Quantum-limited measurements: One physicist’s crooked path from quantum optics to quantum information I.Introduction II.Squeezed states and optical interferometry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Advertisements

From Gravitational Wave Detectors to Completely Positive Maps and Back R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański 1, K. Banaszek 1, J. Kołodyński 1, M. Jarzyna 1, M. Guta.
Quantum limits in optical interferometry R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański 1, K. Banaszek 1, J. Kołodyński 1, M. Jarzyna 1, M. Guta 2, K. Macieszczak 1,2, R. Schnabel.
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
Quantum limits on estimating a waveform I.Introduction. What’s the problem? II.Standard quantum limit (SQL) for force detection. The right wrong story.
Quantum enhanced metrology R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański 1, K. Banaszek 1, U. Dorner 2, I. A. Walmsley 2, W. Wasilewski 1, B. Smith 2, J. Lundeen 2, M. Kacprowicz.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Universal Optical Operations in Quantum Information Processing Wei-Min Zhang ( Physics Dept, NCKU )
Complexity and Disorder at Ultra-Low Temperatures 30th Annual Conference of LANL Center for Nonlinear Studies SantaFe, 2010 June 25 Quantum metrology:
LIGO-G W Report on LIGO Science Run S4 Fred Raab On behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Shot noise in GW detectors G González. x Power (ASDC) bright dark /2 The dark fringe L+  L L-  L i  L  P=P 0 sin 2 (  t+k  l) = (P 0 /2) (1+sin.
Center for Quantum Information and Control Quantum control and feedback: A circuit-based perspective I.Is there a problem? II.Measurement-based and coherent.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
QUEST - Centre for Quantum Engineering and Space-Time Research Single mode squeezing for Interferometry beyond shot noise Bernd Lücke J. Peise, M. Scherer,
R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański 1, J. Kołodyński 1, M. Guta 2 1 Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University, Poland 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, University of.
Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entang lement I.Introduction II.Ramsey interferometry and cat states III.Quantum and classical resources IV.Quantum information.
Interferometer Topologies and Prepared States of Light – Quantum Noise and Squeezing Convenor: Roman Schnabel.
Quantum Interferometric Sensors 22 APR 09, NIST, Gaithersburg Jonathan P. Dowling Quantum Science & Technologies Group Hearne Institute for Theoretical.
Quantum computation: Why, what, and how I.Qubitology and quantum circuits II.Quantum algorithms III. Physical implementations Carlton M. Caves University.
Optomechanical Devices for Improving the Sensitivity of Gravitational Wave Detectors Chunnong Zhao for Australian International Gravitational wave Research.
Towards a Universal Count of Resources Used in a General Measurement Saikat Ghosh Department of Physics IIT- Kanpur.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Precision Interferometry Gregory Harry Massachusetts Institute of Technology - On Behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
Quantum limits on estimating a waveform I.What’s the problem? II.Quantum Cramér-Rao bound (QCRB) for classical force on a linear system Carlton M. Caves.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański 1, J. Kołodyński 1, K. Banaszek 1, M. Jarzyna 1, M. Guta 2 1 Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University, Poland 2 School of Mathematical.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Physics and Astronomy FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES Putting entanglement to work: Super-dense.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
LIGO-G R Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala PAC 12, MIT June 2002 Present status and future plans.
Using entanglement against noise in quantum metrology
LIGO-G D LIGO Laboratory1 Stoyan Nikolov LIGO-G D The LIGO project’s quest for gravitational waves Presenting LIGO to the students of.
Quantum limits on linear amplifiers I.What’s the problem? II.Quantum limits on noise in phase-preserving linear amplifiers. The whole story III.Completely.
How I became a quantum optician Moo Stack and the Villians of Ure Eshaness, Shetland Carlton M. Caves IYL Celebration, UNM, September 25, 2015 And the.
International Gravitational Wave Network 11/9/2008 Building an Stefan Ballmer, for the LIGO / VIRGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO G
From Quantum metrological precision bounds to Quantum computation speed-up limits R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański 1, J. Kołodyński 1, M. Jarzyna 1, K. Banaszek.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Quantum metrology: dynamics vs. entanglement
Why we should think of quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities Carlton M. Caves C. M. Caves, C. A. Fuchs, R. Schack, “Subjective probability and.
October 1, 2007 Quantum Optical Sensing: Single Mode, Multi-Mode, and Continuous Time Jeffrey H. Shapiro.
LOGO Gravitational Waves I.S.Jang Introduction Contents ii. Waves in general relativity iii. Gravitational wave detectors.
Sense and sensitivity:,,robust’’ quantum phase estimation R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański 1, K. Banaszek 1, U. Dorner 2, I. A. Walmsley 2, W. Wasilewski 1, B.
Metrology and integrated optics Geoff Pryde Griffith University.
MICRA: status report Exploration of atom-surface forces on a micrometric scale via high sensitivity force measurements with ultracold quantum gases. Objectives:
Role of entanglement in extracting information on quantum processes
Sub-Planck Structure and Weak Measurement
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Characterization of Advanced LIGO Core Optics
Quantum-limited measurements:
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
the illusion of the Heisenberg scaling
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
Detector of “Schrödinger’s Cat” States of Light
Quantum-limited measurements:
Enhancing the astrophysical reach of LIGO with squeezed light
Nergis Mavalvala (age 47)
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
e2e Simulation Techniques in Quantum Microscopy and GW Interferometry
Quantum Optics and Macroscopic Quantum Measurement
Squeezed states in GW interferometers
Controlled Splitting of an Atomic Wavepacket
Advanced LIGO A Quantum Limited Interferometer
The Grand Unified Theory of Quantum Metrology
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory
The Grand Unified Theory of Quantum Metrology
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Advanced Optical Sensing
Quantum metrology: An information-theoretic perspective
Presentation transcript:

