California Community Colleges Adopting New Prerequisites Under the New Title 5 Requirements PRESENTATION FOR THE CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHIEF INSTRUCTIONAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STEPHANIE LOW DEAN, CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLORS OFFICE Chancellors Office Hottest Topics: A Story About Trains 3/25/2011.
Advertisements

The Florida College System House Bill 7135: Relating to Postsecondary Education Julie Alexander & Carrie Henderson April 20,
Implementing the Recent Title 5 Revisions A Study in Options Presented by the California Association of Community College Registrars and Admissions Officers.
Billie Jo Rice John Carpenter. Course Outline of Record (COR) Legal document outlined in Title 5 § Legal contract between faculty, student, and.
Local Approval of Stand-Alone Credit Courses Training Session provided by the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office and System Advisory Committee.
Ensuring Student Success through Technology.  Established criteria restricting/advise which students may/should enroll in a particular course.  Are.
Dr. Mark Sanchez, Liz Estrella, Tony Anderson, Dr. Romero Jalomo
Training for Implementation of CEC§ Creating AA-T and AS-T (SB 1440 Transfer Degrees) Spring 2011 February 1, 2011.
LEARNING CENTER & SUPPLEMENTAL LEARNING ISSUES Wheeler North San Diego Miramar College Ray M. Sanchez Fresno City College.
2007 Curriculum Institute July 12 2:15-3:45pm Tutoring and Supplemental Instruction - Clarifying the 2006 Title 5 Changes John Nixon and Michelle Pilati.
Information Competency: an overview Prepared by: Erlinda Estrada Judie Smith Mission College Library Santa Clara, CA.
18 Units in the Major: Too Many or Too Few? Beth Smith, Chair, Counseling Library Faculty Issues Committee Janice Johnson, Grossmont College Miles Vega,
The Board of Governors Motion on Assessment: An Update Mark Wade Lieu Academic Senate for California Community Colleges.
2010 Faculty Leadership Institute Hot Topics Beth Smith, Treasurer Richard Mahon, Area D.
Mark Wade Lieu, ASCCC President Jane Patton, ASCCC Vice President Janet Fulks, ASCCC Curriculum Chair 1.
Local Approval of Stand-Alone Credit Courses Training Session provided by the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office and System Advisory Committee.
Prerequisites and Content Review ASCCC Curriculum Committee July 2011.
Kale Braden, ASCCC North Representative Michelle Grimes-Hillman, ASCCC Curriculum Committee Chair James Todd, Interim Vice-President, Student Services,
Convocation Opening Address College of Sequoias Welcome&Introductions.
Criminal Intent – Innate or Learned? Why We Do What We Do Ian Walton and Michelle Pilati.
Michelle Grimes-Hillman, ASCCC Curriculum Chair Kim Schenk, Senior Dean, Diablo Valley College Erik Shearer, Napa Valley College.
Janet Fulks, ASCCC Curriculum Chair Jane Patton, ASCCC President 1.
Implementation of the Student Success Task Force Recommendations Wheeler North, Treasurer, ASCCC Michelle Pilati, President, ASCCC.
Prerequisites Changed My Life ASCCC Fall Plenary Session November 2013 Greg Burchett, Riverside City College John Stanskas, San Bernardino Valley College.
California Community Colleges Adopting New Prerequisites Under the New Title 5 Requirements ASCCC 2012 Spring Curriculum Regionals May 5—Woodland College.
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
The New Mission Frontier: The Community College Baccalaureate Degree Pilot John Stanskas, ASCCC Executive Committee Jolena Grande, Cypress College Jackie.
ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College.
What is the Standard for Baccalaureate Level Quantitative Reasoning? Starting the Intersegmental Conversation Ginni May, ASCCC Executive Committee John.
Our Constantly Evolving Curriculum: Hot Topics ASCCC Curriculum Committee: Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Chair Marie Boyd, Chaffey College Erik Shearer,
Placement of Courses in Disciplines Dan Crump, American River College Michelle Grimes-Hillman, Mt San Antonio College ASCCC Curriculum Institute, July.
ASCCC Fall Plenary November 1, 2007 Proposed Changes to Title 5 Academic Senate for California Community Colleges.
Berta Cuaron, CIO, Palomar College Kathy O’Connor, Faculty, Santa Barbara City College Beth Smith, Faculty, Grossmont College Phil Smith, Faculty, Sacramento.
Minimum Qualifications for Faculty in the California Community Colleges April 21, 2016 Spring Plenary Session John Stanskas, ASCCC Secretary Sylvia Dorsey-Robinson,
Minimum Qualifications for Faculty in the California Community Colleges May 5, 2016 CTE Leadership Academy John Stanskas, ASCCC Secretary.
Implementing Content Review Beth Smith, Grossmont College Chair, Curriculum Committee David Morse, Long Beach College Curriculum Committee.
Minimum Qualifications for Faculty in the California Community Colleges May 5, 2016 CTE Leadership Academy Pre-Conference Session John Stanskas, ASCCC.
Minimum Qualifications for Faculty in the California Community Colleges April 13, 2016 Webinar John Stanskas, ASCCC Secretary.
Pre-requisites, Co-Requisites, and Advisory Preparation
Cheryl aschenbach, north representative
Curriculum: CHANGES AND UPDATES
Pre-requisite Content Review and Disproportionate Impact
Implementing the Strong Workforce Program - Curriculum
ACADEMIC SENATE FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITES COLLEGES
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Curriculum and Accreditation
Student Success Task Force: Update
Curriculum and Accreditation
Ginni May, ASCCC Area A Representative
Training the curriculum committee
Pre-requisites, Co-Requisites, and Advisory Preparation
Training the curriculum committee
AB 705 and You: Your Program and Your Students – Noncredit, ESL, and Basic Skills Ginni May, Area A Representative, Math and Quantitative Reasoning Task.
What we know about ab 705 Cheryl Aschenbach, North Representative
AB 705 – Where are we now and how do we do it?
Prerequisites and Content Review
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
A Conversation about Prerequisites
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
Fall 2018 Overview from Curriculum Regional Meeting (11/17)
ACADEMIC SENATE FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITES COLLEGES
Training the curriculum committee
What we know about ab 705 Cheryl Aschenbach, North Representative
Understanding Repetition and Withdrawal July 10, 2009
Noncredit Prerequisites and Corequisites
IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING PREREQUISITES (AB 705, Prerequisites, & Articulation) Aimee Tran, Saddleback College, ASCCC Curriculum Committee, Articulation.
Diane Dieckmeyer, Vice President of Instruction, Mira Costa College
Curriculum Streamlining Training: A Deep Dive
Consider the Source – Deciphering Fact from Fiction: Implementation Requirements vs Options for AB 705 Marty Alvarado, Executive Vice Chancellor Educational.
Training the Curriculum Committee
Presentation transcript:

