WHAT DOES QUEBEC WANT? November 13, 2001. Issues... federalism what level of autonomy should Quebec have? asymmetrical federalism –should Quebec have.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
French-English Relations in Canada A clash of paradigms.
Advertisements

Visual Timeline English and French Canadian Relations.
French English Relations Tuesday January 11 th, 2011.
C ONSTITUTION. WHAT IS CONSTITUTION ? a body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged.
+ Patriating The Constitution. + Statute of Westminster A 1931 constitutional change that extended the law-making power of Canada. Canada was now allowed.
Reference re Secession of Quebec, 1998 Case 48 Teodora Pop.
Perspectives on the Quebec Referendum Separatism vs. Federalism.
Language Politics in Canada Douglas Brown St Francis Xavier University February 2013.
THE CONSTITUTION DEBATE MS. CAMPBELL SOCIALS 11. THE CONSTITUTION DEBATE By 1984 Canadians outside Quebec felt the issues of the Constitution had been.
The Importance of a Constitution Basic framework for a nation’s form of government and legal system A nation’s rule book re: making, amending or revoking.
Language Politics in Canada Douglas Brown St Francis Xavier University February 2011.
“Vive le Québec Libre!”: Quebecois Identity from 1980 to 1997.
The Canadian Constitution and The Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Canada’s Constitution. Background  Constitution: Document that outlines the principle rules that make up the political structure of the country  Rule.
Majority and Minority Rights - Quebec
By: Edwin, Muhammad, Ashley, Brandon, Catherine, Kashaf, and Shareena.
“Distinct” society Referendum
BY: JAMES AND SHAMOON AND TEJVIR AND MARNINA AND JONAUS AND ASHIKAA AND CALVIN AND SARAH AND MICHELLE FRENCH AND ENGLISH RELATIONS 1980’S AND 1990’S.
Language Politics in Canada Douglas Brown St Francis Xavier University March 2007.
Rights and Freedoms Unit 2. Canada’s Constitutional Law Chapter Focus Explain the role of the constitution Explain how constitutional law developed Distinguish.
The Plains of Abraham 1759– The British defeated the French army at Quebec City. France gives up all their land claims in present day Canada. However.
SECTION ONE: The Context Part One: The Constitutional Context.
Aboriginals, Regionalism, Quebec and the Constitution.
Constitutional Reform CLN4U. When Canada patriated the constitution in 1982, it was renamed the Constitution Act, 1982, and the following changes were.
Quebec in the 1980s and 1990s. The Patriation of the Constitution After the failed 1980 Quebec referendum, Trudeau begins to work on his promise of a.
Unity or Separation? Defining Canada: 1980’s-1990’s Constitution debate, Meech Lake Accord, Charlottetown Accord, 1995 Referendum.
The Parti Quebecois, Bill 101, 1980, 1982, Meech Lake, Charlottetown, 1995.
Yes or NO Oui ou Non Quebec Sovereignty. Rene Levesque Premier of Quebec Runs the PQ (Parti Quebecois) Wants to separate Quebec from Canada. Feels that.
The Evolution of Canada’s Constitution Act.  When Canada signed the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 after WWI, Canada took its first step toward nationhood.
WHAT DOES QUEBEC WANT? November 15, The Response of the Other Provinces the “Calgary Declaration” (1997) – all provinces and citizens are equal.
Big Changes To Canada 1982 – Did you know … … up until 1982, Canada’s Constitution was a British law called the British North America Act. Were.
Canadian Unity – The Quebec Questions continues!!! Civil Rights In Canada Constitution to Referendums.
Quebec Nationalism “The Quiet Revolution”. Jean Lesage – “Time for a Change”  Stamp out corruption  Wages and pensions raised  Modernization across.
RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS Constitutional Law Part 2. Evolution of Canada’s Constitution Enacted by the British Parliament (BNA Act 1867) Any amendments had.
CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS A History Lesson After the Constitution of 1981.
The History Quebec had a desire to be separate since —Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism (Bi & Bi Commission) found that.
Megan Ranjeev Reymund David Sharon  Rene Levesque/Parti Québécois wanted Sovereignty by Association  Quebec would be politically separate, but still.
COLLECTIVE RIGHTS Chapter 4 Review. Rights guaranteed to specific groups in Canadian society for historical and constitutional reasons.
Chapter 8 What is it to be Canadian? ► French/English Relations ► Multiculturalism ► Aboriginal Peoples.
Jean Lesage. Answer: Led the “Quiet Revolution” in Quebec and campaigned on the slogan “Maitres chez nous”
Meech Lake Accord, Charlottetown Accord & the 1995 Referendum
The Duplessis Era Maurice Duplessis was the Premier of Quebec; leader of the Union Nationale -known as “le chef”-the boss! -supressed political.
Understanding the path to patriate Canada’s constitution and address the constitutional needs of all provinces, Ms. Whitfield CHC2D1.
French-English Relations in the 1980s & 1990s
The Constitution Debate
MEECH LAKE.
The Constitution Debate
Charlottetown Accord.
AMMENDMENTS TO THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION
Canadian Constitutional Law
French English Relations
Constitutional Law Part 2
Unit 2 Rights and Freedoms
A little bit about me:Mr.Hoy
English and French Canadian Relations
Consequences of the Referendum
The Canadian Constitution
Deeper Look Into The CCRF & OHRC
Quebec 1980 to today.
Chapter 4: Societal Choices in Contemporary Quebec
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Constitutional Law Part 2
Unit 2 Rights and Freedoms
Majority and Minority Rights
Political Growth and Tensions
Meech Lake Accord, Charlottetown Accord & the 1995 Referendum
Unit 2 Rights and Freedoms
CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
REVIEW – THE HISTORY OF QUEBEC AND CANADA
Presentation transcript:

