U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter Eight: Mapping Earth
Advertisements

High Accuracy Helicopter Lidar & Mapping Jeffrey B. Stroub, CP,RLS,PPS,SP Vice President Business Development September 9, 2014 Jeff Stroub CP, RLS, PPS,
A Comparison of Digital Elevation Models to Accurately Predict Stream Channels Spencer Trowbridge Papillion Creek Watershed.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Action Plan for the Development of Watershed and Sub-Watershed Boundaries for northwestern Mississippi.
Terrain for the Lower Colorado River Flood Damage Evaluation Project Erin Atkinson, Halff Associates, Inc. Rick Diaz, Lower Colorado River Authority Symposium.
Applied Geographics, Inc./Tennessee Regional Forums/Enhanced Elevation/August 2011Slide 1 Tennessee Business Planning Technical Overview on Enhanced Elevation.
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Background The USGS is working with the U.S. Army at Fort Bragg to develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3). The.
Digital Terrain Model (DTM)
By Megan and Slade. A topographic map is a map that shoes the surface features, or topography, of the Earth. Topographic maps show both natural features,
PSC 121 Prince George's Community College
1 Virginia Geographic Information Network Virginia’s Elevation Framework Layer Upcoming LiDAR Projects and the Elevation FIAT John.
Celso Ferreira¹, Francisco Olivera², Dean Djokic³ ¹ PH.D. Student, Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University ( ² Associate.
Approximate Floodplain Mapping - Procedures and Approaches to Data Challenges Troy Thielen, CFM Brett Addams, CFM May 18, 2010.
From Topographic Maps to Digital Elevation Models Daniel Sheehan DUE Office of Educational Innovation & Technology Anne Graham MIT Libraries.
MR-RST Madison ISU LIDAR Applications and Tests Iowa State University Shauna Hallmark Reg Souleyrette.
Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment
Lecture 16 Terrain modelling: the basics
Processing Geospatial Data with HEC-GeoRAS 3.1
Using ESRI ArcGIS 9.3 3D Analyst T I N
From Topographic Maps to Digital Elevation Models Daniel Sheehan IS&T Academic Computing Anne Graham MIT Libraries.
Adams County Lidar Project
As you look through the following slides please: Write one sentence for EACH slide that covers the Main Idea and Supporting details for that slide.
Processing Terrain Data in the River Proximity Arc Hydro River Workshop December 1, 2010 Erin Atkinson, PE, CFM, GISP Halff Associates, Inc.
Automated Techniques to Map Headwaters Stream Networks in the Piedmont Ecoregion of North Carolina Valerie Garcia Forestry Department, North Carolina State.
Terrain Mapping and Analysis
TerraStream: From Elevation Data to Watershed Hierarchies Thursday, 08 November 2007 Andrew Danner (Swarthmore), T. Moelhave (Aarhus), K. Yi (HKUST), P.
Digital Terrain Models by M. Varshosaz
BUILDING STRONG ® Betting on the Silver Jackets in North Dakota CORPS OF ENGINEERS SHOWCASE: Interagency Silver Jackets Teams Today.
Minnesota Elevation Mapping Project Metro Area Collect 1/13/2011 Tim Loesch Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
A Simple Drainage Enforcement Procedure for Estimating Catchment Area Using DEM Data David Nagel, John M. Buffington, and Charles Luce U.S. Forest Service,
.LAS files (Log ASCII Standard) Not useable directly in ArcGIS A single X-Y position can have multiple Z values Must be converted to MultiPoint file.
National Research Council Mapping Science Committee Floodplain Mapping – Sensitivity and Errors Scott K. Edelman, PE Watershed Concepts and Karen Schuckman,
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
LiDAR Contour Options Randy Mayden, VP Business Development
Watershed Modeling using HEC-HMS and EPA-SWMM ©T. G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E. 10 July 2012 Lesson 2.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Lidar Interoperability: The Need for Common Guidelines and Practices ASPRS Annual Conference Thursday.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Creating Watersheds, Stream Networks and Hydrologically Conditioned DEMS Steve Kopp Dean Djokic.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Processing ArcHydro Datasets with NHDPlus Version 2, Emphasizing StreamStats Data Development Webinar.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
Generation of a Digital Elevation Model using high resolution satellite images By Mr. Yottanut Paluang FoS: RS&GIS.
Processing Elevation Data. Limitations of DEMs for hydro work Dates Static, does not evolve Matching to linear line work due to scale Processing errors.
FLOOD MAPPING Menaxhimi i rezikut te permbytjeve Objektivat Gjenerale.
ArcView 3-D Analyst.
LOCATION OF THE DAM ON KOSI RIVER USING GIS TECHNIQUES By Anil Kumar Hemant Singh Himanshu kashyap.
Flood Inundation Mapping Program
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
Floodplain Mapping using TINs Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) Representation of stream channels using TINs Floodplain delineation using HEC-HMS,
LIDAR Flood mapping for Brownsville and Matamoros Gueudet Pierre GIS in Water Resources University of Texas Austin Fall 2002.
Topography is the shape of land and includes area’s elevation, relief, and landforms. Elevation is the height above sea level of a point on Earth’s.
[Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis Utilizing Terrain Data] [Barrett Goodwin]
Contour Mapping from LiDAR Presented by: Dave Bullington Surdex Corporation St. Louis, MO
Project founded by eContentplus Programme Magistrato alle Acque di Venezia Provision of interoperable datasets to open GI to EU communities MAGISTRATO.
Surface Analysis Tools. Lesson 7 overview  Topographic data  Sources  Uses  Topographic analysis  Hillshade  Visibility  Contours  Slope, aspect,
watershed analysis of Oak Ridge
Definition In scientific literature there is no universal agreement about the usage of the terms: digital elevation model (DEM) digital terrain model (DTM)
Utilizing ArcScene to Visualize Catch Basin Contributing Areas
Terrain modelling: the basics
Terrain Represent the “Surface” of the Earth
Watershed Analysis.
Aim: To be able to interpret a topographic Map.
PSC 121 Prince George's Community College
GIS and SMS in Numerical Modeling of Open Channel Flow
Topographic Maps.
Warm-up slide Jan : end of The World: Dubai island development sinks back into sea - financial crisis.
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
PSC 121 Prince George's Community College
Map Notes As we go through the power point, please do the following:
GIS Analysis in Land Management
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