California Community Colleges Adopting New Prerequisites Under the New Title 5 Requirements PRESENTATION FOR THE CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHIEF INSTRUCTIONAL OFFICERS CONFERENCE FRIDAY, APRIL 20 TH, 2012 BURLINGAME, CA

Workshop Presenters Sonia Ortiz-Mercado, Dean, Matriculation, California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office David Morse, ASCCC Secretary, Professor of English, Long Beach City College Tim McGrath, Vice President, Instruction, San Diego Mesa College

Presentation Overview Overview of new title 5 prerequisite regulations  Requirements for content review with statistical validation and content review alone  Focus on new requirements for content review only process ASCCC recommendations and approach to adoption of new prerequisites Local college district planning process for implementation of the new regulations Question and Answer

Background & Overview of New Prerequisite Regulations New title 5 regulations on prerequisites, corequisites, and advisories adopted by the Board of Governors on March 8, 2011 (section 55003) Allows faculty to establish prerequisites or corequisites in English, reading, or mathematics on content review alone or content review with statistical validation Chancellor’s Office guidelines, developed in consultation with the System Advisory Committee on Curriculum and Matriculation Advisory Committee released February 2012

Allowable Purposes for Establishing Prerequisites or Corequisites Title 5, section (d) specifies the purposes for which prereqs and corequisites may be established: The prereq or corequisite:  Is expressly required or expressly authorized by statute or regulation  Will assure that the student has the skills, concepts, and/or information needed to succeed for the course it is established  Is needed to protect the health and safety of the student or others

General Requirements for Both Methods of Establishing Prereqs & Coreqs Requirements for establishing prerequisites, corequisites, and advisories either by content review alone or by content review with statistical validation: 1. Adopt policies on how the college plans to adopt prereqs, coreqs, or advisories that the college determines are “necessary and appropriate” [55003(b)(1)] 2. Adopt procedures to assure courses for which prereqs or coreqs are established are taught in accordance with course outline of record [55003(b)(2)]

3. Adopt policies to ensure that each section of the prereq or coreq is to be taught by a qualified instructor and in accordance with COR [55003(b)(3)] 4. Adopt a process for the review of prereqs & coreqs at least once every six years– for vocation courses or programs, every 2 years [55003(b)(4)] 5. Establish a basis and process for students to challenge prereqs or coreqs consistent with 55003(p) [55003(b)(5) & (p)] 6. Prereqs establishing communication or computational skill requirements may not be established across the entire curriculum unless established on a course by course basis [55003(b)(4)] General Requirements for Both Methods of Establishing Prereqs & Coreqs

