Toxicology and Biodegradation of Crude and Dispersed Oil in the Arctic Marine Environment Joint Industry Program Research Managed by: Jack Word NewFields.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.
Advertisements

Exposure and Effects Workgroup Study Ideas Five-Year Plan: Risk to Birds Is there clear evidence of pollutant effects on survival, reproduction,
UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS 1 UAF Toxicology and Ecosystem Impacts INE, Dr. Robert A. Perkins, PE IAB, Dr. Mary Beth Leigh Kelly McFarlin.
Update on the Bering Strait Port Access Route Study CDR James Houck 17 th Coast Guard District 23 May 2012.
Watershed Approaches and Community Based Planning
Long-Term Studies in Port Valdez, Alaska Long-Term Studies in Port Valdez, Alaska A. L. Blanchard, Howard. M. Feder, Carrie Parris and Hilary Nichols Institute.
US Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division Northwestern Division 1 System Flood Control Review: Regional Agency Review Briefing Lonnie Mettler Northwestern.
Advances in Treating Agents for Oil Spill Response with Applicability to the Arctic Amy Tidwell & Tim Nedwed, ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company Ian.
Bioremediation of marine environment contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon Richard Mannion Martin Casserly Martin Gallagher.
Materials and Chemistry 1 Fate and effects of dispersed oil Examples from research projects Effects of Dispersed Oil Workshop Anchorage, March.
In-situ fluorometry for oil-spills Chris Fuller Jim Bonner Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University ABSTRACT The current SMART protocol used.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP Thursday, December 3, 2009 Relevance of Climate Change for the Arctic Marine Biological System Presented by: Dr.
NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS For use by Toxicology Sub-committee only Please do not copy or distribute.
Environmental Sensitivity to Oil Spills in Gulf Shores, AL
Chronic Estuarine & Marine Silver Toxicity: Water Quality Parameters as Modifying Factors T.J. Ward, R.L. Boeri T.R. Wilbury Laboratories C. Hogstrand.
Oil Spill-Related Activities at the National Academy of Sciences Deborah Glickson UNH Oil Spill Forum October 29, 2014.
وحدة الاعتماد الأكاديمي 8/16/2015. ACCREDITATION Dr. ABD EL-SLAM HEMAID BADR A.A.U. DIRECTOR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING JAZAN UNIVERSITY 8/16/2015.
MANAGEMENT BOARD 1 Working Safely While Protecting the Environment – Role of the ESRF Paul Barnes, ESRF Management Board Chairperson U.S. – Canada Northern.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Kelly McFarlin, Mary Beth Leigh and Robert Perkins University of Alaska Fairbanks Indigenous Microorganisms Degrade Oil in Arctic Seawater Introduction.
Food Advisory Committee Meeting December 16 and 17, 2014 Questions to the Committee Suzanne C. Fitzpatrick, PhD, DABT Senior Advisory for Toxicology Center.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Sediment Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay Sediment Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay Natalie Bartosh GIS in Water Resources, Fall 2003 Dr. Maidment, The.
ISO. ISO 9000 is a family of standards for quality management systems. ISO 9000 is maintained by ISO, the International Organization for Standardization.
Developing a Literature Database for the North Aleutian Basin of Alaska Elisabeth Ann Stull North Aleutian Basin Information Status and Research Planning.
INE Work with Oil Dispersants CROSERF and Beyond NewFields Beaufort Sea Workshop 26, 27 March 2008.
North Pacific Climate Regimes and Ecosystem Productivity Changing climate, changing ecosystem: Current issues & results.
Introduction Oithona similis is the most abundant copepod in the Gulf of Alaska, and is a dominant in many ecosystems from the poles to the sub-tropics.
Arctic Energy Development Fran Ulmer Chair, US Arctic Research Commission USAEE Presentation July 29, 2013.
Marine Ecology of the Arctic Connectivity, change, and resilience Arny Blanchard Institute of Marine Science University of Alaska Fairbanks Oceanography.
Towards a future Maritime Policy for the Union: Martin F. Diez-Picazo Martime Policy Task Force - European Commission.
Some Thoughts on Ecology
Charge Question 4-1: Please comment on the ecotoxicity studies selected to represent the most sensitive species in each of the risk scenarios (acute aquatic,
