HIGH SPEED RAIL CORRIDOR PUNE- MUMBAI- AHMEDABAD Pre-Feasibility Study Presented by: P. K. Gupta, Group General Manager, T&S Pradeep Tyagi, SDGM,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tackling the Environmental Impact of Transport Presentation by David Jamieson MP to the Institute for Public Policy Research Wednesday 15th October 2003.
Advertisements

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANDARD GAUGE IN THE MEDITERRANEAN CORRIDOR. Cartagena- French border.
Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge
Securing a safe, sustainable rail network Michael Roberts Chief Executive.
Indian Railways Update 10 th IHHA Conference 2013 New Delhi.
IRSC DUBLIN OCTOBER 2006 vue n°1 INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY SAFETY CONFERENCE Dublin 23 – 25 october 2006 CIRCULATION OF TRAM-TRAINS ON THE FRENCH NATIONAL.
Jean Carlos Pejo - Chairman ALAF Brazil October 23, 2014
Opportunities for Public-Private Partnerships in Railways 20 th May 2006.
SACN PT Sustainability GAUTRAIN 1 SACN Seminar on sustainable PT SUSTAINABLE MEGA PUBLIC TRANSPORT PROJECTS Rapid rail project in Gauteng Romano Del Mistro.
Workshop on Infrastructures Key research to solve mobility barriers Claude Dumoulin Bouygues Travaux Publics (France) reFINE core team Industrial Technologies.
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT When to invest in High Speed Rail Links and Networks Chris Nash Research Professor
Cross-Border Infrastructure: A Toolkit Mass Transit: Comparison of Bangkok & Kuala Lumpur Session on Private Sector Participation Yong Hee Kong PPP Resource.
QUICKER THAN ROAD, CHEAPER THAN AIR, A PROMISING COOPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS AND AIRLINES WORD FROM KLAUS EBELING – Secretary general of European Intermodal.
Express Rail Link The First Operational TETRA System for Rail in the World Dr. Aminuddin Adnan CEO Express Rail Link Sdn Bhd 18 May st Malaysian.
Siemens.com/answersunrestricted © Siemens AG 2013 All rights reserved. SIHARBOR: The shore connection System for berthed ships Systems and Solutions for.
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT When is high speed rail economically justified? Chris Nash
BETTER AIR QUALITY 2004 SPECIFIC TRANSPORT MEASURES TO REDUCE EMISSIONS IN HYDERABAD, INDIA Yash Sachdeva, RITES Ltd Viresh Goel, RITES Ltd D.S.Chari,
Managing Director/CEO
Background Research on High Speed Rail Kumar and Wencan.
Workshop on Infrastructures Sustainable Infrastructure for Efficient Mobility: the Key Challenges Luc Bourdeau ECTP Secretary General Industrial Technologies.
Prof Andrew McNaughton HS2 Ltd Technical Director 1 Developing HS2.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
EurailSpeed Milano 2005 Siemens Transportation Systems The Transrapid Maglev System a necessity for the growing mobility market a necessity for trackbound.
June 2013 Building the New Silk Road: EBRD transport infrastructure investments in Central Asia Askar Namazbayev, Infrastructure Russia and Central Asia.
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION. LEVEL CROSSINGS ON GEORGIAN RAILWAY TRACECA ROUTE AUTOMATION OF 39 LEVEL CROSSINGS ON THE MAIN LINE FROM AZERBADJAN BORDER.
INDIA’S INFRASTRUCTURE – Issues and Prospects PRESENTATION BY SS Kohli Chairman & Managing Director INDIA INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE COMPANY LTD NEW DELHI.
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION
Sustainable travel for Limerick and Area By Professor Lewis Lesley.
1 THE INFRASTRUCTURE OPPORTUNITY : A MACRO PERSPECTIVE Rajiv B. Lall Managing Director & CEO Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited JAPAN MAY.
INDIAN RAILWAYS INSTITUTE OF CIVIL ENGINEERING. Introduction of high speed corridors on IR– impact & challenges before us.
Possible Routes. The Salmon Weir Crossing – A new bridge A new Bridge The Salmon Weir Crossing A new Bridge.
INDIAN RAILWAY VISION CAPACITY CREATION BY More than 30,000 kms of route would be double / multiple lines (compare to around 18,000 kms today).
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
REDUCING THE NEED TO TRAVEL David Banister The Bartlett School of Planning University College London Mobile Network Seminar – 16 th May 2003.
February 2014 Bus Rapid Transit for Chennai. Chennai city bus service GOOD PATRONAGE  50 lakh daily passenger trips  3650 buses  Maximum flow of.
Aarya Trans Solution Company Profile.
Environmental Impacts Socio-Economic Environment Land Use Transportation System Design & Construction of Facilities Operations & Maintenance Activities.
A TURN AROUND STORY LEADING CHANGE ANDTRANSFORMATION INDIAN RAILWAYS Presentation for Japan-India PPP Seminar, New Delhi (organized by NCAER) 14 th February,
HŽ Passenger Transport – overviewBUCHAREST HŽ PASSENGER TRANSPORT.
9618/PLT/EUR/318-05Page 1 Edition 1 High Speed Regional Services High Speed Regional Services: a new market? by Jean-Pierre ORSI, director Europe SYSTRA.
European Commission 1 Directorate General for Energy and Transport Discussion for a co-ordinated trans-European Deployment Plan for ERTMS 15 June 2004.
TRACECA CONSTRUCTION OF INTERMODAL TERMINAL IN THE REGION OF RUSE CITY BULGARIA Infrastructure Working Group Kiev, 11 May 2011.
International Logistics Centres for Western NIS and the Caucasus Georgia: Areas in the vicinity of Tbilisi airport Ministry of Economy and Sustainable.
Sustainable public transport – electric transport development project for the capital.
DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR – CONSTRUCTION & MAINTENANCE PRACTICES
Evan Tony - Thomas Landi - Peter Son - Team “Freight- ened”
Summary and Wrap-up Discussion 8 July 2015
Social cost benefit analysis of Delhi Metro
The case studies of Mexico City and Belo Horizonte Carbon Expo Cologne, 28 May 2010.
INDIAN RAILWAYS  I. Rly. Vision for Next 10 Years  Opportunities for International Partners A Presentation by – Mr. Arbind Kumar Director (Projects)
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS Review of the East Africa Railways Master Plan Peter Kieran CPCS Transcom Limited March 11, 2010.
TRAFFIC STUDY AND FORECASTING SHRI DEVI POLYTECHINIC
Inquiry on High-Speed Railways High-Speed Railways – social infrastructure for stronger development and competitiveness SOU 2009:74.
RAIL BALTICA RIGA STATION – ASPIRATION FOR THE FUTURE
Challenges and solutions for transport in Norway
Investigation of Road Project By S.N. Nanaware
HS2 - What tests should be applied in evaluating the final business case ? Chris Nash.
SIHARBOR: The shore connection System for berthed ships
Updated Design of Detector Hall
The Gotthard Base Tunnel
Jean Carlos Pejo - Chairman ALAF Brazil October 23, 2014
Investigation of Road Project
Maintenance Strategies for Turnouts
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Chisinau-Gurgiulesti Motorway, Construction of Comrat Bypass
LOGISTICS INDUSTRY IN INDIA.
Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Life Cycle Costing.
Presentation transcript:

HIGH SPEED RAIL CORRIDOR PUNE- MUMBAI- AHMEDABAD Pre-Feasibility Study Presented by: P. K. Gupta, Group General Manager, T&S Pradeep Tyagi, SDGM, T&S RITES LTD.

CONTENTS Background & Salient Features Traffic Forecast Concept Design Alignment Station Locations Costs Estimates Environment Studies Financial and Socio Economic analysis Conclusion

Study for PUNE- MUMBAI- AHMEDABAD by RITES, SYSTRA & ITALFER

Salient Features States: Maharashtra/Dadra-Nagar-Haveli (UT)/ Gujarat Length: 640 Km double track Maharashtra: 328 Km Dadra-Nagar-Haveli: (UT) 5.5 Km Gujarat: 306.5 Km Length on Bank: 549 Km Length on Bridges: 72 Km Length in Tunnels: 19 Km No of Road Over Bridges: 130 Nos Quantity of Earthwork 76 millions cu.m Tunnel between Lonavala and Karjat 18.3 Km Mumbai HSR Trans Harbour Link bridge: 17.2 Km 3 Main Terminal Stations at Mumbai, Pune and Ahmedabad 3 Intermediate Stations at Navi Mumbai Airport, Surat and Vadodara. 2 Depots : Main Depot Geratpur (Ahmedabad) /Auxiliary Depot (Pune)

