Accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model Alfred Roelen Rombout Wever National Aerospace Laboratory Flight Safety and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crew Compliment. OBJECTIVES The importance of Safety & the effects of reduce crew.
Advertisements

TEM & LOSA: The State of Affairs
Robert L. Helmreich, Ph.D. FRAes The University of Texas
Monitoring Normal Operations in ATC: The State of Affairs
TEM as an Analytical Tool
TEM as an Analytical Tool
Flight Crew Activities During a Typical Flight
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR DXXX-1A The Transition Towards Free Flight: A Human Factors Evaluation of.
Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium National Aerospace Laboratory NLR CXXX-1A Free Flight with Airborne Separation will result in an uncontrolled,
In need of a model for complexity assessment of highly automated human machine systems Fredrik Barchéus, Pernilla Ulfvengren, Johan Rignér.
Management Of Human Factors Risk Conference - RAeS 11 th May 2006 Managing Human Factors Risk Captain Steve Sheterline General Manager Training British.
Incident Review Meeting Guidance Material & Presentation Template
Using Bayesian Networks to Model Accident Causation in the UK Railway Industry William Marsh Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis Group Department of.
Office of Research and Engineering Safety Study Report: Introduction of Glass Cockpit Avionics into Light Aircraft Quantitative Analysis Results Loren.
Ames Research Center 1October 2006 Aviation Software Systems Workshop FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Aviation Software Systems.
Weather related Aviation Crashes & Deaths in 2004 by Type of Operation Crashes Deaths Crashes Deaths Scheduled Airlines 1 13Scheduled Airlines 1 13 Air.
1 Clustering NTSB Accidents Data Lishuai Li, Rafael Palacios, R. John Hansman JUP Quarterly Meeting Jan
Boeing Field 1.
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
APPLICATION OF A RISK-BASED DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR EVALUATING AVIATION TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION TO A CONTROLLED-FLIGHT-INTO-TERRAIN ACCIDENT by Denise.
Boeing Field. Downbursts can be Divided into Two Main Types MACROBURST: A large downburst with its outburst winds extending greater than 2.5 miles horizontal.
Federal Aviation Administration Summary of Recent Safety Recommendations from Aircraft Accident Investigation Authorities Sources: Korean Aircraft and.
MIT ICAT MIT ICAT. MIT ICAT MIT ICAT Motivation Adverse Weather Significantly Impacts Flight Operations  Safety % All US Accidents  Efficiency.
Modelling and Probing ATM automation Paula SantosDavid Slater
Altitude Deviations STEADES High-level analysis Gordon Margison Assistant Manager, Global Aviation Data Management.
Runway Excursions. Runway Excursion 2000 Worldwide, runway excursions are the highest single occurrence category of all accidents for commercial & general.
TIWANA WALTON MENTOR: SHARON MONICA JONES High Level Aviation Safety Risk Assessment.
Commercial Aviation Safety Team (TEAM) Mode Awareness and Energy State Management Aspects of Flight Deck Automation Mode Awareness and Energy State Management.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Orlando – Tampa Flight Standards District Office Flight Training Special Emphasis CFI Special Emphasis.
Data Driven Safety. X-15 Simulator X-15 Simulator Use Time honored criteria to predict aircraft behavior failed to uncover serious threats Pilot.
Incident Review Meeting Example  The next slides are an example of how to complete the template and identify latent conditions, threats, errors, UAS and.
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
Incident Investigation and Analysis
Office of Aviation Safety Pinnacle Airlines Flight 3701 Jefferson City, Missouri Lorenda Ward Investigator-in-Charge.
Office of Aviation Safety Canadair Challenger November 28, 2004 Montrose, Colorado.
Federal Aviation Administration TAIWIN By: Jim Riley, ANG-E282 To: Icing Wx Tools Meeting Date: 11/19/13 – 11/21/13.
Software Testing and Quality Assurance Software Quality Assurance 1.
IFly project: Airborne Self Separation as basis for advanced en route ATM Henk A.P. Blom iFly coordinator National Aerospace Laboratory NLR
SAFETY AND SECURITY CHALLENGES TO AFRICAN AIRLINES Chamsou ANDJORIN Executive Director Boeing International relations.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration North Florida Flight Standards District Office FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR WORKSHOP North Florida FSDO CFIs.
WORLDWIDE AVIATION SAFETY COOPERATION
Futron Corporation 400 Virginia Avenue,SW Suite 340 Washington, DC Phone Fax NASA PRA Practices.
Health & Safety P4 & P5. H & S – P4  Responsibilities of supervisors and employees when complying with health and safety regulations and legislation.
1 Stéphane DEHARVENGT F-DGAC SFACT/R.E 3rd International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference - October 22-25, Atlantic City (USA)
“THE IMPACT OF ECONOMIC CRISIS ON AVIATION SAFETY” CHRISTOS PETROU EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.
WHAT IF ANALYSIS USED TO IDENTIFY HAZARDS HAZARDOUS EVENTS
ORLANDO FSDO-15 FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR SPECIAL EMPHASIS PROGRAM.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation Human Spaceflight Guidelines Update COMSTAC, Systems.
Communications between Flight Deck and Line Maintenance The Critical Interface.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration North Florida Flight Standards District Office Designated Pilot Examiner 2008 Recurrent Seminar.
International Civil Aviation Organization ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user course Module N° 4 Preliminary Data Entry at the BEA Mexico City November, 2010.
International Civil Aviation Organization ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user course Module N° 7 Analysis and Codification Mexico City November, 2010.
A Technology Partnership for the New Millennium Anne Harlan, Director William J. Hughes Technical Center 68th NASAO Annual Convention September 20, 1999.
European Aviation Safety Agency Standardisation Workshop – Cologne – Germany – EASA HQ Data standardisation Reinhard Menzel Safety Analysis.
Zuliana-July Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE By: Zuliana Ismail, 2010.
1 © The MITRE Corporation This is the copyright work of The MITRE Corporation and was produced for the U.S. Government under Contract Number DTFA01-01-C
UML DESIGN By: J Kamala Ramya Y Devika
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration North Florida Flight Standards District Office Designated Pilot Examiner 2010 Recurrent Seminar.
Aviation safety NEED FOR AVIATION SAFETY
FAA Update Federal Aviation Administration
The Business Aviation Perspective
Top Cabin Crew Job in India by Airwing Aviation Academy india.aspx Address: First Floor,
Commercial aircraft operation engine realibility & safety
The Capstone Experience
Aviation Accidents in Alaska
Turbulence Accidents and NTSB Research Update
Runway Excursions.
Safety Data Collection and Analysis at ICAO
Review and comparison of the modeling approaches and risk analysis methods for complex ship system. Author: Sunil Basnet.
Assessment of Safety Culture from a Holistic Viewpoint: Plans, Actions and Perceptions within an Asian Airline Company David Passenier, Nektarios Karanikas,
Presentation transcript:

Accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model Alfred Roelen Rombout Wever National Aerospace Laboratory Flight Safety and Aircraft Operations Department

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 2 Outline Objective Accident types and scenarios Modelling approach Scenario development process Example loss of control accident scenario development Results

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 3 Objective Development of the top layer of an Integrated Safety Model. Provide an initial framework for staged development and integrating work by the different organisations

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 4 Integrated Safety Model (Framework)

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 5 Scenario clustering Collision with ground Collision with object General disintegration

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 6 Accident types

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 7 Flight phases Take-off Climb En-route Descent Approach Landing

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 8 Fatal accidents and flight phases

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 9 Proposed scenario matrix TaxiTake-offClimbEn-routeApproachLanding Abrupt maneuverXXXX Uninhabitable cabin environmentXXXXXX Loss of control (unrecovered)XXXXX Controlled flight into terrainXXX Forced landingX Mid-air collisionXXX Collision on groundXXX Structural accidentXXXXX Fire/ExplosionXXXXXX

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 10 Accident scenario representation To... From...

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 11 Event Sequence Diagram Pivotal Event Initiating Event Comment End State Pivotal Event

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 12 Event Sequence Diagram Initiating Event Pivotal Event Pivotal Event Pivotal Event Comment End State

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 13 Modelling Approach: selection of Initiating event and pivotal event Initiating Event –Deviation from normal operation –Active failures (triggering events) –No latent failures (softer/deeper) Pivotal Event –Event with possible intervention –Different causal pathway –Active failures –No latent failures (softer/deeper)

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 14 Modelling Approach: Level of detail Transparency. Limited complexity at the top layer of the model. ESD need further detail by means of Fault Trees and Bayesian Belief Nets. Minimise inter-dependencies of Fault Trees. ESDs can be quantified with available accident- incident- and flight data.

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 15 ESD development steps 1) Individual accidents are analyzed and represented as a sequence of events. 2) Accident scenarios are generalized per type of accident, initiating event and flight phase. 3) Generalised scenarios are combined into one generic ESD so that this ESD covers a class of accidents. Selection of accidents/incidents: ~ past 15 years, commercial air transport, ‘Western built’ aircraft, accident investigation report available

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 16 Example : Loss of control accident Accident type: loss of control Flight phase: en-route/approach Multiple ways to loose control over the aircraft: different loss of control accident scenarios

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 17 Loss of control accident scenario initiators System e.g. flight control system failure, propulsion system failure Environment e.g. wind shear, turbulence, ice  Flight Crew e.g. spatial disorientation

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 18 Accident type: Loss of control Flight phase: En-route/approach Initiating event: Propulsion system failure Example

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 19 Step 1 From accident report to accident scenario

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 20 British Midlands, 737-4Y0, G-OBME, East Midlands, January 8, 1989

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 21 ESD British Midland 737 G-OBME

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 22 Atlantic Southeast Airlines, EMB 120RT, N256AS, Carrollton, Georgia, August 21, 1995

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 23 ESD ASA EMB 120RT N256AS

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 24 Step 2 Generalising the accident scenarios

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 25 ESD British Midland 737 G-OBME generalising added branch through systematic analysis and generalising, combining

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 26 Step 3 From generalised specific accident scenarios to one generic scenario

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 27 Generic ESD ‘loss of control’ Flight phases: climb-cruise, landing Initiating event: propulsion system failure

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 28

September 2006 accident scenarios for an integrated aviation safety model 29 Results 35 different generic accident scenarios covering all accident types and all flight phases. Fully quantified All integrated into a single ‘Master Logic Diagram’