By: Adil Godiwalla, P.E. Houston Airport System www.fly2houston.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ODOT Structure Project Manager Seminar Concrete Decks
Advertisements

Beam Design Beam Design Civil Engineering and Architecture
1 Fundamentals and Application of Stress Ratio in Concrete Pavement Design Edward H. Guo Consultant April , 2012 FAA Working Group Meeting.
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT BEAM
FAA Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting, April Concrete Overlay Research Shelley Stoffels, D.E., P.E. Lin Yeh, PhD FAA Airport Pavement Working.
Dr. Wa'el M. Albawwab ECGD4228 Transportation Engineering II Summer 2008 Sat. 15:30-18:30 PM K115.
Chp12- Footings.
Design of Slabs-on-Grade
Reinforced Concrete Design-8
Advanced Flexure Design COMPOSITE BEAM THEORY SLIDES
Lecture 33 - Design of Two-Way Floor Slab System
Pavement Design Session Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Pavement Design CE 453 Lecture 28.
Reinforced Concrete Flexural Members
Materials used for pipes: Sewers are made from: 1- Concrete 2- Reinforced concrete 3- Vitrified clay 4- Asbestos cement 5- Cast iron (lined with cement).
Shear and Diagonal Tension
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
LRFD-Steel Design Dr. Ali Tayeh Second Semester
ONE-WAY SLAB. ONE-WAY SLAB Introduction A slab is structural element whose thickness is small compared to its own length and width. Slabs are usually.
Association of California Airports ACA Annual Conference Pavement Evaluation Pavement Maintenance/Management Plan (PMMP) September 11, 2014 Reinard W.
Chp.12 Cont. – Examples to design Footings
Section 3 design of post-tensioned components for flexure Developed by the pTI EDC-130 Education Committee lead author: trey Hamilton, University of.
Wall Form Design Example (Continued)
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
PCI 6th Edition Connection Design.
CHAPTER 7 TRANSVERSE SHEAR.
Structures and stress BaDI 1.
Increased load capacity of arch bridge using slab reinforced concrete T.G. Hughes & M. Miri Cardiff School of Engineering Arch 04, Barcelona, Nov ,
BEARING OR CRUSHING Bearing Stresses (Compression Perpendicular to the Grain) Allowable stresses for compression perpendicular to the grain are available.
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 14: Stresses in Beams
R/W Rehabilitation. Pavement Condition North 3000 feet North 8000 feet.
Jerry G. Rose, PE University of Kentucky Department of Civil Engineering REES 3: Module 3-D REES 2014.
EXAMPLE 9.3 – Part III PCI Bridge Design Manual
CRACK CONTROL IN CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS
Footings.
Adhesive bonding.
Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester
SHEAR IN BEAMS. SHEAR IN BEAMS Introduction Loads applied to beams produce bending moments, shearing forces, as shown, and in some cases torques. Beams.
SHEAR AND BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAMS IN HORIZONTAL BEAMS WITH
University of Palestine
STRUT & TIE MODELS (S-T-M)
Compression Component Design
Jennifer Soderstrom University of Washington
1 Differences Between BRASS and AASHTO Standard Spec Engines Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2011 Helena, Montana.
By Dr. Attaullah Shah Swedish College of Engineering and Technology Wah Cantt. Reinforced Concrete Design-4 Design of doubly reinforced beams.
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
STRUCTURES Outcome 3 Gary Plimer 2008 MUSSELBURGH GRAMMAR SCHOOL.
LRFD- Steel Design Dr. Ali I. Tayeh second Semester Dr. Ali I. Tayeh second Semester.
 2005 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd 7. Transverse Shear 1 CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Develop a method for finding the shear stress in a beam having a prismatic.
LTPP Lessons Learned: Kansas SPS-2 July 17, 2013 Abilene, KS Gabe Cimini Database Manager, LTPP NRSC.
An-Najah Nationa Unuversity Faculty Of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Nablus-Palestine Foundation Design of Multy story building Suprevisors:
LTPP Lessons Learned: Delaware SPS-2 Wednesday April 9, 2014 SPS-2 Tech Day, Dover, DE Gabe Cimini Project Manager, LTPP North Atlantic Regional Support.
6- Calculation of shear stress at composite interface: A)Under service load: Strain and stress distributions across composite beam cross- section, under.
Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement
Two loading Conditions
2010 FAA Airport Technology Transfer Conference Some Key Findings from NAPTF Testing of Unbonded PCC Overlays IPRF Project 04-02: Improved Overlay Design.
Beam Design Beams are designed to safely support the design loads.
Presented to: FAA Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting By: David R. Brill, P.E., Ph.D. Date: April 24, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Update on.
By Dr. Attaullah Shah Swedish College of Engineering and Technology Wah Cantt. Reinforced Concrete Design-6 Shear Design of Beams.
Prof. Shrikant M. Harle Asst prof. Dept of Civil Engg PRMCEAM
AR362 - Structural Systems In Architecture IV Lecture : Foundations
Dr Badorul Hisham Abu Bakar
Shear in Straight Members Shear Formula Shear Stresses in Beams
Plain & Reinforced Concrete-1 CE3601
Structural Design of Highway
Introduction to Pavement Design
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
Pavement Structural Analysis
Pavement Structural Analysis
Pavement Overlay Design
Presentation transcript:

