Copyright © 2013 The Brattle Group, Inc. PRESENTED TO PRESENTED BY The Principles and Practices of Time-Variant Pricing California Public Utilities Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Advertisements

Energy Analysis Department Electricity Markets and Policy Group DOE Smart Grid Investment Grant Program: Dynamic Pricing & Consumer Behavior Studies Chuck.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Dynamic Pricing - Potential and Issues Joe Wharton and Ahmad Faruqui Kansas Corporation Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency March 25, 2008.
R&D 1 Demand Response and Pricing in France EDFs experience New regulation Main goals 10/11 th April 2007.
Copyright © 2009 The Brattle Group, Inc. Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
January 20, 2004 California’s Statewide Pricing Pilot Larsh Johnson – President and Chief Technical Officer, eMeter Sanjoy Chatterjee – Principal, Chatterjee.
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
SGCC Peer Connect: Time-of-Use Pricing May 7, 2013.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
California Public Utilities Commission Residential Rate Structure Rulemaking R Workshop Overview Time Variant Pricing (TVP) Workshop Gabe Petlin.
The ESKOM Pilot Testing and Findings of the Residential Time-of-Use Tariff (Homeflex) Project by Vashna Singh and Marcus Dekenah 17 October 2006.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
November 2001 CHRISTENSENASSOCIATES RTP as a Demand Response Program – How Much Load Response Can You Expect? Peak Load Management Alliance Fall Conference.
Developing Critical-Peak Pricing Tariffs with the PRISM Software Ahmad Faruqui May 30, 2007.
The Continuing Evolution of U.S. Electricity Markets
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Copyright © 2014 The Brattle Group, Inc. PRESENTED TO PRESENTED BY Seven FAQs about Time- Variant Pricing California Public Utilities Commission Ahmad.
Copyright © 2009 The Brattle Group, Inc. Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual.
BRINGING DYNAMIC PRICING TO THE MASS MARKET Ahmad Faruqui, Ph. D. NARUC Winter Meetings Washington, D.C. February 19, 2007.
Colorado Rural Electric Association Energy Innovations Summit Demand Response: Are Customers Ready to Change Their Ways? Confidential October 27, 2014.
Copyright © 2009 The Brattle Group, Inc. Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual.
Copyright © 2015 The Brattle Group, Inc. A global perspective on time-varying rates CAMPUT Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen’s.
Energate: Leaders in Consumer Demand Response ENERGATE: AN ONTARIO CASE STUDY A fully integrated 2.0 Smart Grid… with Ontario Consumers.
Innovative approach to DSM through Open Access Jayant Deo MD & CEO, Indian Energy Exchange
MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse Langston, OG&E Oct 20 th 2013.
Copyright © 2009 The Brattle Group, Inc. Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual.
SMART REGULATION FOR ENERGY SECTOR CHALLENGES. 2 Power Sector Challenges Decarbonisation Security of Supply Competitiveness Smart Regulation POWER SECTOR.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
HOW WILL AMI & DYNAMIC PRICING AFFECT LOW INCOME USERS? Ahmad Faruqui, Ph. D. Principal National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners New York,
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
CPUC Workshop on Best Practices & Lessons Learned in Time Variant Pricing TVP Load & Bill Impacts, Role of Technology & Operational Consideration Dr. Stephen.
Leading the Way in Electricity TM Tariff Programs & Services Customer Services Business Unit Overview of Demand Response At Southern California Edison.
EEI Energy Efficiency Initiative Eric Ackerman ( Senior Manager, Regulatory Policy April 23, 2007.
California Public Utilities Commission Residential Rate Structure Rulemaking R Status Update Low Income Oversight Board Meeting Gabe Petlin Analyst,
Kathleen King, Ph.D. Vice President SMART METERING WEST COAST 2007 CONFERENCE, Los Angeles, California August 21, 2007 The Importance of Demand Response.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
Copyright © 2015 The Brattle Group, Inc. Comments on the Straw Proposal On behalf of the California Water Association CPUC Workshop Balanced Rates Rulemaking.
The State of Demand Response in California Ahmad Faruqui, Ph.D. Principal June 13, 2007.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Smart Grid Value Proposition October 4, 2010 Lynda Ziegler.
2010 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting NASUCA 2010 Mid-Year Conference Presented by: Lee Smith Senior Economist and Managing Consultant Presented to: June ,
Rate Policy Discussion Presentation to Review Panel November 1, 2013.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
POSITIVE ENERGY TOGETHER ® Industry Trends Discussion MEC Conference San Antonio Texas, October 19 th, 2009 Jesse B. Langston.
1 Proposed Policies to Increase the level of Demand Response Energy Action Plan Update April 24 th, 2006, Sacramento, CA Mike Messenger, CEC.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
Tariff Structure Statements – Energex and Ergon Energy AER public forum.
Powering a Reliable and Sustainable Energy Future for Ontario Bruce Campbell, President and CEO, IESO March 3, 2016.
1 BGE Smart Energy Pricing Program: Update to Maryland Public Service Commission April 23, 2008 Wayne Harbaugh VP – Pricing & Regulatory Services.
Republic of the Union of Myanmar Electricity Sector Financial and Regulatory Issues 18 May 2016 by Myanmar Energy Team The World Bank.
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
Demand Analysis Working Group Ahmad Faruqui , Ph. D. Principal
Mass Market Demand Solutions in PJM
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Impact of Dynamic Pricing on AMR
Christensen Associates
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Retail Rate Design & Administration
Maryland’s Grid Modernization Experience
DC State Community Solar Policy Trends National Conference of State Legislatures Webinar June 7, 2018 Autumn Proudlove Senior Manager of Policy Research.
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2013 The Brattle Group, Inc. PRESENTED TO PRESENTED BY The Principles and Practices of Time-Variant Pricing California Public Utilities Commission Ahmad Faruqui, Ph.D. July 30, 2014