7. Determination of whether a student meets a prereq shall be based on successful completion of an appropriate course or on an assessment using multiple measures [55003(k)] 8. Ensure that no exit test may be required to satisfy the prereq or coreq unless incorporated into the grading for the course [55003(n)] General Requirements for Both Methods of Establishing Prereqs & Coreqs

For prereqs requiring precollegiate skills in reading, written expression, or mathematics, districts must also: 1. Ensure that courses and sections designed to teach the required skills are available with reasonable frequency based on the number of students who are required to meet the prerequisites [55003(l)(1)] 2. Conduct an evaluation to determine the impact on student success and whether there is any disproportionate impact. Where there is disproportionate impact, develop and implement a plan, in consultation with the Chancellor’s Office, to address the it [55003(l)(2)(A) and (B)] General Requirements for Both Methods of Establishing Prereqs & Coreqs

1. The method used to determine which courses might be the most compelling candidates for new prereqs and coreqs 2. The provision of appropriate numbers of prereq and coreq course sections 3. The assurance that other degree applicable courses are available such that student progress toward their educational goals is not unnecessarily impeded 4. Training for the curriculum committee, and 5. The use of research to evaluate the effect of the new prereq and coreq on student success, with particular attention to disproportionate impact Establishing Prereqs & Coreqs Conducting Content Review Alone In addition, to establish prereqs or coreqs in reading, written expression, or math for degree applicable courses not in a sequence, districts must also adopt a plan that specifies:

Content review is defined in title 5, section (c ) as: “a rigorous, systematic process developed in accordance with sections to approved by the Chancellor as part of the district matriculation plan required under section 55510, and that is conducted by faculty to identify the necessary and appropriate body of knowledge or skills students need to posses prior to enrolling in a course, or which students need to acquire through simultaneous enrollment in a corequisite course.” The Content Review Process Section 55003(a) allows districts to use content review alone or content review with statistical validation to establish prereqs, coreqs and advisories:

Content review begins with the COR COR delineates the course content, competencies the student is expected to achieve, assignments to be completed, and assessments to measure student performance COR is examined to identify the skills and knowledge a student needs in order to succeed in the course The guidelines outline a process for conducting content review (p.7-8) The Content Review Process & the Course Outline of Record (COR)

Section 55003(e) lists the types of courses that are exempt from the content review or content review with statistical validation process:  If required by statute or regulation, or  Part of a closely related lecture-lab course pairing within a discipline, or  Required by a four-year institution, or  Baccalaureate institutions will not grant credit for a course unless it has the particular communication or computational skill prerequisite Courses Exempt from Content Review

Section 55003(i):  Requires that districts establishing prereqs, coreqs, or advisories report to the CCCCO new prereqs or coreqs established during the year as part of annual MIS data collection cycle  Required by August 1 st of each year  Data from the Curriculum Inventory will be used for evaluation  FYI: CCCCO will be surveying colleges regarding prerequisites & coreqs implemented during the academic year per title 5 section 55003(i). Survey released in early summer with a due date of July 15, 2012 Reporting the Establishment of Prereqs to the Chancellor’s Office

Section 55003(l):  Requires that districts monitor whether or not the prerequisites or corequisites have a disproportionate impact on particular groups of students. Monitoring the Impact of Prereqs & Coreqs

Matriculation Plans, Section 55510(a)(6) and (7):  Requires that district matriculation plans identify the procedures & policies a college will use to establish and review prereqs, coreqs, and advisories & that district policies are in place  Due to SB 1456 and the “repurposing” of matriculation, the matriculation plan process has been suspended for now Equity Plans, Section 55003(l)(2):  Requires districts to monitor equity in accordance with college student equity plan process  New equity plan process is TBD and contingent upon SSTF Student Success Scorecard outcomes & process Student Equity & Matriculation Plans

ASCCC Recommendations

Background & Overview of New Prerequisite Regulations Academic Senate Emphasis Prerequisites will increase student success if applied prudently.  Not everything needs a prereq  Each prereq must be the correct one for the specific class.  Colleges must plan to apply prerequisites in a logical sequence—not all at one time.  Colleges must ensure that enough sections of the required classes are available.

Background & Overview of New Prerequisite Regulations Academic Senate Emphasis Faculty discipline experts in the discipline for the desired pre-req should be involved in the conversation in order to inform the selection of the specific prerequisite course. Departments and colleges must be assured that their programs will not suffer if they apply prereqs.

