RULES DONE RIGHT HOW ARKANSAS BROUGHT ITS OIL AND GAS LAW INTO A HORIZONTAL WORLD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OIL & GAS DEVELOPMENT AND UNITIZATION LAWS IN VARIOUS STATES
Advertisements

Proposed Land Use & Development Regulations Public Hearing Month Day, 2012.
WHAT TO DO WITH THE LEFTOVERS? OWNERSHIP ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH ABANDONED PLATFORMS, WELLS, AND UNITS The Legal Issues.
Natural Gas Drilling Activities - A State Perspective Ryan Benefield, P.E. Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality
Meeting the Letter and Spirit of the Law: Legal Components of Comprehensive Plans.
IMPORTANT READ CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS PRODUCT LICENSE AGREEMENT AND LIMITED WARRANTY BY INSTALLING OR USING THE SOFTWARE, FILES OR OTHER ELECTRONIC.
Rushcliffe Borough Council Development Management Process Changes to Planning Legislation Andrew Pegram Service Manager, Communities February 2015.
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES RELATING TO EASEMENTS Michael Mammen – Partner, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers.
Crossing Agreements Canadian Best Practice Crossing Agreements A Canadian Best Practice Brad Watson TransCanada Pipelines and Alberta Common Ground Alliance.
Bruce M. Kramer Of Counsel Arkansas Law Review Symposium: 75 th Anniversary of the Arkansas Conservation Act STATUTORY UNITIZATION: AN UNDER-UTILIZED CONSERVATION.
Ezra A. Johnson July 23, 2014 Can’t we all just get along? Surface and Mineral Rights in Texas Texas Association of REALTORS.
Notices of Violation, Orders to Cease Operation and Consent Orders.
Ezra A. Johnson December 12, 2013 Can’t we all just get along? Surface, Minerals and Public Utilities in Texas Texas Association of REALTORS.
Water Demands for Mining Richard Lowerre Adapted from presentation to Texas Groundwater Summit September 2013.
1 A&BS in Relation to Marine Genetic Resources Prof. Dr. Alexander Proelß hydrothermal systems.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 09 NECESSARILY INCIDENTAL AND DOUBLE ASPECT DOCTRINE 1 Shigenori Matsui.
1 Hydraulic Fracturing Regulatory Processes in Louisiana James H. Welsh Commissioner of Conservation.
To Begin The Discussion Remember The Rule Of Capture.
Conversation on the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS) and Critical Infrastructure Protection Chemical-Terrorism Vulnerability Information.
It’s not my Fracking Problem! Regulations, Liability, and the Process of Hydraulic Fracturing Katie Heath November 30, 2010.
The Name Equality Act of 2007 AB 102 (Chapter 567, Statutes of 2007)
EVOLUTION OF SPACING AND POOLING IN COLORADO Denver Association of Division Order Analysts July 21, 2014 Denver, Colorado Steve Sullivan Welborn Sullivan.
Quench My Thirst: Water Rights in the Context of Water Treatment Technologies Peter E. Hosey Jesse S. Lotay Jackson Walker L.L.P. 112 E. Pecan, Suite 2400.
NEGOTIATIONS Eric R. King University of Oklahoma Law School Fall 2009 November 4, 2009.
SB 490 Amendments to the Kansas Underground Utility Damage Prevention Act Effective January 1, 2003.
Carbon Capture and Storage State Legislation Kathy G. Beckett Midwest Ozone Group January 22-23, 2009.
Chapter 1 RESERVOIR.
Negotiations Eric R. King Week Eleven November 4, 2010.
RAJKUMAR UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM & ENERGY STUDIES.
ETF – O IL AND G AS T RACT, M AY 5, 2015 GROUNDWATER AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS.
Dr. Diganta Biswas School of Law Christ University, Bangalore.
Part 1.3 Mineral Rights & Leasing. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Understand.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Horizontal Drilling Permit Applications Lorenzo Garza.
Water and Wastewater Certification 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
DENVER ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM LANDMEN LAND PRESENTATIONS BEFORE OIL & GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSIONS February 15, 2006 Presented by: Michael J. Wozniak.
UTAH GEOTHERMAL Dr. R. Gordon Bloomquist, Ph.D Washington State University Energy Program Salt Lake City, Utah 20 January 2004.
E&P STORM WATER OVERVIEW Domestic Onshore Energy E&P STORM WATER OVERVIEW Domestic Onshore Energy May 10, 2005.
Investment Funds Conference “Collective Investment Funds in the Qatar Financial Centre – Confidence and Opportunity” November 26-27, 2007 Michael Webb.
1 Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 A strategic view.
How 1041 Regulations are Impacting Geothermal Development A discussion of how counties are applying 1041 regulations to geothermal development and the.
UFT Rule ProposalS Adopting statewide Horizontal rules in texas
1 GOOD GOVERNANCE Today, we will discuss: what good governance means in the environmental enforcement context; creative enforcement measures which contribute.
Development of United Kingdom North Sea Oil and Gas Stephen Dow CEPMLP, University of Dundee.
Idaho Oil and Gas 101 Bobby Johnson, P.G. Oil and Gas Program Manager Idaho Department of Lands.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 24, 2009 Class 8 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (WTO TRIPS); Global Problem of Patent Protection for.
Dealing with Missing Persons and Holdouts: Using Rule 37 and MIPA for Urban Gas Development Presented By: Eric C. Camp W HITAKER, C HALK, S WINDLE & S.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Lorenzo Garza Drilling Permits and Online Filing – Advanced Topics to be discussed: Stacked Laterals, Allocation and PSA wells,
DRAFT Proposal for a European Directive on the Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide Subject to modification on adoption by the Commission.
Location Exception Increased Density Eric R. King Week Five September 30, 2010.
Current state of regulation of shale gas regulation in the UK Dr Sanna 12 March
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
1 Proposed amendments to the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (NEMA) October 2007 Presentation by Joanne Yawitch DDG EQP.
Contractor Alternate Design Serving the Public’s Best Interest.
Cag University Faculty of Law and Faculty of Economics And Administrative Sciences.
SPACING Vertical Horizontal Eric R. King Week Three September 8, 2011.
Municipal Water Rights…… Water Law & Policy Seminars March 12, 2012 Kent L. Jones, P.E. State Engineer.
INTERNATIONAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAW OCTOBER 29, 2012.
Developing U.S. Shale Gas and Oil Resources: Problems and Prospects for the Next Decade Peter D. Blair, Executive Director NRC Division on Engineering.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
Woodford Horizontal Wells June 30, 2005
SUBDIVISION AND COMMON INTEREST DEVELOPMENT LAWS HOW THEY AFFECT CONVENTIONAL HOUSING COOPERATIVES AND OUR PROPOSED NEW MODEL.
Faculty of Economics And Administrative Sciences
Wyoming Statutes §§ through
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM LANDMEN
FORMS OF BUSINESS ORGANISATION
Dr. Jim Thomas Desert Research Institute
Slide Set Twenty-Three: Modern Challenges in Property Law – Land Use 3
Pooling Cost Determination Change of Operator
Presentation transcript:

