Longitudinal Skull Strip A Product of the IDeA Lab Mario Ortega.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Week 2 Vocabulary Review Quiz Friday, September 3 rd.
Advertisements

VBM Voxel-based morphometry
Shapelets Correlated with Surface Normals Produce Surfaces Peter Kovesi School of Computer Science & Software Engineering The University of Western Australia.
Concepts of SPM data analysis Marieke Schölvinck.
QUESTION 1: name the a) study and b) orientation Answers: A) This is a CT scan of the head B) This is in the coronal plane * The dark areas are the paranasal.
Introduction to Functional and Anatomical Brain MRI Research Dr. Henk Cremers Dr. Sarah Keedy 1.
OverviewOverview Motion correction Smoothing kernel Spatial normalisation Standard template fMRI time-series Statistical Parametric Map General Linear.
Chapter 4: Image Enhancement
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Correlation 2 Computations, and the best fitting line.
Step 1: Load data we have 20 axial slices for the brain starting from the neck up to top of the head for each of three modalities: T1, T1C, T2.
Mr Barton’s Maths Notes
Viewbox 4 Tutorial How to create a Template Please view this tutorial as a Slide Show in PowerPoint, because it contains animations that will not appear.
Haskins fMRI Workshop Part I: Data Acquisition & Preprocessing.
Systems of Linear Equations
Face Recognition Using Neural Networks Presented By: Hadis Mohseni Leila Taghavi Atefeh Mirsafian.
Method Comparison A method comparison is done when: A lab is considering performing an assay they have not performed previously or Performing an assay.
Shear Forces & Bending Moments Shear & Moment Diagrams
Co-registration and Spatial Normalisation
Vectors and the Geometry of Space 9. Functions and Surfaces 9.6.
Preprocessing of FMRI Data fMRI Graduate Course October 23, 2002.
1 of 41 chapter: 12 >> Krugman/Wells ©2009  Worth Publishers Behind the Supply Curve: Inputs and Costs.
SLICER: Initial Experience at Dartmouth Tara McHugh, M.A. Robert Roth, Ph.D. Brain Imaging Laboratory Dartmouth Medical School / DHMC NA-MIC National Alliance.
Time Series Data Analysis - I Yaji Sripada. Dept. of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen2 In this lecture you learn What are Time Series? How to.
National Institute of Mental Health
Processing Lab 3 – Header issues and trace editing Bryce Hutchinson Objectives: Fixing elevation issues Define an LMO function Pick first breaks Kill traces.
< BackNext >PreviewMain Chapter 2 Data in Science Preview Section 1 Tools and Models in ScienceTools and Models in Science Section 2 Organizing Your DataOrganizing.
Rate of Change and Slope. A rate of change is a ratio that compares the amount of change in a dependent variable to the amount of change in an independent.
Statistical Parametric Mapping Lecture 11 - Chapter 13 Head motion and correction Textbook: Functional MRI an introduction to methods, Peter Jezzard, Paul.
Bryce Hutchinson & Sumit Verma
Power Supply Design. Power Supplies For most electronic devices it is necessary to provide a stable source of DC power. Batteries often serve this function.
Chapter 2 Data in Science. Section 1: Tools and Models.
MultiModality Registration Using Hilbert-Schmidt Estimators By: Srinivas Peddi Computer Integrated Surgery II April 6 th, 2001.
7 | Cost and Industry Structure. Fixed and Variable Costs Fixed costs are expenditures that do not change regardless of the level of production or factor.
What is the purposes of this slide? This slide is used to confirm the effects of applying the moving average method and showing the difference of choosing.
User Manual for Tmaptool – T1 ρ processing tool Guruprasad Krishnamoorthy Chetana Bayas Gargi Pednekar.
Kim HS Introduction considering that the amount of MRI data to analyze in present-day clinical trials is often on the order of hundreds or.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Higher sensitivity of the MR coils leads to MR coil designs which leave nearly.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic representation of the near-infrared (NIR) structured illumination instrument,
Assessment of data acquisition parameters, and analysis techniques for noise reduction in spinal cord fMRI data  R.L. Bosma, P.W. Stroman  Magnetic Resonance.
Mr Barton’s Maths Notes
Click a hyperlink or folder tab to view the corresponding slides.
Multimodal Integration: Registration
Systems of Linear Equations
Philips DTI Processing
Estimating PM2.5 using MODIS and GOES aerosol optical depth retrievals in IDEA Hai Zhang , Raymond M. Hoff1 , Shobha Kondragunta2.
Quantification of Tumor Burden in a Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Lung Cancer by Micro-CT and Automated Analysis  Kai H. Barck, Hani Bou-Reslan,
Uwe J Ilg, Stefan Schumann, Peter Thier  Neuron 
Signal, Noise, and Variation in Neural and Sensory-Motor Latency
Kevin Mann, Courtney L. Gallen, Thomas R. Clandinin  Current Biology 
Gina Rinetti-Vargas, Khanhky Phamluong, Dorit Ron, Kevin J. Bender 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Stretch reflex adaptation in elbow flexors during repeated passive movements in unilateral brain-injured patients  Brian D. Schmit, PhD, Julius P.A. Dewald,
Neural Mechanisms of Hierarchical Planning in a Virtual Subway Network
Perceptual Learning and Decision-Making in Human Medial Frontal Cortex
Nathan L. Hendel, Matthew Thomson, Wallace F. Marshall 
Sectional Anatomy Lesson 2 Topic 1 Cranium and Facial Bones
Zachary Frazier, Min Xu, Frank Alber  Structure 
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Michael S. Beauchamp, Kathryn E. Lee, James V. Haxby, Alex Martin 
Neural Mechanisms of Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff
Nathan L. Hendel, Matthew Thomson, Wallace F. Marshall 
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages (October 2014)
Christian Büchel, Jond Morris, Raymond J Dolan, Karl J Friston  Neuron 
Michael S. Beauchamp, Kathryn E. Lee, James V. Haxby, Alex Martin 
MultiModality Registration using Hilbert-Schmidt Estimators
Mr Barton’s Maths Notes
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2002)
Valerio Mante, Vincent Bonin, Matteo Carandini  Neuron 
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Presentation transcript:

Longitudinal Skull Strip A Product of the IDeA Lab Mario Ortega

The Olden Days… We have received over 3800 scans form the Framingham Project. All of these scans have been traced by trained analysts with a ICC’s (Intra- class Correlation Coefficient) of 0.95, from 2000 to present. The process of Hand-Tracing takes roughly 30 minutes to simply acquire a Filtered Total Cranial Volume (No RoI’s). Recently, a different approach was studied to reduce man-hours, and increase tracing accuracy, this approach we called Longitudinal Skull-Strip. LGS is comprised of several components that allow it to work more accurately and efficiently than a complete hand-traced image. The general idea is to use an existing hand-traced TCV, and use it to “cookie-cut” the later images. The Steps are 1. Loading images, 2. Slicealign 3. LincoregL3 (Linear Coregistration) 4. SVCleanup …all on one easy interface.

Longitudinal Skull Strip Process Steps 1. Loading images 2. Slicealign 3. LincoregL3 (Linear Coregistration) 4. SVCleanup …all in one easy to use interface.

Longitudinal Skull Strip Interface User Friendly interface Fast and easy to use, only Step 5 requires user visualization and minor cleanup of images.

SliceAlignment The DSE scan is a subtraction of the T2 (time2 relaxation) from the PD image (proton density). The problems this causes is excessive ghosting of the image if the patient moves between acquisitions. When the images are placed together, this causes a “wiggle” effect. The sliceAlign tool is used to remove this “wiggle” from pseudo-T1 images made from the PD-T2 difference. Framingham acquires DSE scans in the coronal plane, this would cause excessive translational movement in the X and Y direction, as well as some rotation if the individual tilts their head about the occipital bone.

Slice Alignment The effects of Slice Align can best be seen in the axial and sagittal plane. On the far left is the image before slicealign was implemented, the right image has been corrected. The result is that the DSE_COR image was fixed for excessive movement in the X and Y direction. This process is implemented on all images through Longitudinal Skull Strip.

Linear Alignment Linear Alignment aligns a pair of images together using up to 12 parameters. These are rotations, translations, scaling, and shears. For this longitudinal project however, we will not be using scaling and shear adjustments, because the individuals skull does not change over time.

Image Pre-Alignment These are unaligned, notice that the images do not lie in the same space. I have drawn three lines at the edge of the skull, to show how the acquisitions differ. LinCoreg will align the year 2000 scan individually to the 3 other dates. Year 2000 Year 2002Year 2004Year 2005

Linear Alignment results Every Pair of images is an aligned Time1 (year 2000), to the respective second year. Once the images are aligned, we use the alignment parameters to create a “cookie cutter” to cut out the brain of the second paired image. Brain Matter changes over time, but the total area in the cranial vault is constant, so the TCV’s should be near identical.

SVCLEANUP and FILTER When the Time1 TCV is stamped onto the TimeX (any future scan), there is usually a small amount of correction required on a few slices of the image. (shown at right) Is all of this work worth it? Time to trace 3 images is cut down by half. Accuracy?

Results 4 Longitudinal Scans, first analyzed by different analysts from 2000 to Below are the Segmented Brain Matter volumes. Notice the smooth decline of the Auto trace with the “wiggle” slice align correction. The most linear slope accurately depicts the loss of brain matter over time. In this case, LGStrip reduced the error of the different individuals who originally traced these images.

LGStrip versus Hand Tracing Above is a graph showing the Total Cranial Volume, Segmented Brain Matter Volume, and CSF Volume. In red are the numbers generated through LGstrip, by analyst MP, in black is the entirely manual traced version. The Linearity of the red TCV line suggests there was very little variability of volumes. The TCV volumes created through LGStrip only varied by 7 cc’s! ( ) These are the TCV volumes These are segmented Brain volumes These are the CSF volumes The volumes acquired through hand-tracing Are in BLACK, The volumes acquired through LGStrip are in Red.

LGStrip versus Hand (ex.2) Here is another example of a series dataset run through Longitudinal Skull Strip. The smooth linear appearance of the green curve has an accurate fit, this individual is possibly a normal individual, reflecting the stable brain volume shown. Manual tracing was longitudinally inconsistent as shown by the constant rise and fall of the blue TCV and CSF lines. These are the TCV volumes These are segmented Brain volumes These are the CSF volumes The volumes acquired through hand-tracing Are in blue-dashed, The volumes acquired through LGStrip are in Green.

Summary As seen through the graphs, the Longitudinal Skull Strip Process, is reducing the human error over time. It also cuts down on hand-tracing time. It is not limited to doing the same subject over 4 years… It can load up 5+ different patient DSE scans, and do them as pairs. LGStrip only works for longitudinal sets of images, and requires one accurate preliminary scan to use as a template. LGStrip will be implemented into the framingham analysis protocol in the next weeks. Work is in progress to also transport ROI’s across serial scans…