Quantum-limited measurements: One physicist’s crooked path from quantum optics to quantum information I.Introduction II.Squeezed states and optical interferometry III.Ramsey interferometry and cat states IV.Quantum information perspective V.Beyond the Heisenberg limit Carlton M. Caves Center for Quantum Information and Control, University of New Mexico School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland Collaborators: E. Bagan, S. Boixo, A. Datta, S. Flammia, M. J. Davis, JM Geremia, G. J. Milburn, A Shaji, A. Tacla, M. J. Woolley. Center for Quantum Information and Control

I. Introduction View from Cape Hauy Tasman Peninsula Tasmania

A new way of thinking Quantum information science Computer science Computational complexity depends on physical law. Old physics Quantum mechanics as nag. The uncertainty principle restricts what can be done. New physics Quantum mechanics as liberator. What can be accomplished with quantum systems that can’t be done in a classical world? Explore what can be done with quantum systems, instead of being satisfied with what Nature hands us. Quantum engineering

Metrology Taking the measure of things The heart of physics Old physics Quantum mechanics as nag. The uncertainty principle restricts what can be done. New physics Quantum mechanics as liberator. Explore what can be done with quantum systems, instead of being satisfied with what Nature hands us. Quantum engineering Old conflict in new guise

II. Squeezed states and optical interferometry Oljeto Wash Southern Utah

(Absurdly) high-precision interferometry Laser Interferometer Gravitational Observatory (LIGO) Hanford, Washington Livingston, Louisiana 4 km The LIGO Collaboration, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, (2009).

Laser Interferometer Gravitational Observatory (LIGO) Hanford, Washington Livingston, Louisiana 4 km Initial LIGO High-power, Fabry- Perot-cavity (multipass), power- recycled interferometers (Absurdly) high-precision interferometry

Laser Interferometer Gravitational Observatory (LIGO) Hanford, Washington Livingston, Louisiana 4 km Advanced LIGO High-power, Fabry- Perot-cavity (multipass), power- and signal-recycled, squeezed-light interferometers (Absurdly) high-precision interferometry

Mach-Zender interferometer C. M. Caves, PRD 23, 1693 (1981).

Squeezed states of light

G. Breitenbach, S. Schiller, and J. Mlynek, Nature 387, 471 (1997). Groups at ANU, Hannover, and Tokyo continue to push for greater squeezing at audio frequencies for use in Advanced LIGO, VIRGO, and GEO. Squeezed states of light Squeezing by a factor of about 3.5

Quantum limits on interferometric phase measurements Quantum Noise Limit (Shot-Noise Limit) Heisenberg Limit As much power in the squeezed light as in the main beam

III. Ramsey interferometry and cat states Truchas from East Pecos Baldy Sangre de Cristo Range Northern New Mexico

Ramsey interferometry N independent “atoms” Frequency measurement Time measurement Clock synchronization

Cat-state Ramsey interferometry J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, D. J. Wineland, and D. J. Heinzen, Phys. Rev. A 54, R4649 (1996). Fringe pattern with period 2π/N N cat-state atoms

Optical interferometryRamsey interferometry Quantum Noise Limit (Shot-Noise Limit) Heisenberg Limit Something’s going on here.