San Francisco, California | brattle.com1 The CPUC has enunciated the following principles for optimal rate design 1) Low-income and medical baseline customers should have access to enough electricity to ensure basic needs (such as health and comfort) are met at an affordable cost 2) Rates should be based on marginal cost 3) Rates should be based on cost-causation principles 4) Rates should encourage conservation and energy efficiency 5) Rates should encourage reduction of both coincident and non-coincident peak demand 6) Rates should be stable and understandable and provide customer choice

San Francisco, California | brattle.com2 The CPUC rate design principles (concluded) 7) Rates should generally avoid cross-subsidies, unless the cross- subsidies appropriately support explicit state policy goals 8) Incentives should be explicit and transparent 9) Rates should encourage economically efficient decision making 10) Transitions to new rate structures should emphasize customer education and outreach that enhances customer understanding and acceptance of new rates, and minimizes and appropriately considers the bill impacts associated with such transitions

San Francisco, California | brattle.com3 These 10 principles map nicely into the 3 principles that guide the practice of TVP Economic Efficiency (2, 3, 4, 5 and 9) ▀ TVP rates send cost-based price signals to consumers, leading to efficient use of capacity, during off-peak, on-peak and critical-peak hours Equity (1, 7 and 8) ▀ TVP reduces cross-subsidies between customers since customers who drive investments in peaking capacity pay for it Gradualism (6, 10) ▀ TVP can accomplish this if the public is educated in advance of the rollout, if the rollout comes with bill protection that is phased out over time, and if a flat rate choice is included in the package

San Francisco, California | brattle.com4 TVP is being widely practiced across the globe Arizona ▀ Over two decades, APS has enrolled 51% of its customers on an opt-in TOU rate and the SRP has enrolled about 30% of its customers on an opt-in TOU rate ▀ SRP has show that the TOU rate has yielded a significant reduction in system peak demand ▀ Both utilities offer rate choices to customers as they sign up for service ▀ In both cases, the TOU rate appeals to large consumers who avoid the upper tier of an inclining block rate by going with TOU Illinois ▀ Both Ameren and ComEd have enrolled about 25,000 customers on RTP in Illinois and are planning to roll-out Flat+PTR