Stereo DTM (Topographic Surface) ☀ Reference image of the traditional stereo-compiled DTM ☀ Built from Masspoints and Breaklines ☀ Much coarser resolution than lidar ☀ Demonstrates the familiar and usually expected character of a topographic DEM ☀ Most notably, the “flat” water surfaces Stream Waterbody

Pure LiDAR (Topographic Surface) ☀ DEM created only using Bare-Earth lidar points ☀ Surface contains extensive triangulation artifacts (“tinning”). ☀ Cause by the absence of: ☀ Lidar returns from water ☀ Breakline constraints that would define buildings, water, and other features (as in the Stereo DTM). ☀ Aesthetically and cartographically unacceptable to most users Tinning in Water Areas

Hydro Flattened (Topographic Surface) ☀ The goal of the v13 Spec. ☀ Intent is to support the development of a consistent, acceptable character within the NED, suitable for contouring. ☀ Removes the most offensive pure lidar artifacts: those in the water. ☀ Constant elevation for waterbodies. ☀ Wide streams and rivers are flattened bank-to-bank and forced to flow downhill (monotonic). ☀ Carries ZERO implicit or explicit accuracy with regards to the represented water surface elevations – It is ONLY a Cartographic/Aesthetic enhancement. ☀ Building voids are too costly to correct. ☀ Most often achieved via the development and inclusion of hard breaklines. Stream Waterbody

Full Breaklines (Topographic Surface) ☀ A further possible refinement of the Hydro Flattened surface ☀ Removes artifacts from building voids ☀ Refines the delineation of roads, single-line drainages, ridges, bridge crossings, etc. ☀ Requires the development of a large number of additional detailed breaklines ☀ A higher quality topographic surface, but significantly more expensive. ☀ Not cost effective for the NED. Buildings Roads

Hydro Enforced (Hydrologic Surface) ☀ Surface used by engineers in Hydraulic and Hydrologic (H&H) modeling. ☀ NOT to be used for traditional mapping (contours, etc.) ☀ Similar to Hydro Flattened with the addition of Single Line Breaklines: Pipelines, Culverts, Underground Streams, etc… ☀ Terrain is then cut away at bridges and culverts to model drain connectivity ☀ Water Surface Elevations (WSEL) are often set to known values (surveyed or historical). Culverts Cut Through Roads

Hydro Conditioned (Hydrologic Surface) ☀ Another type of surface used by engineers for H&H modeling. ☀ Similar to the Hydro Enforced surface, but with sinks filled ☀ Flow is continuous across the entire surface – no areas of unconnected internal drainage ☀ Often Achieved via ArcHydro or ArcGIS Spatial Analyist Filled Sinks

Active Comparison Slide (click the buttons below) Pure Lidar Hydro Flattened Full Breaklines Hydro Enforced Hydro Conditioned Stereo DTM

References ☀ USGS-NGP v13 Draft LiDAR Base Specification ☀ Special Thanks to: ☀ Hans Karl Heidemann ☀ Jeremiah Ross Vinyard-Houx ☀ James V Mauck