080820_v1DP TRAVEL MANAGEMENT - PROCESS ON THE GILA NATIONAL FOREST.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Travel Management Rule: Southwestern Region Implementation Travel Management: Designated Routes and Areas for Motor Vehicle Use ALL Trails Users Affected.
Advertisements

LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Restore McComas Meadows /Meadow Creek Watershed Project # Restore McComas Meadows/ Meadow Creek Watershed Project # Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries.
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Sources of Nonpoint Source Water Pollution in forestry and silviculture: - Timber harvesting - Roads - Wildfire - Recreation.
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Golf Course Construction Planning TRF 250 Golf/Sports Field Construction.
Project Law Enforcement Agreements Portland General Electric Tony Dentel.
Griffith Park Fire Draft Recovery Plan May 30, 2007 Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa Councilman Tom LaBonge, CD 4 General Manager Jon Kirk Mukri City of Los.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FORESTRY DIVISION (323)
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Brian Wolyniak Urban Forester Penn State Extension ORDINANCES TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE TREE POPULATIONS.
Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forest Canyon Lakes Ranger District
Relationship to E-Flows Riparian Areas Influences groundwater/surface water relationships Provides filters to improve water quality Provides habitat for.
Transportation Alternatives. MAP-21 & TAP MAP-21 requires the following with respect to the allocation & selection of projects: ◦TAP funds sub-allocated.
OHV Use on National Forest Lands. Background From 1982 to 2000, the number of people driving motor vehicles off road in the United States increased.
080829_v2DP1 Draft Proposal _v2DP2 Purpose of Workshops Solicit additional input Reconnect with those who provided input Identify if some important.
Components of a Long Term Implementation Plan Spring 2008.
Careers for Graduates of OSU ’ s Natural Resource Ecology and Management Department.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Other Environmental Issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Noise Endangered and Threatened Species Explosive/Flammable Hazards and Underground.
 To join the teleconference, dial , passcode #  To download handouts :  Click the Handouts button at the top of the screen, right.
Center for Watershed Protection USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State and Private Forestry How to estimate future forest cover in a watershed.
Travel Management Rule Implementation
Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative An Approach to Landscape Scale Conservation in Southwest Wyoming October 23, 2014.
Low Flow Analysis & Water Use Plan Science & Community Environmental Knowledge Fund Forum June 10, 2004 Barry Ortman Diversified Technical Services Dawson.
Session 131 A community profile provides a base for overlay analysis and for discussing a hazard’s impacts on a community.
Prioritizing Agricultural Lands for Riparian Buffer Placement in the Raritan Basin: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Model Project Partners: North.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Two Planning Processes.
Flintstone-Oldtown Planning Region Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Meeting June 23, 2010 Insert pictures.
The WLP must be consistent with these objectives 1.maintaining or enhancing an economically valuable supply of commercial timber from the woodlot licence.
TRAVEL MANAGEMENT PLAN Wallowa-Whitman National Forest March 2008 Nez Perce Tribe Update Nez Perce Tribe Update.
Land Use Single family uses - 30% of land Community Services - 13% Roads - 13% Multi- family use 8% Vacant 6% 2 Family use – 6% Parks – 5% Commercial –
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
Highway Location Study CE 453 Lecture 4 See also lab 2 and lab 4 instructions, and EIS lecture notes See also 04 DOT development process.doc Refs:
I-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project Tanya Lamb Urban Geography, GEOG 481 Description 15-mile stretch Hyak (MP 55.1) to Easton (MP 70.3) 2010 scheduled to.
INYO NATIONAL FOREST - TRAVEL ANALYSIS PROCESS Public Meeting – April 21, 2015.
1 C E T A S Purpose and Need Presentation Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
1 C E T A S Triage Presentation, Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Module 7, part A – Issues and Description.
1 Four Proposals from Oconee County. 2 We are all unique and have different experiences and perspectives. **** Opportunities And Challenges.
Marin Coastal Watersheds Permit Coordination Program Marin Resource Conservation District U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Sustainable Conservation.
  16 th Annual OSC Readiness Training Program Community Involvement Case Study – Standard Mine Gina Cristiano R8 Emergency Planning.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Resource Management Plan (RMP) Revision for the Las Vegas and Pahrump Field Offices Muddy Mountains.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service Brad Barber Project Manager for SCFA Texas Forest Service.
Atlin-Taku Land Use Plan Resource Chapters Update Presentation to Multiparty Workshop #6 Atlin Rec Centre, Nov 27-28, 2009.
Preparing a Woodlot Licence Plan A Joint Presentation of: Federation of BC Woodlot Associations Ministry of Forests Prepared by: A.J. Waters and Associates.
Welcome Opportunity to Learn – Public, Groups, Agencies and FS Patience Respect Ask.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
12 July 2010 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits Critical Environmental Areas Under SEQR What Do They Mean?
Lake Raleigh Wetland Creation Feasibility Study NC State Centennial Campus Melanie Carter, Jennifer Burdette, Amanda Jones.
The Endangered Species Act of 1973 Daniel Eidelson Period 3.
Metropolitan Planning Organization for Blair County (Altoona MSA) Regional Long Range Transportation Plan Draft Agency Coordination Meeting (ACM)
National Forest System Grazing Objectives 1.Manage range vegetation to protect basic soil and water resources, provide for ecological diversity, improve.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
Proposed Helicopter Pad By: Lesley Stein and Jordan Kittle.
The Fish and Game Commission has designated the states portion of the South Bay Salt Ponds an Ecological Reserve. Planning for the management of Ecological.
Restoration Under a Future Climate Understanding and managing climate change effects on federal lands Dr. Cynthia West, Director Office of Sustainability.
Monterey County Grading and Erosion Control Requirements and Enforcement Methods 1.
Land Protection. Conservation Restriction (CR) Voluntary legal agreement that protects land forever from being developed.
Hydrosphere Notes Part 9-Land Use.
Griffith Park Fire Draft Recovery Plan May 30, 2007
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
The Gila River Restoration at Apache Grove
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Presentation transcript:

080820_v1DP TRAVEL MANAGEMENT - PROCESS ON THE GILA NATIONAL FOREST

080820_v1DP What is the purpose of the Process?  To designate a system of roads, trails, and areas that will be open to motor vehicle use on the Gila NF

080820_v1DP What approach has the Gila taken?  A single, Forest-wide approach  This provides consistency: InternallyExternallyMaps

080820_v1DP Focus of the Gila’s Process  Analysis will be limited to existing roads and trails.  Only roads/trails shown on current FS map and those roads added by the public will be considered for possible designation.

080820_v1DP  All motorized vehicle types will be considered for use on roads (e.g. full size vehicles, SUV’s, ATV’s, motorcycles, etc.)  Trails designated for motorized use will be limited to use by: –Motor vehicles less than 50” or to single track (motorcycle) use  Seasonal restrictions may be considered on a case by case basis

080820_v1DP  Road closures / decommissioning of non-designated roads may be considered.  New road/trail construction requests may be considered on a case by case basis or analyzed in the future under a separate NEPA process.  Non-motorized types of uses will not be considered at this time

080820_v1DP Route Designation

080820_v1DP Routes were assessed using:  Resource Concerns or “Coarse Filter”  Public Input  Fine Filter

080820_v1DP Resource Concerns  The Forest developed a “coarse filter” –A GIS model that prioritized roads for field verification based on input by resource specialists. Inputs included:  NMED 303(d) list of Impaired Surface Waters  ESA aquatic and terrestrial species; critical habitat; or habitat specified in recovery plans  NMED identified public (community) water supply source  Large drainages that flow into any of the previous 3 points  Perennial channels with non-listed fish species

080820_v1DP Resource Concerns (cont.)  Maps and tables have been developed for: –Road densities by 5 th and 6 th code watersheds –Road density by section in relationship to wildlife species and habitat including Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive

080820_v1DP Public Input  From November 2005 into 2007 the Districts had: –Met with all 4 County Commissioners –Held 46 public meetings / open houses with over 900 attendees –Met with over 380 individuals including range permittees, landowner, outfitter guides, etc. –Received hundreds of route specific information.

080820_v1DP Other Agencies  Worked with other agencies: –A-S National Forest –US Fish and Wildlife Service –New Mexico Department Game and Fish –State Historic Preservation Office

080820_v1DP Fine Filter  Public input  Priority 1&2 roads (coarse filter)  LRMP Standards and Guides  Escape routes / access to safety zones  Current road status  Rights of Ways (granted / acquired)  Permitted uses (range, utilities)  Current recreation uses & opportunities

080820_v1DP Fine Filter (cont.)  Current erosion processes  Steep slopes / sensitive soils  Cultural resources  TES habitat & other wildlife resources  Road densities (Coarse filter)  Relation to stream channels  Road overlap trail (e.g. CDT)  Parallel or duplicate (goes to same location) routes  Road position on slope

080820_v1DP Motorized Dispersed Camping

080820_v1DP Locations for Motorized Dispersed Camping was assessed using:  Public Input  Criteria Filter

080820_v1DP Criteria  Proximity to Private Land  Fire hazards –Fuels conditions –Vegetation type –Prevailing wind direction  Threatened, Endangered, & Sensitive species habitat  Riparian values  Relation to stream channels

080820_v1DP Criteria (cont.)  Steep slopes  Sensitive soils  Known sensitive cultural resource sites  Maintenance level of road  Speed / traffic levels  Public safety  Current dispersed use pattern  Road jurisdiction