THE ARCTIC OIL SPILL RESPONSE TECHNOLOGY JOINT INDUSTRY PROGRAM JENNIFER WYATT, ARCTIC JIP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CHAIR June 17, 2014.
1 Mesocosm Scale Evaluation of Dispersant Effectiveness and Toxicity Kenneth Lee, Kats Haya, Les Burridge, Simon Courtenay, Zhengkai Li Fisheries and Oceans.
2012 Arctic Report Card Tracking recent environmental changes Martin Jeffries 1, J. E. Overland 2, J. A. Richter-Menge 3, and N. N. Soreide 2 1 Office.
Scaling ecosystem information for decision making – global information for local action Phillip R. Mundy Auke Bay Laboratories Alaska Fisheries Science.
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
Chukchi Sea Environmental Studies Program Caryn Rea Environmental Studies Lead ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. January 23, 2009 Environmental Studies Baseline.
Preliminary Data on Euphausiid Distribution and Growth in the Northern Gulf of Alaska. A.I. Pinchuk, R.R. Hopcroft, K.O. Coyle Institute of Marine Science,
1 Scenarios and More California Water Plan Advisory Committee Meeting April 14 th, 2005.
Advanced Monitoring Initiative: Arctic Coastal Data Mining and Assessment Project Carrie Parris*, Arny L. Blanchard*, Doug H. Dasher +, Hilary K. Nichols*,
Seasonal variations in mean water column temperatures in the northern GOA (obtained from IMS GLOBEC website ). The temperature.
Leaching of Alternative Chemical Treated Wood & Aquatic Toxicity of Alternative Chemical Treated Wood Leachates Update: July 9, 2001.
Confidence in Assessments Workshop in Anchorage, Alaska 26 and 27 March, 2008.
Setting Standards: The Science of Water Quality Criteria EA Engineering, Science, and Technology ® Presented by: James B. Whitaker Review of Annex 1 of.
3/17/08Arctic Observation Integration Mtg1 Introduction & Workshop Goals Hajo Eicken Chair, SEARCH Observing Change Panel Geophysical Institute University.
1 Environmental impacts and aspects of absorbents used for CO 2 capture Ingvild Eide-Haugmo 1, Karl Anders Hoff 2, Odd Gunnar Brakstad 2, Kristin R. Sørheim.
Unit 7 Chapter 24 Ocean Water
Doney, 2006 Nature 444: Behrenfeld et al., 2006 Nature 444: The changing ocean – Labrador Sea Ecosystem perspective.
1 Assessing Vulnerability of Living Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Roger Griffis Climate Change Coordinator, NOAA Fisheries Service.
Introduction Egg production in copepod species may be the largest component of copepod production and is a parameter routinely monitored in ecosystem studies.
Robert Suydam Department of Wildlife Management, Alaska North Slope Borough Ph.D.-Fisheries, (Univ. of Washington, expected in 2005), M.S-Biology, (Univ.
Baltic Sea Regional Project Inesis Kiškis, World Bank.
The Plant Kingdom Living on Planet Earth © 2011 abcteach.com Tundra Plants Mountain and Tundra Plants (Part 2)
Length-weight-age relationships of demersal fishes in the Chukchi Sea Brenda L Norcross, Brenda A Holladay, Christy Gleason – School of Fisheries and Ocean.
Joint Environment Canada/NOAA Freezing Spray Project LT Christine Schultz National Weather Service Ocean Prediction Center.
The oil and gas activities in the Arctic Environmental issues and solutions Lionel Camus & Salve Dahle Akvaplan-niva ©
Restoration Under a Future Climate Understanding and managing climate change effects on federal lands Dr. Cynthia West, Director Office of Sustainability.
Growth Rates of Euphausiids in the Northern Gulf of Alaska in A.I. Pinchuk *, R.R. Hopcroft, K.O. Coyle Institute of Marine Science, University.
Seasonal-to-Decadal Predictions of Arctic Sea Ice: Challenges and Strategies Sponsors: NASA, ONR, Intelligence Community Report available: October 30,
TTWG Report & Technical Topics SRRTTF Meeting Dave Dilks March 16, 2016.
Tracking life history of each particle Particles could be divided into three groups (Fig. 7) The red group’s period of copepodite stage shortened when.
Chesapeake Bay Program
Development of Compliance Tools for Metals
Food Web Discussion Valuable Ecosystem Components for Beaufort and Chukchi Seas Effects of circulation on food web and VECs III-
HUMAN HEALTH THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON IN THE UNITED STATES:
Relationship Between NO3 and Salinity:
Spatial Tools for Arctic Mapping & Planning
Interpretation of Descriptor 8
Presentation transcript:

Toxicology and Biodegradation of Crude and Dispersed Oil in the Arctic Marine Environment Joint Industry Program Research Managed by: Jack Word NewFields 4729 NE View Dr Port Gamble, WA And Robert Perkins University of Alaska, Fairbanks Institute of Northern Engineering Fairbanks, AK 99775

Research Partners NewFields, UAF, BASC, BARC, Alpha Analytical Technical Advisory Committee: USCG, NOAA, USEPA, ADEC, NSB, CEDRE, UAF, COOGER, SINTEF, Akvaplan Niva. Sponsoring Companies Shell ExxonMobil Statoil ConocoPhillips Program Management Barrow Arctic Research Center Barrow, Alaska

JIP Research Objectives Identification of Research Needs Literature review International workshop Develop scopes of work and test protocols Develop infrastructure to support research work in the Arctic (personnel, facilities, equipment and testing procedures to accomplish tasks) Conduct work and provide monthly updates to TAC and JIP members on the outcome of the research efforts – modify efforts as needed to address issues and discoveries This information is provided on an open-access ftp website that is updated regularly

Determine sensitivity of key Arctic species to chemically and physically dispersed petroleum under Arctic conditions (pelagic marine, cold water and ice-free conditions). Compare sensitivity of key Arctic species to sub-Arctic, temperate and tropical species. Determine whether the dispersant Corexit 9500 adds to petroleum toxicity. Key Toxicology Research Objectives Physically Dispersed Petroleum (WAF) Chemically Dispersed Petroleum (CEWAF) Physically and Chemically Dispersed Petroleum Preparation

Key Biodegradation Research Objectives Respirometer Study biodegradation of petroleum under Arctic conditions (+5 to -2°C; 24 hour illumination and 24 hour darkness; ice-free) with indigenous microbes contained in natural seawaters. Temperatures reflect summer and winter conditions. Determine rate of biodegradation of chemically and physically dispersed petroleum. Determine effect of weathering on biodegradation rates of physically and chemically dispersed petroleum.

Calanus glacialis – pelagic copepod representing significant Tier II food web contribution to Arctic invertebrates, fish, marine mammals and seabirds. Boreogadus saida – marine fish representing important Tier III food web contribution to Arctic fish, marine mammals and seabirds Myoxocephalus sp – marine/estuarine fish representing Tier III food web contribution to Arctic fish, marine mammals and seabirds. Thysanoessa raschii– pelagic krill species representing important Tier II food web contribution to Arctic fish, marine mammals and seabirds Calanus glacialis Boreogadus saida Myoxocephalus sp Thysanoessa raschii Bioassay 0 ± 1 °C Key Species Selected for Arctic Toxicology Testing

Arctic Toxicity Findings  Pelagic organisms respond to the concentrations of petroleum in the water column (PAH)  Dispersant concentrations do not add to the petroleum toxicity at recommended dispersant oil ratios (DOR 1:20)  Dispersant (Corexit 9500) by itself at recommended use rates does not show significant toxicity to copepods  Toxicity is expressed over longer periods of time for Arctic copepods versus subarctic and temperate species (12 versus 4 days).  Arctic species show equal or less sensitivity to petroleum exposure than temperate species after appropriate exposure periods.  We have developed a ‘breaking wave WAF’ procedure that physically disperses petroleum into the water column sufficiently to produce biological effects based concentrations.