Background & Overview of New Prerequisite Regulations Academic Senate Position Prerequisites that are thoughtfully and judiciously established through a content review process are the best response to Student Success Task Force Recommendation 3.4: “Community colleges will require students to begin addressing basic skills needs in their first year and will provide resources and options for them to attain the competencies needed to succeed in college-level work as part of their education plan.”

San Diego Community College Prerequisite “Draft” Plan

San Diego’s Approach to Prerequisites San Diego District is made up of three colleges: City, Mesa and Miramar All of our curriculum is aligned so a course prerequisite impacts all three colleges Each campus has a curriculum committee Each campus has representation on a District Curriculum Committee to align all courses District Curriculum Committee created a “Prerequisite Sub Committee” to create process

Committee Process Committee discussed why were prerequisites needed Decided to review data on Advisory skill level vs. Prerequisite validation Advisory Courses – General Education History 109, Psychology 101, Anthropology 102 and Biology 107 Perquisite Courses – Economics Micro/Macro

Advisory Courses – Psychology 101 College Reading/Basic Composition SemesterSkill LevelCohortSuccessful Completion Unsuccessful Completion Withdrew Fall 2010 Attained 1,15880%13%8% Not Attained 86757%30%14% Total/Average 2,02570%20%10% Fall 2009 Attained 1,15175%16%9% Not Attained 85653%32%15% Total/Average 2,00766%23%12% Fall 2008 Attained 99076%11%12% Not Attained 82359%25%16% Total/Average 1,81368%18%14%

Advisory Courses – Anthropology 102 College Reading/Basic Composition SemesterSkill LevelCohortSuccessful Completion Unsuccessful Completion Withdrew Fall 2010 Attained 59774%14%11% Not Attained 24739%38%23% Total/Average 84464%21%15% Fall 2009 Attained 56177%12%11% Not Attained 18250%38%12% Total/Average 74371%18%11% Fall 2008 Attained 53670%17%13% Not Attained 16843%41%16% Total/Average 70464%22%14%

Advisory Courses – History 109 College Reading/Basic Composition SemesterSkill LevelCohortSuccessful Completion Unsuccessful Completion Withdrew Fall 2010 Attained 74173%15%12% Not Attained 37056%31%13% Total/Average 1,11167%20%13% Fall 2009 Attained 72573%14%13% Not Attained 28153%29%19% Total/Average 1,00667%18%15% Fall 2008 Attained 69570%13%16% Not Attained 25244%26%30% Total/Average 94763%17%20%

Advisory Courses – Biology 107 Elementary Algebra/ College Reading/Basic Composition SemesterSkill LevelCohortSuccessful Completion Unsuccessful Completion Withdrew Fall 2010 Attained 70470%15% Not Attained 37442%35%24% Total/Average 1,07860%22%18% Fall 2009 Attained 61873%13% Not Attained 35744%30%27% Total/Average 97562%19%18% Fall 2008 Attained 61068%15%17% Not Attained 41542%33%26% Total/Average 1,02557%22%20%

Prerequisite Course – Economics 120 and 121 Intermediate Algebra Semester CohortSuccessful Completion Unsuccessful Completion Withdrew Econ 120 Fall ,07373%15%12% Macro Fall ,05757%24%19% Fall ,10559%21%20% Econ 121 Fall %15%9% Micro Fall %25%18% Fall %24%17%

San Diego Mesa College Example Timeline Spring 2012 (February 2012) Request for prerequisite data Spring 2012 (April 2012) Approval to establish English 101 prerequisite for Anthropology 102 effective Fall 2012 Announcements printed in Fall 2012 catalog and schedules Announcements of change in respective classes (effective ) announcements of change (effective ) sent to all students Communication with high school partners of upcoming change for ( ) Spring 2013 Repeat steps from Fall 2012 Mandatory prerequisite effective Fall 2013 registration

Issues to Consider Enrollment Management Strategy Additional Basic Skills vs. Transfer/General Ed Who Goes First??? “GO BIG” or “a few classes each semester” Planning Issues - Resource Allocation New Faculty??? Regional Issues

Question and Answer…

Chancellor’s Office Guidelines for Title 5 Regulations Section 55003: Policies for Prerequisites, Corequisites and Advisories on Recommended Preparation (2/3/12) pdf Student Success: The Case for Establishing Prerequisites Through Content Review (Fall 2010) Implementing Content Review for Communication and Computation Prerequisites (Spring 2011) Additional Resources

For more information… Sonia Ortiz-Mercado, Dean, Matriculation & Early Assessment California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Tim McGrath Vice President, Instruction San Diego Mesa College A-103, (619) David Morse Secretary, ASCCC Professor of English, Long Beach City College