Optical interferometryRamsey interferometry Entanglement? Between arms Between atoms (wave entanglement) (particle entanglement) Between photons Between arms (particle entanglement) (wave entanglement)

IV. Quantum information perspective Cable Beach Western Australia

Heisenberg limit Quantum information version of interferometry Quantum noise limit cat state N = 3 Fringe pattern with period 2π/N Quantum circuits

Cat-state interferometer Single- parameter estimation State preparation Measurement

Heisenberg limit S. L. Braunstein, C. M. Caves, and G. J. Milburn, Ann. Phys. 247, 135 (1996). V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, PRL 96, (2006). Generalized uncertainty principle Cramér-Rao bound Separable inputs

Achieving the Heisenberg limit cat state

Is it entanglement? It’s the entanglement, stupid. But what about? We need a generalized notion of entanglement /resources that includes information about the physical situation, particularly the relevant Hamiltonian.

V. Beyond the Heisenberg limit Echidna Gorge Bungle Bungle Range Western Australia

Beyond the Heisenberg limit The purpose of theorems in physics is to lay out the assumptions clearly so one can discover which assumptions have to be violated.

Improving the scaling with N S. Boixo, S. T. Flammia, C. M. Caves, and JM Geremia, PRL 98, (2007). Metrologically relevant k-body coupling Cat state does the job. Nonlinear Ramsey interferometry

Improving the scaling with N without entanglement S. Boixo, A. Datta, S. T. Flammia, A. Shaji, E. Bagan, and C. M. Caves, PRA 77, (2008). Product input Product measurement

Improving the scaling with N without entanglement. Two-body couplings S. Boixo, A. Datta, S. T. Flammia, A. Shaji, E. Bagan, and C. M. Caves, PRA 77, (2008); M. J. Woolley, G. J. Milburn, and C. M. Caves, arXiv: [quant-ph].

Improving the scaling with N without entanglement. Two-body couplings S. Boixo, A. Datta, M. J. Davis, S. T. Flammia, A. Shaji, and C. M. Caves, PRL 101, (2008). Super-Heisenberg scaling from nonlinear dynamics, without any particle entanglement

Bungle Bungle Range Western Australia

Pecos Wilderness Sangre de Cristo Range Northern New Mexico Appendix. Two-component BECs

Two-component BECs S. Boixo, A. Datta, M. J. Davis, S. T. Flammia, A. Shaji, and C. M. Caves, PRL 101, (2008).

Two-component BECs J. E. Williams, PhD dissertation, University of Colorado, 1999.

Let’s start over. Two-component BECs Renormalization of scattering strength

Two-component BECs Integrated vs. position-dependent phaseRenormalization of scattering strength

? Perhaps ? With hard, low-dimensional trap Two-component BECs for quantum metrology Losses ? Counting errors ? Measuring a metrologically relevant parameter ? Experiment in H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop’s group at University of Queensland S. Boixo, A. Datta, M. J. Davis, A. Shaji, A. B. Tacla, and C. M. Caves, “Quantum-limited meterology and Bose-Einstein condensates,” PRA 80, (2009).

San Juan River canyons Southern Utah Appendix. Quantum and classical resources

Making quantum limits relevant The serial resource, T, and the parallel resource, N, are equivalent and interchangeable, mathematically. The serial resource, T, and the parallel resource, N, are not equivalent and not interchangeable, physically. Information science perspective Platform independence Physics perspective Distinctions between different physical systems

Making quantum limits relevant The serial resource, T, and the parallel resource, N, are equivalent and interchangeable, mathematically. The serial resource, T, and the parallel resource, N, are not equivalent and not interchangeable, physically. Information science perspective Platform independence Physics perspective Distinctions between different physical systems

Making quantum limits relevant. One metrology story A. Shaji and C. M. Caves, PRA 76, (2007).

Using quantum circuit diagrams Cat-state interferometer C. M. Caves and A. Shaji, “Quantum-circuit guide to optical and atomic interferometry,'' Opt. Comm., to be published, arXiv: [quant-ph].