RULES DONE RIGHT HOW ARKANSAS BROUGHT ITS OIL AND GAS LAW INTO A HORIZONTAL WORLD

BEFORE REGULATION, YOU COULD CAPTURE, OR BE CAPTURED FROM WHAT THIS PICTURE NEEDS IS SOME GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION

HOW DID ARKANSAS BRING ITS OIL AND GAS LAW INTO A HORIZONTAL WORLD? Flexible modern enabling statutes Flexible modern rules

Act No. 105 of 1939 AN ACT to Prevent Waste, Foster, Encourage and Provide Conservation of Crude Oil and Natural Gas, and Products Thereof and Protect the Vested, Co-Equal or Correlative Rights of Owners of Crude Oil or Natural Gas...

Act No. 105 of 1939 Created the conservation agency, the AOGC Mandated formation of drilling units in which all owners are given correlative rights: (2) As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires, “drilling unit” means the maximum area which may be efficiently and economically drained by one (1) well, and the unit shall constitute a developed unit as long as a well is located thereon which is capable of producing oil or gas in paying quantities.

Act No. 105 of 1939 The 1939 act permitted integration (compulsory pooling) of uncommitted interests, but did not provide for a penalty amount to be recovered by participants from non-consenting interests

Act No. 536 of 1963 This amendment to the Conservation Act rewrote the integration provision to mandate a risk-factor penalty on carried non-consenting interests and to authorize a “permanent transfer” of non-consenting parties’ interests (i.e. a forced oil and gas lease)

Act No. 881 of 1985 Permitted the formation and integration of “Exploratory Drilling Units” (units for wildcat wells) Requires that a minimum of 50% of unit’s working interest support the formation of an Exploratory Unit

Act No. 964 of 2003 Redefined “Unit” for purposes of the Conservation Act Original Conservation Act (2) As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires, “drilling unit” means the maximum area which may be efficiently and economically drained by one (1) well… Amended Conservation Act (2)(A) As used in this subchapter, "drilling unit" means a single governmental section or the equivalent unless a larger or smaller area is requested by an owner, as defined in § , within the drilling unit to be established and a larger or smaller area is established by order of the commission…

Act No. 964 of 2003 Expressly authorized multiple unit wells from the beginning of development: (2)(B) The commission shall have the continuing authority to: (i) Designate the number of wells that may be drilled and produced within a drilling unit; and (ii) Regulate the spacing among multiple wells drilled and produced within a drilling unit.

