Amendment 3/5 Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legal Framework, Investment Opportunities and Technical Innovation in the Electricity Sector Security of Supply through competitive markets: Design of.
Advertisements

1 RTWG Tariff update to the BOD, MOPC, SPC, and RSC January 4, 2005.
WELCOME Western Area Power Administration1. Where did the journey begin? Western Area Power Administration2.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
1 COST OF SERVICE OBJECTIVES & METHODOLOGY Utah Cost of Service Taskforce May 23, 2005 Dave Taylor.
9/22/00 1 Jerry W. Smith. 9/22/00 2 Jerry W. Smith.
LOCAL REGULATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE QUICK TELECONFERENCE American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Climate Change, Sustainable.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 10 The Role of Costs in Pricing Decisions.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
Power Factor: What Is It and Estimating Its Cost Presented by:Marc Tye, P.E APPA Business & Financial Conference September 21, 2004.
Small Renewable Net Metering - An Investor Owned Utility Perspective John R. Grimwade Senior Director Strategic Planning & Development Presentation to.
Economic Analyses of FPL’s New Nuclear Projects: An Overview Dr. Steven Sim Senior Manager, Resource Assessment & Planning Florida Power & Light Company.
RenewElec October 21, 2010 Robert Nordhaus, David Yaffe Van Ness Feldman 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC (202) FERC’s.
Utah Schedule 37 Update June 25, Schedule 37 Background Schedule 37 – Published rates for standard power purchase agreements with qualifying facilities.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
Water and Wastewater Certification 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
Interconnection of Small Wind & Solar Systems to Distribution Utilities: A Cooperative Perspective Patrick Parke Midwest Energy Hays, KS September 26,
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Electric Restructuring In Pennsylvania Sonny Popowsky Pennsylvania Consumer Advocate May 10, 2007 Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Transforming.
National Power Corporation Small Power Utilities Group POWER SUPPLY AGREEMENT.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Utah Cost of Service and Rate Design Task Force
Transfer Service Meeting, October 19, 2005 Bonneville Power Administration Long-Term Transfer Service (GTA and OATT) Customer Kick-Off Meeting Garry Thompson.
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
Liberalization of Electricity Market in Taiwan Su, Jin-sheng Energy Commission Ministry of Economic Affairs August 8, 2001.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
2 nd ACC Workshop June 20, 2014 The SSVEC Perspective David Bane, Key Account Manager
1 Bilateral Interconnection Agreement Model Presented to HAPUA Working Group 5 (ESI Services), Project 6 By Power Purchase Agreement Division Electricity.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Privatization and Liberalization of the Electric Power Industry in Taiwan Energy Commission Ministry of Economic Affairs October 5, 2001.
Bulk Power Transmission System
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
APPA’s Financial Planning for Municipals Mark Beauchamp, CPA, CMA, MBA September 27, 2005 Business & Finance Workshop.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Incremental State Assessment Surcharge (Section 18-a Surcharge) Fall 2009 Customer Meetings.
September 21, 2005 ICF Consulting RGGI Electricity Sector Modeling Results Updated Reference, RGGI Package and Sensitivities.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
RGGI Workshop on Electricity Markets, Reliability and Planning Topic Session 3: RGGI Design, Markets and Reliability – Issues Relating to System Operations.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations May 8, 2012 – COPS Meeting May 9, 2012 – WMS.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
G&T Update – Western Farmers Electric Cooperative OAEC MR/PR Fall Meeting (2015)
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
EEI Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreement Drafting Committee Optional Provisions to EEI Master Power Purchase & Sale Agreement remarks of Dickson C. Chin*
Philippine Feed-In Tariff System Implementation 1.
1 Basic Concepts on Power Supply Agreement (PSA) Francis Saturnino C. Juan Executive Director Energy Regulatory Commission.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. Southwest Connecticut RFP Markets Committee November 14, 2003.
Proposed framework for charges for generators connected to the Distribution network Please note that the contents of this presentation are proposals at.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations June 27, 2012 – ETWG Meeting.
High Level Post Processing Cost Estimates MWG SSC Meeting September 26, 2011.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Reliability-Must-Run (RMR) Cost Evaluation and Settlement Basis Ino González ERCOT RMR Workshop May 24, 2016.
1 Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461 ERCOT Commercial Market Operations November 2, 2012 – RCWG Meeting.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
PJM: Managing Grid Evolution Through Markets
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
1 Electricity Distribution Price Review Metering Workshop 14 July 2005.
Open Access Transmission Tariff Amendment No. 9 Greg Broeking, Chief Financial Officer March 7, 2012.
Education Funding: How Much is Enough?
SMECO Demand Response filing
Wind Management at MISO
DRAFT- April 3, 2001 Restructuring Proposal to Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. April 6, 2001 This Information is CONFIDENTIAL Per Section 5 of.
Energy Storage Settlements Consistent with PUCT Project & NPRR461
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
The Need for Compensatory Standby Rates
Idyllwild Water District
NYS Department of Public Service
Retail Rate Design & Administration
Presentation transcript:

Amendment 3/5 Workshop

Outline of A3 & A3 Limitations

Amendment No. 3 Member may elect non-EKPC supply for up to 15% of its load, subject to aggregate cap for all Members of 5% of EKPC’s load Amendment 3 elections are no longer part of the Wholesale Power Contract. 90 days’ notice for non-EKPC supply to serve load with an average coincident peak demand ≤ 5 MW; 18 months notice for non-EKPC supply ≥ 5 MW Once a load is returned to EKPC system, may not be served by non-EKPC supply again Non-EKPC supply for a new service territory only permitted if acquisition terms require the territory to continue to be served by non-EKPC supply EKPC supplies, and Member pays for, interconnection, transmission and ancillary services for non-EKPC supply Member solely responsible for all additional costs.

Limitations of Amendment No. 3 Allows non-EKPC supply only for a specific load Non-EKPC supply for a percentage of a Member’s total load is not permitted Non-EKPC supply must follow load shape of specified load 7 x 24 energy blocks not permitted Load-shaped supply is not generally available in small kW amounts Use of non-EKPC supply for a newly acquired service territory is very limited Permitted only if acquisition terms require that territory continue to be served by the existing supplier

Limitations of Amendment No. 3 Each Member does not control whether it will be able to exercise a non-EKPC supply option when the Member has an opportunity Allocation Committee under Policy 305 may have already allocated the full 5% of EKPC’s total load to other Members by the time a Member has its first opportunity to exercise its non-EKPC supply option Does not expressly address responsibility for stranded costs or for load growth of non-EKPC supplied load Requires only 90-days notice for non-EKPC supply < 5 MW, and 18-months notice for non-EKPC supply > 5 MW Does not specify notice period for obtaining supply from EKPC for non-EKPC supplied load 3

EKPC/member Wholesale power Contract

Mortgage and Wholesale Power Contract EKPC’s Board of Directors are required by Section 4.15 of its RUS/CFC Mortgage to implement rates so as to provide sufficient revenue (i) to pay all fixed and variable expenses when and as due; (ii) to provide and maintain reasonable working capital; and, (iii) to maintain a TIER of not less than 1.05 and a DSC of not less than 1.0.  EKPC’s Members are required by Paragraph 4(b) of the Wholesale Power Contract and Section 1.06 of EKPC’s By-Laws to pay the rates as set by the EKPC Board.

A3 More Details

Amendment 3 Need to Know Facts Bundled vs Un-Bundled Service Cost impact to members Direct Assignment Socialization Transmission & Ancillary Services Commission Approvals

Bundled vs Unbundled The Wholesale Power Contract provides bundled rates to Members. Bundled rates include: Capacity and Energy Reserves Transmission Service Transmission Ancillary Services Transmission to Distribution transformation services EKPC Overheads Unbundled rates require that you purchase the following services independently Interconnection of Generation Management of Your Power Supply

Cost Impact of Amendment 3/5 EKPC’s fixed costs do not change as a result of removing load from the Wholesale Power Contract Amendment 3 did not change the obligation of the members to fund EKPC’s costs Removing billing determinates from a rate leads to collection of inadequate revenues to fund the revenue requirement Underfunding of the revenue requirement must be addressed (ie EKPC’s financial integrity)

Options to address Underfunding Direct Assignment Socialization

Direct Assignment Impact The direct assignment associated with a 1 MW reduction would be approximately $546,500. The direct assignment associated with a 50 MW reduction of load would produce a direct assignment of $27.3 million.

Percentage Increase over Current Demand Rates Socialization Impact Percentage Increase over Current Demand Rates E1 E2 Load Reduction of 600,000 kW 2.003% 1.827% Load Reduction of 1,200,000 kW 4.255% 3.821% Load Reduction of 1,800,000 kW 6.508% 5.9800%

Impact methodology

Direct Assignment Under the net book value method, the original cost of Steam Generation and Other Production assets less the corresponding accumulated depreciation is calculated. The percentage of the load being removed divided by the three-year average of EKPC’s coincident peaks excluding Gallatin Steel, a “Share of Load” ratio, is applied to the current net book value to determine the stranded costs associated with the load being removed from the Wholesale Power Contract.

Direct Assignment As of February 2011, the net book value of Steam Generation and Other Production assets was $1.628 billion. The three-year average (2008-2010) of EKPC coincident peaks excluding Gallatin Steel is 2,980 MW. A 50 MW reduction of load would produce a “Share of Load” ratio of 1.68% and a direct assignment of $27.3 million. Stated another way, the direct assignment associated with 1 MW would be approximately $546,500.