San Francisco, California | brattle.com5 TVP in the US (continued) Massachusetts ▀ The DPU has issued a “straw” proposal that calls for default CPP+TOU pricing; customers could opt instead for a Flat+PTR ▀ An order is expected before year-end Mid-Atlantic Region ▀ BGE and PHI are rolling out Flat+PTR to some 2 million customers in Delaware and Maryland ▀ PJM is allowing price-responsive demand to be bid into its multi- state capacity markets, as AMI and dynamic pricing are rolled out in its footprint of 60 million customers ▀ Pepco has proposed Flat+PTR in the District of Columbia

San Francisco, California | brattle.com6 TVP in the US (concluded) Oklahoma ▀ In two years, OG&E has 81,000 customers enrolled on variable peak pricing (VPP) and/or TOU pricing and the goal is to reach 20 percent of customers over a three-year period ▀ Smart thermostats are installed by OG&E to customers who sign up for these rates ▀ In 2012, OG&E’s VPP and TOU pricing programs cut peak demand by 135 MW ▀ The program is part of a portfolio of programs designed to eliminate the need for a 600 MW coal plant

San Francisco, California | brattle.com7 TVP (for distribution networks) in Australia The regulatory scene ▀ The Productivity Commission has shown that TVP would lower costs for all customers ▀ The Australia Energy Market Commission recommended that TVP should be made mandatory for large customers, optional for vulnerable customers and default for everyone else ▀ Next month, the Australian Energy Regulator’s annual conference features two sessions on TVP The businesses ▀ AusGrid (Sydney) has enrolled some 20 percent of its residential customers on TOU rates ▀ Distribution network service providers in Queensland and Victoria have completed pilots with TVP

San Francisco, California | brattle.com8 TVP in Canada The province of Ontario has deployed AMI to 4.5 million households and small businesses ▀ The regulated retail rate plan replaced a two-tier inclining block rate with a TOU rate with on peak, intermediate and off-peak periods ▀ About 90% of residential customers have chosen to receive service on the TOU rate plan and about 10% have chosen flat rates being offered by retailers The Ontario Power Authority has shown that TOU rates lowered peak demand in the first year ▀ Analysis is underway on the second-year results

San Francisco, California | brattle.com9 TVP in Europe A couple of years ago, Italy rolled out AMI to all 29 million households along with default TOU pricing ▀ About 23 million residential and small-medium enterprises are on TOU pricing ▀ A recent analysis of Italy’s default TOU concluded that more than half of customers have shifted consumption patterns in the first year ▀ The overall customer savings were € 2.54 million in the first year France began rolling out its tempo tariff a couple of decades ago ▀ The tariff features on-peak and off-peak rates that vary across three types of days ▀ About a third of EDF’s customers are on that tariff

San Francisco, California | brattle.com10 TVP in Asia Japan has been testing smart technologies and pricing in four cities ▀ Dr. Koichiro Ito of Boston University has evaluated these projects and concluded that customers do respond to hourly marginal prices ▀ Ito found that the various CPP treatments reduced peak demand by 11% on average CLP Power in Hong Kong is running a two year pilot with PTR+TOU ▀ The first year results provided evidence of demand response

San Francisco, California | brattle.com11 Conclusions TVP can contribute to many of the optimal rate design principles set out by the CPUC TVP for residential and small business customers has been practiced widely across the globe Both opt-in and opt-out deployments have yielded meaningful results

San Francisco, California | brattle.com12 Presenter Information AHMAD FARUQUI, PH.D. Principal│ San Francisco Dr. Ahmad Faruqui is a Principal with The Brattle Group who specializes in analyses and strategy relating to the customer. He has helped design, monitor and evaluate energy efficiency investments for a wide range of electric and gas utilities and testified before a dozen state and provincial commissions and legislative bodies. He has also worked for the Alberta Utilities Commission, Edison Foundation, the Edison Electric Institute, the Electric Power Research Institute, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Ontario Energy Board and the World Bank. His work has been cited in publications such as The Economist, The New York Times, and USA Today, and he has appeared on Fox News and National Public Radio. The author, co-author or editor of four books and more than 150 articles, he holds a Ph.D. in economics from The University of California at Davis and B.A. and M.A. degrees in economics from The University of Karachi. The views expressed in this presentation are strictly those of the presenter(s) and do not necessarily state or reflect the views of The Brattle Group, Inc.