TRAFFIC FORECAST PUNE-MUMBAI-AHMEDABAD 26.6 Million passengers 24.0 passengers – year 2021 PUNE-MUMBAI-AHMEDABAD 26.6 Million passengers per year in 2021 104 Million passengers per year in 2041

TRAVEL TIMES Substantially shorter running times AHMEDABAD VADODARA SURAT Substantially shorter running times Saving of 2/3 compared to existing running times PUNE

Standards of Construction Gauge : 1676mm (Broad Gauge) Speed : 350km/hr Ruling Gradient : 3% Radius of Curvature : 6425m Axle Load : 17 ton Track structure : Ballastless Interoprability : Full with existing railway network

Signalling & Telecommunication ETCS Level 2 with GSMR Telecommunications: GSMR Operation Control Centre ( OCC) One single OCC in Mumbai including Train Traffic Control and Sub-Stations Control

OVERHEAD CATENARY SYSTEM (O.C.S.) Power Supply 2 x 25 KV PS – 8 no Sub - Stations O.C.S. 2x25 KV Either French, German / Chinese Technology 1 Messenger Bz 116mm² 1 Contact wire Cu Mg150mm² 1 Negative feeder Al Ac 288mm² 1 Aerial earth conductor Al Ac 93mm² Dropper cable Bz 12mm² Maximum span 63m Contact wire height 5.08m Catenary encumbrance 1.40m Maximum tension length 1400m Sub-station every 50 to 70 km 9 9

ROLLING STOCK 1676 mm gauge Rolling Stock 3300mm car body EMU Fleet size: 38 Trains sets in 2021 (Investment cost Rs 6783 Cr)

ALIGNMENT Alignment is generally away but within 13 km of existing track Alignment closer to existing track near major cities No Level crossing 2 m high boundary wall on both sides Viaducts in urban areas along existing track Minimum disturbances to existing infrastructures and private properties Intermediate stations in suburbs of the cities to avoid costly works to reach city centres which do not provide sufficient traffic.

Section Definition Entire route divided in 3 sections Mumbai-Pune Section (Shedung to Pune) Mumbai Outer (Shedung to Virar) Mumbai-Ahmedabad (Virar to Ahmedabad) Mumbai-Ahmedabad Section Mumbai Outer Area Mumbai-Pune Section Mumbai Outer Area Mumbai-Pune Section 12 12

15.09 (6.78 along existing track) Mumbai-Pune Section Item Details Total length in km 96.5 No. of tunnels 1 Length of tunnels (km) 18.3 No. of viaducts 1 (35m deep) Length of viaducts (km) 15.09 (6.78 along existing track) Relocation of houses/properties (km along alignment) 10 Radius of sharpest curve (m) 6425 Speed restriction No speed restriction 13 13

Mumbai Outer Area Item Details Total length in km 83.75 No. of tunnels 1 Length of tunnels (km) 0.785 No. of viaducts Length of viaducts (km) 7.83 Relocation of houses/properties (km along alignment) 1.25 Radius of sharpest curve (m) 5556 Speed restriction At 1 place 14 14

Mumbai-Ahmedabad Section Item Details Total length in km 423 No. of tunnels NIL Length of tunnels (km) No. of viaducts 8 Length of viaducts (km) 7.88 (2.2 along existing track) Relocation of houses/properties (km along alignment) 6 Radius of sharpest curve (m) 5000 Speed restriction At 1 place 15 15

Mumbai-Pune Section (Khandala Tunnel) Alt. MP-1 Alt. MP-3 Perspective view of Khandala Hills Alt. MP-2 Lonawala Ex. Railway Station Plan showing 3-alternatives 680m over burden 18.3 km long tunnel Longitudinal Profile along MP-1 18 18

SU-2 SU-2a SU-1

Mumbai Connection- options Description SU-1 SU-2 Part of SU2+SU2a Length (excluding Links) 32.85 24.5 21.68 Length in tunnels (km) NIL 2.425 Length on viaducts (km) 17.24 16.57 Relocation of houses/properties (km along alignment) 3 9.8 3.1 Owner ship of Land of proposed Station Port trust Indian Railway

CONNEXION TO MUMBAI

Mumbai-Ahmedabad Section (Surat) Existing Railway Line Alt. MA-1 Alt. MA-2 2 1 DFC Proposal 1 2 Surat HSR station Plan showing alternatives at Surat 25 25

Mumbai-Ahmedabad Section 2 1 Airport 4 Alt. MA-1a Alt. MA-2 Alt. MA-1 Existing Railway Line 3 Padra DFC Proposal Vadodara HSR station 4 Plan showing alternatives at Vadodara 26 26