Comparative Toxicity of Spiked Petroleum & Dispersants Species LC 50 ( µg/L) Corexit or Total PAH -- Aurand et al 2009 (green shading) Corexit 9500WAFCE WAF 24h48h24h48h24h48h Eurytoma affinis Copepod19,20015, Copepodite14,6009, Nauplii9,5006, Species LC 50 ( µg/L) Corexit or TPAH - JIP Program Results Corexit 9500 WAFCE WAF Calanus glacialis (4 d) ~50,000 to 125,000 Calanus glacialis (12 d) ~20,000 to 50, to to 510 Species 96h LC 50 TPH – Fuller and Bonner, 2001 (pink shading) Corexit 9500WAFCE WAF Menidia berylina 40,000 to 117,000 >14,500 to 32,30024,900 to 36,900 Mysidopsis bahia (=Americamysis) 500,000 to 1,305,000 26,100 to 83,10056,500 to 60,800 Cyprinodon vulgaris 593,000 to 750,000 >5,70031,900 to 39,500 Vibrio fisheri 104,000 to 242, to 1,30012,800 to 27,900 1.Younger stages are more sensitive 2. Corexit 9500 is ~100-fold less toxic than PAH 3.Corexit 9500 is ~3-fold less toxic than total petroleum 4.WAF and CE WAF preparations are equally toxic based on petroleum measurements 5. Arctic species (C. glacialis is less sensitive than temperate copepod (E. affinis)

Comparative Toxicity of Petroleum in Arctic, Subarctic and Temperate Regions Red Bars show Arctic species response

Arctic Biodegradation Findings Indigenous microbes in natural Arctic seawater degrade petroleum hydrocarbons under Arctic conditions The respirometry studies indicate that there is a lag phase followed by biodegradation which are comparable to rates under laboratory temperate conditions Fresh oil biodegrades more rapidly than weathered oil Respirometry is a good surrogate for estimating rates of biodegradation of total oil (=mineralization) – chemistry evaluates degradation of individual components of oil (primary biodegradation) The dispersant (Corexit 9500) does not inhibit biodegradation nor does it appear toxic to the microbes Chemically dispersed fresh oil degrades more rapidly than chemically dispersed weathered oil Biodegradation of chemically dispersed fresh oil removes ~60% of the chemically measured components over a period of 57 days under Arctic conditions with natural seawater and it’s component microbes

Chemical Assessment of Total Oil Loss During Incubation

Biodegradation of Oil and Dispersed Oil Under Arctic Conditions (after 57 days in incubator; measured by GCMS)

Summary Arctic species that have been tested with petroleum and Corexit exposures react with similar or higher resilience than temperate species. When results from this JIP research are compared to results provided by Akvaplan Niva and CROSERF, similar trends are evident. Chemically dispersed oil effects are less toxic than physically dispersed oil toxicity on a per unit petroleum basis Corexit 9500 shows little toxicity by itself or when mixed with oil at appropriate environmental and petroleum based concentrations. Winter -Close up of Pressure Ridge Ice Winter - Bear Guard

Summary - Continued Petroleum biodegrades in the Arctic with indigenous microbes in pelagic waters under summer and winter ice-free conditions. Chemical dispersants appear to enhance the completeness of degradation of measured components in oil over undispersed petroleum (~60 % compared to <30 %); Degradation of weathered oil is less than fresh oil under sealed conditions (no evaporation) Summer – Open Water Conditions Photo credit: all photos taken by Jack D Word