By: Adil Godiwalla, P.E. Houston Airport System

The apron at Ellington Airport had settled about 9” to 12” due to the movement of the geological fault. The apron is about 40 years old and this happened in time period. Therefore, the apron had to be shut down in this vicinity as there was a deep and large hump in the apron. (about 6” to 12” in depth). Realizing that it is very complex and difficult to bridge across an actively moving geological fault, I used a unique and novel technique for pavements, namely, beam on elastic foundation technique.

This is an advanced technique used in Foundation Engineering. I had used it extensively in Nuclear Power Plant Design and therefore decided to use this technique for this complex issue where the geological fault was causing a settlement and pavement separation of about 12” depth in 25 years. The geological fault line was conspicusous and so I decided to demolish and reconstruct 120 foot (north- south) length of the apron and full width of about 1000 feet (east-west) of the apron.

The down throw side of the geological fault is the more treacherous side, so I selected 80 foot on the down throw side of the fault and 40 foot length on the up throw side of the fault. The computation worked out to 21” Reinforced Concrete pavement over 6” cement stabilized crushed limestone base over 6” lime stabilized subgrade. Due to the excessive stresses and strains in the concrete pavement, caused by the movement of the fault, I decided to put two layers of reinforcing steel, one near the bottom of the concrete pavement and one near the top surface of the concrete pavement. The pavement cross-section is shown in Figure No. 1

21” Reinforced Concrete Pavement 6” Cement Stabilized Crushed Limestone Base 6” Lime Stabilized Subgrade

The horizontal movement caused the neoprene joint sealants to be squooshed into liquid. Therefore, in about the year 2000, we replaced the neoprene joint sealants with Dow Corning silicone joint sealant, which has been performing well so far. The flexural strength of the concrete pavement was specified as 650 psi minimum in 28 days. The compressive strength of the cement stabilized crushed limestone base was specified as 650 psi in 7 days.

On December 16 th, 2009 a Non Destructive Test was performed on this pavement. The NDT results showed that the pavement was performing well even after 23 years. In addition, there are no cracks not distresses in the pavement even after 23 years. The Non Destructive Testing Results are summarized herein.

Fault Line Pavement Deflection Testing Results Structural Results Summaries of the structural properties are provided in the following table. The table shows the average, 15th percentile, and standard deviation for the layer modulus values and for the Impulse Stiffness Modulus (ISM). E values (or modulus values) are provided for the PCC, the CTB, and the sub-grade. The ISM provides an indication of the overall strength of the pavement system including the sub-grade. It is calculated by dividing the peak impulse load by the deflection measured under the load plate.

ISME1 pccE2 baseE4 subgrade (kips/in)(psi) Average10,54810,150,170761,26319,622 Standard Deviation8832,289,480171,7112, th Percentile9,8467,985,150598,88617,507 These values are indicative of a very stiff pavement structure. The structural properties compare favorably with pavement of similar thickness throughout the HAS. For example, Runway 8L-26R at IAH has a comparable overall stiffness with an average ISM of 11,440. Results indicate that the pavement section continues to perform very well from the standpoint of strength / structural capacity. Detailed results for each test point are available.

Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Results The subject pavement sections last received a detailed PCI survey in At that time, the feature PCI ranged from a low of 70 to a high of 83. Detailed distress results and projections from the 2001 PCI survey are available. All ramp pavement located over the fault line was above the minimum service level (MSL) when last inspected. The entire area was projected to exceed the 20 year design life, and features 7137 and 7139 were projected to remain above the MSL until Feature 7135 was projected to be at the MSL in 2010, but routine patching can extend the service life of this feature. We have performed this task of routine patching on this feature 7135 and this should extend the life of this segment significantly.