Infrastructures Maintenance Maintenance Head Office in Navi Mumbai 3 main Track operational units 7 No track Maintenance Bases (80 kms interval) 2 Main Signalling/Telecom/OCS/PS Units 2 Depots for rolling stock : Main Depot Geratpur (Ahmedabad) /Auxiliary Depot (Pune) Approximately 330-340 staff

Cost Estimates 1 - INVESTMENT COST Construction – Rs. 49075 Cr Rolling Stock - Rs. 6783 Cr for 2021 2 - OPERATION COSTS – Rs. 205 Cr, in year 2021 3 - MAINTENANCE COSTS Rolling Stock - Rs. 145 Cr, in year 2021 Infrastructure - Rs. 254 Cr, in year 2021

Break up of Construction Cost Items Amount (Rs Cr) 1- Civils (including Land and Environment) 27,243 2- Station 890 3- Systemsk 12,327 4- Depots 523 5- Project Management/ Risks 8,092 TOTAL 49,075

Cost Breakup Depots Project Mgmt. Civil Systems Station 16 1 44 25 12 Land/ Environment Station 2

Environment Studies Does not encroach into wildlife sanctuaries and national parks Requires 2560 Ha land Agriculture – 1926 Ha (75%) Forest - 116 Ha (5%) Barren - 262 Ha (10%) Settlement - 51 Ha (2%) Water Body - 205 Ha (8%) Compensatory reforestation for 97,632 trees

Environment Studies (Contd..) Reduction in Air Pollution Carbon dioxide (CO2) - 257,300 Tonnes/Annum Carbon Mono oxide (CO) - 1,320 Tonnes / Annum Hydro Carbon (HC) - 154 Tonnes / Annum Nitrogen Oxide (NoX) - 354 Tonnes / Annum Particulate Matters (PM) - 24 Tonnes / Annum Noise Level at 15 m from centre line - 76.2 dBA (75/70 for industrial, 50/40 for silence zone) Vibration - 80-85 VdB (60-65) Environmental Cost INR 292.3 Crore

FARE Policy FARE in 2021 FARE evolution + 4% /year + 5% every 5 years 7Rs/Km (75% of the seats capacity) 7 Rs/Km + 30% for 1st Class 4.5 Rs/Km (25% of the seats capacity) 25% extra charge for short trips (< 150 Km) FARE evolution + 4% /year + 5% every 5 years (over and above)

LAND revenues Revenues 2021 2026 2031 2036 2040 Mumbai HSR station Estimated LAND REVENUE Figures (in Rs crore) Revenues 2021 2026 2031 2036 2040 Mumbai HSR station 267.4 561.1 805.6 1156.5 1544.5 Pune HSR station 36.6 76.8 110.2 158.2 211.3 Ahmedabad HSR station 63.4 133.0 190.9 274.1 366 Total Revenues 367.4 770.9 1106.7 1588.8 2121.8

Financial Analysis 11.42% Key Financial Indicators: Pre-Tax Project FIRR 11.42%

PPP Project Structuring The Project Structures proposed under PPP mode are: OPTION I - Design, Build, Finance, Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) of the entire project by a single Private Developer, who will be responsible for construction , operations and maintenance, thus there will be no interface risk and all revenue risk can be transferred to the private developer. OPTION II - Unbundling the project into different components, so as to make the project components attractive to private players from the perspective of affordability in terms of size and risk allocation.

PPP Project Structuring (Contd.) OPTION I DBFOT of the entire project by a single Developer key parameters Land provided by IR, VGF - 17% of Project Cost, Soft Loan - 20% of total Debt. Equity IRR – 16%

PPP Project Structuring (Contd.) OPTION II A. Build and Transfer of Civil Works VGF - 40 % of project Cost, Annual Grant - Rs. 2,700 crore, Soft Loan - 20% of total Debt. Equity IRR – 16% B. Build, Operate and Transfer of Systems, Stations, Trains and Depots VGF - 17% of Project Cost, Revenue share - 53% of fare box collections

Socio Economic Analysis . Pre-Tax Project EIRR 12.80%

Conclusion Project is justifed due to following reasons : Necessary to compete with road and air modes of transport Stops the decline of the railway on the long distance transport segment Provides an attractive transport offer in terms of reduced travel times and connectivity with the existing networks. Despite the high investment cost it is financially and economically sustainable

Thanks