Parents may first notice that their child loses interest in things sooner than other kids, or seems constantly “out of control” Often teachers.
Child Centered Outcomes. Our mission  To transform the lives of children and young people who are at significant risk of harm to their wellbeing as a.
MENTAL ILLNESS. Approximately one-third of the adult population in the United States at some point in time meets the diagnostic criteria for a mental.
1 National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop Adult Inpatient.
A joint Australian, State and Territory Government Initiative Experiences and lessons from benchmarking Older Persons Mental Health Services Dr Rod McKay.
Strengths and Difficulties Training South Cumbria November 2014.
Exceptional Children Ch 21-2.
Right Information Right people Right time Performance & Evaluation Division Snapshot Health and developmental differences between boys and girls at school.
 Strengths Difficulty Questionnaire.  In academic RtI, we screen everyone.  In behavior RtI, we only screen a few. o No need to screen the entire population.
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Kaouki Manina MA Education Special Need.
Practice Key Driver Diagram. Chapter Quality Network ADHD Project Jeff Epstein PhD CQN ADHD National Expert/CQN Data Analyst The mehealth Portal and CQN.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Parents, Caregivers and Youth Information on BERS-2 Parent Rating Scale April 13, 2012.
Copyright © The REACH Institute. All rights reserved. Tools to Know and Love.
COPE: Community Parent Education Program Evidence Base and Future Directions Charles E. Cunningham, Ph.D. Professor Department of Psychiatry & Behavioural.
Depression in children and young people referred to Specialist CAMHS: An audit of screening procedures. Dr. Michelle Rydon-Grange Clinical Psychologist,
“Focusing on the Process” Jeff Schmidt MD.  Recommendation #1: Children ages 4-18 who present with academic underachievement, behavior problems or.
Purpose Of Training: To guide Clinicians in the completion of screens and development of Alternative Community Service Plans.
THE JAPAN jidoyogoshisetsu study Research Design and major findings of Japan’s first systematic research on institutionalised children’s mental health.
TES (training, education, support) Presented by: John Chiocchi, Paula Slevin, Mark Sampson,
Dr Alex Hassett and Anna Neal May 2011
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Crisis Resolution & Home Treatment Service
CRISIS RESOLUTION / HOME TREATMENT - DEFINITION
Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder
Tools for Screening and Measuring Progress
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ’s)
The SDQ Process Please press enter to move through the following slides (This will take around 5 minutes) Created by Lee Adams – V1 – 11/7/17.
Presentation transcript:

1 National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

2 Learning Objectives At the completion of this session participants will be able to:  Describe the SDQ and its various versions  Identify the components of the various versions of the SDQ  Describe the scoring of the SDQ  Describe approaches to interpretation of the SDQ

3 What is the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)  Developed by Dr Robert Goodman, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College, University of London.  Designed as a brief behavioural screening questionnaire about year olds  Exists in several versions to meet the needs of researchers, clinicians and educationalists.  Each version includes between three or four of the following components:  A) 25 items on psychological attributes.  B) An impact supplement  C) Cross informant information  D) Follow-up questions  Note:four ‘teacher’ versions are available, these are not required for the National Outcomes and Casemix Collection.

4  There are six versions (parent-report and young persons self report) currently specified under the National Outcomes and Casemix Collection  PC1 – Parent Report Measure for Children aged 04-10, Baseline version;  PC2 – Parent Report Measure for Children and Adolescents aged 4- 10, Follow up version  PY1 – Parent Report Measure for Youth aged 11-17, Baseline version;  PY2 – Parent Report Measure for Youth aged 11-17; Follow up version  YR1 – Youth self report measure (11-17), Baseline version  YR2 – Youth self report measure (11-17), Follow up version.  The different versions have different rating periods and different combinations of components. Versions of the SDQ

5

6 Extended SDQ: 25 items on psychological attributes (Symptom Items)  emotional symptoms (5 items)  “Many worries or often seems worried “  conduct problems (5 items)  “Often fights with other children “  hyperactivity/inattention (5 items)  “Restless, overactive, cannot stay still for long “  peer relationship problems (5 items)  “Rather solitary, prefers to play alone “  prosocial behaviour (5 items)  “Considerate of other people’s feelings “  Total Score  Note Some items are reversed  Three point scale “not true”,, “somewhat true” or “certainly true” added together to generate a Total difficulties score (based on 20 items)