WELCOME TO THE FAYETTEVILLE SHALE PLAY!!! The oil and gas business learned a new and wonderful word —“unconventional.” The critical characteristics of an unconventional reservoir are high organic content, conducive to the formation of oil and/or gas, but very low permeability. Scientists have long theorized that immense reserves of oil and gas were locked within unconventional rocks, but lacked the ability to produce those reserves with conventional vertical-well technology, making their exploitation commercially impractical. Science then came to the rescue. Around the start of this century, the drilling industry perfected two processes, horizontal drilling and multiple stage hydraulic fracturing (fracking).

Rules Must Adapt to Accommodate New Science Unconventional Resource Development Brings New Regulatory Challenges

Prevention of waste: – Wells are long skinny horizontal things, hard to fit into boxes; moreover, polar orientation is not always best – Lack of formation permeability mandates wells to be located on close spacing – These closely spaced wells work better if they work in coordination, rather than competition with one another – Scientists continue to learn, and improve, on-the-fly, thus challenging even the most recent assumptions Protection of correlative rights: – Science or no science, regulation must still protect every owner’s fair share

Examples of Arkansas’s Modern Regulation Detailed integration orders 1 Regulation in advance of development: AOGC General Rule B-43 Modern, environmentally-based regulation of processes such as fracking and underground disposal 1 1 These apply to all wells, conventional and unconventional.

Detailed Integration Orders Unleased mineral owners who are “deemed leased” are bound by the terms of an express lease form, adopted by AOGC, whether they execute it or not – The “deemed” lease applies to subsequent unit wells, also Owners who participate or are non-consent are bound by the terms of a JOA, adopted by AOGC, whether they execute it or not – This JOA applies to subsequent unit wells, also

GENERAL RULE B-43 Abandons well-by-well “Field Rule” approach in favor of regulating the entire play, all at once – Covers every known or reasonably imagined occurrence of an unconventional reservoir in the state. – Covers almost every aspect of the regulation authorized by the Conservation Act Not Static; Continues to change and improve as the industry changes and improve

GENERAL RULE B-43 Pre-forms 640 acre units across multiple counties Allows 16 wells, per reservoir, per unit 1 Provides for reasonably close well spacing (560’) and reasonably accommodates even closer spacing via easily obtained location exceptions Makes the outcome of disputes before the agency predictable Permits shared cross-unit wells 1 More to come about the “16-well problem”

SHARED CROSS-UNIT WELLS THINKING OUTSIDE OF THE BOX

THE BAND-AIDE IS BEST Band-Aide

The cross-unit well is here to stay. According to the A.O.G.C. records, more than 85% of all wells permitted to be drilled in the Fayetteville Shale Play today are cross-unit wells. The next picture shows what the result looks like.

END OF THE GAME PICTURE

THE SIXTEEN WELL PROBLEM NOTHING IS PERFECT Because of an unintended incongruity between rules, each segment of a cross-unit well is counted as a separate well for purposes of the otherwise generous sixteen-well limit. In other words, a single well could be counted twice, thrice or more times.

CAN YOU FIND THE TWO WELLS IN THIS PICTURE?

Well No. 1

CAN YOU FIND THE TWO WELLS IN THIS PICTURE? Well No. 2 Well No. 1

CAN YOU FIND THE TWO WELLS IN THIS PICTURE? Well No. 2 Well No. 1 Not a Well

FOCUS ON THESE TWO UNITS 21 SEGMENTS, COUNTED AS 21 WELLS 18 SEGMENTS, COUNTED AS 18 WELLS

THE SIXTEEN WELL PROBLEM— NOTHING IS PERFECT The result of this weird confluence of AOGC rules appears arbitrary. It punishes units which are developed by multiple short segments of cross-unit wells, for no good reason. Neither does it appear to protect anyone’s correlative rights. Even if it is accepted that protection of the surface is within the power of the A.O.G.C., the rule has nothing to do with surface use. A well is counted as one of the sixteen, whether its surface location is in the unit or not. The A.O.G.C. has declined to consider changing or abolishing this rule, regardless of its apparent lack of valid purpose. Fortunately, however, it has granted exceptions to the rule when it has been shown that a significant portion of a unit would otherwise go undeveloped.

MODERN REGULATION OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE PROCESSES General Rule B-19 regulates completions utilizing hydraulic fracture treatments General Rules H-1, H-2 and H-3 regulate SWD wells

A FINAL POINT Regulation must have the ability to adapt. Otherwise, we risk allowing our rules to hamper technology Arkansas has become a leader in the transition of its statutes and rules to accommodate the industry’s shift to unconventional reservoir development Inevitably, the future will bring more technological advances. The challenge will be to continue to adapt regulation to exploit, rather than hamper, those future developments, whatever they turn out to be, while still preventing waste and protecting correlative rights