Direct Assignment As of February 2011, the net book value of Steam Generation and Other Production assets was $1.628 billion. The three-year average (2008-2010) of EKPC coincident peaks excluding Gallatin Steel is 2,980 MW. A 50 MW reduction of load would produce a “Share of Load” ratio of 1.68% and a direct assignment of $27.3 million. Stated another way, the direct assignment associated with 1 MW would be approximately $546,500.

Direct Assignment Rate impact determined by using the billing analysis from EKPC’s last base rate case and assumes the load being removed is from Schedule E1 and E2. The demand revenues for E1 and E2 were adjusted to reflect an offset from potential transmission revenues. The rate impacts for removed monthly loads of 50 MW, 100 MW, and 150 MW were modeled; rate impact determined on an annual basis. Removed load allocated proportionally between E1 and E2.

Rate Impact of Socialization. Percentage Increase over Current Demand Rates E1 E2 Load Reduction of 600,000 kW 2.003% 1.827% Load Reduction of 1,200,000 kW 4.255% 3.821% Load Reduction of 1,800,000 kW 6.508% 5.980% Increase in demand rates would apply to all Members including those reducing load. Energy rates would also be impacted, as some fixed costs are recovered through energy rates. That impact has not been determined. Any change in revenues generated by base rates would also impact the calculation of the environmental surcharge.

Transmission Expenses

Transmission Service Any entity wishing to move wholesale power across the Bulk Electric System must be offered non-discriminatory rates and services by the transmission service provider If a member wishes to serve a portion of their load by a non-EKPC source, in accordance with the WPA, and the source for the capacity and energy is not located on the member’s distribution system with the load, EKPC will offer non-discriminatory rates and services to that member This offer cannot be declined unless the member demonstrates it has acquired these services from another source

OATT (www.oatioasis.com/ekpc) Schedule 1 Scheduling, System Control, and Dispatch Service Must take from EKPC $0.08856 per kW per Month Schedule 2 Reactive Supply and Voltage Control $0.03978 per kW per Month Schedule 3 Regulation and Frequency Response Service May choose alternative supply if available $0.12837 per kW per Month

OATT (www.oatioasis.com/ekpc) Schedule 4 Energy Imbalance Service May choose alternative supply if available Cost based on incremental or decremental cost of the supplier’s resource mix 100% of cost for deviations +/- 1.5% (minimum of 2 MW) 110% of cost for deviations between 1.5% and 7.5% (2 MW minimum up to 10 MW) 125% of cost for deviations greater than 7.5% (10 MW) Schedule 5 Operating Reserve – Spinning Reserve Service $0.12837 per kW per Month

OATT (www.oatioasis.com/ekpc) Schedule 6 Operating Reserve – Supplemental Reserve Service May choose alternative supply if available $0.25673 per kW per Month Schedule 7 Long-Term Firm Point-To-Point Transmission Service To serve load on EK, purchase NITS instead (Schedule 9) May be required to purchase P2P on another system to get the power/energy to the EK border $1.94 per kW per Month (TVA) $0.94 per kW per Month (KU/LGE) Schedule 9 Demand Charge for Network Integration Transmission Service Must purchase from EKPC May elect P2P instead $1.62 per kW per Month

OATT (www.oatioasis.com/ekpc) Schedule 10 Generator Imbalance Service May choose alternative supply if available Customer pays Schedule 10 or Schedule 4, not both Same rate structure as Schedule 4 Provision for intermittent resources Schedule 11 Loss Compensation Service May choose to self-supply losses or purchase from EKPC If EKPC supplies Energy Charge = 2.5% * Energy * 110% of AVC Demand Charge = $8.56 per kW of Reserved Capacity per Month Reserved Capacity is that Capacity reserved for losses 4% of the maximum hourly energy

Transmission & Ancillary Services Must be purchased to move power from the source to the load if using the Bulk Electric System Would likely add $5 to $11 per MWh Depending on location of source Depending on load factor of the load

PSC Approvals

PSC Approval and Requirements KRS 278.300 requires any utility subject to the jurisdiction of the PSC to get approval of the PSC to issue any evidences of indebtedness that has a term longer than two years.   The PSC considers a contract for the purchase of power the same as an evidence of indebtedness and therefore requires approval for a power purchase agreement with a term longer than two (2) years. This would more than likely require a showing that the PPA was the least cost option to the utility. KRS 278.990(4) provides for a fine to be imposed upon the utility for a violation of KRS 278.300 of up to $10,000.00 and KRS 278.990(1) provides for a fine of up to $2,500.00 on any officer, agent or employee of the utility for violation of KRS 278.300 and up to six (6) months in jail.

Questions and Discussion Privileged and Confidential 4