7 Extended SDQ : Impact  The SDQ includes items which identify the impact of the psychological attributes of the child or adolescent.  A probe question is asked “Overall, do you think that your child has difficulties in any of the following areas: emotions, concentration, behaviour or being able to get along with other people”? If the answer to this probe is “No”, the impact questions are not asked.  Respondents indicate there have been problems they are then asked to rate  chronicity,  distress,  social impairment, and  burden to others.  This is useful additional information for clinicians and researchers re psychiatric caseness and the determinants of service use

8 Extended SDQ : Cross Informant  On admission, respondents are asked to identify teachers impressions of the child or young persons presentation.  “Over the last six months, have your child’s teachers complained of…’  E.g. “Acting without thinking, frequently butting in, or not waiting for his or her turn”  These cross informant questions provide useful additional clinical information giving a sense of how pervasive any difficulties may be  In addition single informant SDQ (Parent or Child/Young Persons) provide useful information which can give a rough probability of diagnosis. However in the case of Hyperkinetic disorder, overactivity is most evident in structured situations such as school, this requires information from informants such as teachers.

9 Two additional questions are asked to determine follow up progress  “Has the intervention reduced problems”?  “Has the intervention helped in other ways, eg. making the problems more bearable”?  Note:  To increase the chance of detecting change, the follow-up versions of the SDQ ask about 'the last month', as opposed to 'the last six months‘  The Chronicity Questions are absent from the follow-up version Extended SDQ : Follow-up

10 Special Considerations  Generally, the ‘admission’ versions are administered on admission and rated over the standard rating period of six months and the ‘follow up’ versions are administered on review and discharge and rated over a one month period. However, for referral from another setting, to prevent duplication and undue burden on consumers and parents, the following guide is suggested:

11 Transfer of care between an inpatient, community residential or ambulatory setting of a consumer currently under the active care of the Mental Health Service Organisation. Admission SDQ - if Follow Up SDQ required at the end of referring treatment settings episode is neither completed nor provided by referring setting. Follow Up SDQ - if Follow Up SDQ is required at end of referring treatment settings episode has in fact been completed and provided by the referring setting. Admission to a new inpatient, community residential or ambulatory episode of care for any reason other than defined above. Admission SDQ - if Follow Up SDQ required at the end of referring treatment settings episode is neither completed nor provided by referring setting. Follow Up SDQ - if Follow Up SDQ required at end of referring treatment settings episode has not been completed or is not provided by the referring setting. Special Considerations

12 Consumer Self Report Measure: When NOT to Offer  The consumer is too unwell or distressed to complete the measure  Psychotic or mood disturbance prevents the consumer from understanding the measure or alternatively, completing the measure would increase their level of distress  The consumer is unable to understand the measure  As a result of an organic mental disorder or a developmental disability to consumer  Cultural or language issues make the self-report measure inappropriate

13 Offering the Measure  Why is it important to complete a consumer and carer self rated measure?  What happens if the carer or consumer refuses to complete the measure, will it effect their treatment?  Who is going to use the information?  What is the information going to be used for?  Assure the consumer of privacy and confidentiality.

14 Scoring the SDQ  Total Difficulty Score  0 (Not True), 1 (Somewhat True), 2 (Certainly True)  For each of the 5 scales the scores can range from 0-10 if all 5 items were completed  Note some items reversed (7, 11, 14, 21 and 25)  Total Score = Emotional Scale + Conduct Scale + Hyperactivity Scale + Peer Problem Scale.  Impact Score  Items 28 through 32 are added together to derive the impact score. Note coding: Not at all (0) A little (0) A medium amount (1) A great deal (2)  Cross Informants  Although these items are clinically useful, they are not scored but become available for further NOCC development

15 Interpreting the SDQ

16 Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire More Information available at “Sharing Information to Improve Outcomes” An Australian Government funded initiative