WHAT DOES QUEBEC WANT? November 13, 2001

Issues... federalism what level of autonomy should Quebec have? asymmetrical federalism –should Quebec have greater responsibilities than other provincial governments language unilingual territoriality pan-Canadian bilingualism

POSSIBLE SCENARIOS: Complete Independence (Landry) Sovereignty of Quebec with links to Canada (Bouchard) Quebec as a Distinct Society within Canada (Chretien, Charest) all provinces equal, strong central government, national bilingualism (Trudeau) all provinces equal, strong provinces, no bilingualism outside Quebec (Reform/Canadian Alliance)

The Quebec Issue and... the constitutional context the political-cultural context the international context

Quebec and the Constitutional Context: The History of Accommodation the Constitutional Deal And No One Cheered Reconciliation...the Meech Lake Accord, 1987 Reconciliation...the Charlottetown Accord, 1991 the reaction to Referendum 1995

The 1982 Constitution...and No One Cheered the 1980 referendum and promise of constitutional renewal Quebec’s Constitutional Veto, Unilateral Patriation, and the Supreme Court of Canada Splitting the “Gang of Eight” “The Night of the Long Knives” the Aftermath

The Aftermath Quebec not a signatory the Charter of Rights and Freedoms – wedge between Quebec and the Rest of Canada without political legitimacy in Quebec gaining political legitimacy and support outside of Quebec the Charter and Distinct Society – litmus test of distinct society

The Meech Lake Accord -- The Quebec Round Quebec’s minimum demands: – recognition of distinct society – increased jurisdiction over immigration – participation in Supreme Court appointments – veto on constitutional amendments – opting out, with compensation, of national programs within provincial jurisdiction

The Death of Meech Lake the changing context Bill 178 in Quebec the recalcitrants Manitoba New Brunswick Newfoundland the aftermath the rise of Bloc Quebecois

Charlottetown Accord scheduled Quebec referendum 1992 “the Canada round” Meech Plus plus aboriginal self-government plus Triple-E Senate failure of the Charlottetown referendum

Charlottetown – The Failure the aftermath – interpretation in Quebec of failure of Charlottetown English Canada would never agree to Quebec minimum demands – set the stage for Quebec referendum 1995

Quebec Referumdum 1995 election of PQ government in 1994 referendum – October 1995 outcome – No50.6% – Yes49.4%

The Federal Response PLAN A -- ensure there are no future referendums – non-constitutional recognition of distinct society – informal recognition of Quebec’s constitutional veto – restraining the federal spending power PLAN B -- defeat any future referendums – Supreme Court reference case required majority territorial integrity

The Response of the Other Provinces the “Calgary Declaration” (1997) – all provinces and citizens are equal – recognizes Quebec “unique character” – if any constitutional amendment confers powers on one province, these powers must be available to all provinces – commitment to federal-provincial partnership Quebec’s response to the Calgary Declaration – negative!

Possible Avenues for Accommodation